I don't know why I am watching this. I don't own any Fujifilm cameras.
@SomeUnremarkableGuy
3 сағат бұрын
do you need to own fujifilm camera to watch video like these?
@erichramone7812
3 сағат бұрын
Same. Most of these shows (and I love this show) but they feed GAS syndrome....
@ShamGod3000
Сағат бұрын
I watch because I like these dudes
@surajravindrababu8986
34 минут бұрын
Soon you will…
@aloysiusyudistianto3611
19 минут бұрын
Yeah, I just watch to see the both of them 😅
@lackoliver55
3 сағат бұрын
We definitely need more 500m talking head segments.
@atselykovskiy
3 сағат бұрын
That was 500mm
@crhuynh8
2 сағат бұрын
@@atselykovskiy Is this actually 500mm or 1000mm equiv to full frame 500mm?
@lackoliver55
2 сағат бұрын
@@atselykovskiy But Jordan should be 500m away to make the most cinematic experience. I want talking head shots that look like the opening scene of The French Connection.
@drchtct
Сағат бұрын
@@crhuynh8 This is 765mm FF equivalent
@atselykovskiy
9 минут бұрын
@@crhuynh8 considering its image circle it is at least 395mm FF equiv
@falxonPSN
2 сағат бұрын
Moving BILF to BILPH was a masterstroke of genius. 👍
@lackoliver55
3 сағат бұрын
That taped floating filter 🤣
@ItsMidasProductions
3 сағат бұрын
This video may have just convinced me to get a telephoto lens for video lol. Definitely not as long as a 500, but a 300 sounds very doable! The compression is so uniquely beautiful
@bingbong4848
Сағат бұрын
Lumix Leica 200mm. You're welcome.
@praisem4267
3 сағат бұрын
Telephoto lenses dimensions are dictated by front lens diameter for the most part, much less so by the field covered. Having made a killer sharp, fairly lightweight lens for medium format, Fujifilm has made a wise choice offering it for x-mount. Now they “only”have to get the concerning autofocus issues solved…
@jessejayphotography
Сағат бұрын
This is correct and should be pinned! The sigma 500mm 5.6, 95mm front element. Nikon 500mm, 95mm. Not a coincidence.
@noahkeepsrecording
2 сағат бұрын
Traded in my 16-55 I for the new model. Always loved it but it definitely can feel very heavy. Looking forward to the lighter weight!
@abhinaybuiss
3 сағат бұрын
Nice job Fujifilm! Bring more, especially XF 23mm f2.0
@simontramper
2 сағат бұрын
Will be interested if you do a side by side comparison of the mk1 and mk2 to see just how much better the mk2 is
@xmeda
3 минут бұрын
It will be interesting to do comparison between Fuji 16-55/2.8II and Pentax DA*16-50/2.8 PLM
@Mutedimagery
Сағат бұрын
Bro had me laughing so hard with the BILPH comment! Thank you
@ekofotoz8260
Сағат бұрын
Loving the 500mm
@heiner71
2 сағат бұрын
Wow, extreme Toneh.
@calsimeth1588
3 сағат бұрын
I'd love to know what changes they made for the X mount version of the 500mm. I wonder if they considered just offering a speed booster adapter with AF for the GFX version. Who cares about weight savings when what matters is light and reach?
@FidelisG
26 минут бұрын
Ooohh a bigger great white sharp Fujinon lens
@kart182
55 минут бұрын
Love the ad
@geinko
3 сағат бұрын
On the episode of BILPH hunters
@HKFIJIHK
3 сағат бұрын
I wonder how the new 16-36 will feel on the upcoming XM-5
@deadly7898
2 сағат бұрын
What 16-36?
@HKFIJIHK
2 сағат бұрын
I meant 16-55 lol
@lionheart4424
Сағат бұрын
Sadly AF-C in Fuji is lacking in this gen. But these two lenses look amazing. They are both well priced and particularly the 500mm looks just gorgeous.
@joliver4083
Сағат бұрын
Waiting for more Toneh samples.
@benoittissier58
3 сағат бұрын
A very good medium format lens may not have sufficient definition for a high MP APS-C sensor. Looking forward to an in-depth test.
@seth094978
2 сағат бұрын
This lens is so good on a 102MP 44x33 sensor, though, that I highly doubt it's going to fail at 40MP APS-C. That's only about 22% more resolution linearly.
@Paul_Rohde
Сағат бұрын
The GFX 500mm review on the Chris Frost channel was the first time I could see separate inner lines on his lens chart test. There's plenty of resolving power there.
@atselykovskiy
21 минут бұрын
2:52 Leading '0' corresponds to 2020 year of manufacture
@hammarbytp
Сағат бұрын
Be interesting to see a comparison of the Fuji 16-55mm with the equivalent Sigma version or indeed the Tamron 17-70mm. When the 1st version of the lens came out, Fuji had a lens monopoly, so it would be interesting to know what know you are getting for the ~$500 apart from an aperture ring.
