If I could design the perfect tank, it'd be: -Air droppable -Amphibious -
@Mmeetthhooss
11 ай бұрын
So the Swedish CV90?
@Marshmallow603
8 ай бұрын
@@Mmeetthhooss no unmanned turret, not amphibious
@EdyAlbertoMSGT3
Ай бұрын
Soo basically a Sprut-SD but modernized (it has several of the requeriments)
@patriotenfield3276
9 ай бұрын
Wait a minute ,this portion doesn't contain > M 41 walker Bulldog > Type 62 light Tank > Type 63 Light Tank > Sheridan Light Tank > Doosan K105 Light Tank > Kaplan Harimau Light Tank
@妳很懂的喔
2 жыл бұрын
It is unbelievable that some countries still use m24.
@dioscoroalvarado924
2 жыл бұрын
K21 105mm. Light tank of South Korea, Harimau 105mm of Indonesia, and the ASCOD II SABRAH 105mm
@dolezhangdole8114
2 жыл бұрын
Only prototype is produced
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
They are medium tank
@yujiinukai7609
2 жыл бұрын
Ascod 2 is light tank
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
How does a 45 ton beast became a light tank? Thought its based on light IFV. Sabrah is too heavy to be a light tank.
@tsarbombawithinternetconne875
2 жыл бұрын
@@Alwindar1 Yeah, i kinda got confused with their classification. The weight is 45-48 tons which is in the same level as the Japanese Type 10 MBT so why would they call it a light tank?
@patriotenfield3276
2 жыл бұрын
AMX-13 and PT-76 . Both Served Indian Army and IDF ( PT-76 captured ones) for many good years till the 90s-2000s. M24 Chaffee's Good too. But You know It's outdated. At by The time M41 Walker bulldog Arrived too late for paxtan.
@osmacar5331
Жыл бұрын
LTs used to be recon and light skirmish work. Mediums did exploitation, and heavies where the breakthrough spearhead.
@connerthecringe
2 жыл бұрын
"During the time of *the* World War Two, during the earlier years of *the* World War Two.."
@jammiedodger7040
2 жыл бұрын
I personally think we need a light tank again as I think they will be crucial in the next Big conflict as we need something we can air life like the scorpion (Britain)
@Jake-dh9qk
2 жыл бұрын
@@banger2998 Light tanks can go to terrains most MBT cant go and have firepower equal to MBTs... they are also easier to transport and fuel.
@Jake-dh9qk
2 жыл бұрын
@@banger2998 Can you name an example? Which ifv do you have in mind?
@WECR
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jake-dh9qk 🤣😂, se la hicíste 👍👍, you did it him.
@Jake-dh9qk
2 жыл бұрын
@@banger2998 Yhe Puma and Lynx IFV costs $9-10million per unit. Their weapons can't compete against MBT. They have rockets that are effective only up to a certain range and can be easily defeated by soft and hard kill protection systems. Their ammo is also limited and they are large bulky targets. K21, Bradley, and Warrior are subpar IFVs that are only designed to fight against other light vehicles and have outdated missiles as well as protection systems. They are slow and bulky as well. Please do some research before just saying random names of "modern" IFV. Average 105-120mm cannons can outrange any IFV by thousands of meters. They can also carry more ammunition, and are easier/cheaper to produce and maintain.
@Jake-dh9qk
2 жыл бұрын
@@banger2998 Can a MBT be less than 30ton? You seem to forget the main point of light tanks. Its not because of their speed, its because of their weight. It allows them to go to places a heavy 50ton mbt cant. It lets them cross bridges without needing specialized bridges, and allows them to be transported easier and faster too. IFV have completely different roles to light tanks because Light Tank is also a role, not just because of their weight class. Some IFVs can be used as a Light Tank but that depends on the country. The Light Tank role, as Ive said earlier, is similar to MBT role except that they can travel to more compromising terrain. They deal with the same enemy as MBT does, and avoid tank direct fire as possible. So in other words, they are basically tank destroyers relying on concealment and ability to go to locations most other tanks cant go. Modern example of Light Tanks are Cv90120, Type 15, Sprut SD, and the MPF light tank, and more from France and other countries.
