0:00 Introduction 0:12 What is the Eucharist 0:29 Transubstantiation 1:20 Transubstantiation in the Bible 3:07 Reply to Objection 3:34 St. Jerome's Vulgate Translation 3:50 St. Cyprian of Carthage 4:32 St. Augustine 5:27 St. Ambrose 6:00 St. John Cassian 6:49 St. Jerome 7:08 Theophylact 7:33 Summary 8:28 Krunker Montage
@SicilianusThomismus
8 ай бұрын
Dwong posting 2 times in 5 days🔥🔥🔥🔥
@shlamallama6433
8 ай бұрын
The Krunker was a fun addition to a neat video.
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
Thanks man. I had that montage sitting in my files for awhile, waiting to use it
@Arpitan_Carpenter
8 ай бұрын
Another W dwong post
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
Thanks boss!
@pedrotorregrosa2081
8 ай бұрын
Blessings brother, Amazing video.
@TheCoachsCoach933
Ай бұрын
Another classic Dwong! Keep these coming. Let no one hide behind their invincible ignorance.
@dwong9289
Ай бұрын
@Big_Steve11
8 ай бұрын
I'm going to listen to this next time I got to iHop
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
CatholicMatch date
@eggyolked108
8 ай бұрын
Ave Maria Purisima 🌹🤍🌹. Holy Spirit we love you sooooo much.
@kalimatuhu
2 ай бұрын
Amazing Dwong 👍 keep up the good work
@Triniforchrist
8 ай бұрын
Just what I needed to hear, our topic at RCIA was on the Eucharist this week, God bless you Dwong 🙏 ❤️
@Testimony_Of_JTF
8 ай бұрын
HE DID IT AGAIN!!!
@Vertiasluxmea
8 ай бұрын
God bless you dwong❤
@lucas343
7 ай бұрын
Looking forward to a video about the Papacy full of unusual references and quotes.
@Palleoge
8 ай бұрын
gonna watch later, just here to like and say I LOVE DWONG
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
I love palleoge
@Argelkuttan
7 ай бұрын
Learning so much from your videos thank you Dwong
@HappyHugs2000
7 ай бұрын
Awesome to see your transformation bro. Also nice to see you're still cracked
@dwong9289
7 ай бұрын
Thanks bro! Do I know you from somewhere?
@HappyHugs2000
7 ай бұрын
@@dwong9289 Yeah we were in slusher together and you used to carry me in fort 🤣
@dwong9289
7 ай бұрын
@@HappyHugs2000 yo wassup dude. Is it Harman? Like from across the dorm?
@etaiinn1071
8 ай бұрын
W video dwong
@shlamallama6433
8 ай бұрын
I went and read the wikipedia article on epiousion, I think supersubstantial makes the most sense out of all of the options, except for maybe "lasting/not running out" which we get from the early translations from Greek into Syriac for epiousion. I'm convinced the Greek word is a neologism, maybe dating before the composition of the Gospels since Greek Christians would have been saying the Lord's prayer before Matthew or Luke was written imo.
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
Yes supersubstantial is from the Vulgate (authoritative translation of the Bible for Catholics), it's taught in the Catechism, its taught by the Fathers, and it is the obvious reason why a new word had to be invented.
@sandmaneyes
3 ай бұрын
What a beautiful dwong (apologetic)
@dwong9289
3 ай бұрын
@@sandmaneyes thanks!
@jordanl.h
4 ай бұрын
Brother doing the work of Christ and thought we wouldnt notice💪🙌🔥
@frankjamesiii5362
8 ай бұрын
Wow this is cool. Never knew this. Thanks for the info!
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
You’re welcome boss
@Brrbank
7 ай бұрын
Your videos are so informational and really explain the development of Christianity (and more importantly why Catholicism is true Christianity). Please keep making more!
@dwong9289
7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, God bless you brother!
@uchennanwogu2142
8 ай бұрын
✝Thank you for this video
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
You’re welcome boss
@yosoq
8 ай бұрын
W fr
@cherubin7th
3 ай бұрын
Jesus made up that word, not the apostles. There is no evidence Jesus didn't use Greek himself for this use case. It was very common to use Greek for philosophy at that times.