@brownbear100
Сағат бұрын
Even the Mki version of the lens was generally better than the sigma. And buying used they were actually a similar price. While the weight and size savings is very welcome now, and on the face of it the price is fair - substantially cheaper than the old version launched for in real terms - you have to really want its advantages for that money.
@4honor
2 сағат бұрын
Bilph?! Oh my~ 😂
@trowawayacc
2 сағат бұрын
Dang that 500mm can shoot the fleas of a dog.
@shang-hsienyang1284
3 сағат бұрын
Video starts at 1:40 for Microsoft Windows users.
@amermeleitor
3 сағат бұрын
The ad was great. Don't miss it, seems like something that could happen for real 😅
@shang-hsienyang1284
3 сағат бұрын
@@amermeleitorthere, I have changed my comment.
@amermeleitor
2 сағат бұрын
@@shang-hsienyang1284 😅 I don't even use Apple products. But I liked the ad. It's funny!
@timothykieper
2 сағат бұрын
My first NEW car cost $2600.
@heiner71
2 сағат бұрын
You should have snug in a photo of Jordan's favorite non-waterfowl bird.
@rivereee
48 минут бұрын
Birds I'd like to photograph lol
@qawazauri3422
2 сағат бұрын
Jordan's Xm5 setup just disappears behind the 500mm lens.😮
@astromech2530
Сағат бұрын
the fuji xf 500mm should had been $2500 and smaller than the gf 500mm 😬. its bigger than the sigma 500mm for the sony and the nikon 400mm 4.5
@pentagramyt417
2 сағат бұрын
I would like ANYONE to make now x1.4 TC handle and x2.0 TC handle (especially this second one..) to see how it performs at 1000 mm f11, for my field 1200 mm is bare minimum and I would like to stop cropping my resolution half, from 900 mm.
@dccoletrain
3 сағат бұрын
I wish they added stabilization at that price to the zoom lens… is it 2x better than Sigma.
@lionheart4424
Сағат бұрын
It is sad that it does not has OIS, but compared to the Sigma it should be at least equally sharp, with better rendering, faster AF and it is weather sealed. I'm sure that we will get videos comparing the two from youtubers in due time.
@JayC133
Сағат бұрын
500 at f5.6? So more comparable to an 800 at f8-11?
@smartestDEV
2 сағат бұрын
Fuji: sorry we gave you a full frame sized lens for APS-C. We fixed it now and won't ever make that mistake again. Also Fuji: do you want a medium-format sized lens for your APS-C camera?
@seth094978
2 сағат бұрын
It's a 500/5.6 sized lens, not a medium format sized lens. You basically get image circle for free at those long focal lengths.
@smartestDEV
Сағат бұрын
Yeah, I know. It was just a joke.
@johnvillalovos
2 сағат бұрын
Anyone else distracted by the shrubbery stuck to Chris' jacket? 😊
@andrewh2341
Сағат бұрын
Love you guys but kind of wish we could skip the “first look pre production” videos. They don’t really bring much to the table because you can’t talk about the meat and potatoes of the topic “do you want to buy this lens?” without actual testing and evaluation.
@nevvanclarke9225
3 сағат бұрын
Changes to the filter size is annoying..I know I know step up rings 😮
@A.Edilbi
Сағат бұрын
Why they don't allow you to test the lens ? It's not like firmware that they can change something. No it's final .that's the lens
@Paul_Rohde
54 минут бұрын
With modern mirrorless, there's plenty that can change. Algorithms for focus by various aspects, same with aperture control, distortion, vignetting, OIS, ...
@A.Edilbi
51 минут бұрын
@Paul_Rohde he literally said " we can't test sharpness and bokeh " those are image quality. Not lens performance. Can't be changed with firmware
@IanButterworthyyc
2 сағат бұрын
At around 3:30 it’s not sharp.
@Powerland56
Сағат бұрын
🤡
@ZappaBlues
38 минут бұрын
Bo-KAY or BO-kah ... I say BO-kah just to irritate people 🤪
@warrenc2306
Сағат бұрын
All the gems in this video!! Next level guys!!!
@lumberjack3008
3 сағат бұрын
Bokeh was the weakest point of the old 16-55mm. A sterile look.
@jackrussel9991
3 сағат бұрын
2.02 "FUJIFILM high end professional general purpose zoom for X mont camera" ... Well better to fix the AF first. Otherwise No meaning in getting getting this glass.
@elzonn
3 сағат бұрын
That focus hunting in the long shot is really awful
@mfdoom808
3 сағат бұрын
First
@noenken
Сағат бұрын
Same lens for a 44x33mm image circle on a 24x16mm sensor ... without being able to use it on both. What's the point of using APS-C if not even the lenses are smaller anymore? That's just silly.
@djstuc
Сағат бұрын
Long telephoto lenses do not shrink in size with different sensors, this myth needs to end.
