Kinda weird when in the final stretch you decided to add the values you had calculated for A and B instead of recalling the first equation that said that A + B = x_0
@madmister
Жыл бұрын
I dont understand what does a and b physiically represent if i m given an pendulum or spring mass system help me or my brain will fry
@olivioarmandocordeirojunio8280
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing. Wonderful explanation.
@nigarabdulkalam2130
7 ай бұрын
Sir can u explain Numerical simple harmonic oscillator using eigenvalue and eigenvector
@AbdulHameed-ge4sc
2 жыл бұрын
Nice explained sir , as you have proved the two different solutions equivalent, what about the third one , is that also equivalent to the other two?
@DotPhysics
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, they are all solutions to the same differential equation. You can show that the e^iwt version is the same as sin and cosine version using the Euler equation. Maybe I'll make an update.
@designX404
Жыл бұрын
amazing explanation , question: in 2nd equation why did you select A(cos wt + phi) why not A(sin wt + phi) and both equations will give negative sign in X double dot?? , why use COS instead of SIN
@tomk4756
Жыл бұрын
to the best of my knowledge I think you can use either, but it will change the phi value, as the sin and cosine standard functions we are used to are the same if shifted by pi radians.
Пікірлер: 8