people who say this is fake is mocking the blood, tear, and sweat of all the engineers, technician, and all staff of this program.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
@@sillybilly8028 : No, it's not. That's just uneducated people making things up because they feel less-than.
@robst247
2 ай бұрын
@@sillybilly8028 You wouldn't recognize reality if it hit you over your empty head.
@VerenaBauer-j2g
2 ай бұрын
The moon landings were FAKE AF! Get with the program, old fart!
@robertparr1256
2 ай бұрын
This is fake and the NDA by all involved is the only thing that is mocking.
@kitchenerleslie6177
2 ай бұрын
@@sillybilly8028 Real? Like your girlfriend's lips, eh?
@standavis5639
2 ай бұрын
I was there, I worked on the throttle control of the Descent engine final testing !
@jonnny8
Ай бұрын
On landing on the Moon would the engine be heard as it was about to land as we do not hear any noise from any engines on the lamb. Just commentary. Why was that?? Rockets make lots of noise
@jonnny8
Ай бұрын
What was the weight ratio compared to Saturn 5 only being tested without a payload of the lamb and extra fuel to take it out of orbit towards the moon and to have fuel to get off the moon?Like would it be Top heavy and if the Saturn 5 worked so good why did they stop using it? Never understood that how they carried a moon buggy as well surely the Saturn 5 would have be unstable on take off. With all that weight at the top hope someone can answer this then I can understand how they did it. Lot of payload and fuel at the top mmmm. Saturn 5 would get astronauts to the space station instead of using Russians rockets?? Surely ???so is there or was there a Cold War between the USA and Russia when we use their Rockets to get to the space station don’t seem any differences there ?? To me
@technowarriorstv
Ай бұрын
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT OMG OMG OMG OMG THATS SUCH A W im obsessed with nasa stuff
@wimkuijpers1342
Ай бұрын
@@jonnny8 Since there is no atmosphere on the moon, you would not hear any sound there, but inside the lunar lander you should be able to hear it and probably feel it too.
@ApolloKid1961
Ай бұрын
@@jonnny8 First of all, the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon. Using it just to go to the ISS is overkill. Much simpler rockets like the Falcon are much much cheaper. There was quite a lot of testing before landing on the moon: January 27, 1967 Fatal plugs-out test Apollo 1. November 9, 1967 Unmanned test flight Apollo 4. January 22, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 5. April 4, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 6. October 11, 1968 First manned flight Apollo 7. Testing of Command and Service module. December 21, 1968 Apollo 8. First flight Saturn 5, First to the moon, First behind the moon. March 3, 1969 Apollo 9. Practice with the LM around the earth. May 18, 1969 Apollo 10. Practicing with the LM around the moon.
@plunder1956
2 ай бұрын
Project Apollo is still the most amazing memory if my teenage years & probably America's greatest achievement. They changed history in a way that will be remembered 500, even 1000 years in the future - people will still remember that Neil & Buzz walking on the moon in 1969.
@philrabe910
2 ай бұрын
58:20 I've always said that this is one of the most important photographs in human history, taken at a time of incredible instability on our fragile Earth..
@cpcnw
3 ай бұрын
"Nobody has been [back] to the moon [since]" - Kubrick made a great job of staging the landing.
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
Kubrick’s best efforts can be seen in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The scenes in space and on the moon are immediately recognizable as fake: they’re recorded in 1 G here on Earth. The Apollo videos show perfect 1/6 g gravity instead.
@ApolloKid1961
3 ай бұрын
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
@joshua1462
Ай бұрын
I remember when mom gave me my first computer and couldn't wait to talk nonsense to my buddies over the interwebs.
@calebprice9478
2 ай бұрын
Too.mich judge Judy music..the rest is good
@davidanderson498
2 ай бұрын
I notice that they omitted mentioning that the astronauts read from the book of Genesis on live TV during the Apollo 8 mission. That was the highlight of the mission.
@Hiram1000
2 ай бұрын
Really? The highlight of the entire mission was reading from a religious text? You live in mid-America, don'cha?
@petergibson2318
2 ай бұрын
Nobody will ever bother living permanently on that god-forsaken rock. Who in their right mind would want to live on the moon? Old-timers from the 1960s maybe. But Taylor Swift isn't doing gigs on the moon any day soon.
@DaveKeenan1956
2 ай бұрын
Live permanently? No. But it would make a great staging post for journeys to Mars.
@0topon
2 ай бұрын
Considering that there are people living in antartica or greenland, i think that there will be also some who want to live on the moon.
@petergibson2318
2 ай бұрын
@@0topon A researcher living temporarily for a few months in a research station at the South Pole is not usually classed as “living there” permanently. Antarctica is like Mars. As Elton John told us…..“Mars ain’t the place to raise your kids”.
@0topon
2 ай бұрын
@@petergibson2318 Although there are a few permanent people living in antartica, yourr right that it was a bad example.
@joshua1462
Ай бұрын
Thank God. She apparently lives in a lot of minds rent free. Too Bad.
@realdeath8657
2 ай бұрын
But why do the astronauts' helmets not match the real ones?
@DaveKeenan1956
2 ай бұрын
What? Please explain what you're talking about?
@BarriosGroupie
2 ай бұрын
The Apollo program makes SpaceX look worryingly like a bunch of amateurs heading into disaster.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
SpaceX are not amateurs. They just used a different method to develop Starship. For the Saturn V, NASA spent years testing individual stages on huge test stands before committing to a first launch. SpaceX moved to doing launches much earlier in the development cycle. They knew that the hard part was not to get the stages to work, the hard part is developing the heat shield, and that is almost impossible to simulate here on the surface. You need to do test flights for that.
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
I do have confidence in SpaceX. It's amazing to see how they can land their boosters on a stamp.
@ontheruntonowhere
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 The lack of integrated testing by SpaceX is courting disaster. Iterating through problems that actually happen doesn't solve problems that haven't happened yet. Musk is very impatient and that quality is going to kill a bunch of passengers someday. I hope I'm wrong.
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
SpaceX doesn't have the blank cheque, but they're doing it!
@christopheryoder8292
28 күн бұрын
Well, given that NASA just made the decision to have SpaceX perform a rescue mission bc their buddies at Boeing produced a stayliner instead of a star liner...your comment aged real well.
