The concept of free association is a real oddity in international relations. Can we really think of these countries as independent? More to the point how far do you think they can and push Washington for more money? And what price it too high for the US to renew these arrangements? As ever, I look forward to hearing your thoughts and comments below. And please do check out World Politics Review: www.wpr.pub/jkl Their support really helps. And it really is an excellent publication!
@wololocute
Жыл бұрын
There are many videos on KZitem which claim that micro chips used in Volvo, MG and Wuling cars are manufactured in Bush family's Chinese semiconductor fab which he got in return for selling Iraqi oil to petro China.
@wololocute
Жыл бұрын
Please if possible verify this.
@freedomsong9747
Жыл бұрын
@seangiang3454 south Korea is a colony
@phk1959
Жыл бұрын
How many individuals are financially, socially, psychologically, ideologically, mentally, (and for a material part of their lifetime, physically) independent? Likewise, how many States are really independent (politically, economically, technologically, militarily or in terms of natural resources)? Are all States equal? In theory maybe. In practice, they aren't. I think dependency of States is something natural, it is a fact of life, a reality...
@TheSwedishHistorian
Жыл бұрын
I mean the population is so small the US can easily throw billions and it will suffice
@Acrnavy
Жыл бұрын
Even as an IR student with a focus on the politics of the Pacific, I never once heard any talk of Palau or Micronesia when it came to matters involving American presence in the pacific. Conversation usually seems far more focused on the straits, Philippines, Japan, Guam, Australia, and China. Even with an awareness of maritime laws and conflicts, it’s very easy for anyone to forget the smaller nations.
@snewsom2997
Жыл бұрын
Other than historical WW2 battles, we have left the folks to their own devices since, though The US, Japan, and Australia are often the ones to step up when they need help. Based on what I believe, I think we are just land or in this case sea grabbing. to make anything past China's 1st island chain hostile waters.
@thomassenbart
Жыл бұрын
@@snewsom2997 It's not sea/land grabbing when you actually fought and conquered these lands previously and have since paid large sums to subsidize what were stone age people, under previous empires, who now play at government. The idea that all nations are equal despite obvious realities, is ridiculous. The US will maintain control over these territories and seas.
@juniorjames7076
Жыл бұрын
Over the years I have come to realize that my university (considered a "top competitive liberal arts" school) either deliberately misdirected, mislead, or simply failed to teach the REAL substantive issues of global affairs. I often look back at my "international relations" or foreign affairs textbooks (usually written by the professor or her friends from grad school) and think what utterly useless books of clown jokes they were. I have been re-teaching myself geopolitics since.
@nromk
Жыл бұрын
@@thomassenbart will it because these countries want to be treated equally, but with congress being dramatic these countries might take anyone else seriously including China
@dipropraubha9434
Жыл бұрын
@@nromk they should, it's common sense. Would you rather do business with a bully who dictates everything and regularly threatens and coerces you and only cares about their own interests or would you go to someone who wants to work towards mutual benefits and cooperation, who's making real longterm transformations in your country and even willing to forgive debts in certain cases if you're unable to pay it back? See the difference between China vs US investment in Africa and why they're turning away from us and shifting towards the Chinese
@jayjinom7060
Жыл бұрын
I love to stumble upon videos like this on KZitem because it helps educate others about the key role & importance these Pacific Islands hold. I’m from the Marshall Islands 🇲🇭 and it’s true about China moving in to the block. They’re slowly creeping in and influencing the Pacific Islands. I grew up in the US and majority of the people are unaware of what took place in the Marshall Islands from 1946-1958. It’s when the US tested 67 nuclear weapons and drenched the Marshall Islands with the firepower of equal to 7,000 Hiroshima bombs. With a massive fallouts & destruction, today there are three total islands that are uninhabitable in the Marshall Islands and it’s far more radioactive than Chernobyl & Fukushima. Fast forward to today, the US has contributed $1B dollars to the Marshall Islands in the last decade meanwhile, Ukraine was given $100B dollars just last year(2022). Thank you for sharing this message because this topic was & still not in the history books.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Jay! One of the things I love about KZitem is that I so often get really interesting and helpful comments from the countries I cover. It really makes a huge difference. The nuclear legacy really does need to be highlighted. As you said, the effects were absolutely devastating and yet so few people know about it today. I’m glad I was able to shed sone light on this, as well as the wider relationship and the current negotiations. In the meantime, thanks so much once again. And do please share the video to anyone else who might be interested. (And my sincerest apologies for the upside down flag around 2.20. It was only pointed out to me later. My editing software flipped it as it reduced it in size. I’m really sorry about that!)
@jayjinom7060
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay No worries Professor James, You’re good. This is the most accurate coverage about the Islands in the Micronesia & particularly the Marshall Islands. You did a superb job!! 👏🏼👏🏼👍🏼
@user-cx9nc4pj8w
Жыл бұрын
The lack of education about anything is pretty scary about the US. Studying fallout and the impacts of nuclear weapons should be mandatory for everyone in the world, but learning time is small, and nuclear weapons states and those seeking nuclear weapons aren't exactly inclined to educate people on the dangers, and these states include the 3 largest in the world. But I think your point about Ukraine is pretty silly. The combined populations of the F.S.M., Palau, and the Marshall Islands are 0.1% of the total population of Ukraine. If you take that into account, the per person support is an order of magnitude higher, and the Marshall Islands are another order smaller than the total. And the support given to Ukraine is not just charity; it includes systems that would need to be decommissioned, or are only produced to keep the production lines going, and it protects Poland, the Baltics, and other NATO countries. And Ukraine is only getting this money because it's been invaded! The US isn't going to keep handing out 100 billion dollar cheques for the next decade! I understand that you think this has been ignored, and I agree with you, but your comparison to Ukraine looks petultant and immature. Also, I have read about this in a history book, although it was not from the US and was about nuclear weapons/technology.
