AI Kirov: Launching missiles one by one. Player Kirov: Going full Honor Harrington :D.
@A350Airways
5 ай бұрын
Which one would be closer to the behavior of the actual Kirov's captain, the AI or the player?
@nelsonteixeira3804
4 ай бұрын
@@A350Airways obviously it depends on the target, but against an Iowa, i dont think it would be holding back, specially under fire from the main guns and all those missiles.
@paulbrozyna3006
Жыл бұрын
Considering how over loaded with munitions and fuel Soviet ships are, I’d have imagined one 16” into the front of the thing would have promoted it to cosmonaut.
@Lannerii
2 жыл бұрын
This was a lot of fun to watch! Comparing the Kirov and Iowa performances to last vid's Poti, I get the impression that the AI is a lot better with the smaller craft in this mod. Let's see some missile boat swarms next!
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Haha I had a similar idea:) ASW seems fun too!
@aleksnight5406
2 жыл бұрын
@@Wolfpack345 The creators of the game intentionally did so. If the big ships of the USSR will play in full force, the chances of the US NAVY are small.
@asiss092
2 жыл бұрын
@@Wolfpack345 Nonsense. The firing range of the P-700 Granite is a minimum of 150 kilometers. The bot launches a rocket once an hour.
@billmuller6133
2 жыл бұрын
The AI is pretty bad at surface ships as it doesn’t riplefire the missiles so even an Iowa can win against an ai Kirov like that - nevertheless good video. Late Ticonderoga (the one with VLS) vs Kirov could be fun
@delayed_control
2 жыл бұрын
Player always wins against any AI. The only way you can lose is with horribly inferior ship or when out of ammo
@-Zevin-
2 жыл бұрын
@@delayed_control Well that's not true with all games, depends on how well the AI is coded and how complex the game is.
@scottmoon50
2 жыл бұрын
Not really. The Ticonderoga class doesn't have the firepower for a Kirov plus 2000lb warhead for rip the ship in half. BTW take a look at a pic Tico class cruiser in the 1980s early 1990s and see where they moved the SQL 32(V)3. Why? Because the SQL-32 jamming in active or standby would cause interference with the CIWS radar causing it not to fire or track.
@Breakfast_of_Champions
2 жыл бұрын
The AI is pretty stillborn in this game.
@jamesTBurke
2 жыл бұрын
In actual combat an Iowa would never go bow on like that. The 16 inch guns are devastating
@DL541
2 жыл бұрын
At one time there was a discussion about the Exocet missile hitting an Iowa-class, one of the captains responded, well, we would have to repaint the hit mark.
@forcea1454
2 жыл бұрын
Given that the Iowas have an internal belt, even an Exocet hit along the waterline would lead to a not insignificant amount of flooding and loss of waterplane area.
@TheKurtkapan34
2 жыл бұрын
An anti ship missile still carries a 150+kg warhead travelling at 600+kmh. A single one might not kill it, but it will still hurt like a motherfucker. And it will fuck up the superstructure, radars, guns, missile batteries.
@Ropetor
2 жыл бұрын
The granit carries a 750kg warhead or a 200kt nuclear one so it wouldn't be so true for it lol
@forcea1454
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheKurtkapan34 In addition to the warhead there's also unburnt missile fuel, and shrapnel of various kinds, including turbine spools from the missiles turbojet, which would cause significant fragment damage.
@DL541
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheKurtkapan34 I agree, Navasource and DAFNS has the quote. lol.
@godswillkneel5072
2 жыл бұрын
I just toured the actual USS Iowa with my daughters a week ago. Pretty awesome to climb around the decks if this old ship.
@Strelnikov403
2 жыл бұрын
You're activating your missiles way too late and they're going active after the enemy starts evading, acquiring the chaff instead of the ship. They have a seeker range of like 15km, pull those markers wayyyyyyy back. They're not like torpedoes. Edit: you're also launching chaff at full speed and outrunning the cloud. Slow down to ≤10kts to hide in the chaff cloud and turn to unmask your CIWS when going defensive. Phalanx sucks at intercepting the huge Soviet AShMs, and with a vessel without a SAM system(s) like the Iowa, you need to work your guns and chaff much harder than normal to avoid being hit.
