The Type 055 vastly outclasses the Zumwalt. Here's why its better: 1. It has an actual naval gun with ammo to fire. 2. It's cheaper to build. 3. It's lighter and smaller. 4. It has better anti-air capability. 5. It's faster (I think) 6. Its ammo for its guns don't cost $850,000 each. 7. There's a lot more of them. 8. It's much cheaper to operate annually. 9. It has 32 more VLS cells. 10. It has a dedicated long-range, volume-search, dual-band (C/S) radar. 11. Its hull doesn't constantly develop water leaks like the Zumwalt (the tumblehome hull needed to be riveted rather than welded, resulting in water leaks).
@TM-zo1nz
Жыл бұрын
Agreed. Not to mention that Zumwalt was meant to replace the Arleigh burke if I'm not mistaken, but most Arlight burke is still in service and USN continues to build more, which shows what a failure Zumwalt is. Type 055 is overall a much more reliable ship
@MrRonald1231
11 ай бұрын
Is the US, UK and it's Allies building more sophisticated Destroyers to date? . The Chinese are dead serious and the 055 is their answer.
@dustinksie1427
9 ай бұрын
After the emergence of the Type 055 destroyer, many countries in the world began to adopt the 055 design in their PPT pictures of new ships. China's plagiarism in weapons is shameful, but for those who hate it, this is indeed a universal rule: hate China, understand China, and become China.
@pewww99
2 жыл бұрын
zumwalt has been a joke for a long time and yet youtube military "experts" still somehow think its the best destroyer lmao
@matthewwalker367
2 жыл бұрын
Yes the Zumwalt didn't live up to expectations but it is still a very capable platform and the stealth capability can come in handy.
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
@@matthewwalker367 The French have a radar that can that can detect jet-skis from over 200km away. Ain't no way stealth is going to compensate for the Zumwalt's massive shortcomings.
@dotsanddash8083
2 жыл бұрын
Kolkata class destroyers are no more the largest class of destroyers in the Indian navy, now it's vishakapatnam class destroyers.
@Praveenvish789
2 жыл бұрын
Indian navy improve all technology and made more advanced features destroyer.
@ALWH1314
2 жыл бұрын
Both Japanese and Korean ships are just enlarged american destroyer, same weapons, same radar, same look.
@Honest888-e4g
Жыл бұрын
To be honest, Type 055 is the top 1, not zumwalt
@奇门道
2 жыл бұрын
Type 055❤️
@陈文辉-u5z
Жыл бұрын
055 should be top1, 052D should be at least top 5
@smarangourav
2 жыл бұрын
Sir u didn't mention the Indian INS VISHAKAPATNAM class destroyer
@shamanbhattacharyya9285
2 жыл бұрын
True.
@aqsunqar
2 жыл бұрын
VISHAKAPATNAM is "DESTROYER" with Frigate capable firepower😝
@rohitb5834
2 жыл бұрын
@@aqsunqar lol it packs more firepower than other Destroyers of similar weight class.
@pranavsivakumar3873
2 жыл бұрын
vishakhapatnam is not yet in service also it is same as kolkata in dimensions
@rohitb5834
2 жыл бұрын
@@pranavsivakumar3873 u need to update yourself
@ЛеонидКучеров-ц5щ
2 жыл бұрын
Is Zumwalt the first??? 1. Its propulsion system is unsuccessful because it was originally designed to supply electricity to the laser gun (which was never installed). 2. His main weapon is 2 155 mm cannons. She shoots special cartridges for $400,000 per shell. Meaning ??? 3. The shape of the case is interesting. But its seaworthiness is now at the level of an iron. 4. The huge superstructure on top is generally wooden. 5. A destroyer at the price of an aircraft carrier??? The result was incomprehensible nonsense. In order to drive the Arabs, it is too expensive. A serious opponent will simply sink this misunderstanding.
@Conan-ny1um
2 жыл бұрын
Every fact except the guns is wrong! And there both currently being removed for 16 cells to carry the Navy’s Hypersonic Missles.
@MrFlatage
2 жыл бұрын
@@Conan-ny1um Every fact is wrong, lmao! Epic trolling as always from you.
@matthewwalker367
2 жыл бұрын
Literally every single point you made is wrong.
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
@@matthewwalker367 Still shouldn't be in first.