@bmac8753
3 ай бұрын
They figured it out life never really happened either this is all a big dream…
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
Who's they?
@RitterLanzehot
3 ай бұрын
Yeah to Augmental Reality 😂
@northamericanpichu
3 ай бұрын
The amount of brain rot and lack of critical thinking in this comment section is astounding
@danielecognome7501
2 ай бұрын
it's scary...
@JackThelRipper
2 ай бұрын
Yah there are allot of special people running around in here, I bet allot of them are bots. The rest are just the crazies with no brain and no life who wish they could be the next famous person but will work their jobs sweeping and mopping the floors.
@jimparr01Utube
2 ай бұрын
@@danielecognome7501 And so are our current times. The US is facing its most critical "launch" come 2024 year end. May you vote with your heart and test your decision against what your mind knows.
@stuartb3609
2 ай бұрын
They can’t understand it, so ‘it didn’t happen’. It’s quite incredible.
@c1ph3rpunk
2 ай бұрын
These are the folks that rot their brains on TikTok all day and haven’t read a book, perhaps ever. The same ones that ask me how to cook ramen noodles when their microwave doesn’t work.
@clarencespears5253
2 ай бұрын
Outstanding presentation Well-researched and put together Includes rare video footage
@stephenpage-murray7226
Ай бұрын
Watched Apollo 11 launch as a schoolboy at Woomera Rocket Range in South Australia. Less than 7 years later I was a shift tech at Orroral Valley tracking station outside Canberra and we supported the multiple ALSEP experiments installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts.
@yovtuubvfdcfrffg
2 ай бұрын
These moon landing deniers are nuts. 😂
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
The worst part is that most of them are American.
@JordanST-n7r
2 ай бұрын
So are you who believe in this crap.
@robst247
2 ай бұрын
Hoaxnuts
@VerenaBauer-j2g
2 ай бұрын
The moon landings were fake as f..k Grow some brain cells.
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
@@JordanST-n7r You could be right...
@cronistamundano8189
2 ай бұрын
To me the Gemini program is underrated. And because they had a enournous test schedule and was a mission full of firsts Apollo 9 is also underrated
@obvious-troll
2 ай бұрын
Apollo astronauts are more enthusiastic when you ask them questions about Gemini rather than Apollo
@wildboar7473
2 ай бұрын
Yes how can your underrated the first HEO feat. As #8 and then #10 are :(
@lifesahobby
2 ай бұрын
Great document thsnks for sharing
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@lifesahobby The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit. Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead. Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
@pauldelcour
18 күн бұрын
One of the better telling docs about going to the moon. Lots of nice high quality footage I never saw (or cannot remeber having seen before...). Thanks NASA for painstakingly filming everything!
@michaelkilgoresr.8361
2 ай бұрын
All the men from Mercury, Gemini and Apollo are some of my greatest heroes. They're the greatest pilots to ever live to alot of people... They certainly are in my book. The Crew of Apollo One will always hold a special place in my heart as well. I'm so grateful for their efforts aswell as all the Astronauts during that time.
@genehauser9217
2 ай бұрын
Who’s here on July 20th 2024?
@maymaypooch
2 ай бұрын
He’d july 24 2024
@genehauser9217
2 ай бұрын
@@maymaypoochhuh?
@wilhelmbauer8844
2 ай бұрын
It's me,and I'm from AUSTRIA. 1969 I was 15 years old and until now i'm very impressed about the MOONLANDING.
@augurseer
2 ай бұрын
July 26th 2024
@georgschenkfilm
2 ай бұрын
@@wilhelmbauer8844einen Bauhelm will er, der Wilhelm Bauer 👷♂️
@moeluv
2 ай бұрын
Bring back 1960s technology I guess. 🤥
@seanbeukman9563
2 ай бұрын
Y'kno? Lol.
@christopheryoder8292
28 күн бұрын
I think it's less an issue of technology and more an issue of will.
@moeluv
27 күн бұрын
@@christopheryoder8292 I was being sarcastic. The US has never landed humans on the moon in the 60s - 70s. 🇺🇲
@seanbeukman9563
15 күн бұрын
@@christopheryoder8292 Thats not what NASA or Elon or anyone is saying. The will is very strong but the tech is not there. imagine? How is THAT possible? China, Russia, India, Europe, Japan, everybody cannot land men on the moon and bring them back safely. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. We never did. The moon is too much of a challenge. Danger beyond imagination. Lets see when they can do it again. They want to build a moonbase to get to Mars? Lets wait and see. Impossible in our lifetime. I will apologise when I am wrong.
@billyz5088
2 ай бұрын
~~ From the day JFK made the challenge in 1962 to put men on the moon before the end of the decade - NASA basically had a blank check to make it happen - but they also had the engineering talent ( and the drive & the discipline ) to make it happen - only when they had to make Apollo 17 the final manned mission in 1972 were the economic realities taking hold - the space shuttle was supposed to be the cost-saving alternative - but it never was that. Now it's just all about putting more satellites in orbit - making collisions an ever-increasing danger - and of course space tourism - for rich folks ..
@ApolloKid1961
Ай бұрын
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University. Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back. After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13 Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet. Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts. Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo. Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive. Can we still see the landingsites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).
@maxsmith695
Күн бұрын
80,000 people can be claimed to make a car. If they fake drive the car onto a football field, do all 80,000 need to witness it?
@philiphorner31
2 ай бұрын
Now instead of science in the White House we have baggies of cocaine.
@lawrencet83
2 ай бұрын
And Hunter sitting in the White House meetings.🙄
@ontheruntonowhere
2 ай бұрын
The Trump admin was chock full of drugs. I think that's why they're so unpleasant and detached from reality. Their brains are literally swiss cheese.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
Or lists of political targets that a small child is obsessed with taking revenge on.
@das250250
2 ай бұрын
Settle now children
@vannpatrickjr1353
26 күн бұрын
Trump a convicted criminal
@gilbert1975nf
6 күн бұрын
I like how music change from USSR to US mood!
