Check out my Patreon/KZitem Membership for all my project files, 3d models, bonus videos, Discord and more or just to support this channel www.patreon.com/OnMars3D
@Houdini_Bob
6 сағат бұрын
wow man, that is a great explanation of how to get nice geometry, there is no short cut for it, it takes effort. thank you for this tutorial
@Asas_TV
3 ай бұрын
Literally blew my mind. Never thought of doing this. Cheers.
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Happy to share!
@ale_dp9
2 ай бұрын
You use a very nice workflow and your patience is the key in modeling process, also as you know, do and re-do , could be the best training experience!!
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
Appreciate it, more to come!
@YAHWEHWARE
2 ай бұрын
This is well put and I appreciate. Just learnt something new today. Another method I use is I take the base mesh into zbrush carved in the details with alphas and other sculpting techniques and retopologize that high model in Maya(I'm a Maya User). It takes some time but it has made my complex hard surface model more cleaner. But again the route to take depends on the model.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
Yeah, there are a bunch of ways of doing the same thing, I've used the Zbrush sculpt method too.
@nabilrahman98
3 ай бұрын
I was following chamferzone's revolver tutorial and was facing this exact pinching issue with SubD enabled. Thanks for the tutorial. It's been really helpful for this specific problem I was facing.
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Glad this helped you out!
@HotBusDriver
Ай бұрын
Interesting, how did you fix the pinching when Chamferzone uses the Remesh workflow? Did you first apply subD, fix it, and then use subD again + Remesh/Corrective Smooth/Decimate?
@AhsanEdits-nf9eh
3 ай бұрын
I was struggling with modelling for a while and I found Aunmar's car modelling series. Although it was in Maya and I'm a blender user I was still able to learn a ton load amount of stuff from that series and I applied that to one of my personal projects. A Gameboy that I was modelling and failed at least 3 times. And after watching that I literally modelled the whole Gameboy without using any booleans. Love your videos bro 🫡 .
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Man, that's great to hear! I always focus teaching workflows where people can apply them to any 3D model or software. Happy to hear to it worked out for you!
@SZ1NA_
3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video!
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! I'm glad you enjoyed the video.
@danielgroenewald3006
3 ай бұрын
you explain it so succinctly
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Appreciate it, happy to help!
@HOWDOT
3 ай бұрын
Thank you as always!!
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
No Problem!
@calpeshsharma4732
9 күн бұрын
Cool
@o.kiryukhin
3 ай бұрын
Great, thank you!
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Happy to share!
@Marvin-vs3tu
19 күн бұрын
Is creasing the edge same as adding edge loop?
@kuljeetsingh5977
3 ай бұрын
can you make tutorial on how to make doom helmet
@rohanrazaghi1198
3 ай бұрын
Amazing🔥
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Thank you my friend!
@digitalart4u
3 ай бұрын
Looks like an interesting technique that surely gets great results. My question would be from a practical point o view. Unless there is a shot that needs to be that close into the object, like shooting an ant crawling on that barrel and that particular shot would also be static and not animated, I personally see no practical reason to finesse that surface to that level and use additional time to do it as it will not be visible at all on medium shots or animated sequences. Is it good to know how to do it, academically? For sure, no doubt about it. Is it really practical in real life scenarios where everything is on fast forward these days? Not so sure... These kind of surface distortions tend to appear only on very shiny surfaces with almost no roughness or textures and only under certain light angles. But again, it is always good to know how to efficiently fix things.
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Appreciate the comment! The practical use is as you described, primarily for Sub-d assets that absolutely need this level of surface perfection. For games, like weapon assets, it's not as necessary. It's more used for high end cgi, vfx, marketing, product visualization where you zoom in on assets at 4k, yes, you need that level of perfection. As I said in the video, I don't use this for every asset, but when I do use this workflow, it provides the results that are needed. As far as timing goes, you'd spend less time worrying about edge flow and topology so it's not like you're doubling the amount of time needed for this. Take my Datsun 240z that I modeled, probably has 100 parts, of those 100, I used this workflow on maybe 3-4 pieces that needed that level of surface perfection, like the body panels.
@emanuelefazio3173
3 ай бұрын
You are the best.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
Thank you :)
@weissmanauditore1570
3 ай бұрын
Do you leave the piece u detached as a separate piece or u merge it back when you are done? (not sure if you are actually working on a detached part or simply an isolated view selection)
@fullyleaded
3 ай бұрын
Its just isolated. He'll attach it back when he's finished. Its just a technique. Could be for the video or just nice to isolate the area youre working in.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
It was just done that way for demonstration purposes, I originally modeled it into the main model.
@chrisjhart
3 ай бұрын
Just a quick question on the shapes of the faces - on the left hand side of the final gun barrel, all of the faces are near enough square, but as we travel to the lower density on the right, they elongate into rectangles. Is this acceptable for UVs? I was thinking that preserving the shape of the square is best as it cuts down on distortion? Is it just a case of using your discretion? Thanks
@fullyleaded
3 ай бұрын
You are absolutely correct. To make your life easier for uv unwrapping you would add edges to the right hand side to make the rectangles similar in size and shape to the faces on the left. However, this would be a metal component so it wouldnt really require a super accurate uv unwrapping so this would be more than enough.
