Sigma 16,30, and 56 are superior than these in every way. Sharper, way less fringing, weather resistant and price point are about the same. Sigma Wins.
@mrait
8 ай бұрын
Hi, do you know what the Sigma model lens called? i need a 35 e mount. Thanks
@ediwitdaheat7798
8 ай бұрын
@@mrait well there’s three: $339 30mm f1.4 DC DN | C, $1,499 35mm f1.2 DG DN | A, and the $899 35mm f1.4 DG DN | A
@duyhungphannguyen3049
7 ай бұрын
@@ediwitdaheat7798 lol bro comparing 1500$ lens vs 300$
@ruffmadman
3 ай бұрын
@@duyhungphannguyen3049 That's if you're comparing the Sirui Snipers against the Sigma Art line. But Sigma also has a kit of 16mm, 30mm, and 56mm Contemporary lenses for around $60 more that stomps all over the Sirui. The Siruis are better cine lenses as the chromatic aberration produces a cool look in video, but for photography, the Sigmas are sharper, have better autofocus (even after updating the Sirui's) and have less chromatic aberration. But if you're looking for a cine lens, why get the Sirui Snipers over the Sirui Nightcrawlers. They Nightcrawlers cost the exact same, but have teeth on the focus and declicked aperture rings...
@mailais3403
26 күн бұрын
yeah no shit one costs 4 tines more than the other
@rayspencer5025
5 ай бұрын
I am waiting for Sirui to produce these in RF mount. On my R7 they would be like a 37mm, 53mm, and 90mm.
@mohammed_the_train_spotter
9 ай бұрын
guys he's lying, check Arthur's video about these lenses they are not sharp and have bad autofocus 🤨🤨🤨🤨
@AlexDon
9 ай бұрын
Why would I lie? I can show you the raw footage I got with these lenses to see how sharp they are. If somebody had a bad result with them maybe they tested it on the wrong camera.
@mohammed_the_train_spotter
9 ай бұрын
@@AlexDon maybe because they paid you to lie? kzitem.info/news/bejne/2GuImHqMpHZplqQsi=Dz7YemIS2qMVz8rH
@TeePham
8 ай бұрын
Not only Arthur, Jason Morris also. In addition, I mentioned the auto focus issue on Sirui ads. They confirmed the bad focus was correct but they will fix it in the next update firmware. So how do you get the new firmware sooner than the others?
@AlexDon
8 ай бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/15x8mayOaWt5n3Y just watch my full review and see for yourself how the autofocus works. I'm not baking Sirui up but don't spread false information if it's not the case. These lease actually perfom good, of course it's not G master autofocus level but it's not the g master price as well so for people who are looking for a more affordable option with good perfomance I think these Sirui lenses are actually very good. @@TeePham
@danfarmer_photo
8 ай бұрын
He’s paid by Sirui. In his full review he doesn’t announce a disclaimer so it can’t be trusted. Funny how out of all the reviews, the one who doesn’t have a disclaimer and therefore supported by the brand, magically finds them sharp. I guess everyone else is wrong! 😂
@robertluxamafreethinker
7 ай бұрын
😍 I wish we could see as well the same move from Mitakon S35 T/1 Primes Lenses with AF soon!! That would be great!!! But, obviously, with more sharpness and details at wide open f/1.0 (T/1) 🤦
@nixone1941
9 ай бұрын
Wow good bokeh. I wonder how it compares to sigma quartet
@mustafakamal8608
9 ай бұрын
Quartet? I know only trio
@ediwitdaheat7798
8 ай бұрын
Sigma is superior; less fringing, sharper and weather sealing. Sigma wins in every round.
@tommasomencarelli7952
8 ай бұрын
@@mustafakamal8608he is right, Sigma has 16mm, 33mm, 56mm and 23mm as well
@tridinh1011
8 ай бұрын
Sigma, and even the cheaper viltrox lenses beat the shit out of these things, please dont throw your money away. Save up and get a viltrox pro 27mmf1.2, beats these things in everyway and beats actual 1st party glass in some ways
@vukhuat4251
9 ай бұрын
Just one question: Do they have weather resistence feature? Hope you will reply, thanks.