@lifesahobby
2 ай бұрын
If you are reading some of the comments here , you will find so many people who lack conviction in their argument about humans not going to the moon . Thats why people argue , they want someone to do the homework for them.. until then they suffer the doubts . This us what happens when you are given choices to study physics , organic chemistry and you say " its too hard " you end up never developing a mind with conceptual capacity .. and you might always pick the easy way from that point on . Its just laziness to doubt and its crazy to argue with them . If you had some guy running across ten lanes of highway, it would be really silly to run across the road with them telling them theyre doing something stupid . So dont argue with them .. youll never change those who never took the ambitious subjects . Youll find behind them all is a lack of physics , science, objectivity , conceptual thought . And that's why they rattle like they do . Here to india .. with the first woman , here to christina cock , heres to the apollo program , vostok, gemini , and all the brave ones who risked it all to inspire us . Gods speed .. 77 tons all the way m may the force be with you and may peace be with those who just dont know .
@zollen123
2 ай бұрын
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@lifesahobby
2 ай бұрын
@@zollen123 Please explain better your question
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@lifesahobby Yet, no human has ever walked on the moon. The only scary thing is that there are still people who believe it happened.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated or lack the understanding of physics, science, etc....? Is that why there are scientists, engineers etc.... all over the world who are very educated that agree NASA faked the landings. What do you say to that? Wake up!
@politicsuncensored5617
13 күн бұрын
Thank you for putting this up. I'm 71 & I watched all of this on my grandparents B/W TV back then in NC. Besides Apollo 11 I don't remember details. Now retired in N. Florida I have been to two Shuttle launches & only can dream of what it was like to watch some of the first manned rocket launches. Shalom
@daryllect6659
13 күн бұрын
Oy!
@ronaldgarrison8478
3 ай бұрын
It appears that, for an astronaut, having drama with Mission Control is especially bad for your career, as illustrated by Mercury-Atlas 7 and Apollo 7.
@LukiferXX
3 ай бұрын
Wally thought he could dictate the rules to Nasa, they all got what they deserved for disobeying orders; besides, he made a career out of he's "stubborn" cold.
@briandunn6342
2 ай бұрын
Wally announced he’d retire after Apollo 7 but other 2 never flew but did ground staff duties.
@LukiferXX
2 ай бұрын
@@briandunn6342 never heard that before, and it was made clear by Chris Kraft that the crew of 7 would never fly again due to disobedience.
@apolloskyfacer5842
9 күн бұрын
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON eight successfully completed their missions, six of which landed two of their crew on the Lunar surface. Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
@asifansari3430
2 ай бұрын
I was in high school, in Lahore, Pakistan...I watched the landing in news...I still have my diary entry on this event
@gregoryjclark81
2 ай бұрын
Was there any appreciable reaction or opinion in Lahore?!?
@Atstudiotrev
Ай бұрын
@@asifansari3430 and you, like my father, have a unique perspective, like anyone that was there to watch it.. you KNOW that those wacky internet moon-landing conspiracy theories have confused so many younger people, and I for one, think it’s important that you tell people of your experience. Most fairly intelligent people can distinguish the difference between internet garbage and verifiable facts, but there are FAR too many people that believe the conspiracies for the simple reason that they want to believe that they know something that makes them FEEL special. This “Dunning-Kruger effect” symptom is one of the things that is disturbing to see in the people we encounter in life, but I think it’s important that people that have personal experience that refutes the conspiracy garbage, speak up, even if some will ALWAYS find the conspiracies more fun than reality. This is unfortunately, just the world we live in, but keep up the good fight for intelligence! 😎
@geordie123-f3n
Ай бұрын
Could not watch this. The background music was so annoying and unnecessary. Why waste a decent documentary with that .😊
@lifesahobby
2 ай бұрын
An empty vessel makes the most noise .
@maumusa123
2 ай бұрын
Spot on
@claudiobrunetti1261
2 ай бұрын
The music is to loud…!
@japjoem4077
2 ай бұрын
Elon said that his company will have humans on the moon by 2023,that didn't happen, smh
@stargazer5784
2 ай бұрын
Musk is a homophobic snake oil salesman.
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
SO?
@christopheryoder8292
28 күн бұрын
Eh Space and Rockets are hard. It's still phenomenal that SpaceX can land and reuse the Falcon 9. Something no one thought was possible.
@DanHintz
Ай бұрын
and no return for 52 years and counting.
@gives_bad_advice
22 күн бұрын
No reason to return.
@fransschepens3
2 ай бұрын
What a lies
@Tarx66
2 ай бұрын
1:40 - ei ollut elämä USAssa mitään kapitalismia edes 1950-luvulla.
@daffidavit
2 ай бұрын
Most people referred to the progroam as "Gem en eee" even though most people say "Gem en eye". It's been said that the German engineers would say "Gem en ee" and the name stayed that way during thoughs days. Also, at 1:16:03 I believe that's Neil Armstrong's Omega Speedmaster that he's wearing on his left wrist. He never wore it on the moon, so Buzz Aldrin was the first person to wear his Speedmaster watch on the moon. It's been said that Neil left his watch hanging on the instrument panel because the built-in clock on the panel stopped working.
@wildboar7473
2 ай бұрын
O well Some lament prononciation of LM with lem.... apparently ignorant to do so.
@daffidavit
2 ай бұрын
@@wildboar7473 Maybe they don't realize that originally, the LM was referred to as the LEM for the Lunar Excursion Module. It was later shortened to the term LM, or Lunar Module.
@wildboar7473
2 ай бұрын
@@daffidavit no rather a anal antihoaxer of 20 years plus.... :) deldelahaye3811 (parts....) wildboar7473 More ignorance....the term LEM was dropped in 1967...The Apollo landers are always referred to as LMs ...pronounced LEM...but those who continue to use the acronym LEM just show they have little, or no in- depth, knowledge of the NASA Apollo missions. 😬 wildboar7473 Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...It is quite likely that the MIT program was made before that date...or they just used the old name LEM *because that was what the general public knew* ,, 🤒 The fact that some sources refer to " LM or LEM " is simply because many people do not know that the name was changed *early in the program* ..and the fact that LM is pronounced LEM does not help the willfully ignorant... 😝 The fact that other people use the term LEM is irrelevant and does not change the fact that the name was changed to LM over 50 years ago. And just because somebody referred to working on the original design of the LEMm as it was then called, *does not excuse the use of the wrong term now.* 🥵 It is not " VERY BAD " to call it the LEM now, it is just factually WRONG...and *when we are debunking conspiracy garbage we rely on getting the correct facts.. It is called attention to detail* - something conspiracy spouters continuously ignore.. 😵💫
@kma86
9 күн бұрын
@@daffidavit@daffidavit my thoughts exactly! When I was young (around age 10 or 11), we had this Encarta 95 (I think) Encyclopedia on the computer and I was very much interested in the space program after watching Apollo 13. The Lunar Excursion Module is one of the words I still remember clearly till this day after learning from that encyclopedia.