@MegaLouLuo
Жыл бұрын
@@Conan-ny1umjust saying, there is no hypersonic missile in service yet. All in programs of development.
@sisphotothen2807
Жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, Zumuwalt is not currently equipped with ship-borne hypersonic anti-ship missiles, right? (U.S. hypersonic missiles have been announced in 2022, and the ship-borne version is in the near future. However, this still represents the shortcoming of the U.S., lagging behind China and Russia by at least 5 years) China's 055 destroyer is equipped with one of the most powerful anti-ship missile with threatening speed and penetration capability in the world, that is, the Chinese YJ21 (another one is the Russian Zircon missile, but the trajectory pattern of Zircon is different from that of the YJ21). The unit price of Zumuwalt is 10-12 times expensive as that of 055, and the threat to the aircraft carrier formation is not even as good as 055, which is already equipped with a large number of hypersonic missiles and dual-band radar. Instead, Zumuwalt focused on 2 naval main guns, which both the cost performance and development future was not comparable to that of anti-ship missiles. Moreover, the unit price of a 155mm advanced naval gun shell reaches 0.8 to 1 million US dollars (the unit price of YJ21 is about 1.8 million US dollars), so i think it is better to equip it with Tomahawk cruise missle to alleviate its shortcomings. In short, the birth of Zumuwalt is a pity. It has many very advanced technologies, but its strategic thought is quite backward.
@glli80
2 жыл бұрын
#1 Zumwalt, you kidding me? You won't see this type will be built anymore, a total failure product.
@xy.j8294
2 жыл бұрын
it's truth
@jwzjwz2003cn
Жыл бұрын
052D should earn a spot after all the Aegis destroyers.
@TM-zo1nz
Жыл бұрын
🙌
@alanmoore2197
2 жыл бұрын
I think you will find that the Royal Navy's biggest vessel isn't a destroyer - and never has been...
@pranavsivakumar3873
2 жыл бұрын
ever wonder where izumo class is with 27000t full load and so is hyuga class with 19000t
@kamikaze.7607
2 жыл бұрын
Those both are helicopter carriers not a destroyer.
@andrewzheng4038
2 жыл бұрын
lol i don't think anybody except for the Japanese call them destroyers, and even then the Japanese only call them destroyers for legal reasons
@pranavsivakumar3873
2 жыл бұрын
@@kamikaze.7607 they are classified as destroyers
@tgsgardenmaintenance4627
2 жыл бұрын
Don't think anyone fell for the Monica of destroyer for these vessels! 🤣
@katherineberger6329
2 жыл бұрын
They're respectively an aircraft carrier and a helicopter carrier. They're not really destroyers in the traditional sense as they have no offensive gun and their missiles are limited to self-defense missiles only.
@jeromesuliva9801
2 жыл бұрын
Pls do another one but this time it's about the largest frigates in the world
@josephjun4688
Жыл бұрын
Top 10 Destroyers & Cruiser in the world 2022 1、Kirov Class BattleCruiser 2、Zumwalt Class 3、TYPE 055 CLASS 4、ARLEIGH BURKE 3 5、Ticonderoga Class Cruiser 6、SEJONG THE GREAT 7、Maya Class 8、ARLEIGH BURKE 2A 9、TYPE 052D CLASS ( The YJ-21 is a Chinese hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile ) 10、Slava Class Cruiser or Vishakapatnam Class or ATAGO CLASS
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
Zumwalt shouldn't even be on the list, it lacks torpedos, powerful anti-ship missiles; a long-range volume search radar; and lacks an impressive amount of VLS cells.
@stc2828
2 жыл бұрын
Funny how No1 is a white elephant
@artistjoh
2 жыл бұрын
Considering how easily Ukraine has been sinking Russian warships it shows that listing armaments is not the measure of how powerful a warship is. Crew quality and training, and ship maintenance are even more important than a long list of weapons. I would have put the Australian Hobart class Air Warfare Aegis equiped Destroyers ahead of the Russian ships. Russian navy surface ships can’t fire weapons from Davy Jone’s Locker, and even a country without a real navy is able to sink Russian warships.
@fabricemartin5561
4 ай бұрын
Considering how russian destroy US and NATO equipement i think they re all suks!!
@donald8050
2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately DDG1000 have made some compromises amendments to reduce its operation costs and stealth … otherwise definitely 10/10
@yusufmartapura6702
2 жыл бұрын
Italia & francis Horizon class destroyer??
