"i have a degree in earth science, and i'm familiar with Albert Einstein." words said before disaster.
@tonybennett4159
Жыл бұрын
Einstein was an undoubted genius, but a lot of things have happened since then, so quoting Einstein is a bit like creationists trying to quote Darwin, plus, both have been copiously misquoted.
@Illawong
Жыл бұрын
@@tonybennett4159 But then more and more people agree with Albert Einstein's position as an Agnostic Atheist.
@norbertjendruschj9121
Жыл бұрын
Having a degree in earth sciences myself (geophysics), I would like to press one point: We are not all idiots.
@nondescriptcat5620
Жыл бұрын
@@norbertjendruschj9121 that's true. what does it for me is being "familiar" with Einstein. like, everyone is "familiar" with Einstein, he's one of the most famous scientists in history. also aren't most earth scientists specialists (either geology, geochemistry, or geophysics)? so it comes off as "i have a broad (but not necessarily deep) understanding of one scientific discipline, so allow me to misrepresent a theoretical physicist in a totally different field."
@norbertjendruschj9121
Жыл бұрын
@@nondescriptcat5620 Indeed. And a theoretical physicist would hardly boast about being "familiar" with Einstein.
@Keras33
Жыл бұрын
Einstein quote: "If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.” So much for this fella being familiar with Einstein!
@nicholashazel7049
Жыл бұрын
It was Richard Feynman. The Feynman Technique Pretend to teach a concept you want to learn about to a student in the sixth grade.
@PreviouslyDelicious
Жыл бұрын
"To say we have not found other life in the universe is like walking up to the shores of the ocean, scooping a thimbleful of water out, peering inside and proclaiming there's no whales in the ocean cause you didn't see them." - some guy I cant remember.
@chesterdamolester6990
Жыл бұрын
Neil DeGrasse Tyson
@PreviouslyDelicious
Жыл бұрын
@@chesterdamolester6990 awesome! Thanks! I knew he said it but I thought he was quoting someone else.
@Mouse_007
Жыл бұрын
I'm going to want to use Occam's razor in a whole new way if I have to listen to this caller ever again.
@sophistichistory4645
Жыл бұрын
..........Good one!!..........
@TheZombieSaints
Жыл бұрын
Ha! That's funny 👍👏
@jquest99
Жыл бұрын
@R Boland It was a cutting point.
@petebetz5358
Жыл бұрын
I'm convinced that this guy couldn't hurt himself with any kind of razor as he surely doesn't have an understanding of what Occam's razor even is... And you're right that was funny as hell..
@joeely6817
Жыл бұрын
I don't think that the place he is calling from would allow him to have a razor or any other sharp objects.
@dx1450
Жыл бұрын
Tom is so incredibly intelligent that even he doesn't know what he's talking about.
@bunji_beans
Жыл бұрын
I have a hunch that using big words is not why no one understands Tom
@Robert_Jacobs
Жыл бұрын
You guys are so generous with your patience and your time, this was like you listening to a 5 year old holding a Lego and shyly telling you about his day that turns into complete stream of consciousness.
@thecarrotsarecoming4711
8 ай бұрын
I think with this guy they saw an opportunity to genuinely converse with someone who has faulty logic
@meloveAi
Жыл бұрын
This, I think, is a good example of being so open-minded your brain falls out.
@dx1450
Жыл бұрын
I'm not so sure he had a brain.
@cryptofacts4u
Жыл бұрын
We know planets exist, we know life exists, we don't know that a God exists, so adding it as an explanation unnecessarily violates Occam's razor
@shinobi-no-bueno
Жыл бұрын
No, it NECESSARILY violates Occam's Razor
@girlwithtehface5880
Жыл бұрын
@@shinobi-no-bueno I think Crypto Facts meant "unnecessarily," as in "violates Occam's razor when it doesn't need to." As opposed to where you said "necessarily," meaning "it definitely does violate Occam's razor." You're both saying it does violate Occam's razor. Crypto Facts was just adding that the additional information does not need to be there and is therefore unnecessary.
@jestermoon
Жыл бұрын
Mysterious eh?
@cryptofacts4u
Жыл бұрын
@@girlwithtehface5880 100%
@Gamer_G33k
Жыл бұрын
@@girlwithtehface5880 Pretty sure he was just making a "Necessary Being" joke
@StrGzr101
Жыл бұрын
Dunning-Kruger on full display. He's sooo impressed with his own faulty reasoning.