@matthewcaughey8898
2 жыл бұрын
Situation like that the Iowa probably would’ve been sailing with a battle group which would’ve easily handled the problem with no SAMs
@edreesamien1064
2 жыл бұрын
Situation like that the Iowa probably would’ve been sailing with a battle group which would’ve easily handled the problem with no SAMs 1
@matthewcaughey8898
2 жыл бұрын
@@edreesamien1064 yeah you just cut and pasted exactly what I already said
@chaseinit1
2 жыл бұрын
Situation like that the Iowa probably would’ve been sailing with a battle group which would’ve easily handled the problem with no SAMs
@blameusa7082
2 жыл бұрын
Situation like that the Iowa probably would’ve been sailing with a battle group which would’ve easily handled the problem with no SAMs
@TheSDB13
2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the Dangerous Waters soundtrack
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Very fitting :)
@francisarmitage8142
2 жыл бұрын
I always prefer surface combat over submarines etc, so I'm really glad to see this video. I'm impressed with the realism. It reminds me of the old 'Fleet Command' that I had a lot of fun with many years ago. It's a shame (to me) that modern war at sea games don't explore surface combat much. Thanks for uploading!
@alanmalan3819
2 жыл бұрын
Kirov was in battles vs German aviation in Baltic sea in real
@Lucas_WAZZAA
Жыл бұрын
Alr, bet you already know this, but im still gonna mention it: Sea Power is the game you want to wishlist, its to be released in about half a year.
@mikeb53
2 жыл бұрын
The main guns on a WW2 battleship would utterly SHRED anything that floats today if it scores hits. The trick would be surviving long enough with the battle ship to do so
@squgieman
2 жыл бұрын
that simply wont happen, pretty much all modern surface ships can out detect, out range, and in the worst case, out run those old gun based ships, also battleships would be absolutely shredded by modern heavy anti-ship missiles, which often weigh more than conventional gun shells, have more explosives, and move much faster
@c3aloha
2 жыл бұрын
As long as you don’t have an incompetent senior chief conducting amateur experiments with 80 year old gunpowder that kill your turret crews. RIP Iowa turret 2.
@Matthewv1998
7 ай бұрын
@@squgieman late reply but..not quite. battleships were built in a totally different mindset then what ships are today. modern ships today are lightweight, rapidly produced vessles made to duke it out over hundreds of miles battleships were made to fight in practically close quarters and made to take hits and keep fighting. the only real modern system that they're totally fucked against are modern torpedos since those are back breakers however...because battleships were made to protect against practically slinging bunker busters around, they have armor that simply isnt seen anymore. modern ships are practically all made out of shell plating which, modern weapons are made to combat against. hence why most modern missles are impact fused and not really made to go through 12 inches of side armor, and if its a deck attack, it has to go through a few decks thats even specfically made for that.. hence the bomb deck, 4.75" armored deck and the splinter deck now, are they invulnerable? no. any boat that gets hit with 1000lb explosive payload is going to have a bad day, but compared to modern ships where a single successful hit practically dooms the ship, a hit on a iowa would more then likely just be a combat knockout and could make it home to be repaired. or keep fighting if it has to, if anythings in range of its guns that is.
@Tom--Ace
2 жыл бұрын
The Kirov was spawned within firing range of the battleship. That's playing to a battleship's strengths The situation may have been very different had the ships engaged out of gun range, which is very much more likely
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
2 жыл бұрын
Without air support the Kirov would be restricted to detecting the Iowa on radar which would already be in gun range of the Iowa.
@xAlexTobiasxB
2 жыл бұрын
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 the kirov carries 3 helicopter each of which has a radar, so it could detect the Iowa at 100 km easily. The Iowa doesn't carry any helicopter But realistically speaking they would never meet 1 vs 1 anyways so there goes your wet dream bubble.. 🙄
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
2 жыл бұрын
@@xAlexTobiasxB The Iowa's were one of the first Naval ships to use drones. We used them for spotting shell fall and finding targets. The RQ2B which had a range of 185 KM.