@yours9192
2 жыл бұрын
Consider visakhapatnam destroyer more powerful than Kolkata class.
@katherineberger6329
2 жыл бұрын
The Flight IIA Arleigh Burke-class destroyers/cruisers are so different from the originals that they should really be called the Oscar Austin-class (lead ship: DDG-79 USS Oscar Austin).
@TM-zo1nz
Жыл бұрын
Still the same platform though, even the Flight 3 now, just changes on radar, etc
@katherineberger6329
Жыл бұрын
@@TM-zo1nz *stares in Spruance, Kidd, and Ticonderoga classes*
@chopchop894
2 жыл бұрын
Love your videos but how tf you got the zumwalt class at no.1 the guns are useless because they can't get ammo for them. Pretty sure they've got no plans to build anymore.
@aqsunqar
2 жыл бұрын
This video is about a size of vessels not firepower sir.
@thomaszhang3101
2 жыл бұрын
I mean, it is the biggest tho.
@thomaszhang3101
2 жыл бұрын
@Austin Carr no, Zumwalt is just not designed for today’s world. It was meant for costal engagements assuming that the US navy will continue to be unchallenged. No amount of accessories can correct the flaw (or error in judgement) in its design.
@thomaszhang3101
2 жыл бұрын
@Austin Carr I’m just saying that the Zumwalt was not suited to the environment of today.
@chopchop894
2 жыл бұрын
@Austin Carr well you're clearly not capable of having a civilised conversation with someone without being racist...I'm guessing you're from Texas lol.
@ENGBriseB
2 жыл бұрын
If this is about size then so be it. But the HMS Type 45s have just had a big refit. They've been fitted out with Sea Captor missiles system. Guided missile and more. The Type 45 gets better weapons and Rolls-Royce engines in 2021 & 2022 with a top speed of 37 mph or 32kn.
@garwhittaker3743
2 жыл бұрын
Not yet....
@tusharcanchi5521
2 жыл бұрын
Another heated debate 👍
@aestheticallyprottoy6588
2 жыл бұрын
We want to see best submarines videos also
@MrFlatage
2 жыл бұрын
How? No one has seen a d/e Perisher for over 7 decades. How are they going to make a video???
@semineutral
2 жыл бұрын
Anyone thinks we should classify certain 'Destroyers' as 'Cruiser' based in tonnage
@themc.kennyshow6585
2 жыл бұрын
I think if its over like 10-11,ooo tonnes, it should be a cruiser.
@TribusMontibus
2 жыл бұрын
The discussion on designations is very subjective. No absolute yardsticks apply. They went out with the Washington Treaty
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
No, destroyers and cruisers have different roles. We don't call modern fighter jets 'heavy fighters' now, do we? (heavy fighters were typically 2 engined aircraft with forward mounted guns, they were also known as 'bomber hunters'. An aircraft example would be the german Bf-110)
@1FATBOY114
Жыл бұрын
those to advanced 155 mm guns are they the same ones that the Navy has no ammunition for and no plans to procure any ammunition for.
@mayowa60
Жыл бұрын
Aren't the zumwalt destroyers seen as useless and Aren't they being decommissioned?
@thqngjdb5832
2 жыл бұрын
You should have included Sejong the Great class instead of kongo
@陈文辉-u5z
Жыл бұрын
055 is the real number one, zumwalt is just a joke
@flamezealous
2 жыл бұрын
Daring class? Biggest in the Royal navy?? Bigger than HMS Queen Elizabeth and Charles???
@劉浩霆-c4j
Жыл бұрын
No type 052D?
@ganboonmeng5370
Жыл бұрын
Zumwat ? My foot...the Type 55 is top !
@ssss8162
Жыл бұрын
Zumwalt's deck looks a little bare.
@daweinie5157
Жыл бұрын
British 45 type is the most advanced ones, they are the only all electricity driven one in the world
@brentbeacham9691
2 жыл бұрын
These videos will become watched 1000xS more often once Russia attacks Ukraine.
@刘禹辰-l2x
2 жыл бұрын
先知
@Jai_BharatMata
2 жыл бұрын
Destroyers....I wonder why They Are called that...