@psychedelicicecream3613
Жыл бұрын
I agree 100%. It's actually kind of amazing 🤯
@StrGzr101
Жыл бұрын
@@psychedelicicecream3613 Tis.
@dx1450
Жыл бұрын
He knows a bunch of big words but doesn't really know what they mean.
@StrGzr101
Жыл бұрын
@@dx1450 ... You said it. And he was trying so hard to stretch his brain around the nonsense. It was hard to watch.
@roscius6204
Жыл бұрын
Oh man... excruciating
@lnsflare1
Жыл бұрын
There's no evidence of life on the infinitesimal fraction of the surface of Mars that humans have physically searched with rovers, therefore Galactus, Devourer of Worlds, exists.
@sausagemahoney7525
Жыл бұрын
I’m alright with that logic
@Khan-wt3lb
Жыл бұрын
Pretty convincing to me absolutely no logical fallacies
@scottc1857
Жыл бұрын
What's even funnier Is we have found life in space. We've found extremophiles in space rocks. The god of the gaps is not even razor thin anymore, we're dealing with nano gaps and therefore nano gods at this point
@TheSufferBrothers2
Жыл бұрын
"Flurble gumble doopie bawpie dwoobie gloop so God."
@freddan6fly
Жыл бұрын
You nailed it.
@88mphDrBrown
Жыл бұрын
Whoa whoa whoa, please don't use such big words.
@davidbartig3661
Жыл бұрын
As soon as i heard about the degree, I wondered "How long before the self important, condescending, bullshit starts?" Huh! Not long, imagine that!
@ninjabluefyre3815
Жыл бұрын
This is doubtless one of the STRANGEST calls one of the shows has ever gotten.
@phoenixkingtheo
Жыл бұрын
The caller really has a high opinion of himself
@JamesR1701
Жыл бұрын
He uses big words even when they aren't necessary, that also makes him an unsufferable prat with a high opinion of himself.
@freddan6fly
Жыл бұрын
The caller is deeply impressed with his own imagined smartness.
@psychoboy6613
Жыл бұрын
Glad it wasn't just me that thought he sounded kinda arrogant or condescending
@stevewhite6861
Жыл бұрын
@@psychoboy6613 Definitely not on your own, he is an insufferable dick.
@djfussell1987
Жыл бұрын
He obviously gets off on the smell of his own farts!
@alangarland8571
Жыл бұрын
"There are no fossils" Nobody really expected there would be fossils
@drewdrewski6278
Жыл бұрын
I can’t believe they devoted half an hour to this!!
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
This is so funny in its own mindnumbingly stupid way...
@greeneyedlady5580
Жыл бұрын
I can't believe that I devoted half an hour listening to that dufus!
@kuroiryu9434
Жыл бұрын
This guy has all the mental planning skill of an underpants gnome
@Robert_Jacobs
Жыл бұрын
?????
@Robert_Jacobs
Жыл бұрын
PROFIT
@nondescriptcat5620
Жыл бұрын
step 1: no life on Mars step 2: ??? step 3: GOD!
@michaelbrown343
Жыл бұрын
Hahahahaaaaaaaa!
@EvilEyeGypsy
Жыл бұрын
As soon as he figures out step 2, he’ll have the last laugh.
@BrookeK92
Жыл бұрын
Love Johnny's subtle callout of this pretentious caller calling the hosts stupid before he even started his argument lol sOrRy iF i UsE bIg WoRdS
@alfresco8442
Жыл бұрын
Injecting something as complicated as a god into the universe is the exact antithesis of Occam's Razor.
@daniellehutchison3585
Жыл бұрын
The fact that god (if he was real) is necessarily the most complicated thing ever -- most likely too complex by definition to ever be accurately understood, perceived, or described by humans -- goes over so many people's heads...like you said the exact counterpart to anything that could be Occam's razor
@dwendt44
Жыл бұрын
"Looking for life" on Mars is just getting started. We've only scratched the surface. The search continues. Mars, it's believed, did have the temperature and the atmospheric pressure that would permit life to happen millions of years ago.
@dx1450
Жыл бұрын
Basically what we've done is like parachuting someone in the middle of the Sahara Desert, who walks around for a few weeks not seeing anything but sand, and then declaring there's no life on Earth.