@jayjinom7060
Жыл бұрын
@@user-cx9nc4pj8w Clearly you didn’t read the whole story. This is not a comparison of size of the Country, nor about the population size either. Instead, I’m referring to how these lands are now lost along with broken promises of returning to these lands. Ukraine is NOT the only country that’s EVER been invaded! Lucky Russia didn’t try any deceive moves to Invade. Instead, they rather do it the old fashioned way and just barged in. Ukraine still has majority of there lands and can still visit them even though it’s under Russian control. MONEY CANT buy uninhabited lands BACK to living conditions. ITS ABOUT PRINCIPAL!! 🤡. You probably have never had ANYTHING in your miserable life taken from you before. So, to sit here and try to question my intelligence about my own country and try to belittle it just because of size or population tells me your the lowest form of life. “I mean C horizon dirt”..
@ShubhamMishrabro
Жыл бұрын
Ukraine is given loans.
@JS-ih7lu
Жыл бұрын
I recommend John Pilger’s documentary on the terrible legacy of US nuclear testing on the Marshall Islands, and the continued fight of its people to get the US to even admit their wrongdoing. The documentary is called “The Coming War with China”.
@peterkops6431
Жыл бұрын
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - providing full historical context to current events is the strength of this entire enterprise. Understanding the past explains the present.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Peter, I know that some people just want to jump into what is happening now. But I always like to think that providing some context really does help make sense of things more generally. That said, I think that history can often be abused. It's about finding the balance. :-)
@peterkops6431
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay hence finding multiple sources!
@greatwolf5372
Жыл бұрын
These three countries are in many ways treated as part of the US. Often when filling out some online forms in the US like for a college or job application, under the state of residence section you will find Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau along with the US states and territories.
@Homer-OJ-Simpson
Жыл бұрын
They have many of the benefits of being a U.S. state while also being independent.
@jayjinom7060
Жыл бұрын
Umm not exactly. I wish though. 😩🤦🏻♂️
@akwaetteettekambaetiowo.1924
Жыл бұрын
They shd just declare it as the State of United States simple.make it 55 state's simple
@RobespierreThePoof
Жыл бұрын
True. Not exactly a legal argument but it does speak to the special status of these countries. I was thinking the other day how ironic it is that modern Japan would actually be a great, democratic protector and.leader for these countries, if it weren't for the past brutality and aggression of Imperial Japan. It is true that small island nations, even when declaring full independence, can rarely maintain total sovereignty and independence. They are usually too small and weak on their own and need some kind of "big brother" relationship. It's a shame Japan can't provide that because of their past mistakes.
@FredoRockwell
Жыл бұрын
Wow - such a great video! I know about these countries but I don't think I'd ever really stopped to think how strategically important they really were to the US. It seems obvious now! Thank you!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Hi there Fredo! Thanks so much. Yes, it’s a really strange situation. I think you’re right. I’d say that they haven’t traditionally been that important. But they seem to becoming more so. And they clearly know it! 😉🙂
@FredoRockwell
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Growing up in America I just never heard about these countries, and I was really engaged with international news (for an American). I make a video about the Marshall Islands in 2021, and my impression was they were still very much bossed around by the US government. I hope they use this leverage to their advantage (but I also hope they don't become too reliant on China either).
@walhdamaskus2408
Жыл бұрын
In the other word US is not doing thing for those countries just for them benefits, its for US benefits.
@FredoRockwell
Жыл бұрын
@@walhdamaskus2408 That is, unfortunately in my opinion, US foreign policy all too often!
@strongchallenger2269
Жыл бұрын
@@FredoRockwell Reliant on China? No never. We don't behave like American politicians. We don't have the hegemonic behaviour. Those islands anyway aren't that important but to the US, yes. Our carriers have demonstrated that we have the ability to project pass the 2nd island chain. Hence, those islands we can afford to let it pass.
@EricZucchini
Жыл бұрын
Just wanted to let it be clear how much I love this channel. There's so much to learn in this world.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Eric. That's incredibly kind of you! I know that some topics don't perhaps generate as much interest as others. But I really do think that it is important to take a look at these issues as well.
@hugodesrosiers-plaisance3156
Жыл бұрын
This sort of subject is one reason I value your channel so much, Professor. I had absolutely no idea this sort of "soft war" between the US and China was even going on in the Pacific. Really fascinating. Thanks for posting! Cheers!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Hugo! I am so glad you found it interesting. I know that topics like this don't always attracts as large an audience as some others, but it seemed like such an interesting and unusual story. And I've personally been fascinated by the concept of free association for a long time. I had wanted to have a chance to do a video on it for a while. It was good to get the chance.
@strongchallenger2269
Жыл бұрын
You should watch the video of Liaoning close to Guam. Chinese Navy has surpassed the 2nd island chain. Next Hawaii when the Fujian is ready around June this year. 2 more are already under construction and likely to be commissioned by 2030 to 2035.
@theconqueringram5295
Жыл бұрын
I remember studying free association when I was a teenager and trying to wrap my head around the concept. But I will say this, sometimes the most vital countries in foreign affairs are not nations with large territorial holdings and robust populations, but small dots on the map that very few people notice. Hopefully, the guys in Washington know this.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
It's a really interesting concept. What makes it really fascinating, and I didn't get into this in the video, is that the two forms - New Zealand vs United States - are actually rather different from each other. Unlike the US, NZ won't let Niue and the Cook Islands join the UN. It seems much more colonial in that sense. However, at the September 2022 Pacific Summit, Biden announced that the US would recognise the two as sovereign states. Maybe Auckland is changing its view? Another video perhaps. :-)
@japjungho4645
Жыл бұрын
so, they're only important because of China influence. 🙄 doesn't sound like it much to me. where's the mutual respect? sounds more like colony than a partnership.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. It is a very interesting situation. The China factor is certainly becoming more important. But it is also important to remember that for the past 40 years the US has had this relationship with relatively little direct benefit. They didn't really deliver that much - although one could, of course, point to the moral responsibility to help them, especially the Marshall Islands. In this sense, I think the relationship has actually been strangely complex. That said, it does appear to be becoming far more straightforward given current geopolitical developments.
@soundmind9772
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay The obvious benefit is being a backup plan in case Hawaiian independence is restored.
@kth6736
Жыл бұрын
1:13 - Another example of such relationship is Bhutan. Where India manages the defense and foreign affairs of Bhutan while Bhutan also uses Indian embassies abroad to carry out its councellor affairs. Although now Bhutan is increasingly taking up their international actions independently.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Many thanks. Fascinating point. This isn't usually listed as "free association", but it certainly has many of the obvious characteristics. I really should do something on this.