@pranavsivakumar3873
2 жыл бұрын
when torpedoes were first invented the biggest ships could be sunk by small boats carrying torpedoes. this is when a ship the size of torpedo boats but armed with guns came into service. their job was to destroy torpedo boats and protect big ships. they were called torpedo boat destroyers then shortened to destroyers
@TribusMontibus
2 жыл бұрын
The discussion on designations is very subjective. No absolute yardsticks apply. They went out with the Washington Treaty
@shawnhe6180
Жыл бұрын
you kidding me the Zumwalt line No.1😂
@angelomendoza1174
Жыл бұрын
I don't think the Zumwalt class destroyers doesn't have smart ammunitions for the AGS anymore, their main guns were practically useless. They will replace to carry hypersonic cruise missiles for the job. Oh! And The Sejong The Great class destroyers should've been number 1 on this list.
@sshray1115
2 жыл бұрын
Given the reputation, this is an ill-researched video commentary good for juveniles.
@killerabdenour1409
2 жыл бұрын
But why are the Japanese and Korean destroyers in their design so similar to the American destroyers?
@Joshua-dt5vi
2 жыл бұрын
The US license their design to the Koreans and Japanese.
@lloydzufelt7514
Жыл бұрын
I just wish you could add their price
@matthewwalker367
2 жыл бұрын
In terms of costs Destroyers are cheaper than Cruisers or Carriers.
@googlegold8229
2 жыл бұрын
Сделай пожалуйста топ 10 лучших противотанковых ракет
@thefrog7854
Жыл бұрын
Where is maya?
@RedboRF
2 жыл бұрын
>what is Slava Class >what is Gorshkov class >what is Kirov class
@stc2828
2 жыл бұрын
Destroyer?
@Zichoe
2 жыл бұрын
slava is cruiser gorshkov is frigate kirov is battlecruiser
@plep1046
2 жыл бұрын
> what is a Destroyer
@TribusMontibus
2 жыл бұрын
The discussion on designations is very subjective. No absolute yardsticks apply. They went out with the Washington Treaty
@yang5159
2 жыл бұрын
Zumwalt defective
@louvement4860
2 жыл бұрын
Where is Horizon class ?
@chopchop894
2 жыл бұрын
Hobart class?
@kylelingjiang3252
Жыл бұрын
where is China PLAN type 052D ?
@ymtjaycegamboa1093
2 жыл бұрын
What about most powerful destroyer
@shamanbhattacharyya9285
2 жыл бұрын
Possibly type 055 or sejong the great
@xredds
2 жыл бұрын
@@shamanbhattacharyya9285 100 percent sejon the great
@xredds
2 жыл бұрын
@Austin Carr well I mean yea but South Koreas sejon the great class are just highly advanced Arleigh Burke classes
@timetraveller8895
2 жыл бұрын
@Austin Carr CCP BOT??
@johnsilver9338
2 жыл бұрын
Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III are undoubtedly the top. For one It has the most powerful AN/SPY-6 radar that can be fitted on a ship. Even the previous AN/SPY-1D(V) is comparable if not a bit better than Type 346A. China's Type 055 destroyer with its Type 346B radar is roughly the same to UK's Type 45 destroyer's SAMPSON and S1850M/SMART-L radar in terms of detection range. Also Zumwalt's RCS can only be reduced to a small fishing boat. Other destroyers will certainly have a bigger RCS no doubt. Plus even if ships are as stealthy like 5th gen planes or a bumble bee, it's useless anyway as Tomahawk is also an anti-radiation missile that can detect and lock-on on enemy ships' radar emissions. Third, while Burke has fewer VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. It also carries SM-6 for both ballistic interception and air defense, but can also target land and sea at medium range. This means Burke can have anti-ship/land attack missile for each of its 96 VLS while still retaining air defense and BMD capabilities. The same can't be said for other destroyers with missiles built for only one purpose. Type 055 has CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for medium range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. Sejong the Great have Hyunmoo III for long range land attack but it don't have medium-long range anti-ship missile. Japanese destroyers on the other hand don't carry land attack cruise missiles but Maya has a medium-long range anti-ship missile with its Type 17. But Sejong, Maya, and Atago also use Mk 41 VLS, so they could also get the same multi-purpose Tomahawk and/or SM-6.
