I feel as though using percentages makes so much sense btw although I feel as though they should label the column as %games won because I also agree that it is very confusing. A 3 set match is generally a much more convincing (loss/win) than a 5 set match so it should be weighted as such imho. For example, if the match is like 4-0 4-0 3-4 3-4 4-2. +8 games from a total of 28 (18 games won for a 64.3% of games won). 4-2 4-2 4-2 is only +6 but (66.7% of games won) I’ve deliberately chosen an unlikely example for 5 set match which almost maximises the %games won for it going all 5 sets and it does slightly worse than a fairly solid 4-2 for 3 sets (but by no means completely 1 sided)
@alvarorodrigues92
2 күн бұрын
Você deveria falar mais sobre as táticas utilizadas e trazer dicas sobre isso. Parabéns pelo vídeo, excelente conteúdo!
@Eldriitch
3 күн бұрын
If we were going to revamp tennis's format without going to something wildly different, I could see double elimination rather than single elimination being much more forgiving to athletes having a bad game while still retaining the overall feel.
@blwilb91
3 күн бұрын
It’s gotta be percentage. Still looks wrong lol
@l4nd3r
2 күн бұрын
Pretty sure the tie breaker is counting head to head because you are tied with Fernandez on +2 sets, while Fruhvirtova is on +4. Either that, or the percentage of games won as i'm pretty sure both King and Fernandez tied on set win%. Edit: Looking on the ATP Next Gen (there is no WTA equivalent in the real world) tie breaker rules, yeah, it looks at percentage of sets and games won in case of a 3 way-tie, the last one is rank apparently.
Пікірлер: 5