@dioscoroalvarado924
2 жыл бұрын
The GDLS ASCOD II is a light medium tank with a turret of Italian Leonard HITFACT 105mm gun or the Elbit system turret SABRAH 105mm gun. future operator is the Philippines army select the ASCOD II SABRAH 105mm using the elbit system turret
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
Medium
@Random_Dude4486
2 жыл бұрын
@@Alwindar1 light medium, magaan na medium tank.
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
@@Random_Dude4486 45 tons is around same weight as some modern mbt like the mbt of japan.
@Random_Dude4486
2 жыл бұрын
@@Alwindar1 mbt's have a seperate role than Light or Light medium tanks.
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
@@Random_Dude4486 i know i just say that its weight is the same as lighter mbts.
@rvail136
2 жыл бұрын
Ummm never hear of the M41 Bulldog? Or the M8 Buford?
@KARTHIKEYAN-fq9oz
2 жыл бұрын
Sprut 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💪💪💪
@SpruceWood-NEG
Жыл бұрын
Only VT5/15 is a real tank here, and the others are only equipped with Anti-tank gun on the armored roof. And in the subsequent versions of the Type 15 tank in China, it is unmanned and the tank is truly consumable. In the face of heavy Man-portable anti-tank systems, there is no difference between M1A3 and 15 tanks. Only the number of mobile firepower is the future. China needs to produce at least 5000 units of 15 unmanned tanks as a consumable reserve.
@johaneslerius9074
Жыл бұрын
Yeah i love Sprut SDM-1 Made Russian❤❤❤
@matiasfrancocano4460
Жыл бұрын
The TAM is another very good tank
@mettingphom2497
2 жыл бұрын
lots of ❤️❤️❤️ for The Buzz 🐝
@bazbazi2745
8 ай бұрын
33 ton light tank ? yes yes very light
@claudiocontreras6955
Жыл бұрын
The japoneses type tank 74
@danareydanarey4222
2 жыл бұрын
next medium tank
@JorgeLopez-vg2yq
2 жыл бұрын
Al parecer, falto introducir o señalar en este material, a: Sueco:ikv-91. Usa: m-551(Sheridan).
@pankajsingh-rq3gr
2 жыл бұрын
South Korean Light tank not mentioned 🤔
@grandayatollah5655
2 жыл бұрын
Which one?
@pheonixshaman
2 жыл бұрын
Neither was the kaplan modern medium weight tank (Made by a joint venture between Turkey and Indonesia).
@pabloguesdon7507
Жыл бұрын
And where is the TAM ( Tanque Argentino Mediano ) ? 30 tons, 105 mm cannon.
@JorgeLopez-vg2yq
2 жыл бұрын
Oh, y tambien un gran olvidado (cv90-120).
@肖博诣
2 жыл бұрын
When I saw m24 in the thumbnail, there’s no way that I can take this vid seriously
@Sicario48monster
2 жыл бұрын
Nice video👍🏻
@Hatori_Mihail
2 жыл бұрын
where is CV90-120t??? it's worth it
@Jake-dh9qk
2 жыл бұрын
This is probably the best light tank and the video chose to put outdated ww2 tanks lol
@henryvagincourt4502
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jake-dh9qk It's not a tank, it's an IFV.
@marksnyder8022
2 жыл бұрын
@@henryvagincourt4502 It all depends on definitions. The CV90 family includes a base unit APC. When light main weapons are added, the vehicle becomes the IFV, designated CV90/XX, the XX being the size of the armament, for example the CV90/40 has a rapid fire Bofors 40mm gun. The CV90/120 is in most respects a light tank, its 120mm main gun being a cut down copy of the Rheinmetall 120mm gun in the Leopard 2 and the Abrams. This iteration of the CV90 has no room for infantry and enhanced armor. It might be the weight (+/- 40 tons in the Cv90/120) rules it out as a true "light" tank.