@kth6736
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Yes its not a widely discussed country. A video would probably struggle to get audiance as well unless its posted when China and India have another stand-off over Bhutanese territory.
@caesarbraganza
Жыл бұрын
Yes, but this isn't entirely true. Post WWII Bhutanese foreign policy has been "guided" (read: controlled) by the Indian state, but over time, direct vestiges of influence have been getting wiped out. In 2005, the Indo-Bhutanese friendship treaty removed mentions of India's guiding role in Bhutanese foreign policy. In 2022, if I'm not mistaken, Bhutan broke away from India's stance of strategic neutrality in the Russo-Ukraine conflict and sided with Ukraine for instance. However Bhutan in practice is joined by the hip with India. Given their relative isolation from every other country (their border with China is just mountains, and the Chinese government claims most of these borderland territories), along with India's defence commitments and aid makes this the case. It's geographical isolation has created a situation where it has allowed India to be its only lens to look at the world, and the both of the foreign policy establishments recognizes this reality quite. It's also why, outside of India, Bhutan maintains formal relationships with a very small amount of countries - Aside from India, it's Bangladesh, Nepal, and Kuwait (for some reason). Also, unlike major tourist Asian destinations like Singapore or Thailand, Bhutan has focussed more on quality on over quantity - which is why they don't see a need to go on a global charm offensive to bring tourism to their country. Thus. Bhutan's foreign policy is quite isolationist due to to the above factors. The security threat from China and its isolation from the rest of the world means that Bhutanese diplomats have their hands ties and their eyes towards India. However, the geopolitics of the Himalayas would start to get very interesting if China were to drop the claims it has on Bhutanese territory and go on a charm offensive like they did with Nepal.
@joshtep6784
Жыл бұрын
If these Pacific leaders were smart, they'd leverage the growing Chinese influence in the region to gain more sovereignty and funding. The Pacific Islands are pseudo colonies to the U.S. and Australia because they serve the purpose of being aircraft carriers for the navy. In reality the relationship is pretty misconstrued and the brain drain is severe because of the lack of investment and business on these islands. Look at how countries like Singapore and Malta leverage their strategic location in the middle of trade lanes works out and how wealthy they are. China is an opportunity that would be a game changer.
@darren5971
Жыл бұрын
China cuts out the middle man goes straight to the top with bribe money .and of course those pacific ministers take it
@ynerrad9291
Жыл бұрын
Cheers Prof for making videos including Pacific states. As a Pacific Studies postgrad student in New Zealand, it’s nice to hear Pacific states mentioned. There’s a lot going on in our part of world and is often viewed as small and irrelevant, but there is a whole lot going on. Cheers 😊
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Darren. It is such an interesting part of the world and yet it really doesn't get nearly as much attention as it should! I really hope the studies are going well. As an area studies person I'm always really delighted to hear about others who are fascinated in trying to understand a particular region of the world. Good luck with it all.
@neokorteks2009
Жыл бұрын
James, this video is an example of material which makes me comming back to this channel despite occasional hiccup. Little known topic explored in detail with unbiased unemotional informative language. Keep up the good work.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much Dejan.
@OnePalestine1948
Жыл бұрын
Very educational thank you🤗
@A_C0426
11 ай бұрын
I am 18 years old and from the Marshall Islands and I must say that we are very aware of the Chinese people moving in with us little by little. American and Europe tours in have been flying in recently, nice explanation and I appreciate the information.
@tonycb7996
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, this was fascinating. As a New Zealander, I find the China/US wrestle over the Pacific gets surprisingly little attention, so this is helpful.
@nromk
Жыл бұрын
Oh if you find that interesting come to the Americas: the USA basically forced everyone to sign a Chinese business exclusion act, which no one is enforcing because China is really good at building factories in the region meanwhile Mexico is trying to get the USA economically involved in Central America and that seems to be failing
@nromk
Жыл бұрын
In addition there's the whole Mecrosur/BRICS chaos, like Uruguay wants a free trade deal with China but Argentina wants any free trade deals with China to be approved by Mecrosur which might or might not be an economic union like the EU or a multilateral trade deal like NAFTA or whatever they changed its name too all while Argentina wants to formally join the BRICS along with Iran. Like crazy right.
@peanut0brain
Жыл бұрын
@@nromk as more countries use BRICS currencies for international trade, the US dollar will become toilet paper. Why anyone want to be part of the losing team?!
@nromk
Жыл бұрын
@@peanut0brain who exactly is using the BRICS currency? The value of the BRICS is possibly as a diplomatic council that can counter the USA not an economic bloc
@peanut0brain
Жыл бұрын
@@nromk BRICS is not an economic bloc? Oh my! I wouldn't waste time on u.
@joshkhor
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Professor James for a very informative article on this subject. My appreciation for the facts.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Josh!
@edwardblair4096
Жыл бұрын
"Free association" should be considered as part of the state relationship spectrum that includes "commonwealth", "autonomous region/district/territory", and "military alliance". It may be rare for the competing factors for integration vs separation are balanced so close to the boundary between separate and single statehood on the "separate" side, but the underlying factors are common with many state relationships.
@charlesmadre5568
Жыл бұрын
Commonwealth is a rather useless word. Australia, the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, Kentucky and England's second-rate UN are all commonwealths. What does that word even mean?
@meimiaolin2581
Жыл бұрын
At one time China was also being colonized and shared off. How times have changed.
@TheLocalLt
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr. Ker-Lindsay for exploring this vitally important yet under-discussed topic, excellent video as always! I have a feeling that, with enough concessions, the agreements will get done one way or another. This was essentially the case in America’s negotiations with the Philippines over the last several years. Also important to note, for those unfamiliar, that “free association” means something different in relation to New Zealand than it does to America, as Niue and the Cook Islands are part of the Realm of New Zealand and are not sovereign states, whereas Micronesia, Palau, and the Marshall Islands are independent sovereign states. That being said, these former American territories are often treated as an extension of America’s remaining Pacific holdings, and as you mentioned they still host significant military assets. Thanks again for the video professor!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much LocalLt. Great point about the fundamental difference between the US and NZ versions of free association. NZ hasn’t let them become fully independent and join the UN. But I suspect that might be changing. Interestingly, at the Pacific summit in September, Biden announced that the U.S. would recognise them.