@cryptofacts4u
Жыл бұрын
Occam's razor explained: We both agree that toasters exist. we both agree that the components of toasters exist. we both agree that toaster components break. We don't agree that Gremlins exist. Occam's razor basically says don't add Gremlins to the explanation unnecessarily. So unless you can prove that Gremlins exist and you have a necessary reason to put them in, they should be left out
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
I dont agree that toasters exists nor that they have "toaster components"
@tetsujin_144
Жыл бұрын
Suppose we consider where these "toasters" came from... Some will say that they come from a toaster factory, filled with toaster factory workers who all work on individual pieces of the toaster, following the design of some toaster designer, the whims of some toaster company CEO, etc., etc., etc. - I find this belief totally unreasonable, it depends on all these additional entities. The simplest explanation according to Occam's Razor, the one that assumes the fewest additional entities, would be to say that an all-powerful god made it! (I love misapplying logic to produce dumb answers)
@roscius6204
Жыл бұрын
Hmmmm pretty sure my toaster has gremlins....
@lnsflare1
Жыл бұрын
Please don't put gremlins in your toasters. Not only would that void your warranty, gremlins are only palatable stewed.
@stevewhite6861
Жыл бұрын
Occam's razor is basically, go with the thing that requires the fewest assumptions.
@Selcryn
Жыл бұрын
And Tom seems to be under the impression that it means to go with the thing that requires all the assumptions.
@stevewhite6861
Жыл бұрын
@@Selcryn Unfortunately for him yes, but delusion runs deep in religion.
@goddessmelanisia
Жыл бұрын
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses before zebra.
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
@@goddessmelanisia if a theist claims he has proof for a god assume they are lying.
@shinobi-no-bueno
Жыл бұрын
@@Selcryn well he's looking for "simplicity" and his theological indoctrination causes him to believe God is the only option thereby being the most "simple."
@MicrobyteAlan
Жыл бұрын
Einstein once said when asked a tough question, “I’m not an Einstein”
@0Fyrebrand0
Жыл бұрын
My favourite part was when he said "It's Einsteinin' time!" and he Einsteined all over those guys.
@hkk3656
Жыл бұрын
The reason he couldn't find god on Mars was because he was hiding behind a rock. Peek-a-boo. 😆
@erniemathews5085
Жыл бұрын
His thinking is as muddled as his theology, but don't he think he's one smart fella!
@wabbajack2
Жыл бұрын
Hosts: "Tell us about Occam's Razor." Caller: "I have a degree in Earth Science and I'm familiar with Albert Einstein..." Me: Dis gun b gud.
@frankwebster9110
Жыл бұрын
I don't I don't want to use big words and confuse anybody so I'm going to use a lot of common everyday words to say absolutely nothing.
@alisonjones8861
Жыл бұрын
OMG. I'm laughing hysterically at the latter end of this call. Please say something that makes sense, Tom!
@blindfreddy9157
Жыл бұрын
Tom is the smartest voice in his own head.
@dx1450
Жыл бұрын
I don't know, I bet the voices in his head are probably far more intelligent. Not a damn thing he said made any sense.
@freddan6fly
Жыл бұрын
"I am familiar with the strawman of Einstein that I dreamed up".
@tetsujin_144
Жыл бұрын
Oh yeah I know that guy, he has crazy hair and a silly-sounding accent. He's pretty fun. I think Walter Matthau played him in a movie once.
@michaelreindel6975
Жыл бұрын
Caller: “I’m *really* smart and [static] - “ Hosts: “Talk into the phone.” Caller: “Occam’s razor implies God is the best explanation for everything.” Hosts: “How’s that…?” Caller: “Because there are no rat droppings on Mars.” Hosts: “And…?” Caller: “And there are also no fossils on Mars.” Hosts: “What’s your actual point?” Caller: “Jupiter’s moons might be drilled.” Hosts: “Huh?” Caller: “I’ve met the burden of proof.” Hosts: “How so…?” Caller: “This is all just going in circles.” For somebody who spent an *annoying* amount o’ time declaring how smart he is, this caller seems to misunderstand basic concepts, leap to extraordinarily erroneous conclusions, meaninglessly regurgitate phrases out of context, and just seems genuinely out-to-lunch… …he’s also *aggressively* condescending for someone who can’t even articulate “Why?” he even called.
@daniellehutchison3585
Жыл бұрын
Well, aggression is naturally a big part of the God belief because it's primarily a projection.. Show me a humble, passive and intelligent person and I'll show you someone who couldn't care less whether or not god exists
@exceptionallyaverage3075
Жыл бұрын
I wonder if Tom's used to talking with people who agree with him just to shut him up.