@takuu7496
8 ай бұрын
love the activity
@ProjectMysticApostolate
2 ай бұрын
Mind blown
@markmelds
8 ай бұрын
Let’s goooo
@esotericsadgirl
8 ай бұрын
banger
@MiszuFiszu
8 ай бұрын
Great stuff, thanks! Unrelated question, I once recall you had a personal blog on blogspot, it had a few pretty cool articles, including some arguments for Christianity directly from Jewish sources. I can't find the blog anymore - do you have the articles stashed anywhere else by chance? Would love to give them another read
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
Thanks brother! Yes I had a blogspot, but I took it down because of some errors in my articles. I remade the Jewish article into a video actually, and improved it kzitem.info/news/bejne/1q6KuJ5pn4l5fqQsi=X3KfhnqyaWvPKh71 I make another blog in the future
@MiszuFiszu
8 ай бұрын
@@dwong9289 Ah, neat! I missed the video. Thanks! Looking forward to you reactivating your blog!
@jordanmiller3927
8 ай бұрын
Comment for the algorithm
@slavicsoup7762
7 ай бұрын
“Thanks for watching an in depth analysis of the Bible and Church Fathers about Transubstantiation… anyways here’s krunker”
@dwong9289
7 ай бұрын
True!
@noelyanes2455
8 ай бұрын
Do one on purgatory
@Iustusxi
8 ай бұрын
Amazingf video
@hjc1402
Ай бұрын
Can accidents remain and exist without the substance they adhere to?
@dwong9289
Ай бұрын
@@hjc1402 only miraculously by the sustaining power of God
@hjc1402
Ай бұрын
@@dwong9289 what does that mean? Do they adhere to the new substance or they really just exist without adhering to any substance?
@dwong9289
Ай бұрын
@@hjc1402 they exist without adhering to any substance and are sustained by God’s almighty power
@hjc1402
Ай бұрын
@@dwong9289 help that make sense to me, or would you say it’s a mystery of how
@dwong9289
Ай бұрын
@@hjc1402 it’s a mystery by God’s infinite power
@thane816
5 ай бұрын
Great video. The only problem is in minute 1:00, where your church imports Aristotle's categories (i.e. accidents) onto a Christian belief. In other words, instead of trying to explain "why" the body and blood still appear like bread and wine, just leave it as a mystery since God didn't reveal why. Aristotle was a pagan.
@dwong9289
5 ай бұрын
The concepts substance/accidents are real and therefore there is truth in using those terms. The Church Fathers used what was true in Greek philosophy to describe the mysteries of the faith. In fact even Trinitarian terminology - Person, Substance, Essence, relations - all use Greek thought. Pagans were wrong about some things but still had access to natural truths known by the light of human reason. Our faith doesn’t contradict human reason, rather it is supplemented by it, as truth cannot contradict truth. Therefore it’s totally fine to use true concepts from Greek philosophy
@hjc1402
Ай бұрын
Aristotle is great and I like Aquinas’ use of him. But Aristotle’s categories of substance and accidents says that an accident can not exist without the substance it adheres to. So how do the accidents of bread remain without the substance of bread they adhere to? I think this is a shame for Aquinas to make this mistake.
@anonemoose102
8 ай бұрын
Your back from your monastic visit?
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
I’ve been back since June 23 2023
@dwong9289
8 ай бұрын
Also do I know you from somewhere?
@enslavedbytruth
8 ай бұрын
✅️
@st.ignatiusantioch
8 ай бұрын
W
@klotzaltacc7768
7 ай бұрын
Stick to the Filioque
@dwong9289
7 ай бұрын
Do you disagree with Transubstantiation? And is so try to refute anything in this video
@gambalombo
6 ай бұрын
"Transubstantiation *in the Bible*" Spends half the video talking about things outside the Bible
@dwong9289
6 ай бұрын
The Church Fathers show my interpretation of the Biblical Passage is the historic Christian interpretation
Пікірлер: 74