@TheLocalLt
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay I did not see that news, there is such an interesting crossover between the relations of Niue and the Cook Is. with New Zealand and their relationship with the rest of the world. As the stakes in the Pacific increase, I think a more concrete solution will probably be found.
@johnnyhorton5984
6 ай бұрын
Makes dry reading but brought alive by filmed presentation. Amazing collection of documents that are actually very exciting in their import. Brilliant! Thank you ever so much!
@4Usuality
Жыл бұрын
These countries are some of our greatest allies in the Pacific, I put them up there as important as any other! As a US citizen, I sincerely hope we can win them over and keep winning them over as we have done, we need them on our side very badly. We also deserve to take care of them, no less because of all the nuclear testing the US performed in the area. Glad to see them as our allies. Also Professor, the camera is still looking super good, I love hearing about the history! Thanks for another great video!
@careyfreeman5056
Жыл бұрын
If we can resist the urge to be arrogant dicks, it's an easy sell. Look at the disaster that is the alternative. You really want to hitch your wagon to that dying horse?
@peanut0brain
Жыл бұрын
Greatest puppets
@peterkops6431
Жыл бұрын
Thanks Prof 👍🏻👍🏻. A really important video you have put together here. Niall Furguson was spot on back in 2005 with his book Colossus. The writing has been on the wall for some time now. I realise it is a big time commitment for you to undertake this KZitem project but the impact you have in spreading unbiased knowledge is phenomenal. Please keep it up. Australia.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for the support Peter! It's always really appreciated.
@duinay3
Жыл бұрын
Isn't "territory" a euphemism for "colony" - the US essentially just took these islands by force.
@joppy6089
Жыл бұрын
Internaltional peace and stability by Uncke Sam?? Ha ha...Greetings from the Netherlands
@michaelleong9015
Жыл бұрын
An excellent video Professor Lindsay. Going by the video's title, I believe that for the US, it's a little too little, too late. They treated the region as an afterthought for decades with little consideration as evidenced by using it for nuclear tests knowing well at that time that it was detrimental and harmful. The parsimonious amount of developmental assistance all these years have left these islands unprosperous. The Global South have largely seen for themselves the tangible benefits that come from dealings with China despite the vast amount of disingenuous narrative (debt trap etc) churned out by the Western media and taken as gospel by people living there. The leaders of these small islands are in an excellent position to skilfully negotiate to take their countries up a notch to the next level with improvements to infrastructure, ports, tourism, connectivity and wealth for their people.
@Locutus
Жыл бұрын
Good for you that you found a channel sponsor! When I saw paid promotion, I was thinking it better not to be Nord VPN, or Raid Shadow Legend. 🤦🏼♂️😂
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Haha! No, I resisted that. :-) I always wanted to hold off sponsorship until I found a partner I could really and truly endorse in good conscience. I've long been a fan of World Politics Review and have actually written for them in the past.
@dedavai
Жыл бұрын
He who pays the piper calls the tune. China is ready to pay. The island nations are bargaining for the best possible deal.
@dipropraubha9434
Жыл бұрын
The Chinese should definitely start influencing, financing and connecting with the Pacific islands and PR to help them get full independence. They should send them arms and tech and resources to enable them to be completely independent from us, as well as military support to secure their interests and protect against typical US invasion and terror
@strickricardo6006
Жыл бұрын
Wrong move for what you're proposing. Especially if China is to be included. China is communist, these island nations are proud free people. The two can't mix. Want help China? Just send your help but don't impose your lifestyle on the islands.
@dunnowy123
Жыл бұрын
Knowing this previously, the rigamarole about the Solomon Islands and China beginning defense ties was so laughable to me. The United States basically has an informal empire in the Pacific, yet considers a defense agreement between ONE Pacific state and China a serious "threat." Again, let's remember: America has 800+ military bases around the world (that we know of), China has a handful (to be fair, that we know of).
@darren5971
Жыл бұрын
Your wrong Australia is the nation with the Empire around the pacific .it's Australia that gives out billions in infrastructure aid not the US .Comes to Fiji The solomons Vanuatu PNG they are our brothers .
@thechloromancer3310
Жыл бұрын
@@darren5971 Perhaps both the US and Australia have empires in the Pacific? It is not like the two are mutually exclusive.
@Locutus
Жыл бұрын
Great video! Thoroughly interesting.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much!
@bobbygamer377
Жыл бұрын
Great Video! 👍
@bhahlouelu8223
Жыл бұрын
Much info n knowledge from this content , terima kasih (thx)
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@richtersundeen6105
Жыл бұрын
Free association means those three are the only nations Americans can visit without a passport (and vice versa, anyone from them can come to the USA at will). It is a very streamlined process to get US citizenship from one of them, and all three use the dollar as currency. It is indeed a strange relationship, one that can be described as a modern-day version of suzerainty, an old concept of a relationship halfway between colonial and independent status.
@darren5971
Жыл бұрын
Yeah none have the cash for a airfare
@dylansablan9103
Жыл бұрын
Though I'm an IR student, finally a video I can relate to! -Guam
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks Dylan. Great to hear it! :-) I hope to do more on the region.
Жыл бұрын
Hello dear Professor James. I adore your channel. One of the best channels ever. When I worked as an ESL teacher I would always recommend your channel to my students. I was born in Yugoslavia, now Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Serb Republic entity). I loved how you described and told the story when it comes to Yugoslavia. It was really nice and compact, full of details. I hope for the better future when it comes to all former Yugoslav republics. I wish you all the best. Greetings from Germany.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Joco. That's incredibly kind of you! I'm so pleased that you felt able to recommend the channel to students. I do try to speak clearly and a little slower than usual precisely to try to make the videos accessible to non-native speakers. Having lived abroad and learning another language I know how important this can be. (Although my Q&A videos are much more in line with how I sound in 'real life'!) Srećna nova godina, hvala puno i pozdrav iz Londona! :-)
@qhuizatlantis8484
Жыл бұрын
You reap what you sow
@user-lk3ih9nm6k
Жыл бұрын
Praise God
@Da__goat
Жыл бұрын
I’m kind of surprised that these nations aren’t already part of the US given how they essentially function in that way
@NikolaHD
Жыл бұрын
Such a good video James! I didn't even know any of this stuff.. Thank you!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Nikola! I’m really glad you liked it. It’s a rather interesting situation, isn’t it!? And one that had received surprisingly little attention.