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
I really want Matt to react to his arguments so we get a ln idea were this craziness comes from
@ravarga4631
Жыл бұрын
Tom is giggling, snickering, chuckling, could he be a troll?
@grantwing4942
Жыл бұрын
The voice is familiar. I think its one that calls under different names. They like to hear themselves talk.
@cctomcat321
26 күн бұрын
A lot of callers laugh at their own incredulity and misunderstanding as a defense mechanism. So it's honestly not that easy to tell.
@onepunch9203
Жыл бұрын
Excellent and generous questions, Secular Rarity!
@gatorboymike
Жыл бұрын
When the volume cut out, that must have been Tom escaping his cell and running from the orderlies.
@FourDeuce01
Жыл бұрын
Tom: “There’s a logic here.” If there was, you wouldn’t have to say that.🤡 “Welcome to my world.” Oh, Tom, nobody can come to visit you in your world.😂
@markmiller7317
Жыл бұрын
You can tell right away that Secular Rarity isn't buying this guy's B.S.
@brianharris7243
Жыл бұрын
Not every complex idea can be expressed in simple language. Sometimes the technicalities are hard to understand.
@nondescriptcat5620
Жыл бұрын
he's completely misrepresenting Ordinary Language Philosophy, the point of which is that using increasingly specialized philosophical terminology, rather than using language as it's commonly understood, ends up creating a lot of the structural problems that philosophy then concerns itself with. so ironically, Tom twisting concepts like "evidence" *is the problem.*
@nagranoth_
Жыл бұрын
And sometimes the problem isn't the words, but that the caller tries to express nonsense.
@0Fyrebrand0
Жыл бұрын
*Believers:* "Life could only come about by divine intervention. Creation implies a creator." *Also Believers:* "Lack of creation implies a creator too, though."
@mickhughes6327
Жыл бұрын
Tom should of probably taken the time to organise his thoughts before calling in.
@dieudebois296
Жыл бұрын
He sure did. But it didn't help.
@FourDeuce01
Жыл бұрын
He should have taken some time to have some thoughts.🤤
@tonybennett4159
Жыл бұрын
This was one of the most painful things I've ever seen on an atheist show. The guy seemed to think that his concepts were so complex that he made great play that he was going to try simple language and he put your incomprehension of the garbage and copious non sequiturs down to insufficient intellect on your part. I felt for you and the twisted logic he was spouting that you were trying to get a handle on. I'm sure he'll go away from this thinking you're intellectual lightweights, and so acts the Dunning-Kruger effect.
@kentiandacalos636
Жыл бұрын
I will forever be stuck on trying to know the connection of having no life in Mars and god existing.
@655irish
Жыл бұрын
Love the Bowie quote From someone so young And a song so obscure Is there life on Mars?
@theholybox4690
Жыл бұрын
I love you guys thx
@MrEmpireBuilder0000
Жыл бұрын
This is exactly why believers are so hard to discuss with. They ALWAYS leap from one idea to another.
@edbyrne7166
Жыл бұрын
Your patience is epic kudos
@bencoppola1222
Жыл бұрын
I would have ironically asked Tom where the missing link in his argument is.
@daytimegaming3122
Жыл бұрын
Tom needs to stop focusing on Occam’s razor, and instead look up the definition of non sequitur.
@tan_x_dx
Жыл бұрын
Speaking of Occam's Razor, did you know that if one was to apply it the way the caller does, then the assumption of an all powerful, all knowing entity would be rejected? Here's a simple proof, which even works under classical christian theology: Consider the act of creation as put forward by christian theology. God creates the universe. Question: Prior to the act of creation, was there a universe? The answer is a simple No. There was no universe in existence prior to the act of creation. This is obvious, and this is in fact the entire point behind the creation. Another question: Given the above, did god need to destroy a universe in order to create one? Again, the answer must logically be no - there was no universe present that could be destroyed. Thus, the ability or power to destroy a universe was unnecessary, since it could not have actually been applied. Therefore, an entity which had all the abilities of god, EXCEPT for that ability could also have gotten the job done. Thus omnipotence is unnecessary - a lesser being would suffice. Thus, by Occam's Razor, god is not omnipotent. QED. A similar argument holds for omniscience, and the knowledge of how to destroy a universe.