@AnimeGamer5390
2 жыл бұрын
1st like and 1st comment
@proAcepilotFA-XXnatonavy
2 жыл бұрын
:D
@AnimeGamer5390
2 жыл бұрын
@@proAcepilotFA-XXnatonavy :)
@khanhonam7196
2 жыл бұрын
But in Viet Nam we use PT 76 to destroy enemy tanks and forts
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
Wherever you heard that, it is partly incorrect. PT-76s did not destroy US tanks during the Vietnam war. 14 (possibly 15) PT-76s were destroyed by US forces during the war. 3 by a single recoiless rifle guarding the Lang Vieh special forces camp and 1 by shoulder fired antitank rockets (before the camp was overrun), 3 by US tanks, and 7 (possibly 8; sources differ) by missile-armed US helicopters. There was only a single tank-against-tank battle between North Vietnamese and US forces during the war. A PT-76 damaged 1 US tank (which was immediately put back into fighting condition) during a nighttime fight in which 2 PT-76s were destroyed. The 3rd PT-76 that was destroyed by a US tank had been done earlier by indirect fire, with an aircraft spotting the shots, an extremely unlikely method of tank engagement. The PT-76 was hit without a chance to shoot back, as the crew didn't even know they were going to be in a fight. Viet Cong and People's Army of Viet Nam did certainly destroy American tanks during the war, and I don't mean to put down their efforts, but it wasn't the PT-76 that was getting the kills.
@AlexanderTch
2 жыл бұрын
@@mikearmstrong8483 wherever you took that either your source propaganda or you lie. PT-76 destroyed a few american tanks during Vietnam war. On 3 of March, 1969 12 North-Vietnamese PT-76 attacked American camp Benhet. One PT-76 hit American M-48 Patton to the turret and it was destroyed. So, at least one American tank was destroyed by PT-76. At the end of 1973 South-Vietnamese tank brigade including 130 American tanks M-41 and M-48 attacked North-Vietnamese positions that defended sea port. One PT-76 (board number 704) destroyed 5 American tanks and damaged two of them, but after also was destroyed. it was first combat case of PT-76 tank ace. By the way both South-Vietnamese and American propaganda always wildly lied and lie. And only naive people believe it so blindly. Sometimes South-Vietnamese declared North-Vietnamese army tanks losses more that North -Vietnamese units had tanks.
@AlexanderTch
2 жыл бұрын
@@mikearmstrong8483 By the way, even T-34-85 managed to destroy a few American M-41 and M-48 during Vietnam war. If you are interested I can provide dates and places where it happened.
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
@@AlexanderTch The 3rd March 1969 battle that you refer to; the M-48 was NOT destroyed. It was hit on the turret, killing 2 men. Replacement crew were immediately found and the tank was back in action before the end of the battle. That was the ONLY tank-on-tank battle between US and NVA forces during the entire war. Whatever destroyed ARVN tanks, I really don't care. Edit: The turret hit mentioned did not penetrate the M-48s armor. It killed the tank commander who was standing up in his hatch, and the company commander who was standing on the tank next to the turret.
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
@@AlexanderTch Considering the gun on a PT-76 was completely incapable of penetrating the frontal armor of an M-48, I think the claim of a single PT-76 destroying 5 M-48s in a single engagement is BS propaganda, but I will do you the courtesy of researching that to see if there any possibility of truth. As for the M-41, a Vietnamese 12 year old with a slingshot could probably knock out one of those.
@kingmulu2822
2 жыл бұрын
How about Medium tank KAPLAN or Harimau from turkey and indonesian? 😳😅
@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365
2 жыл бұрын
These tank are quite small :))
@bestestusername
2 жыл бұрын
In built up areas, forested and mountainous areas these are all toast to a couple of guys with an anti tank missle
@DOI_ARTS
Жыл бұрын
No Elbit Sabra?