@NikolaHD
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Incredible how noone ever talked about this :O
@williambeeson435
Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, William. That is incredibly kind. And very much appreciated. Have a great weekend!
@spadeysay6846
Жыл бұрын
What has these island nations really benefited from their associations with the US regime? What progress has the US regime bestow upon them other than use their lands as firing range for the nuclear bombs and missiles? If their leaders are smart, they should be fully independent to decide on all aspects of their independence and sovereignties.
@plumsberries.4600
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for this video. im a palauan and i really loved your video. i Also want you to know cofa was signed last week. so happy because it comes at a very hard time for us palauans.
@JamesKerLindsay
5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. I’m not sure that I have ever had a viewer from Palau! 🇵🇼😀
@plumsberries.4600
5 ай бұрын
Mesulang (thank you) ❤ for your work
@medianmack
Жыл бұрын
@Prof James Ker Lindsay Please consider doing a full length exposition of offers made by Ukraine and other countries to install a U.N. peacekeeping force along the line of contact with the separatist regions of Ukraine. Russian claims that the war was necessary for humanitarian reasons largely rely on the shelling of separatists after the cease fire. Peacekeepers would have removed this pretext entirely so it is very important that people know of these offers to provide a U.N. peacekeeping force.
@zombiekilldemon
Жыл бұрын
I'm Puerto Rican and I support Free Association as the best alternative to full independence. Puerto Rico should never be a state! If we did we would become like the native Hawaiians, the poorest demographic in their own homeland.
@thomassenbart
Жыл бұрын
Not likely. The population of PR is large and would not collapse, as happened to the Polynesians after first contact with Europeans. Also, PR has strong connections with populations in the states, especially NYC. Statehood would vastly change the island but it is politically impossible at the moment. Also, the level of corruption on the island is not a good fit.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Matthew. Great point. It does raise the question as to whether this is a good alternative option for Puerto Rico? Retaining the link to the US would be beneficial in so many ways, especially with the right to live and work in the US. But having a proper place in the world would be good. I have always been rather sceptical about the Commonwealth status. It has always seemed rather colonial - and indeed was only seemingly invented by the US to get the UN off its back!
@zombiekilldemon
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay you should do a video on it! Also you're correct the status quo of "commonwealth" is colonialism. There has already been a bill introduced and passed the house of representatives that calls for a binding referendum vote between Independence, Free Association, and Statehood. It will unfortunately never pass the Senate.. If it did pass the Democrats would flood Puerto Rico with political ads propagating for statehood only to get 2 more Senate seats. They will continue with fear tactics and lies like independence will lead to us becoming Haiti, or that all Puerto Rican Vets will instantly lose benefits; All lies. The bill includes provisions to still continue those benefits even after independence. Puerto Ricans under statehood would lose all rights to their land just like Native Hawaiians. Unlike native Americans or native Alaskans native Hawaiians have no special rights. They are just considered Pacific Islanders. Puerto Rico will end up just like Hawaii full of rich white people gentrifying the population off the island to the mainland, increasing inequality, and the loss of our public beaches to private hotels and other property developers. No to statehood!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
@@zombiekilldemon Thanks. I did do a video on Puerto Rico a couple of years ago. A few things have happened since then, but the background remains valid. kzitem.info/news/bejne/l6utmYxug6edpnY
@JS-ih7lu
Жыл бұрын
The US has egregiously abused its trusteeship of the Marshall Islands with nuclear testing and continue to lie to its residents till this day on the resulting health problems. At least the US wouldn’t blow up its own “state” and contaminate it forever. (See John Pilger’s documentary on the Marshall Islands, it’s the worst case of human rights abuse that’s never talked about)
@benjauron5873
Жыл бұрын
At 2:26, your flag of the Marshall Islands is upside down. 🇲🇭
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Seriously!? Oh no! I’m going to throttle the editing software! (Final Cut pro.) Sometime when you change the size of graphics it flips things around. Matters weren’t helped as I was up against the clock on this one and it decided to seize up on me. Blame Apple! :-) Sorry to any Marshallese watching!
@jayjinom7060
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Lol. No worries, shi happens. Also another thing to point out that is I noticed you placed the Marshall Islands flag in the middle where it belongs because I feel like we are the middle child of the group 😩🥴🤦🏻♂️
@_Zaaier
Жыл бұрын
I love your videos and information, keep it up! 👌👌
@bayersbluebayoubioweapon8477
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. It always feels like discussion of this topic is downplayed in importance
@mojewjewjew4420
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like colonialism.
@rabuanmantine8522
Жыл бұрын
Wow… never knew that arrangements existed… TQ Prof.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Yes, it is a strange and little known situation.
@RobespierreThePoof
Жыл бұрын
Free association is a superior arrangement to being a colony, but it hasn't stopped the US from behaving in ways that are a little questionable. Bikini Atoll is one clear example. At the same time, simply withdrawing entirely from the Pacific is not an option because it would clear the way other actors to move in. It's hard to say what the solution is.
@user-cx9nc4pj8w
Жыл бұрын
I don't think people understand just how small these archipelagoes actually are. In total, they only have a fifth of a million people. That is half the size of Tampa. They are never going to be "fully independent nations". They're just too small. They don't have the money or the people for their own defence, which would require a significant navy and airforce to protect them. That is why they've bounced between imperial powers through conquest. Their position is only even important from a tactical and strategic military perspective; it's not like Singapore which has access to trade. So they're pretty lucky that a new rivalry in the Pacific has given them more bargaining power, unless it ends in violence on their territory of course.
@HSstudio.Ytchnnl
Жыл бұрын
Guam, Palau, the Carolinas, & the Marianas could've been part of the Philippines instead because of the Spanish. This could've been a potential superpower.
@alvinchua5211
Жыл бұрын
The US should return Guam and the Marshall Islands back to their owners.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
The Marshall Islands is an independent state already and a member of the UN. But Guam is certainly another question.