@danij5055
Жыл бұрын
"I'm familiar with Albert Einstein. Also apparently I can't even count to 3." Brilliant...
@simonkoster
Жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein also said (slightly parafrased) "Simplify your explanation as far as possible, but no further".
@AngryBoozer
Жыл бұрын
Weird thing to say though. How can you even do something more than it’s possible?
@davidhoughton2377
Жыл бұрын
He literally went “no life on Mars, god wins, end of”
@mikesommer1914
Жыл бұрын
Tom owes us all 30min of our lives back.
@formerfatboy90
Жыл бұрын
Came for the rationality, stayed for the “Life on Mars?” lyrics.
@psychologicalprojectionist
Жыл бұрын
Occam's Razor completely misstated! It is nothing about "understanding" or say anything about the truth of an assertion. It simply says "should be preferred". It accepts that a more complicated explanation could be right, but without evidence to rule out a simpler explanation, the simpler explanation is more likely.
@MicrobyteAlan
Жыл бұрын
70% of everyone will only understand 50% of this clip. 😳
@Mouse_007
Жыл бұрын
I'm 30% sure I understood 10%
@MicrobyteAlan
Жыл бұрын
@@Mouse_007 -I 100% agree with you
@cnault3244
Жыл бұрын
"Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14% of people know that." ~~Homer Simpson
@MicrobyteAlan
Жыл бұрын
@R Boland- exactly 😊 good one 👍
@johnmurrie8907
Жыл бұрын
Nonsense - everyone knows that 42% of statistics are made up! 🤣
@acidicsubstance
19 күн бұрын
This is a clear example of "having a degree does not mean someone is smart".
@jestermoon
Жыл бұрын
Take A Moment I've been to Mars my friend and I meet this girl who said she was a god of all god's I love her. Get Free Enjoy the time we have. Stay Safe Stay Free 🌐
@Leszek.Rzepecki
Жыл бұрын
I'll bet if they had found life on Mars, it would ALSO have been an argument for the existence of god! These apologists do love having it both ways.
@cnault3244
Жыл бұрын
Tom in Michigan has proved there is no life on Mars? Pity he didn't post a link to his peer-reviewed scientific paper that proves there is no life on Mars.
@ziploc2000
Жыл бұрын
Could have saved NASA billions in Mars Rovers.
@michelepowponne562
Жыл бұрын
He has a DEGREE in Earth Science for heavens sakes! A rare and precious thing. Please stop and bow to down to his advanced wisdom in Cosmology 😂
@nickwardmusic
Жыл бұрын
Patience of Job springs to mind lol
@Ozone280
Жыл бұрын
"Proving god with a telescope hasn't proved god" Proving god with my toenail fungus cream hasn't proved god either - and for the same reason.
@burkeyatm
Жыл бұрын
I’m 100% convinced that a supernatural entity could exist. However, until ANY proof for such a thing exists, I can discard it in the same way that I discard the existence of unicorns.
@ahh_yes_mr_bax
Жыл бұрын
This is what someone sounds like when they watch a lot of “documentaries” and think they are the smartest in the room. He actually starts out with a really terrible understanding of Occum’s Razor, then violates Occum’s Razor for almost the entire rest of the call.
@carolinenagel7085
Жыл бұрын
This one is as funny is the one with Genevieve and Katie talking to - well, making fun of, to be fair - Billy from Texas. Both made me laugh so hard my sides hurt.
@greeneyedlady5580
Жыл бұрын
Ooh, I'll have to search for that one!
@cryptofacts4u
Жыл бұрын
Says he has a definition that is three parts, the third part is actually three things, so it's more like a five-part definition
@freddan6fly
Жыл бұрын
Not sure he can count.
@gokblok
4 ай бұрын
"JMIKE ARE YOU LISTENING?" 😂😂😂
@joykeebler1916
Жыл бұрын
To Joann Brady: Remember - David Bowie said there were spiders on Mars (little of a laugh) - lol
@robertjenkins2578
3 ай бұрын
I think Tom holds the concept of god tenaciously. He is hoping to discover sufficient, convincing evidence for his hope. He is honest enough to say that he can’t point to anything that others can also point to and say “There it is!”
@juanjoseescanellas3798
3 ай бұрын
You know?, I liked your approach, clarity, patience, kindness, and communication style.
@GokuOverJesus
Жыл бұрын
The Dunning-Kruger in full effect.
