As promised in the review, here’s a tutorial how to use the GMT function: kzitem.info/news/bejne/woScy4qCfaRznZwfeature=shared Enjoy 😁
@Nachovalenti899
Жыл бұрын
I bought my Tudor BB GMT 2 years and a half ago. It's in perfect condition, everything works perfectly, the accuracy is impressive, and I don't have any problem with the thickness or weight. Some people are talking about that and they have never worn the watch. I love it, I'm really happy with it and I don't care what parrots repeat over and over again. Thanks for your video.
@mema4922
Жыл бұрын
Incorrect. They’re ceramic ball bearings on the clasp, not plastic, so very high quality
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
My bad! Thanks for bringing that to my attention! That’s pretty cool
@mema4922
Жыл бұрын
@@distincttimepieces no problem. Good video!
@resjon7981
11 ай бұрын
The thickness is 14.5mm and pretty balanced with the width. Small wristers hate it but such is life.
@Nachovalenti899
10 ай бұрын
Agreed 👍
@distincttimepieces
10 ай бұрын
My wrist is quite large and I still find it top heavy!
@jramz8724
Жыл бұрын
One of my favorite pieces from the Tudor collection, same year when Rolex released the GMT Pepsi, The Tudor GMT looks very classic as the Rolex GMT back in the days. Very nice video content my friend, well done 👍
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing your thoughts my friend. Exactly, it’s like a modern Rolex GMT
@pete3486
Жыл бұрын
Great video! I’ve had mine since 2019 and absolutely love it. During summer months I use a rubber strap from Everest, worth a look! 💙❤️
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I’ll check it out 🙏
@Soloseas
Жыл бұрын
I think Tudor/rolex purposefully make the cases on Tudor’s thick to differentiate them from the slender Rolex.
@Phil5150Bower
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this as contemplating purchasing this or a vintage gmt master 2, think I’ll go with vintage.
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Nice! To be fair you can’t go wrong with either!
@nickowen1070
Жыл бұрын
The tudor catch balls on the bracelet are actually superior to rolex as on the tudor they are in fact very hard wearing ceramic, not plastic!!
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for letting me know! My bad! Another kind gent also pointed this out in the comments. I’m glad to hear they’re not plastic, that’s another positive for this watch! 😁
@NeoWahNah
Жыл бұрын
The "case" is not 15mm thick. The case + the dome crystal is. The thickness also doesn't make the watch feel top-heavy. The overall weight of the watch does. The watch without the bracelet weighs 93 grams.
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your feedback
@chris.thebeard
Жыл бұрын
I own the GMT with the black Dial, love the watch and style with the steel bracelet. Only the thickness is i a point. If you wear the bracelet a little bit loose, the watch slides a bit on the wrist because of the weight
@jfalconc
6 ай бұрын
Even though the movement is COSC certified (-4 to +6), Tudor advertised it in their website to be accurate from -2 to +4!!!
@JohnHeos-no1hg
24 күн бұрын
The bb gmt, those click ball for the clasp are ceramic not plastic.
@Coffee8Watches
Жыл бұрын
Great review of this Tudor model! I like this model and I wish Tudor would make a 39mm version similar to the Tudor Black Bay Pro 😊
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
Who knows, that might be in the works 😁
@adriancox2786
Жыл бұрын
I disagree that a “gmt master II outperforms the Tudor in every single way” I own both & im sorry, that’s a nonsense statement: watch snobs will love it of course. Build quality they’re on par with each other. Both COSC, Rolex is more refined, more finesse, has that splash of white gold dial furniture, but it’ll never age, the rest of the watch will but not the bezel: the Tudor will age wonderfully and at under half price, with both in hand I’d take the Tudor.
@distincttimepieces
Жыл бұрын
It’s all down to personal views and what you’re looking for in a watch. The Tudor truly is a value proposition that is almost on par with the Rolex. My statement comes off the basis that the Rolex dial is beautifully lacquered, the materials are more premium and the adjustability is superior. I find it to be more comfortable and ergonomic and the design is iconic - after all, it’s the Tudor’s inspiration. Rolex goes above COSC with the Superlative Chronometer Certification which involves testing for precision to -2+2 secs. Just handling the watch is a complete different experience. You’re right that the Rolex is more resistant to ageing and to many that’s superior - to others, maybe not. Thanks for sharing your viewpoint, it’s always interesting to hear new perspectives. Also, you’ve got the best of both in your collection!😁
@69fastfurious
10 ай бұрын
4:45 sorry to correct you man but the “plastic balls” are ceramic made 🤔 Rather make your home work first mate … got to agree on the bezel being bit difficult to operate as it doesn’t come bit of the case just like the “older BB Heritage” , regarding about the date wheel “issue” is already fixed for long time plus as you said after do like the Opaline dial but on sun it’s hard see time/minutes , regarding to this “Diet Pepsi “ I wish the GMT Red Hand “ was bit thicker like the Tudor Pro regarding to the thickness Rolex will not let is “Sister” Company make a slimmer case or else … maybe in few years when they release newer versions by Rolex it’s for keeping “Us Customers” fill their bank accounts and buy newer models Mate ! Wishing you happy seasons weekend!
@distincttimepieces
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Wishing you a wonderful Christmas too 🎄
@69fastfurious
10 ай бұрын
@@distincttimepieces Thank you very much for your kind reply wishing you and all family an Happy Christmas 🎄 and prosperous 2024 🎉, my apologies if my sharing opinions as a owner oof these model in “review” was just for those newer viewers could see from new perspective as an owner of this model have little bit more correct info, as you made the review around almost one year maybe you get wrong info these brands are very secret about specifications “Tudor,Rolex, Omega etc “ amigo ! Kind regards from Portugal 🇵🇹 Europe
@Scorpion-king-c8q
10 ай бұрын
Tudor is not Rolex, design choices are deliberate otherwise it will become Rolex GMT, not sure why all reviewer compare this with Rolex GMT (it is not never will be) which is twice the price and even more due to non availability. This watch is fantastic for price. There is no comparison to Rolex GMT. Buy Tudor for Tudor not Rolex.
@distincttimepieces
10 ай бұрын
Can’t avoid comparing them! The connection can’t be denied..
Пікірлер: 33