@richardlu4195
Жыл бұрын
Prof - I take it that you are logical, truth-seeking, up-right and intelligent. Please tell us truthfully - what has China done to the US that the US has made China Enemy No. 1? As a matter of fact, if not for China augmenting and moderating the US economy with its cheap and somewhat reliable products, the average US citizens' standard of living would be worse off. Do you seriously think the US can compete with the Chinese in the longer term ? China has 4.25 times the population of USA. China can survive and thrive without exporting to the US. China will soon be on par or slightly ahead of the US in some vital and strategic technologies. It makes no sense for the US Government (not the citizens) to try to bash China. Surely Taiwan cannot be the issue. If it is, the US is at the wrong end of the stick to begin with. Isn't it cleverer to work with China instead of fighting it ? Isn't it better to co-operate and win-win ? Even to prosper your neighbours - isn't it better than fighting with them ? Prof - China is not USA's enemy. Poverty, lack of food, shelters, medical care, work opportunities and most importantly education are the enemies.
@BettBeat_Media
Жыл бұрын
Modern IR completely ignores US imperialism and neocolonialism. That's why it's a severely lacking field. It relates all to "strategic interests" or "security". While 90% is maintaining wealth and increasing profit for its corporate elites.
@somefatbugger
Жыл бұрын
Once again, a masterful analysis. Being an Australian I do appreciate your geopolitical analysis of our own backyard. We Australians very much do recognise the significance of the Pacific nations with respect to our very own security and future prosperity.
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Shaun! I really appreciate it. The Pacific is such an interesting and hugely important area, and yet it gets barely any attention here in Europe. And this was a topic I had long wanted to cover.
@somefatbugger
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Thanks for covering it. Of late it has come home to us Australians that with China's persistent attempts to influence our region including the Pacific it has become a matter we need to take more seriously, due to our reliance on sea lanes for the majority of our trade.
@johnlay3040
Жыл бұрын
If you look at the history of Asia, you'll find the only time aggression happened is at the WWII. it is due to Japanese copying aggressive nations of Europe. Before that US was not an aggressive nation. The security in the Pacific only becomes an issue after the Japanese aggression. Following the WWII US becomes increasingly defensive in this regions. Later on, the defensive becomes offensive, then country which is under threat, such as China started building their own defense, and it is perceived as a threat by US. So things just keep on going like a chain reaction, until it reaches the dangerous level like it is today.
@mahatmagaand
Жыл бұрын
Loved the topic Professor. With love from New Delhi, India Sybell John Sajan
@Xavyer13
Жыл бұрын
Imagine if they could apply for statehood like Puerto Rico #55states
@thomassenbart
Жыл бұрын
Applying for statehood is always a possibility for any territory of the US but being accepted is something else entirely.
@charlesmadre5568
Жыл бұрын
Puerto Rico (51), Douglass Commonwealth (52), Guam (53), USVI (54), Northern Mariana Islands (55), American Samoa (56), Marshall Islands (57), Palau (58), Pohnpei (59), Kosrae (60), Yap (61), Chuuk (62). America could have 62 states!
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
I did come across a really interesting article suggesting that a group of them should get together and apply to become a US state. It is a fascinating idea. I'm not sure it would get very far, or that they would want to give up their independent status, but it was interesting to see it raised.
@charlesmadre5568
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesKerLindsay Even if we were to create a gigantic State of Micronesia by incorporating the 3 compact states plus Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, the population would still be a fraction of Wyoming's.
@sordman2
Жыл бұрын
@@charlesmadre5568 That would be the only option. As seperate entities, their populations would not be sufficient for a representative and 2 senators each, but combined, their population would be a little over 400,000 - or about 170,000 less than Wyoming's, and their total area would be around 600 sq miles less than Rhode Island's. It's exclusive economic zone would be 4,600,545 sq miles including Wake Island, Howland Island, and Baker Island. Although it would be the least populated state, have the lowest GDP and per capita, it would still be one of the most powerful least-populated country subdivisions in the world.
@akhalif579
Жыл бұрын
I think these countries Islands will stay as US strategic assets for seeable future thats will keep them self rule for now. Thanks
@supadog1453
Жыл бұрын
U.S. is being rejected all over the world. Why?
@jonhone1
Жыл бұрын
It’s just all about divide and conquer to serve the powerful country
@salilbhatnagar
Жыл бұрын
The isolationist policy of the past few years have really hurt our standing in the world. The US must lead in the international stage and strengthen our alliances.
@peanut0brain
Жыл бұрын
Lead in the international stage & strengthen your alliances for more wars?
@louisewaltu5142
Жыл бұрын
So true only if we knew the free aid aiming to Micronesia
@ALHantaz
Жыл бұрын
Good info 👍
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@carlabroderick5508
8 ай бұрын
Fine if US is declining but the GDP is still so good and military power so great, I think the strategists should wait longer to make sure.
@sy-2akiripa404
11 ай бұрын
woooow
@AlteredState1123
Жыл бұрын
Great topic!
@bowlampar
Жыл бұрын
China expansive sphere of influence in Pacific Ocean had raised the sense of urgency for US to reassess and renew its Pacific Allies relationship with Palau, Micronesia and Marshall Islands. The coming of a new player in Pacific theatre is not all bad for some island nations after all as commonly believed. 🤔
@koontekinte0
Жыл бұрын
thank you very much for the video, professor, as always - a pleasure. I always found it strange for a country to not run its own defense forces and policies, even if it results in better quality of life for the population. however, I tend to believe that if not for the US, the entire south pacific would be controlled and annexed by some big neighboring country (not necessarily China), to the detriment of the local population. it is extremely interesting to see all the pacts and international agreements falling apart as the different pieces of this equilibrium shift and change and disturb it.
@alalesc3796
Жыл бұрын
The USA has military bases all over the world and territories as far as Asia, why?! Who tell them that can take that land?! And they have the guts to complain about Russia?!
@shaybs
Жыл бұрын
Personally, considering these aren’t white or European ethnic countries. I think they’ll be more willing to go for whatever is in their interest. For example, Australia sided with the US. However, if one thinks about it would be easier for Australia to be in the Chinese camp from economic and geographic perspective. However, its shared European or Anglo Saxon heritage makes side with the States. This barrier isn’t there for some of the other pacific countries.
