Thanks for your informative YT video. I am also a new KZitemr.
@erichstocker8358
Жыл бұрын
All reported F numbers are usually roundoffs and approximations. Only the T values are really physically on. It isn't a big deal there isn't that much light gathering difference between a 1.0 or 1.1 and a .95. As all these f stops are marketing values by almost all lens manufacturers.
@ChadWilson
Жыл бұрын
I have this lens for Fuji X-M1 and the bokeh is crazy. The lens is heavier than the camera and looks quite comical, but I regret nothing, I have been able to shoot in incredibly low light it.
@midisax
6 ай бұрын
Very nice video! Keep up the great work!
@JACKnJESUS
9 ай бұрын
Your English is pretty good...doing just fine with it. I don't have anything faster than f/1.4 but this lens is awfully tempting. In full sunlight...add a polarizer to the lens...it should add back in some contrast and pop...you lose a little light...but so what...it's full sunlight. You still get the crazy depth of field...and it won't look as washed out. Great video...subscribed.
@blqhamuha
Жыл бұрын
Not really 0.95 7artisanss have a habit of lying in their lens data🤓
@lostforfun5328
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for comment. I am not shore is it true, but still that is outstanding lens ,my favorite at this time. I think there is many marketing tricks now days. You never know 🤔
@livonian
Жыл бұрын
A F-number is simply calculated by dividing the lenses focal length by the diameter of the entrance pupil. Easy to check 🤷♂
Пікірлер: 8