@Twirlyhead
2 жыл бұрын
Light tanks of lttle use in a modern army but still of use in some third world situations though even the ubiquitous RPG-7 can see them off. The exception is the British Scorpion, Scimitar variant actually, because its primary use is as a recce vehicle not as a tank but the British themselves moving onto more advanced modern recce solutions in the near future. Germany has introduced the Wiesel AFV which is an air transportable retro tankette thing but to me looks like an anachronistic rehash of a failed concept and a liability on a modern battlefield.
@chenkzarsenio8183
2 жыл бұрын
2S25 SPRUT-SD itu tak termasuk light tank,,,??!
@Ivan_IvanbI4
2 жыл бұрын
Type 15 (33 tonnes) - Light tank?
@qbz95love
2 жыл бұрын
In China, yes. The enemies of ztq15 are mainly swampy and jungle Southeast Asia (impossible) and India (very likely) occupying a lot of plateau terrain. India lacks agile modern armored vehicles/light tanks, and the deployment of main battle tanks (even if it is difficult to support logistical maintenance and maneuver) becomes the only option. In order to face the t72/t90 directly, the ztq15 chose to greatly increase the frontal armor and sacrifice the side armor. It can almost achieve the same protection ability as the old ztz99 on the front, but almost no protection on the side, and upgrade the artillery and on-board computer and engine. , these all add to the weight of the ztq15. Although the weight of the ztq15 is heavier, this is to deal with the special battlefield - the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and the frontal threat of the main battle tank (even if it is an old-fashioned one). Compared with its main enemy, it is indeed a small man.
@개구리-j3t
2 жыл бұрын
맙소사 북한군 경전차가 4위라니....
@MrCastodian
2 жыл бұрын
Wow, Type 15 at second spot under Sprut and first place, how? It’s not even comparable. And btw, Sprut is a tank destroyers, not a Tank.
@vovin8132
2 жыл бұрын
You're wrong, the Sprut is a light tank designed for paradrops with the VDV. It's armament is designed to be modular where some versions have a "tank destroyer" calibre gun or a mortar system. The term tank destroyer is very ambiguous these days and while half the tanks on this list would qualify as tank destroyers in Cold War era, actual tank destroyer role these days is relegated to ATGM platforms.
@haikalhadzik7744
2 жыл бұрын
Not only the Sprut Tank are amphibious, it also weild 125mm smoothbore gun while type 15 only had 105mm rifled tank gun
@haikalhadzik7744
2 жыл бұрын
and it also twice as light with only 16 tons
@haikalhadzik7744
2 жыл бұрын
which could be air-dropped
@haikalhadzik7744
2 жыл бұрын
It had a very good firepower and versatile option to deployed, but if your looking for a heavily armored tank then look for T90M or T-14 [Main Battle Tanks]
@nedimharacic1809
2 жыл бұрын
There is high caliber cv90
@sergio7985
2 жыл бұрын
TAM??
@d.h.n2678
2 жыл бұрын
TANK K-21 ?? 25 TONS SUR COREA
@AndroPro-kf2oz
Жыл бұрын
cv90120 should be no.1
@mindq4328
2 жыл бұрын
Fakkkin love it
@fouly1981
2 жыл бұрын
CV90 ??
@gregorioenriquez358
2 жыл бұрын
#04 Shin’ Heinz. No Built 666 ? LOL!
@moodtazeech1590
2 жыл бұрын
Thailand💪🏻
@BenyoSid
2 жыл бұрын
Hi Buzz, 🐝😁✌️
@semdavidanger
2 жыл бұрын
Oh,. My,.