@monchobullet8006
3 күн бұрын
1:15 -"en los 50´s la vida en los Estados Unidos era buena"... Tenían buen pasar porque tenían leyes que favorecían al consumidor, no al empresario... el trabajador común y corriente tenía acceso a todo, y no tenía problemas en pagar impuestos altos (que a la postre, costearían proyectos como el programa Apollo)... Todo éso cambió 180 grados con Reagan, desde ahí hasta hoy es todo decadencia... LEYES, ahí está la clave; NO en la producción...
@smash3394
3 ай бұрын
Only the need to overtake the USSR forced the USA to pump such huge funds into the lunar program
@yomommaahotoo264
3 ай бұрын
You mean - pump so much money into the lunar frauds.
@zollen123
2 ай бұрын
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@smash3394
2 ай бұрын
@@zollen123 гонка китая? у китая другие заботы
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
Only the need to stay ahead of the US forced the USSR to pump huge finds into their lunar program.
@timothymccarthy8044
15 сағат бұрын
Only spacecraft commander, Frank Borman, was called back from training in Downey California to Houston to discuss the proposed switch to a lunar orbit mission. Borman alone made the decision. Lovell and Anders, along with Armstrong, Aldrin, and Haise were not at the meeting, and had no input on the decision. How the producers of this documentary missed that well documented fact is odd to say the least. The archival footage is not from that meeting. Original Apollo 8 commander, Jim McDivitt was first asked if he wanted the lunar orbit mission, but decided to stay with the first test flight of the lunar lander. Nothing new, or special here. Just more of what has already been done in other documentaries.
@ronaldgarrison8478
3 ай бұрын
1:08:20 There it is again. I think that's a MYTH. I cannot IMAGINE that crew trying to make an unauthorized landing. Your whole life is building to this moment, and you are going to BLOW it by performing some stunt, for which neither they nor the guys on the ground had made any plans. I think that's utter BS. I'm sure they short-fueled the LM because the extra fuel was simply unnecessary. On space missions, you're always looking for ways to save whatever weight you can, and I'm sure that was just one more of those cases.
@00govan00
3 ай бұрын
Gotta improvise sometimes, you overly skeptical post-truth zombie.
@ronaldgarrison8478
3 ай бұрын
@@00govan00 Bite me. Even if you were being sarcastic.
@kitemastercheok5794
3 ай бұрын
NASA is still dreaming that their Lie would come true AFTER China landed her astronauts on the Moon . Dream on NASA. Prices are going up and American GDP is crashing !
@villagegirl68
2 ай бұрын
There was more fuel than was specified and Armstring knew it. He was in command. Heck if it were me in that situation I'd have gone for it too.
@ronaldgarrison8478
2 ай бұрын
@@villagegirl68 Pay attention. My comment was about Apollo 10, not Apollo 11.
@MuhammadMahing
Ай бұрын
Ayo appolo tampilkan buat ambil baru hajar Aswad buat appolo kerjakan apa masih tidur pagi kah???🌹🌹🌹🙏
@fransschepens3
2 ай бұрын
From dream to dream
@gives_bad_advice
22 күн бұрын
"he flew over South America at night" It is suspicious but not strong evidence unless combined with other inconsistencies. Gagarin was not a geographer and may have confused one mountain for another.
@markissboi3583
2 ай бұрын
Lost count how many times ive watch this Nasa to the moon . A bit help from aussie space honeysuckle creek You got look it up this was a new area of tech that change the world .
@jackkomisar458
2 ай бұрын
Aussies should also know about the 64-meter radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was responsible for receiving the signals from most of the 2 ½ - hour Moonwalk.
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
Foir a good, almost true, story and a good laugh, watch THE DISH! Love it!
@JJB_the_og
Ай бұрын
41:06 apollo 1
@LucidDreamer54321
3 ай бұрын
To the moon, Alice!
@thrummer1953
3 ай бұрын
Honeymooners?
@maxxsee
2 ай бұрын
satanic lies
@lawrencet83
2 ай бұрын
@@thrummer1953 Duh!
@lawrencet83
2 ай бұрын
@@thrummer1953 🙂
@ericcommarato7727
2 ай бұрын
loved the Honeymooners...
@dougball328
2 ай бұрын
At 51:22 that is not a Saturn -1B, that is a block 1 Saturn. Get it correct, guys, or leave it out. So much for "best documentary".
@kennielsen6505
2 ай бұрын
Noone sees curvature from low Orbit..
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
That is incorrect. Earth’s curvature is visible, even to the naked eye, from an altitude of 10 km. We have thousands of photos from the ISS that clearly show curvature.
@SelwynRewes
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 he's talking about when the lead singer of Hermans Hermits Peter Noone went up to the ISS...
@nickfraser2434
2 ай бұрын
Of course they do. Where did you get that from?
@kennielsen6505
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 No its not.. Who gave u that crazy idea..a
@kennielsen6505
2 ай бұрын
@@nickfraser2434 no they really dont.. You watch to much Nasa tv
@nickfraser2434
2 күн бұрын
I often wondered why the incomplete and curtailed missions were ever considered "embarrassments". How could that be? They were doing things never done before! This is one of the best documentaries I have seen. Lots of footage I have never seen before and I thought I had seen everything! Absolutely marvellous !
@MrRichard57000
2 ай бұрын
From dream to fakearie
@SteveT-0
5 күн бұрын
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images.
@jackkomisar458
2 ай бұрын
The narrator says at 3:38 "Coast-to-coast, citizens were watching" the failed Vanguard launch of December 6, 1957. In fact, the launch was not televised live. An article on page 76 of the December 16, 1957 issue of the magazine "Broadcasting" says, "WTVT (TV) Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. aired 400 feet of film of the explosion of the Vanguard missile one hour and 50 minutes after the earth satellite burst into flames Dec. 6 at Cape Canaveral, Fla., 110 miles from the station. Roger Sharp, a WTVT newscaster, and a 2-man camera crew...covered the explosion from four miles away and rushed the film to WTVT by chartered plane. WTVT supplied prints for stations in New York, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Montgomery, Louisville and Miami in time for newscasts that same day."