@callmeflexplays
Жыл бұрын
Just a bloviating gibberish generator. When he said, "there's a logic here", he was clearly mistaken.
@dobrien51
Жыл бұрын
Tom’s college needs to revoke his degree no matter what it is in.
@i_perpetuated_a_white_savi344
Жыл бұрын
None of Tom's responses have anything to do anything the hosts are asking. They're complete non sequiturs. He almost sounds like someone suffering from a schizophrenia or a psychosis. It's also common with people who have Alzheimer's and certain types of dementia. After listening to this call, I'm sort of concerned for his mental health.
@thomastrinkle2294
Жыл бұрын
We’ve only explored a tiny tiny portion of Mars.
@psychedelicicecream3613
Жыл бұрын
This guy went so far out of his way to connect dots that just simply don't connect
@sausagemahoney7525
Жыл бұрын
I think it was the first time he mentioned “they didn’t find life on Mars” that I realised it was an argument from incredulity, which would have been a perfect time to explain that fallacy to him. I think it would have saved about 15mins
@boianko
Жыл бұрын
Honestly the caller genuinely sounds like they might be suffering from some sort of psychosis. The way he draws all these seemingly unrelated theories together in some complex logical web, that he himself says other people are unable to understand (though he attributes it to using "complex words"). It's sad really, he probably isn't this nonsensical when he is in his right mind.
@joykeebler1916
Жыл бұрын
Spiders in reference to dried up river beds - so-to-might-have-been on Mars.
@petebetz5358
Жыл бұрын
All I can say is, you guys may not believe in God but you have the patience of the saints!
I immediately got r/iamverysmart vibes from tom, haven't watched all the way through yet but I imagine he's gonna be very arrogant even though he was wrong about occam's razor
@vooveks
Жыл бұрын
3:25 I’m not the only one who thinks JMike likes to bust out those five dollar words a bit too much, then…?
@fullTimeVeganinOhio
Жыл бұрын
Shouldn't he have just stopped his argument at the beginning when he didn't understand Occam's razor?
@carncats07
Жыл бұрын
30:31, absolute genius Bowie drop!!!! And again 2 min later.
@jbibro
6 ай бұрын
“I know this is complicated but I’m trying to keep it simple.” 🤔
@josephmayfield945
26 күн бұрын
Bro thinks he’s waaaaaay smarter than he is. 😂
@LassieSgr
Жыл бұрын
God is One, and everything in all the universities and all the "heavens" is within God. There is no place without God
@BlarglemanTheSkeptic2
Жыл бұрын
Here, have a 🥕. You sound like you need one! May Holy Unicorn bless you, my child. *NEIGHMEN!*
@roscius6204
Жыл бұрын
So, god is everything.... can't argue with that. Because it's just a different name for everything
@seanmeehan5955
Жыл бұрын
This is so sad. This poor guy is struggling so hard to articulate his position that I actually feel for him.
@Canthavemybones
Жыл бұрын
I couldn’t follow this call at all. I have no idea what he was trying to convey.
@Mouse_007
Жыл бұрын
I would be worried about you if you did understand him.
@cnault3244
Жыл бұрын
I thin k he was speaking in tongues.
@freddan6fly
Жыл бұрын
Not sure he was trying to convey anything.
@davidgaunt5018
Жыл бұрын
I don't think I've ever heard a more muddled, perplexing argument on this or any other atheist call-in show. How the hell does the absence of life on Mars prove anything other than that observation? His spurious connections and reasoning are completely baffling.
@latinzane
4 ай бұрын
Theres more evidence the life may have existed on Mars than god exists. After all, evidence of water has been detected.
@MrBrowsin
Жыл бұрын
This guy is adorable, I hope he calls again
@thewhitness21
Жыл бұрын
Also, it's not Io, it's Europa that we suspect might have life under the ice. It's super fascinating and has to do with the moon being stretched and unstretched by the gravity of Jupiter and the effect that has upon geothermal vents on the seafloor. Something we know can support life on earth. Homie is circling the drain in these concepts and doesn't really seem to grasp them...
@smochygrice465
Жыл бұрын
Winner 🏆 The no life on mars totally sold me God..., 😂🤣🥳
@kindredsoul79
Жыл бұрын
Classic example of a person who had learned a lot of facts, without being taught as a child to understand what new facts mean. God of the gaps fallacy.
Пікірлер: 465