@ericlakota1847
2 жыл бұрын
I'll bet that type 15 is amazing china make some dam reliable low coast macheanery I hate to admit it amarican farmer some of their tractors we bought almost as a gamble the price was right ye their chincy creature comfort but the motor and drive train and up keep is amazing barely ever break and the parts are cheep easy to fix
@mrxxavier9081
2 жыл бұрын
More like ancient tank lol..light tank is like ascod sabrah kaplan mt
@ericlakota1847
2 жыл бұрын
North korea shin young still have all the original oil they came with haha can't feed their own soldiers
@ericlakota1847
2 жыл бұрын
Theas small tanks are awsome the us started with shermen but the British tool it to next level 3 small tanks are better then 1 big tank the way wars are today I think small tank will be better tank if they are reliable
@dc-4ever201
2 жыл бұрын
Sabre? Surely you mean the Scimitar? I don't recall the UK having a scout tank called Sabre in recent history.
@thebuzz4108
2 жыл бұрын
It's a variant
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
Scimitar was the previous Scorpion variant with the 30mm gun, now replaced by Saber.
@dc-4ever201
2 жыл бұрын
@@mikearmstrong8483 Yeah a bit confusing as when Ajax was announced a senior Army ofgicer was on TV stating it was replacing Scimitar.
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
@@dc-4ever201 Yes, it gets confusing. Because Ajax didn't have a Scimitar or a Saber; he had a large club, and was attempting to replace (well, kill actually) Hector.
@tankiesontour
2 жыл бұрын
@@mikearmstrong8483 Sabre was a Fox turret fitted to a Scorpion hull and these was replaced by Scimitar.
@nedimharacic1809
2 жыл бұрын
All of those till n.korean Light tank (not scorpion/sabre) are not deserving of their positions
@eakphotobangkok7413
2 жыл бұрын
ประเทศไทย ไม่แพ้ใครในโลก
@Primeradox
2 жыл бұрын
ผมอยากจะบอกว่า เราซื้อมาจาก สหรัฐอเมริกา :|
@mikes.4136
10 ай бұрын
Yes - Thailand is the sole operator of the Stingray tank. It is a very sound design. 😊
@bibinthomas5282
2 жыл бұрын
Hows type 15 light tank when it's 33tons lmao
@deslow7411
2 жыл бұрын
"A light tank is a tank variant initially designed for rapid movements in and out of combat, to harass and outmaneuver heavier tanks." "The Type 15 is designed to fulfill the requirement for a lighter, more mobile modern tank that can effectively operate in highland/plateau, woodland and water-rich regions where the heavier Type 99 and Type 96 main battle tanks might have difficulties traversing." Wikipedia
@bibinthomas5282
2 жыл бұрын
@@deslow7411 tanks weighing from 20-25 are light tanks , between 30 to 50 medium,and the ones above 50 are heavy tanks..... Source:google☺️☺️☺️
@MH-sq8zz
2 жыл бұрын
@@bibinthomas5282 over 50 is a super heavy👍
@victorbuturoaga6220
2 жыл бұрын
@@bibinthomas5282 So M-1 ABRAMS is a heavy tank when it is a MBT?
@Rebellion90s
2 жыл бұрын
@@bibinthomas5282 And those are by what standard? M26 Pershing were initially a heavy tank but later reclassified as a medium tank due to change of standard. IS-2 weighted around 40's tons so it's a medium tank, right?
@defencenewsbangladesh5810
2 жыл бұрын
Can I upload your videos on Facebook page???
@txvsherman5995
2 жыл бұрын
i dont think stingray tank is thailand, it US
@delmarlewis8897
2 жыл бұрын
Built by Cadillac Gage lost to the M8 which in turn was cancelled now its refurbished in competion with the Griffin for the mobile protective firepower for the airborne guys
@Vadim-gi4sg
10 ай бұрын
Все они слабые по отношению к минам
@abrarabid1740
2 жыл бұрын
Not agree with you
@yujiinukai7609
2 жыл бұрын
Ascod 2 of Israel
@benganchan1420
2 жыл бұрын
Sitting ducks for drone attacks
@proAcepilotFA-XXnatonavy
2 жыл бұрын
3rd comment
@IhsanurRahman-l7c
Жыл бұрын
Uuuuuu
@mztk8558
2 жыл бұрын
2st comment
@علینخعی-ز7ن
2 жыл бұрын
🌹🌹👏👏✌️✌️✌️
@hernangallo307
2 жыл бұрын
🇺🇸👽👍
@stmary5
2 жыл бұрын
Army tanks have more fire power in the United States Army
@haikaloronsentnel138
2 жыл бұрын
CH!NA TYPES 15 L!GHTS TANK IT'S THE BEST!!!