@roccorossetti7579
2 ай бұрын
JFK said the end of the decade. In this entire video the guy talks about 12-31-1969 being the deadline. However the deadline (decade) is actually 12-31-1970.
@ontheruntonowhere
2 ай бұрын
That's not how decades work. Were you home-schooled? 🙄
@roccorossetti7579
2 ай бұрын
please explain how it works. The calendar was created by Catholic Romans who used Roman Numbers. The thought of “0” zero was not considered. The first year was “1”. There was never a 01-01-0000, instead it was 01-01-0001. Therefore a decade starts at every 20_1 and last for 10 years.
@ontheruntonowhere
2 ай бұрын
@@roccorossetti7579 You WERE home-schooled. JFK's statement about reaching the moon "by the end of the decade" referred to the 1960s, meaning before the start of 1970. This aligns with the common understanding of a decade as a span of 10 years starting from a year ending in 0 and ending in a year ending in 9 (e.g., 1960-1969). The general modern usage defines decades this way. A pseudointellectual often engages in discussions in a way that seems knowledgeable but lacks true understanding or depth.
@respectdawildo_danjones508
2 ай бұрын
@@roccorossetti7579JFK said the “60’s” which meant the 60’s, NOT 1970
@roccorossetti7579
2 ай бұрын
@@respectdawildo_danjones508 No where did JFK say 60's.
@johnmarcos1929
2 ай бұрын
They NEVER went to the moon.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
False. A ton of evidence proves 9 Apollo missions went to the moon, and 6 of those landed on the moon.
@johnmarcos1929
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 This is from Nature Magazine. Title: Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts. And your dilemma now will be whether to believe the scientists of the 1960s or the scientists of 2018.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@johnmarcos1929 The Nature article is about long-duration missions, like the missions to Mars we’re currently considering. Not the two-week missions to the Moon that were done for Apollo. Modern radiation measurements show a human can spend more than a month on the moon without any radiation protection before getting to the current annual dose limit set by OSHA.
@johnmarcos1929
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 I believe you didn't read the article. And if you read it, you didn't understand anything. No one leaves low orbit, it is no coincidence that planet Earth is known as the cradle. In addition to the dangers of solar and cosmic radiation, there are other risks that intelligent people close their eyes to avoid seeing.
@Atstudiotrev
2 ай бұрын
Ha! Well done, but this is an old troll idea. Better to do the flat-earth troll these days! You get better results by saying “the earf am be FLAT!” And the regular people get all mad.. suuuuuper funny for us trollz, AM EYE RITE??? Tee-hee!
@kevinharte3636
9 күн бұрын
Now I wonder how this compares to the current Artemis missions.
@ApolloKid1961
9 күн бұрын
The budget.
@kevinharte3636
9 күн бұрын
@@ApolloKid1961 Yeah I think that's a big one!
@nickfraser2434
2 күн бұрын
Artemis is fantastic but for some reason it doesn't quite hold the allure Apollo had! My age obviously has something to do with that. This is a young person's game and I wish all people working on the Artemis, good luck and godspeed!
@polnoeceloe
2 ай бұрын
56:17 56:42 56:53 58:05 1:00:49 1:17:18 I like that when filming flights from inside a spaceship, there is always a blue sky outside the window. There was always good weather in space lol
@Hiram1000
2 ай бұрын
I know you're obviously trolling, but just in case you are new to general Space Science, or have read little on the matter ( I'm 52, so was educated at a time when you needed to read on subjects extensively, unlike today), let me try to explain. The Blue Sky, as you call it, is apparent because the camera, or window, is looking DOWN at the earth below. The atmosphere of the earth, especially in Low Earth Orbit, always looks blue. If the camera was looking out into the blackness of space, you would see nothing. The astronauts would see stars, but the Camera, and by extension we the viewer, cannot resolve stars, so the sky looks black. Go outside tonight and snap off one pic of the sky and look at the image. You will see no stars. Maybe Venus, or the moon if its bright enough, but no stars. You need a long exposure of more than a second to see any stars. Some phones, on night mode, will do it automatically, but generally no.
@matthewmcinnis9368
Ай бұрын
@Hiram1000 "The Astronauts would see stars"? Wonder why Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins couldn't see them while they went to the moon and back with Apollo 11. Nor did others from Apollo 12 through 17! THEIR own words! Look into it!
@MoesDavis
2 ай бұрын
Wow thank you for uploading. While it seemed intermidable, it was relatively comprehensive as well. Best documentary so far.
@manggfcvgj
3 ай бұрын
KENYA TO LAND ITS FIRST MAN ON THE MOON BY 2032
@LucidDreamer54321
3 ай бұрын
Bad Joke
@Ronobuildstech
3 ай бұрын
usituaibishe buda delete
@mfgt4595
3 ай бұрын
You mean the UK, it means the same thing!
@traveltime997
Ай бұрын
Life in the 1950s was good? Unless you were poor or black. Give me a break...
@Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod
2 ай бұрын
Looks WORTHLESS and like LIES.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
Verifiable reality.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Fake landings, deal with it. Do you like the flag blowing in the wind on multiple missions?
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Fake moon landings.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Fake
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@aok4418 The only instances where the flag moves is when the astronauts are working on the flag, and during the LM liftoff when rocket exhaust flows past the flag. In between, we have hours of footage of the flag staying completely stationary in a way that we can’t replicate on Earth.
@majobedric7432
16 күн бұрын
sa obzirom na rast tehnologije u odnosu na prije 60 godina, danas bi trebali imati kolonije na planetama koje nas okružuju, ali, činjenica je da čovjek nije bio na mjesecu zadnjih 60 godina jer kako bi rekli, mi neznamo kako to izvest... da se čovjek zapita, nazadujemo li ili napredujemo????
@gives_bad_advice
15 күн бұрын
What would be the motivation to put men back on the moon? What could men do there that a robot could not?
@hopebear06
3 ай бұрын
My dog ate my homework. 🙄
@michael.forkert
2 ай бұрын
From Dream to Science Fiction.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
Reality, as proven by a ton of evidence. You have nothing to support your claims.
