There have been lengthy debates about the outcome of the Battle of Uhud. Some historians interpret Uhud as a defeat for the Muslims, while some generally hesitate to call it a victory, and pass a verdict of somewhere in between. Then there are those who consider it a loss that later turned into an overall victory. The fact of the matter is that if we analyse it in light of the then prevailing customs and rules of warfare, it cannot be called a defeat for the Muslims, because what was the nature of the loss for the Muslims and the victory for the disbelievers? The Muslims were still on the battlefield when Abu Sufyan returned with his army to Makkah, raising hollow slogans. He also raised the false slogan that “this day is revenge for the day of Badr.” However, this was an empty claim. After all, how did this in any way avenge what happened at Badr? At Badr, the disbelievers saw casualties extending from their infantry to their most eminent chieftains, while 70 of their fighters were taken captive. At Badr, the Muslims acquired many spoils of war. At Badr, the Muslims - who were the clear victors - in keeping with the Arab custom, remained on the battlefield for three days, while the Makkan army fled. But on the day of Uhud, the disbelievers did not even gain a single one of these [victories]. How then could this be called justice for Badr?
#FridaySermon #MTAi #sermon #sermons #khutbah #khutba #juma #prayer #god #Allah #allahﷻ #holyprophet #hazratmuhammadsaw #battle #khilafat #battleofbadr
Негізгі бет "There have been lengthy debates about the outcome of the Battle of Uhud."
Пікірлер: 6