@Tom--Ace
2 жыл бұрын
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 that's great, but the Kirov would still detect you far far out of gun range. It doesn't matter if you detected the Kirov too! Its just stupid to think an Iowa could sail up to a Kirov without being detected. Its totally unrealistic and not only that, the inability of battleships to get within gun range (even in wwii!!) without excessive risk was the very reason battleships were abandoned in the first place! Battleships are cool, but obsolete. They would never get within range of a modern ship like the Kirov without being detected and likely hit by dozens of anti ship missiles, and rendered a mission kill at best
@Tom--Ace
2 жыл бұрын
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 no matter which way you stack it (lone Kirov vs lone Iowa, totally unrealistic, or fleet centred around Kirov and fleet centred around Iowa), the Kirov would always detect the Iowa far outside of gun range and while in a fleet vs fleet situation frigates may well hit the Kirov (it's uncertain who would win, although Kirov would have a huge advantage over ordinary missile frigates), the matter would be decided before the Iowa ever got involved and it would be essentially useless. The Iowa isn't a ship that's useful for matching up against the Kirov or modern missile frigates, which would always detect her well outside of gun range and would smash her to bits with missiles before she ever got into gun range (mission kill at the least, with all radars dead). Battleships are cool, but modern naval battles centre around missile and aircraft carrying ships like frigates, Kirov and most importantly, aircraft carriers. The Iowa in reality would likely sail with an aircraft carrier group, which would likely beat the Kirov battle group, and the only contribution of the Iowa to the battle would be shore bombardment and CWIS for incoming missiles
@Alexyrion
2 жыл бұрын
My god I did not know I needed this so much. Now I REALLY want a modern surface ship combat game!
@jingyunyang6275
2 жыл бұрын
mobile game called modern warships. total shitshow
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Sea power will be our savior!
@notfeedynotlazy
2 жыл бұрын
Somebody should just upgrade good old Harpoon's graphics
@stitch77100
4 ай бұрын
@@notfeedynotlazy Command: modern operation ? (I don't know if that's what you meant, but it seemed to fit the description)
@forcea1454
2 жыл бұрын
Should really have launched all the TASMs and Harpoons at one in that first engagement. The Iowas were brought back into service primarily because they could carry a significant amount of Armoured Box Launchers for Tomahawks, not because of the guns (early on in the reactivation program mothballing the guns and just using the ship as a TASM/TLAM carrier was mooted).
@sorenlilienthal1368
2 жыл бұрын
The USMC, who loved artillery support from the sea and the bigger the better, were about the strongest supporters of reactivating the WW2 battleships.
@IrishCarney
2 жыл бұрын
@@sorenlilienthal1368 Said it for me, thanks. And the Marines were the biggest advocates for keeping the Iowas too. You'd think the Navy would at least have kept one of the Des Moines class heavy cruisers, since they had auto loading guns with double the rate of fire. Then again, 8 inches is a lot smaller than 16, and it's worse than that - the Des Moines' shells weighed 335 lbs but the Iowas' a whopping 1,900!
@jayjay53313
2 жыл бұрын
No it's not, the Iowa was reinstated because of its 16" battery good for clearing beaches for USMC amphibious landing apart from able to carry large numbers of TLAM before there's VLS. Its air defense system is no where near aegis having just RIM-7 Sea Sparrow Mk15 Phalanx CIWS. USS Iowa won't stand a chance against Kirov battlecruiser that has long range SAN-6 (S300) SAM, Mach 3+ sea skimming anti-ship missiles that could be launched multiple via its VLS.
@IrishCarney
2 жыл бұрын
@@jayjay53313 The Marines loved those guns for their primary mission of amphibious assault, but that love hadn't saved the Iowas from being retired on multiple prior occasions. No, what revived the Iowas was the Kirovs. The Iowas were not an exact mach for these Soviet "battlecruisers" but the political and PR pressure to match and counter these new Soviet monsters (which were well over twice the size of the Ticoconderoga cruisers) was intense, especially with the cancellation of the roughly Kirov-comparable Strike Cruiser concept.
@jayjay53313
2 жыл бұрын
@@IrishCarney the BBG revival came before Kirov battlecruiser enters service. There was need for artillery guns for beach landing when US predicted there will be war campaign in Middle East that might need battleship to secure beach head for amphibious assault. The battleships were later phased our when there's no more such war & there's no need for it plus it guzzles fuel with poor range. Kirov VLS inspired US to refit later Ticonderoga class cruisers that entered service with VLS replacing the impractical racks launcher for TLAM.
@shadekerensky3691
2 жыл бұрын
I look forward to when Sea Power comes out, it'll be so fun to see a proper Iowa vs Kirov fight.
@Vchk1917
2 жыл бұрын
Recently, the devs were interviewed by Jive Turkey (or Sub Brief, a former US sonarman who does gaming and naval analysis for a living). You might wanna watch it, both interviews that they participated in gave a lot of info about SP.