@michael.forkert
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 _Verbosity about evidence, are no evidence at all. Videos even less._
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@michael.forkert As evidence for the moon landings, we have: - 382 kg of lunar rock samples available to any geologist, - hours of live TV and film, - more than 8000 photos, - scientific results from every experiment they did, - thousands of technical documents that show how they did it. We can analyze this evidence, and have been doing that for 50 years now, In all that time, not one of these items has been found to be fake. For example, the Apollo videos show they're in 1/6 g gravity, which we cannot replicate on Earth today, which proves those videos were not recorded on Earth, but on the moon. In addition, we have confirmation from multiple independent sources: - amateur astronomers could see the CSM/LM on their way to the Moon. - in several countries including the USSR, people monitored Apollo spacecraft radio transmissions. Radio astronomers used their telescopes to monitor transmissions, confirming they were transmitting from the moon. - in the 50 years since the landings, thousands of geologists all over the world have examined lunar rock samples and found they don't look like the rocks we find on Earth. - The NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and India's Chandrayaan 2 orbiter has photographed the Apollo landing sites, with enough resolution to show the foot tracks of the astronauts. - Japan's Selene lunar orbiter has mapped the Apollo landing sites and found the topography matches that seen in Apollo photos. - laser reflectors were left on the moon by the Apollo missions, and can be pinged from Earth by anyone with a powerful laser.
@briandunn6342
2 ай бұрын
A correction in Gemini 3 flew March 23 1965 but video script says July. In Gemini 4 closing Ed White hatch after the EVA was the problem.
@pontifixmax
Күн бұрын
35:00 Sounds like the People's Court.
@robertbolding4182
2 ай бұрын
Where was the lunar lander tested unmanned on the moon surface. Had The landings been real they would have carried a lunar lander to the Moon by Apollo and landed it unmanned on the surface as a test. If that never happened don't ask me to believe that we went to the Moon.
@DaveKeenan1956
2 ай бұрын
Why? The lander was test flown in Earth orbit and in lunar orbit. What would have been learned by landing a unmanned module on the Moon? The landing struts, which were designed to compress, had been extensively tested on Earth, so I ask again, what would have been learned by landing an unmanned module on the Moon? To me, your assertion that an unmanned landing on the Moon was necessary is simple ill informed.
@MrMa1981
Ай бұрын
The Shuttle never been tested. The first mission is the actual test. Isn't that scarier?
@yogeshpathak8478
3 күн бұрын
Very nice informatic ❤
@sarkissati1217
3 ай бұрын
❤ Слава Советской космонавтики ❤
@christianetstu
3 ай бұрын
❤
@jakepopalo
3 ай бұрын
4 запуски Н1,і всі провальні😂😂😂.Який Слава?😅
@sarkissati1217
3 ай бұрын
@@jakepopalo Советский Луноход в ноябре 1970 первым прилунился на Луне и забрал на Землю содержимое лунной поверхности. Советский космонавт первым в космос полетел, Советский спутник первым был выведен на орбиту
@jakepopalo
3 ай бұрын
@@sarkissati1217 в 69году Аполлон11 прилунился,два астронавта погуляли по Луне и уже вернулся с Луны,доставил десятки кг.реголита. А ты тычешь свой лохоход🤣🤣🤣 А фейк о "полете" Гагарина своей бабушке расскажи. Все космические достижения ссср благодаря украинцу С.П.Королеву ,группе немецких ученых создавшие А4( ФАУ2) Где доказательства "полета " Гагарина!?Их нет,нет ни видео ,нет ни Гагарина...🤣
@viliOS57
2 ай бұрын
@@sarkissati1217Sovjeti su čestitali amerikancima kad su se spustili na mjesec. To ne bi napravili da spuštanja nije bilo. Inače, Lunohod je prvi automat koji je "šetao" mjesecom, i sve ostalo ste u pravu, ali amerikanci su jedini slali ljude.
@advsonhere
2 ай бұрын
"The result of an unprecedented surge in scientific and engineering activity with remarkable spin-offs… in less than 9 years the United States went from space amateur to technological hyperpower". That's proof of how humans could do amazing things, in a relatively short period of time, if they really put their mind to it. And that's why wise Jacque Fresco stated that we must put our mind to changing the socioeconomic organization system under which our society operates as we did to put a man on the moon. Watch "The choice is ours" documentary to learn about his proposal.
@MrNorma77
3 ай бұрын
Hollywood movi
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
nope, reality.
@ApolloKid1961
3 ай бұрын
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
@SteveT-0
5 күн бұрын
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images.
@tonemarieantonsen1597
Күн бұрын
What is the Russian songs called 🤔
@JordanST-n7r
2 ай бұрын
There should be at least a live camera on the moon. People believe in politicians and leaders, they would believe every lie served.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
We already have live cameras watching Earth from a much better vantage point: geostationary orbit. Weather satellites take photos of the entire hemisphere every 10 minutes.
@JordanST-n7r
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 And the reason is they can't go further than that.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@JordanST-n7r No, that’s not the reason. DSCOVR operates at 1.5 million km from Earth and takes regular photos. But the photos taken from geostationary orbit are of much higher quality: the closer you get the higher the resolution. We’ve launched more than 200 spacecraft that have left Earth orbit entirely. More than 30 successful missions to the moon including 8 manned ones, of which 6 landed.
@JordanST-n7r
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Now I am persuaded.
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
I have more confidence in science.
@jonfarthings5134
10 күн бұрын
Is this Martin Clunes narrating..??
@brianstephen5392
2 ай бұрын
Bunch of liars never went anywhere ever!
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
Nope. Tons of evidence proves the Apollo missions reached the moon.
@brianstephen5392
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 You must be the only one left believing those pantomimes, what would you do with a brain if you had one?
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@brianstephen5392 I used my brain to evaluate the evidence for and against the moon landing. I found that the evidence for the moon landings is solid, with no indication of fakery anywhere. The “evidence” against the moon landings turns out to be nonexistent. There is no actual evidence that shows the moon landings were faked. The moon landing deniers don’t present evidence, they only present arguments that turn out to be full of holes. People who follow the evidence have only one choice: accept that the Apollo landings are real. Believing the moon landings were faked is nothing more than wishful thinking.