@noenken
Сағат бұрын
@@djstuc In my understanding when you design a lens for a much smaller image circle at the same (not equivalent) focal length and f-stop, you need less light to go through. A design specific to that smaller image circle could be quite a bit thinner at the very least. I'm happy to learn but I don't think that's a myth. (?)
@djstuc
48 минут бұрын
@@noenken as I said, LONG TELEPHOTO lenses do not follow this same philosophy, it only applies to more standard lenses. This subject has been covered many times, the image circle is of much less importance at these focal lengths, check out these lenses from any manufacturer and they are all much the same.
@Paul_Rohde
28 минут бұрын
Remember, although they're the same mm, their AOV are different. If the two lenses were made for the same AOV, they would be rather different sizes, and completely different lenses in construction. This lens does have elements tailored for APS-C, so they aren't fully the same and interchangeable.
@JohnJHPark
2 сағат бұрын
Wow, from 3:24, AF is hunting back and forth continuously on his face. Looking at his left eye and chin. I literally shocked.
@gijspeters5866
2 сағат бұрын
He is squinting pretty hard, to be fair.
@djstuc
2 сағат бұрын
You’re using footage taken with a 500mm lens to bash the video tracking AF😂 The only thing shocking here is how utterly ridiculous that is.
@JohnJHPark
2 сағат бұрын
@@gijspeters5866 His entire head facing front is fully in the frame for a reasonably long time. You know what that means.
@gijspeters5866
Сағат бұрын
@@JohnJHPark What does it mean, exactly?
@lionheart4424
Сағат бұрын
I have seen crazy AF hunting on Fuji for sure but that ain't it bro.
@cy9nvs
3 сағат бұрын
I wonder what an APS-C only 500 f/5.6 would look like. Probably even lighter, smaller and cheaper. While it's cool they're making this lens available for X-Mount, I can't help but feel like you're paying a hefty premium, considering it's actually for Medium format.
@6042833
3 сағат бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@Triforian
3 сағат бұрын
Long teles, at least starting at 135 mm, if not earlier, don't get lighter or cheaper when building them for a smaller sensor. So, no, I don't think you need to wonder. There's not going to be a substantial difference.
@gijspeters5866
3 сағат бұрын
Likely made with both MF and APS-C in mind when designing. Also, the benefit in terms of size with smaller sensors doesnt really translate when talking about super telephoto lenses, just look at the 100-400 and 150-600, that were made just for APS-C. Those are actually heavier than this lens.
@cy9nvs
3 сағат бұрын
@@Triforian this makes no sense, bigger image circle definitely means bigger glass elements.
@williamchan8866
2 сағат бұрын
With all the other brands with apsc for longer reach you’re stuck with full frame lens. So at least this has been modified a bit for apsc. But if you look at the Fuji 200 mm f2 what a gorgeous hunk of apsc glass.
@Username_CC_
3 сағат бұрын
16-55 with no OIS is just sad but love the size
@thecaveofthedead
2 сағат бұрын
I feel like that 40g could basically just be the different lens mount? If they're the same lens, it's nice for Fujifilm's production efficiency but then it means X-mount users miss out on what could have been a much lighter lens if the glass was reduced for the much smaller image circle possibly.
@seth094978
2 сағат бұрын
When your focal length gets long enough, The size of a lens is dictated mostly by the focal length and aperture. 500/5.6=89.3mm minimum size, basically. Maybe a couple of the rear elements could have been slightly smaller, but it certainly would not have been "much lighter" if designed purely for XF. This lens is lighter than the Olympus 300/4, despite being designed for GF! With long lenses you basically get image circle size for free, and in fact it is very typical for the image circle of zoom lenses to get way larger as you zoom in.
@gijspeters5866
2 сағат бұрын
There is maybe a difference to the glass close to the mount, but the front of the lens will be the same regardless of sensor size, believe it or not. This is because at long focal lengths the diameter of the aperture has to be very large, and the elements required for that are going to cover just about any sensor size.
@lionheart4424
Сағат бұрын
Check the TTArtisan 500mm f6.3 for full frame. It is very similar in size to this one.
@OdiumTV
3 сағат бұрын
The dreadful Fuji autofocus is really showing at some points, they really need to fix their software...
@emmgeevideo
2 сағат бұрын
Bird shots, good. Ad skit, not funny.
@Paul_Rohde
17 минут бұрын
They forgot to add the laughter track!
@bilalkaraca4459
3 сағат бұрын
No OİS is a no go even if its a very good lens
@lumberjack3008
3 сағат бұрын
Compact and light weight is more important. Especially for a 16-55mm lens....
@Aozaka
3 сағат бұрын
Except canon, no camera brand produce a 24-70 equivalent that has OIS. Besides most of camera bodies already have IS nowadays
@bbc6rgf57ytty5yxyw5gt
Сағат бұрын
@@Aozaka Panasonic has a 24-70 equivalent that has OIS.
Пікірлер: 107