@justarandombird
2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, a great battle between 2 of my favourite ships. Great job!
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Waldemarvonanhalt
2 жыл бұрын
The Kirov cruiser Peter the Great visited my city a few years ago. Massive ship that stood out like an elephant in the room when looking down towards the harbour docks.
@ElijahLandstrom
6 ай бұрын
i wish i could see a kirov up close.
@Hangry_Hungarian
2 жыл бұрын
These Surface Cold War videos are really cool, would love to see more!
@gareththompson2708
2 жыл бұрын
I would be interested in seeing a more realistic scenario with both ships having their wartime escorts and starting at whatever distance they would have first detected each other at.
@tefras14
2 жыл бұрын
11:50 shooting down a missile but the thing is so angry it still hits you out of sheer spite
@jawajacobite7207
2 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see you do a surface ship campaign! If at all possible. I think the Lowa would be a cool challenge. Great videos. Love em please keep em coming :)
@OmegaPaladin144
2 жыл бұрын
That was awesome. This series has tons of potential. I think the Iowa might be fun in a convoy raiding scenario like the first one you did with the Tico. ASW would definitely be interesting as well.
@ussenterprise3156
2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, Battleship vs Battlecruiser, Cold War edition
@SuperIv7
2 жыл бұрын
In reality Kirov would launch a salvo of Mach2+ P-700 missiles from few hundred miles and run away. Those missiles would select appropriate paths and approach the target simultaneously and from different directions. At no point Kirov would be in danger of being hit by anything that Iowa has.
@captaincumrag42069
2 жыл бұрын
The Kirov would just have to stay out of the range of the Iowa's guns and it's anti air defenses should be able to take down most missles that the Iowa would fire at it. Although I'm confident many modern surface ships would destroy an Iowa, by just bombarding it with missiles from beyond visual range, well out of range of the Iowa's guns. An Arliegh Burke destroyer could do kill an Iowa. Unless for whatever reason the US Navy decides to super fit the old battleships with modern weapons lmao
@MultiGamingNetwork03
2 жыл бұрын
@@captaincumrag42069 Iowa has these things called CWIS. It'll laugh as it knocks your missiles out of the sky.
@ThatGuyOrby
2 жыл бұрын
@@captaincumrag42069 That would only work assuming that Kirov's AA systems worked and considering what we found out about the condition of the Moskva (which was the literal Flagship of the Black Sea Fleet) when it was sunk? Chances are none of it would be. The only AA systems that were functional on Moskva at the time it was attacked was one of it's five CIWS emplacements. We know this because of a maintenance report that was declassified mere weeks before the ship's sinking which revealed that it was barely even functional.
@captaincumrag42069
2 жыл бұрын
@@ThatGuyOrby I'm aware of that now and having read up more on the poor condition of the Soviet fleet and how current Russia maintains that fleet, my chances are now on Iowa. While it'd still be possible for Kirov to launch enough missiles to overwhelm the Iowa's CWIZ systems I doubt they would waste that many to try. They are pretty much equal In terms of speed so whoever spots who first has the advantage. Hearing about how awful Russian crew training and damage control I'm even less confident in them. It's crazy how poorly they maintained those Soviet era ships and now the effects are biting them in the ass in the Ukraine/Russia conflict
@danielefabbro822
2 жыл бұрын
Just imagine if the Iowa had our laser system to point and tracking targets. 16' laser guided shells would hit that target. With a single salvo you would have rekt it.
@Stlaind
2 жыл бұрын
In 1991 they were using drones for spotting and one even got an iraqi garrison to surrender to it's drone....
@22steve5150
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine if the Navy would have went ahead with the early to mid 90's modernization plans. New shells for the 16" guns that more than doubled the range, significantly upgraded air defenses including both RAM and ESSM launchers, new shock resistant illumination radars, Mk41 VLS modules, and belowdecks rear hangar for drones.
@l.m.s2874
2 жыл бұрын
Арта в 21 веке? Ерунда, дорого слишком. Даже если дальность в два раза увеличить. Сейчас на модернизированном "Адмирал Нахимов" ставят гиперзвуковые "Циркон", с дальностью 1000км. Это куда дешевле арты, да и эффективнее)
@danielefabbro822
2 жыл бұрын
@@l.m.s2874 can you translate to English? I can't do that from my phone.