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
This video is 2 days old at the time of this comment, and claims the M-24 Chaffee is still in service in several countries. It was actually retired by Uruguay, the last active user, 3 years ago. This is what happens when some "KZitem professor" doesn't do any research other than looking up and quoting directly from wikipedia, which will accept inaccurate entries from any unqualified idiot, and are rarely updated.
@Russian288
2 жыл бұрын
next medium tank
@vovin8132
2 жыл бұрын
No such thing as a "medium tank" since WWII. You either have light tanks or main battle tanks.
@sergio7985
2 жыл бұрын
@@vovin8132 En ea categoría de tanque medio están el TAM "TANQUE ARGENTINO MEDIANO" , LEOPARD 1.. etc.
@EdyAlbertoMSGT3
Ай бұрын
@@sergio7985 El TAM tecnicamente queda como tanque ligero, el Leopard 1 es demasiado viejo para la clasificación
@AbdulRehmanhec_
2 жыл бұрын
You missed Kaplan Tank
@Elbereth_TV
2 жыл бұрын
" 2 build, 1 prototype" i wonder why.
@chenkzarsenio8183
2 жыл бұрын
kaplan or harimau turki and indonesia 🇮🇩 joint
@hcjet
2 жыл бұрын
Type 15 ≠ VT5, it's 38 tons fully loaded
@Anonymous-pw3se
2 жыл бұрын
What are the main difference and how do they affect, can you elaborate? Is vt5 much worse than type 15?
@valerilazarev1647
5 ай бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/pJdtz6angJV3qn4 kzitem.info/news/bejne/pJdtz6angJV3qn4 And the unmanned light robot - the Alpar tank?
@braddbradd5671
5 ай бұрын
zorawar India's light tank should be second its better than the Chinese one as it can operate at a higher level in the mountains and is lighter and faster and longer distance with the same fire power and ammo and has more electronic communications and radar .The capabilities of the new light tank will also be enhanced by artificial intelligence, integration with swarm drones for increased situational awareness, loitering ammunition for high lethality, and an active protection system.and explosive armor
@user-ca73lzby8u
3 ай бұрын
There are no such things as light tanks. All of them are medium tanks
@JoseLopez-xu8ue
Жыл бұрын
Mini gun on the top but machine gun too many tanks can be used in Ukraine because of new theory's of use of tank
@JorgeLopez-vg2yq
2 жыл бұрын
En mi opinion, el Sabre es una reiteracion del Scorpion, y el Shaffee esta fuera de este contexto, creo que el (Ikv91 y el M551 Sheridan) tienen mas, un espacio merecido en esta lista, saludos.
@mikearmstrong8483
2 жыл бұрын
The Saber is a reiteration of the older Scimitar, which was a variant of the Scorpion. There were also personnel carrier, antitank missile, armored ambulance, and command versions of the Scorpion. All had different names that started with "S". The M-551 Sheridan doesn't easily fit into any category. It was sort of an air-mobile tank destroyer pressed into service as a tank in Vietnam. The reason I say this is because a light tank should have a usable gun. The Sheridan did not. It had a 152mm gun meant to fire either a high explosive antitank round or a Shillelagh guided antitank missile. The vehicle was so light that firing the gun with the antitank round knocked the missile guidance system out of use almost every time.