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
That would have been about 400,000 liars. It's great that they were all able to keep their mouths shut.
@brianstephen5392
2 ай бұрын
@@wimkuijpers1342 Compartmentalised and the vast majority couldn't tell the difference between mock ups and the real thing, monitoring things from a screen means nothing, same with the mars pantomimes they are lying to us, some see it, most refuse to see it.
@MP-iw3kb
3 ай бұрын
📺propaganda
@petsmart1000
3 ай бұрын
😂😂
@ApolloKid1961
2 ай бұрын
Well, let's spend a hundred billion dollars (expressed in today's money value), put 400,000 people to work for 10 years just for propaganda?
@dougball328
2 ай бұрын
BS
@wiedep
2 ай бұрын
"...to the moon, Alice!!!..."
@stargazer5784
2 ай бұрын
Hey hey, Ralphy boy! 👍😉
@renz758
3 ай бұрын
Big Hoax 😂
@gunsandpoker7432
3 ай бұрын
Yes you are 😂
@fingerprint5511
3 ай бұрын
And the Village Idiot arrives with its Foil Hat. I'd call you a man but that would insult men 😂
@jakepopalo
3 ай бұрын
Ти деградант з росії?😂😂😂
@petsmart1000
3 ай бұрын
You prob think the earth is flat too. LMMFAO 😂😂 🥴🥴
@THOUGHTCRIME_No1
3 ай бұрын
@renz758 Title of this video should be: From dream to hoax
@koboyjoachim4424
3 ай бұрын
big dream but never come LOL.. maybe soon when dinosaurs will alive again 🤣🤣🤣
@SelwynRewes
2 ай бұрын
so sorry for your partner...
@whitey3631
2 ай бұрын
some comments certainly build a strong case for neutering
@rickreid8572
2 ай бұрын
No way this happened
@rickreid8572
2 ай бұрын
@@kitchenerleslie6177 not sure that's got anything to do with it. Get that sleeve rolled up dude....
@kitchenerleslie6177
2 ай бұрын
@@rickreid8572 Conspiracy theorists are simple as f.
@rickreid8572
2 ай бұрын
@@kitchenerleslie6177 how many did you take? Get that sleeve up further man!
@kitchenerleslie6177
2 ай бұрын
@@rickreid8572 Rick, yer dumb.
@kitchenerleslie6177
2 ай бұрын
@@rickreid8572 Hope you haven't procreated. We have enough science denying we todds already.
@Radio478
2 ай бұрын
❤
@casio007
2 ай бұрын
imagine we haven't been there for another 52 years. We never went to the Moon for sure!
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
After the first manned dive to the deepest point of the ocean, it took another 50 years for another human to get there. Does that mean that first dive was a fake? Apollo was the most expensive engineering project in history. Repeating it will require a similarly gigantic investment. NASA’s current budget is only 1/10 of what it was during Apollo.
@wimkuijpers1342
2 ай бұрын
'We' have been there. 6 times.
@DaveKeenan1956
2 ай бұрын
Just a thought, it's been over 20 years since Concorde last flew commercially.
@joshua1462
Ай бұрын
As evidence......The term "numb nuts" was created for a reason.
@SteveT-0
5 күн бұрын
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images and see
@fendermarshallbluesbox3407
Ай бұрын
from dream to lie
@politicsuncensored5617
14 күн бұрын
Karen Dingleberry even the "Soviet Union" when it was still the Soviet Union acknowledged that the USA had in fact landed on the moon. Along with "communist China" & other nations. None of which were friends then with the USA and now with the USA. Up voting your own stupid comment is rather - - - "Childish & Immature"~~~~!! Shalom ya Schmuck
@terencehurst8636
2 ай бұрын
Keep on dreaming.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
It's never to late to get a college degree in engineering, son.
@terencehurst8636
2 ай бұрын
@@kitcanyon658 I have a lot more then that👨🎓
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
@@terencehurst8636 : Ok, and you still don't understand physics, electronics, manufacturing engineering, chemistry, material science, to name a few? Why is that?
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@kitcanyon658 And you do? You think you understand these things combined together. I bet your education is limited to high school. Arrogant people like you are mist likely insecure she uneducated.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@kitcanyon658 Be specific. What are the physics, electronics, manufacturing, chemistry, material, and science they don't understand?
@Mike-tv9rk
24 күн бұрын
The crew "were" preparing! Not was preparing. Not a good start for the first sentence of the film. I'll give it a few more mins. 😢
@gives_bad_advice
22 күн бұрын
They're not incorrect. In American English collective nouns tend to be treated as singular--"the family is" "the audience was" &tc.
@willoughbykrenzteinburg
20 күн бұрын
As has been said, in American English, "the crew WAS" is correct. If you said instead "the crew MEMBERS" - you would then use "were". The crew WAS preparing - correct The crew members WERE preparing - correct Similarly, if you were talking about a team (which is made up of multiple individual members), you wouldn't say, "The team were good"; you'd say, "The team was good." "crew" and "team" are similarly referring to a group of people. It is singular. A "batch" is referring to a group. Like a batch of eggs. You wouldn't say, "That batch were bad". You'd say "That batch WAS bad". Same concept.
@gives_bad_advice
20 күн бұрын
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg I'm a USAmerican and i say "they audience were," just to be a pest.
@yomommaahotoo264
3 ай бұрын
LOL - All staged folks.
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
Nope. All reality, and supported by tons of evidence. You, on the other hand, have nothing.
@yomommaahotoo264
3 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 False evidence. Here's a stupid shill question for you... Show us ANY independent evidence of humans breathing low pressure (5psi and under) pure O2 for days and weeks at a time as in the comical apollo frauds. You CAN'T because every leo capsule since the hoax has astronots breathing near sea level earth O2 and N2. Waiting shill....
@yomommaahotoo264
3 ай бұрын
My replies might be deleted by you shills but we all know it was a fraud.
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
@@yomommaahotoo264 Nope. We don't know that at all. As I said before, there is *no evidence* for your claims. Absolutely none whatsoever.
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
@@yomommaahotoo264 Campbell, 1927, was the first to study the effect of 100% O2 at low pressure on animals, for durations of up to 2 months. Clamann and Becker-Freysing spent a week in a low-pressure pure oxygen environment in 1939, they did experiments at various pressures. They were the first to establish the limits of human breathing with regards to pressure and oxygen percentage. "Space-cabin Atmospheres: Oxygen toxicity” is a review of previous research by Roth from 1964 that lists all of these.