@arturshepard2490
9 ай бұрын
Probably no, they are not expensive
@Donovanleonphotography
4 ай бұрын
I have Sigma Art lenses for good sharpness and I’ve just purchased these for more of a creative film like look…
@ethanfloyd9598
9 ай бұрын
It’s actually 56mm for the final lens, just clarifying for anyone doing the math and only getting 82.5mm full frame equivalents.
@Falconry2525
9 ай бұрын
54mm
@Falconry2525
9 ай бұрын
Sorry 84mm
@masus7757
7 ай бұрын
Canon users crying rn
@yemaneehaile
9 ай бұрын
How do you get this image quality on a KZitem Short? Please explain...
@bleucommelebleu
9 ай бұрын
Mxf
@the_designerskitchen
9 ай бұрын
What do you think? Do they Work on the Ronin 4d???
@mslater92
9 ай бұрын
Ronin 4D is a full frame camera so it would only work in one of the cropped sensor modes
@onlinetraderucom
9 ай бұрын
Canon rf mount?
@Angelo_Paduraru
8 ай бұрын
Unfortunately not. I was looking the same. But this because they have autofocus, canon forbids autofocus third party lens 🙄. If was manual focus, then Sirui made for RF mount.
@marcosjaviernicanorhernand7036
9 ай бұрын
No los encuentro en b&h 😢
@henningmartin2000
9 ай бұрын
They're not yet released.
@alanaperture
9 ай бұрын
Did they give you a script to read? Lol Several videos on these lenses say the exact same thing literally word for word.
@mohammed_the_train_spotter
9 ай бұрын
yes they did, he deleted my comment
@KwonFiveNine
8 ай бұрын
Yeah they paid a lot of youtubers to give these good reviews. Luckily I found a couple real KZitem reviews that gave the correct breakdown of these and they're not great, yet
@mohammed_the_train_spotter
8 ай бұрын
@@KwonFiveNine he keeps deleting my comments exposing him....
@j5daniel182
8 ай бұрын
3 different “focal lengths”. They are all the same size.
@KNAPPAID
8 ай бұрын
Hence " focal " lengths
@j5daniel182
8 ай бұрын
@@KNAPPAID referred to “Focal” as “sizes”.
@KNAPPAID
8 ай бұрын
@@j5daniel182 oh my bad i forgot bout the video, too focused on your comment 🙏
@fredriksvard2603
8 ай бұрын
What is a "creative" look?
@atherton1ful
24 күн бұрын
55 it's 56
@iamwisdomsky
8 ай бұрын
those fringing on the bokeh balls are so.... yuck! 🤮 gotta stick to sigma.
@iyason6878
4 күн бұрын
Bad af, hunting most of the time, slow to respond, the optical quality is below Viltrox 😂😂😂😂, no, just noooo
@KNAPPAID
8 ай бұрын
Dont get this if youre doing photos. Get this if you're mostly doing videos. Af i mediocre and its soft - its a nightwalker with af , optical performances are the same - even the dissasembled optics are the same.
@owenjenkinsofficial
8 ай бұрын
I have noticed in reviews people on KZitem seem to have issues with softer lenses that are common to cine lens lines because they are used to laser sharp g masters. I haven’t owned the snipers and am not sure how soft they are but I am interested in trying them eventually and getting them if I like them. Definitely a lens series aimed towards a budget film and narrative type of cinematography, not the clinical g master KZitemr look. I totally understand the bokeh fringing is debatable on whether that’s just poor construction or a tasteful vintage look, given plenty of other higher end detuned lens footage I’ve seen still have much less fringing on the bokeh. It’s open to debate. I have seen reviews that show that fringing is only really prominent at the T1.2-2 range and it cleans up nicely above that.
@tridinh1011
8 ай бұрын
@@owenjenkinsofficialwhy do people have a problem? Because they marketed this as the stills lens and the nightwalkers as the cheap cine ones, we can understand the poor IQ on nightwalker because its apparently cine, but this? Nah, its gonna be torn to shreds for the absolute dogshit IQ
Пікірлер: 60