@Homer-OJ-Simpson
Жыл бұрын
It might a bluff to get as much as they can because these three nations really are treated as US states that are independent. That means they have lots of rights Americans do and also have their own independence.
@emperor___palpatine
Жыл бұрын
It’s been a while since it was on the news, but has there been any progress on Bougainville becoming independent from PNG?
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Great question! This is something that I have been meaning to come back to for absolutely ages.
@fahadazmi3998
Жыл бұрын
great
@katubird2814
Жыл бұрын
Protecting international conflicts and war
@ephraimbrener9143
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for very interesting topics. From what I understand, though, the Federation of Micronesia has more pro-US stand than the others. Am I right? Also, how the Chuuk aspiration to become independent will affect this relationship?
@nromk
Жыл бұрын
I think the assessment that the South Korean president made about congress should be ringing in the background here: with the freedom caucus being overpowered in congress any meaningful legislation in relation towards anything is mote.
@omarb1912
Жыл бұрын
Ukraine got 100 billion in less than a year. Those islands are in a good negotiating position
@graceantonio3573
Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SIR! THIS IS INDEED GOOD INFORMATION. SIGH... I'M FROM THE PACIFIC-SOUTHEAST ASIA REGION, THE PHILIPPINES. I DON'T LIKE WHAT AMERICA HAD DONE TO MARSHALL ISLANDS WITH NUCLEAR TESTS, I CRY TO GOD ABOUT SUCH THINGS. I KNOW THE USA HAS ITS OWN VIEW ABOUT HAVING "CONTROL & INFLUENCE" AS ITS STRATEGIC POLITICAL STAND, BELIEVING IT IS NECESSARY BUT IN TRUTH, ITS QUESTIONABLE. THE WESTERN MINDSET, THAT ITS AMERICAN INTEREST IS TO SPREAD AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IS A STALE & STUCK UP IDEOLOGUE. HOW ABOUT CHANGING THE "STRATEGY & STYLE" THAT MAKES IT LOOK LIKE A CONTROL FREAK? A WANNABE "KING OF THE WORLD" AS IT MUST SHOW ITSELF A BENEVOLENT MONEY TREE (HAHAHA!) &AS IT IS, ITS AS IF THE WESTERN SUPERPOWER MUST HAMMER ITS STAKE AS A CLAIM, MAKE A DEPOSIT AS A "TERRITORIAL ID" THAT THESE ARE TINY NUGGETS OF ISLANDS OF HUMANITY IN THE POCKETS OF AMERICA. ITS A RESULT OF THE WW2 PROBLEM THAT HAS REACHED ITS END. BACK THEN, IN THE PAST, IT WAS TO HAVE CONTROL OF THE PACIFIC AS JAPAN HAD THE UPPERHAND, THERE WAS A THREAT BY THE "AXIS OF POWER" THAT FORMED SIMPLY BECOZ THE WORLD OF NATIONS WENT THROUGH A TERRIBLE TUG OF WAR, OF POLARIZATION, OF A DIVISION AS "FACTIONS" RESULTED OUT OF POLITICAL DISAGREEMENT, A COMPETING WORLD VIEW AMONG THE WORLD OF NATIONS & ABOVE ALL, OF FEAR. IT WAS SET TO MOTION BY A STRONG LEADERSHIP OF A POLITICAL PARTY IN GERMANY, IT WAS SUPPORTED BY THE OTHER NATIONS WHO WERE ALSO AT A DISAGREEMENT WITH THE WESTERN POLITICAL INFLUENCE. GERMANY & ITS INFLUENCE LOST, JAPAN LOST, ITALY LOST, CHANGED ITS MIND WHEN WW2 ALLIED FORCES SUCCEEDED TO STOP THE ADVANCE OF THE AXIS POWER. SO... DO THE OLD AMERICAN "INSTALLATIONS" OF HOW TO "GOVERN" THE WORLD REMAIN A NECESSARY WAYS & MEANS? THE WORLD IS CHANGING, MINDSETS MUST CHANGE & "STYLES" TOO MUST CHANGE, OTHERWISE IT COULD VERY WELL BE AN OUTMODED STYLE, UNFIT & UNMISTAKINGLY IN NEED OF CHANGE. AS A LIFE GROWS, CHANGES, MATURES, SEASONS CHANGE SO TO SPEAK, SO DO POLITICAL STRATEGY, OLD WAYS, WORLD VIEWS AS WELL AS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PEOPLES OF DIFFERENT REGIONS OF THE WORLD! AS HUMAN BEINGS MUST GROW IN MATURITY, LIKEWISE POLITICAL VIEWS TOO! ADJUSTMENTS & REFINEMENTS IS NEEDED FOR GROWTH, FOR A BETTER WORLD. MAY GODLY WISDOM LIGHT & GUIDE, MAY POLITICAL VIEWS CHANGE FROM OLD WAYS, AN OUTMODED VIEW & MINDSET. MILITARY PRESENCE PRESENCE & "WESTERN" INFLUENCE, CONTROL & MIGHT TO THE PACIFIC REGION MAY NO LONGER BE NECESSARY. IF THE WEST CAN CONDUCT A "SOUND" WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EAST, THERE'S NO NEED TO PLAY TUG OF WAR, ESTABLISHING CONTROL & MAINTAINING ITS STAKE ON THE GROUND, ITS PRESENCE & INFLUENCE THROUGH AN "OWNERSHIP" ID THAT SAYS "WE BELONG TO AMERICA." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAA! SIGH... POLITICS.... A HUMAN FOLLY. ITS A SICK SAD SCREWY GAME OF POLITICAL MANIPULATION, THATS AN OLD WAY, BAD HABIT, BCOZ OF FEAR, DISTRUST, PRIDE & PREJUDICE, THAT HUMAN WEAKNESS OF MALICE, DECIET, ENVY, CONCEIT, SELFISHNESS THAT CAN EASILY SLIDE TO HATRED & VIOLENCE. AH PATHETIC! WHY CAN'T WE LEARN TO RESPECT & ACCEPT ONE ANOTHER? I HUMOUROUSLY SAY THAT IN THE 70s THERE WAS A POP SLOGAN "MAKE LOVE NOT WAR" BUT TODAY ITS DEFINITELY "MAKE PEACE, DO BUSINESS." HAHAHAHAHAAAAA!