@INDIAN-th1sm
Жыл бұрын
Chennai ❤
@vietletien2794
2 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏👏
@fangxusun1723
Жыл бұрын
Zumwalt is an embarrassment
@archarajrajendran4222
2 жыл бұрын
Atago is not 3 rd It is in 6
@andyguyuk1
2 жыл бұрын
Zumwalt just look awsome, intimidating as fk
@wtfgenos4836
2 жыл бұрын
055南波灣
@mv3592
2 жыл бұрын
USS Benson
@archarajrajendran4222
2 жыл бұрын
Where is vishakapatanam class
@1默然回首
2 жыл бұрын
052d哪去了
@陈文辉-u5z
Жыл бұрын
给别家留点活路
@xmar4497
Жыл бұрын
Zumwalt the worst
@sandhugaming117
2 жыл бұрын
where is kirov class
@aqsunqar
2 жыл бұрын
Soviet "Atlants" are nuclear powered cruisers actually.
@votpavel
2 жыл бұрын
Grosser kurfurst enters the chat
@Vinzwak
2 жыл бұрын
Philippines had 15 destroyer
@adiyafanny876
2 жыл бұрын
😂🤣
@adiyafanny876
2 жыл бұрын
😂🤣
@陈文辉-u5z
Жыл бұрын
😅😅😅
@uniquefriendship6777
2 жыл бұрын
Good luck Russia 🔝
@donaldhill2972
2 жыл бұрын
Sinkable.
@master-gu5ld
2 жыл бұрын
arbes plees
@hardyanpajero69
2 жыл бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🚢🚢.
@ironchefa1
Жыл бұрын
怎么没有我们台湾国的沱江军舰?❤
@unknownsourceofficial6215
2 жыл бұрын
Were is rassian desteoyer
@marcd5196
2 жыл бұрын
in rassia
@archarajrajendran4222
2 жыл бұрын
Type 55 not in second it is in 4th
@jasonshen7600
2 жыл бұрын
ok what's in second then? name a single destroyer in the world better than it.
@johnsilver9338
2 жыл бұрын
Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III are undoubtedly the top. For one It has the most powerful AN/SPY-6 radar that can be fitted on a ship. Even the previous AN/SPY-1D(V) is comparable if not a bit better than Type 346A. China's Type 055 destroyer with its Type 346B radar is roughly the same to UK's Type 45 destroyer's SAMPSON and S1850M/SMART-L radar in terms of detection range. Also Zumwalt's RCS can only be reduced to a small fishing boat. Other destroyers will certainly have a bigger RCS no doubt. Plus even if ships are as stealthy like 5th gen planes or a bumble bee, it's useless anyway as Tomahawk is also an anti-radiation missile that can detect and lock-on on enemy ships' radar emissions. Third, while Burke has fewer VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. It also carries SM-6 for both ballistic interception and air defense, but can also target land and sea at medium range. This means Burke can have anti-ship/land attack missile for each of its 96 VLS while still retaining air defense and BMD capabilities. The same can't be said for other destroyers with missiles built for only one purpose. Type 055 has CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for medium range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. Sejong the Great have Hyunmoo III for long range land attack but it don't have medium-long range anti-ship missile. Japanese destroyers on the other hand don't carry land attack cruise missiles but Maya has a medium-long range anti-ship missile with its Type 17. But Sejong, Maya, and Atago also use Mk 41 VLS, so they could also get the same multi-purpose Tomahawk and/or SM-6.
@陈文辉-u5z
Жыл бұрын
Only an idiot who knows nothing about the military can say so.
@fraccozeta
Жыл бұрын
@@jasonshen7600 Indian ship😂
@jasonshen7600
Жыл бұрын
@@fraccozeta 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣So powerful it can even fire on itself lol
@johnmatthews8088
Жыл бұрын
Zumwalt is a joke they built 1 cos it dont work properly its missiles so expensive they cant use em should be off list also uk daring class is faster and has longer range than the arliegh burke so I find upsetting that this is down list when should be higher aiegh burke goes 30kn 17k range type 45 goes 32 kn range 18.5k the speed given on her is not correct I know this I travelled on a type 45 and seen it do 32 kn its weapons are very simple to us ship just uk ship is faster and longer range yet it kept down would please recognize the error on uk ship plz
@06588275
2 жыл бұрын
pretty sure he mentioned 2 russian destroyers that were the largest i guess in order they were
Пікірлер: 161