Has he ever heard of Merkva 4 or Challenger 2 (not to mention their new versions)?
@INVICTUSSOLIS
Жыл бұрын
Challenger 3 is not on the list? Or even challenger 2 which has never been destroyed
@dondouglass6415
Жыл бұрын
I am slightly confused.... Run flat tyres on a tank? Maybe I am missing something here? 🤔😕
@AK47HEAVYMETAL83
11 ай бұрын
This is funny lol the American M1 Abrams and the Israeli Merkava are two of the top in the world, period. Specs don’t make a tank powerful, but its crew.
@bartolinijanicki
Жыл бұрын
T-14 is not a finished tank. The tank has bad engine, the model is a crap ...
@alsmith4885
Жыл бұрын
Ok, you can scrap the Armada and replace it with the Challenger 2. The Armada has only proven itself in parades. It is ridiculous to "assume" it is powerful. Why? Because the Russians said so. Really, if you want to speculate on unproven MBT's, then even the Type 10 and the Oplot-M have more credibility, at least they have performed in live fire training and are active with Japan and Thailand. What a joke.
@gandigooglegandigoogle7202
Жыл бұрын
it's really shit what you say.....the only tank that has never been destroyed in combat is the Leclerc tank! and you do not even quote .... yet it is a monster of technology, and the most expensive in the world.
@forytonly689
Жыл бұрын
The best way to rank battle tank is not capabilities but the no. of actual battles involves and imerges supreme.😂😁oh yeah...
@i.ibraev3462
Жыл бұрын
Lancet-3 doesn't care what tank you have))
@calebhasty7171
Жыл бұрын
Neither does a nice Javelin.
@i.ibraev3462
Жыл бұрын
@@calebhasty7171 Firstly, the price is 50 times more expensive. Secondly, the flight radius is 2.5 km vs 80 km)))
@alexandremarcelino7360
Жыл бұрын
O type 99 na minha opinião é o mais impressionante entre todos, tem um perfil extremamente baixo e uma velocidade em estrada excelente.
@calebhasty7171
Жыл бұрын
An M1A2 Abrams would rip it to shreds.
@Armoredunit
Жыл бұрын
Sorry man just got triggered by the thumbnail I mean damn three T-72's
@calebhasty7171
Жыл бұрын
I know that's what I was looking for a comment about. T-90 for US? M1 Abrams for Germany? T-90 for China? (Although China likely has T-90s their main battle tank is the ZTZ-99A)
@Lenzabi
Жыл бұрын
What is with the out of place cartoony tank footage? stick to footage of the correct tanks.
@philmoss7013
Жыл бұрын
Another unresearched post.
@rmmz28
Жыл бұрын
10:29 you show new found leopard 2 capability....lmao shooting at plane!
@Tomatnaufmaugn
Жыл бұрын
well technically it's supposed to be able to fire the main gun at helicopters if it can spot them before it's too late.
@brianlehman1244
Жыл бұрын
president trump please
@sachafriderich3063
Жыл бұрын
What's up with thst thumbnail???
@calebhasty7171
Жыл бұрын
I know that's what I was looking for a comment about. T-90 for US? M1 Abrams for Germany? T-90 for China? (Although China likely has T-90s their main battle tank is the ZTZ-99A)
@hellrider6609
Жыл бұрын
T 14 is only no 5?
@USMilitaryMovement
Жыл бұрын
others even think that it should not be included in the list ;)
@stevecrumpton4608
Жыл бұрын
No 50 is better,Russia said the hypersonic missile can not be intercepted, what happen in Ukraine?
@dritantahiraj3830
Жыл бұрын
@@USMilitaryMovementit shouldnt lol where has it fought?
Пікірлер: 26