@andycroager8850
3 ай бұрын
The Sabre is the Scorpion with a Fox turret fitted with a 30mm gun the same as the Scimitar
@andycroager8850
3 ай бұрын
The were many light tanks between the world wars
@start3215
7 ай бұрын
Light tank 2c25 Sprut in service in the Airborne Forces since 2009. Landing with the crew provided ....Russian airborne force /watch?v=QgcejpYkxgc
@shivguna9761
2 жыл бұрын
Buzzu u r Israeli ?
@Knightmare919
2 жыл бұрын
Wheeled tank destroyers has completely replace most light tanks they are far cheeper and easy to maintain.
@ericlakota1847
2 жыл бұрын
Your buggin the some of thease tanks are faster and more reliable if you think about it tracks are amazing this day age they go down the road 60mph and tank is only 2wheel drive drive train with a tough track watch those british tanks flying down highway blowing doors off their heavy attack trucks at 40mph
@ericlakota1847
2 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought too tell is watch UK army games
@hillaryisorena4283
2 жыл бұрын
You missed the Sabrah Light Tank of Israel
@kk-gr3ly
2 жыл бұрын
Isn't it modified M60 MBT?
@hillaryisorena4283
2 жыл бұрын
@@kk-gr3ly NOpe
@crimeo1557
2 жыл бұрын
@@kk-gr3ly Nope
@crimeo1557
2 жыл бұрын
@@kk-gr3ly Search Sabra light tank
@กําลังใช้งาน-ซ2ค
2 жыл бұрын
อันดับสามแรร์ไอเทม ขนาดผู้ผลิตยังไม่มีครอบครอง
@Rebellion90s
2 жыл бұрын
ไม่มีกับไม่เอานี่คนละเรื่องนะครับ
@erolertugrul8896
2 жыл бұрын
You are ignorant or intentionally giving deficient information, as always. Please seach properly and do this kind of comparison. You miss "Kaplan" or "Harimau" lightweight tank.
@Alwindar1
2 жыл бұрын
Medium tank
@ActiveChildGunner87
2 жыл бұрын
Harimau is a medium tank
@erolertugrul8896
2 жыл бұрын
@@ActiveChildGunner87 Tanks are not devided as light, medium and heavy. Medium tanks are using for fire support and help for main battle tanks (mbt). Yes harimau is medium tank but don't confuse! All tanks in this video are medium tank. Armored fighting vehicles are light, such as Stryker.
@indianman84950
2 жыл бұрын
No have top 10 any Indian tank , why?
@worlddefenceupdates6649
2 жыл бұрын
DRDO and L&T building busy in designing right now.
@макслюлюкин
2 жыл бұрын
does the author of the channel really consider a Chinese tank weighing 33 tons to be a light tank? Soviet t55.t 62 tanks weighing 36 tons were considered medium tanks, and the T-64A weighing 38 tons was classified as the world's first main battle tank, that is, a tank combining the armament and armor of a heavy tank and mobility and specific power per ton of weight from an average tank. And all these tanks had anti-shell booking. A light tank, by definition, cannot hold anything larger than 50 mm, and even less with modern guns and shells.
@mr.nobody6059
2 жыл бұрын
it's chinese it self that considered it as a light tank. the classification is not solid, depending to the country that use them.
@TK-pl9cu
2 жыл бұрын
Because it has a 1000hp engine which makes it light enough
@злойкот-г1т
2 жыл бұрын
Sprut 18 tons and a full 125 mm tank gun! How can the caliber determine the classification of the tank?
@DoitsuRyoku
2 жыл бұрын
Weaponry, armor or weight often don't have much to do with the designation as it simply depends on the purpose and usage of the tank
@nicholasthegreatogreking1036
2 жыл бұрын
Travel back to the 80s then, by modern tank standards it is very light
@johaneslerius9074
Жыл бұрын
I love Russian Light tank Sprud SDM-1/2S25 ❤❤❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Пікірлер: 200