@chrisjhart
3 ай бұрын
@@fullyleaded thanks very much!
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
That's correct, as @fullyleaded explained, for Sub-D, and even distribution of quads is the best for subdivision as well as UVs -- Glad you caught that :) I was originally using this asset with a remesh workflow but for sub-d, you'd want a more square density.
@chrisjhart
3 ай бұрын
@@OnMars3D thanks, I wasn't trying to be pedantic or anything. I see it a lot on forums where people are telling others that their meshes are too dense, but computers these days are well up to dealing with heavy models, and as you have said, you could always bake them anyway. Speaking of baking it would be great to see some videos taking these same files and how you approach it. Many thanks for such invaluable work
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
@chrisjhart all good! That's one of my pet peeves too, when people say a model of too high or low poly with no context. And yeah, I'll be covering the baking process in full detail.
@No1BRC
2 ай бұрын
It's just interesting while I usually always try to use as less as geometry as possible, I just had the issue last week when I had a client asking for very small details to be included and I went the way applying a subd which I usually don't do and I wondered whether this is a legit way😅
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
It comes in handy for those types of requests :)
@ja3d
2 ай бұрын
I see that you use ngons in some areas, it could produce pinch or artifacts?
@The9PointStar
2 ай бұрын
Maybe i miss something but with that method you get the detail on a high subdivided geometry, so wont get a lower poly version right? The point is to just start modeling with more subvidisions? Thanks
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
You can bake the geometry down to the low poly, I cover that here: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pJWI15iEm4uAnXosi=vPQJC1WcNQjsGqXH
@rayenwiller
2 ай бұрын
all i can say, that's right.
@yarugatyger1603
3 ай бұрын
A topic where I envy game artists who can use floaters.
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
That's definitely a good trck to use for real-time assets.
@UML649
2 ай бұрын
In fact, you don't need perfect Sub-D for this kind of hard surface modeling unless you need deformation effects. For game engines, such resources usually have too many unnecessary vertex data.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
The purpose of this sub-d model was to bake down to the low poly model, that's why the high poly was created with perfect surfaces.
@UML649
2 ай бұрын
@@OnMars3D For hard surfaces, what we need are perfect and accurate normals rather than perfect surfaces. As long as the normals are correct, whether the topology is perfect or not doesn't really matter in my opinion.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
@@UML649 We're saying the same but different things here. For a game ready asset, I'm talking about texture baking, so one way to use sub-d model with perfect surfaces is to bake it down into a texture map for a low poly mesh. For a VFX/CGI workflow that requires a quad sub-d workflow, the Sub-D model is perfectly fine as is. Different workflows for different use cases.
@UML649
2 ай бұрын
@@OnMars3D Thank you for your input. As a technical artist with over ten years of experience, I find this approach somewhat inefficient. I prefer to use CAD tools (such as Rhino or Plastisity) to create hard surface models, and then use Blender to create low-poly versions. In my opinion, except for character models (which require deformable meshes for animation), other types of models do not necessarily need to strictly follow quad sub-d, as it can be inefficient and unnecessary.
@OnMars3D
2 ай бұрын
@@UML649 I agree, for game ready assets, CAD models work great since it can give you a high and low poly model from one source. I use CAD modeling tools on a regular basis and will cover the Plasticity > Blender > Unreal Engine in future videos. But for non-game workflows, like VFX/CGI where they rely on a quad/sub-d workflow, the model needs to be sub-d ready. For example, once you have a CAD model in Maya/Blender, you can't increase the level of detail if the camer pushes too close. I talk about this exact topic here where I discuss quads vs tris/ngons here: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2IiG2qyvnaN1qHo That's what I mean by different workflows for different use cases.
@nabilrahman98
3 ай бұрын
Can you please make another video for remesh workflow for highpoly SubD mesh like this one
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
That's the plan, I originally made this revolver using the remesh workflow, so I'll have more videos in the future about that!
@nabilrahman98
3 ай бұрын
I will look forward to it
@afloox
3 ай бұрын
I'm interested in your topology course but I'm not a Patreon member. Is there any solution to get informed as soon as it will be available? Newsletter?
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
Yes! I'm in the process of setting up a new site, and will share on all my socials once it's up.
@afloox
3 ай бұрын
@@OnMars3D Thank you for your answer! Waiting for the big annoucement! :)
@rizkyhimawan7494
2 ай бұрын
Dude are u sure? I mean thats n-gone
@marsmotion
3 ай бұрын
using chamferzones revolver tut technique i can get the high and low at the same time in one modeling go.
@OnMars3D
3 ай бұрын
I'm using the remesh workflow on the AGL Long Colt, so I will be covering videos on that workflow in future videos.
Пікірлер: 65