@user-lk3ih9nm6k
Жыл бұрын
Wawoo
@voiceless123
Жыл бұрын
Tell us about Argentina and china relationship. Would like to learn
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Great suggestion. These days the relationship between China and almost any country is rather interesting!
@tiredox3788
Жыл бұрын
I'm surprised you didn't mentioned Australia I heard they have been trying to build alliance with pacific islands. Also, you for about China building islands in the pacific. Oh what about Climate control? Do you think that plays a role too in these decisions?
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. I didn’t mention Australia because I wanted to focus on the issue at hand. The problem with any short video is that introducing new elements risks complicating matters and can make things difficult to follow - especially for viewers new to the topic. Hopefully I covered the US and the Freely Associated States well. I’ll try to look at Australia in another video.
@leechgully
Жыл бұрын
As an Australian, I can tell you the new Labor government is trying very hard to forge new ties and restablish good diplomatic relations with many of the nations of the Pacific and Oceania. We had a decade of neglect under the former conservative government which really chose to take a back seat to US efforts. I think both Australia and New Zealand as US allies can help to forge better relations with these countries on behalf of US/Western interests in ways that are different to the US because of their proximity, middle power status and shared regional interests. However Australia as a major coal and gas exporter faces problems convincing these nations it is sincere in its efforts to lower global warming emissions and work in partnership with the Pacific nations towards mitigating the effects of climate change.
@snewsom2997
Жыл бұрын
Losing, no, Giving up yes, we are just walking away from the littoral waters Directly next to Asia Proper and everything all the way to the Suez as well as defending and guaranteeing those trade lanes the ones China relies on. China gets a moat, we get a moat, Japan gets a moat, and Taiwan gets a moat. For the foreseeable future we will also be the only power with force projection beyond lobbing ballistic/hypersonic missiles.
@daveh893
Жыл бұрын
It seems these three states have realized what realtors know, that it's location, location, location.
@JGldmn333
Жыл бұрын
The USA's navy is still head and shoulders above everybody else. But If we are giving these areas up....China may very well fill that void. A bigger threat would be losing the Phillipines as our freinds...which has been far too friendly to China lately. China is a pain in the rear end....for sure. We need to keep these little states in our fold. Let's hope we somehow come to our senses.
@calvinblue894
Жыл бұрын
Philippines being good friends with China is GREAT NEWS... Peace is Good!
@darren5971
Жыл бұрын
Philippines is Asia not part of the region concerned .
@cpxh7703
Жыл бұрын
Phillipines be friend with China is good for both countries and the region. Why fight China for the US? We have seen what happens to the Ukraine. We rather want to see a peaceful Asia.
@alvanalvino
Жыл бұрын
Questions (1) What happens if the USA refuses to fund and renew these agreements and China rushes in with a better offer? Will the Chinese navy take over those waters if they were to fund and develop these islands? India would be worried sick about such a development. (2) Has the past payments to these islands been worth it for the USA? (3) Besides the treat from the Chinese in the Pacific Ocean are these islands strategically important to the USA in 2023?
@craigkdillon
Жыл бұрын
You did not mention the new American military base being built on Palau. Is that in danger of not being built?
@arjmobile5010
Жыл бұрын
US BULLY HAS BIG PROBLEM TO BULLY
@guillaumeroy7528
Жыл бұрын
I'm sure you meant to say that the three countries are located in the western Pacific (not the eastern Pacific). 1:42
@JamesKerLindsay
Жыл бұрын
Yes, indeed. Oops. Well spotted! 🫢🤫
@patrickrpedrus747
Жыл бұрын
$2.1 Billion and the FSM is still pretty much a hot mess.
@holymainlandchinaexplorer1545
Жыл бұрын
Not only lose Pacific power but also can't defend Hawaii or mainland America
@AugustusOmega
Жыл бұрын
England has such status as the micronesian islands in their special relationship with the United States. Although, mind you at 3000 dollars per year the average english is not as wealthy as micronesians but the english hold their head up high nevertheless.
@Jay-hr3rh
Жыл бұрын
What I've heard are countries selling land they didn't buy.
@melheinrich5438
Жыл бұрын
Why don't Guam and American Samoa to do statehood? So ingrained in America 🇺🇸 that would be know problem for not denying joining. Awesome brothers being a territory.
@spaceshuttledoorgunner125
Жыл бұрын
US national interest. Being able to do what ever the US wants or else.
@thomassenbart
Жыл бұрын
This is what it will come down to, if push comes to shove. These areas will not be abandoned so easily.
@clueseeker2226
Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, the Democrats and Republicans are in the pocket of whoever donates the most to their election campaigns. Currently huge amounts of money are being awarded to defense companies, which allows such companies to make large donations in return. Consequently, the interests of ordinary Americans are being neglected so I suspect the interests of the inhabitants of these islands will be neglected also. In this situation the latter may choose to cultivate closer relations with China. This is not necessarily bad because China seems to encourage win-win relationships. Nevertheless, I wish rules could be adopted in the US to restrict the size of donations from vested interests. Then US politicians might do more to serve the interests of ordinary people both in and outside the US.
@sandradavies623
Жыл бұрын
Despite the dip in crypto, I still thank you d for the level-headed financial advice. I started stock and crypto investment with $4,345 and since following you for few weeks now, I've gotten $18,539 in my portfolio Thanks so much to Mr Roberts trading platform °°
@sandradavies623
Жыл бұрын
@Timothy William After I came across bitcoin trading platform of Expert Robert my financial life has totally changed.
@sandradavies623
Жыл бұрын
I used to hold BTC and It really messed up my mental health. So for me, trading daily and taking out your profit is the best choice.
@emilymartha8030
Жыл бұрын
Wow😊l know him and I have also been trading with him, he’s such an amazing man with good skills keeps me happy all week knowing I earn 15thousand extra income trading with him.
@nikkimakpeace2708
Жыл бұрын
I need his help, my investments aren't holding up well and I'd like to be making weekly profits, How can someone reach out to him?!!°°°
Пікірлер: 417