@Zikbel
27 күн бұрын
From dream to dream
@LOWERCASEMAN
3 ай бұрын
“From dream to Hoax” more like it
@RoyalBengalAviation
3 ай бұрын
300+B USD, 400K+ engineers & life of 3 astronauts were needed just to create a Hoax? Yeah right
@yomommaahotoo264
2 ай бұрын
@@RoyalBengalAviation Grissom, White, and Chaffee assassinated because Grissom was spilling the beans in the hoax shill.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@yomommaahotoo264 Sure. They assassinated Grissom in a way that guaranteed massive attention would be brought to his complaints. Basically the dumbest possible way of getting rid of him. And again, you fail to present evidence for your claims.
@yomommaahotoo264
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 And that wasn't the only assassination they got away with.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@yomommaahotoo264 and yet again you are making claims that are not supported by evidence. Apollo 1 was an accident, nothing more.
@Marvinfj32
24 күн бұрын
I read back a ways and didn't see anything about it, but there is a boomerang shaped object on the right side spinning from bottom to top at 57:10 there abouts. it's not hard to see. looks out of place but I guess there was junk up there already.
@HeetXS
2 ай бұрын
Yet NASA lost everything. Darn.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
Nope. All of the data from Apollo remains available today, much of it in public archives. Darn.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
Someone didn't do his research. Did he?
@respectdawildo_danjones508
2 ай бұрын
They “lost” the funding dummy 🤡
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@HeetXS Check out the shadows on these photos from artificial light. AS11-40-5903 AS14-68-9486 AS16-108-17627 AS14-68-9486
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@kitcanyon658 Is that you, Hobbes?
@frankh.rockel5811
2 ай бұрын
What is the music starting at 48:00?
@das250250
2 ай бұрын
It's used way too much ,
@rgp8038
3 ай бұрын
I love watching comedies on Saturday morning.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
@user-ky5dy5hl4d : Spoken like the jealous boy you are. What? Was math that difficult for you, son?
@robotsonrockets
2 ай бұрын
I love reading insubstantial comments from non educated and not very intelligent people who will never achieve anything in their poor life
@robotsonrockets
2 ай бұрын
@user-ky5dy5hl4d Are you a bit limited in your intelligence?
@robotsonrockets
2 ай бұрын
@user-ky5dy5hl4d a you a little bit depressed because you will never achieve anything like a masters degree or a Phd in your life?
@robotsonrockets
2 ай бұрын
@user-ky5dy5hl4d are you a little sad because you will never achieve anything like a masters degree or a Phd in your poor life?
@andrewpark651
Ай бұрын
BREAKING;))))
@dharakis
2 ай бұрын
we cant go to the moon today .. did they lie and take an oath of secrecy . ΑΩ
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
We can go to the moon today. All we have to do is spend tens of billions building new spacecraft to get there. We have proof “they” didn’t lie.
@kitcanyon658
2 ай бұрын
No, they didn't lie back in the 60's and 70's. Real men and women figured it out and put 12 different men on the surface. If that offends your Gen Z or millennial sensibilities then I suggest you stop spending all your time playing Fortnight and get an education in engineering. It's time to adult up, son.
@Meinstein
Ай бұрын
you mean.. no one has been able to go the moon since. I don't know how they got there.. but getting there has proved that AI and robotics are the way to go today. Machinery is much easier to land and retrieve from both the Moon and Mars... and if there is a failure.. no human lives are lost.
@cb613
3 ай бұрын
I guess they are impervious to the deadly radiation in the van allenbelt . Must be like super heros.
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
The radiation levels in the VA belts are low enough that normal humans can travel through them without getting a dangerous dose of radiation. We just can’t orbit in the belts indefinitely.
@dougball328
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Logic won't work on these clowns. But nice try. I give you credit.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit. Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead. Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
@aok4418
2 ай бұрын
@@Hobbes746 Cosmic radiation is encountered in and above the radiation belts. The latest data confirms that the harsh radiation can't be tolerated without proper shielding. They didn't have it then, and they still don't have it figured out.
@Hobbes746
2 ай бұрын
@@aok4418 Why do you post the same comment multiple times? Stop spamming.
@MagicRoosterBluesBand
Ай бұрын
Can't go now or in the near future with our advanced technology... couldn't go 55 years ago with primitive technology. Logical.
@gives_bad_advice
22 күн бұрын
"Primitive technology..." 55 years ago they were splitting atoms, lanunching 300 ft rockets, and performing human heart transplants. Pretty hard to call that primitive.
@MagicRoosterBluesBand
21 күн бұрын
@gives_bad_advice can't figure out how to go now, can't go in the foreseeable future. Didn't go 55 years ago.
@gives_bad_advice
21 күн бұрын
@@MagicRoosterBluesBand "can't figure out how to go now," Have they tried? If they'd been working on it and burning through cash at the rate they did in the 60s/70s and couldn't make it work, then you'd have a point. But that's not the case. There has been no effort to go whatsoever until recently. What would be the incentive to risk lives and spend all that money? What can a man do on the moon that a robot cannot?
@MagicRoosterBluesBand
21 күн бұрын
@@gives_bad_advice Constellation program? 0 men on the moon. Artemis program? 0 men on the moon. $350 billion later. NASA is a fraud.
@syddiesel8420
3 ай бұрын
The moon landing was done at area51 fact! I mean landing a tin can on the moon 😂
@Hobbes746
3 ай бұрын
That’s not a fact, that’s a long-disproven false claim.
@franknorthcuttmusic
3 ай бұрын
Referring to the lunar module as a 'tin can' makes it quite clear that you know nothing about the Apollo program, ergo your opinion is meaningless.
@thrummer1953
3 ай бұрын
You some sort of Sorehead, or What?
@dougball328
2 ай бұрын
Prove it, A-Hole. Even the Russians, who were listening to all the radio transmissions, congratulated us.
@robotsonrockets
2 ай бұрын
Please provide evidence for your "fact". Thanks.
@houseofgain
2 ай бұрын
Fun fact, Wernher von Braun married his 1st cousin. That's definitely not rocket science.
Пікірлер: 1,1 М.