@l.m.s2874
2 жыл бұрын
@@danielefabbro822 Sorry, i don't speek english, i from Russia. "Translete")
@lauriea2971
2 жыл бұрын
Could u do the German battleship Bismarck vs the Usn Iowa class
@timonsolus
2 жыл бұрын
Bismarck was severely outclassed by Iowa. 1940 technology vs 1945 technology. Iowa had far superior radars and fire control.
@portablepooper1173
2 жыл бұрын
Yes however the Iowa class has weaker armor than the Bismarck. Iowa didn’t have turtle back. The Bismarck took dozens of torpedos to sink, the Iowa would only need 4 to 6
@filippomunari8147
2 жыл бұрын
@@portablepooper1173 bismarck was not sunk, he was scuttled by his crew after getting hit in the helm by a torpedo
@DarthPhallix
2 жыл бұрын
@@timonsolus You're partially correct. Had the Bismarck survived until the end of the war, it's a certainty that the Germans would have been continuously upgrading her with more modern and advanced systems as the war drew on. A hypothetical 1945 Bismarck with new gadgets and technology would have been a formidable adversary provided there were no aircraft around, which were the bane of any large surface ship in that conflict. Even in 1940, she was more than a match for anything afloat. In addition to being a war of attrition, WW2 was really just one giant arms race, and the Germans were no slouches in developing useful and innovative goodies. By 1943-44, however, they had begun to suffer in terms of logistics and production in a big way. What cannot be refuted is that their optics and naval gunnery were devastatingly accurate.
@jace_under_mars5386
2 жыл бұрын
@@portablepooper1173 True but the Iowa and Yamato caused Germany to come up with the H class battleship. The Iowa was a very fearsome ship, She and her sisters also had better guns. The main issue with Bismarck is it's guns would break down very easily. Meanwhile Iowa had better fire control,better guns,bigger guns, and could fire from farther.
@OfficialUSKRprogram
2 жыл бұрын
Nice! Glad you played both sides, really gives a good perspective of both weapon systems
@MrFunkhauser
2 жыл бұрын
that granite that circled your ship accidently is a great strategy to distract CWIS EDIT: The AI in this game is almost always a dissapointment. Fire one torp/missle and do nothing else.
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
It is a mod, the ai is not ment to do this.
@Deltarious
2 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry but in a battle where an Iowa somehow magically spawns in gun range of a Kirov it's not even a contest and the Iowa will steamroll the Kirov every time. It only takes one solid hit from a 16 inch shell to completely ruin the Kirov's day and although the Kirov could cripple the Iowa with solid hits we must remember that it is an armoured battleship and is designed to take hits. Of course there is no realistic scenario where an Iowa *gets* into gun range of a Kirov before sustaining mission-killing levels of damage, but if it were teleported to within a reasonable range the Kirov is not going to survive.
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
2 жыл бұрын
Say they were in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, how is Kirov going to detect Iowa at long range? Without land based aircraft to identify a target and pass on firing information Kirov is BLIND. If she relied on her surface search radar by the time she detects Iowa she is already in range of those fearsome guns.
@BBeyer2K8
2 жыл бұрын
Now you need to do a Kirov vs 10 subs 😂😅
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Haha oh boy. I definitely want to do some ASW!
@BBeyer2K8
2 жыл бұрын
Yah, I’ve played with the Russian RBU’s, they are fun to use, I one shoted a Typhoon class with the RBU
@BBeyer2K8
2 жыл бұрын
It’s even better when you hit the sub with a RBU and they blow ballast but they still sink, slowly until they crush.
@robinraphael
2 жыл бұрын
we need to see you play against another well rounded player aka real person not A I
@BBeyer2K8
2 жыл бұрын
@@robinraphael cold waters is a single player game, but it would be cool to do multiplayer in cold waters, but all killer fish games are single player :/
@jedispartancoolman
2 жыл бұрын
It is my dream that games like this will combine with DCS and gunner heat ready
@andrewmontgomery5621
2 жыл бұрын
Clash of the Titans.
@barnacle_bill2257
2 жыл бұрын
clash o' clans
@maxcaysey2844
Жыл бұрын
Love seeing anyting with an Iowa class really! Keep making these videos! We need more 16" gun fun!
@tedlarsson1765
2 жыл бұрын
Nice video man,beautiful visuals but the best thing abt it is you :) thanks for the great vids man
@zapy9715
2 жыл бұрын
You know for a warship designed in 1939 and built in 1940, The Iowa did pretty good against a ship made thirty years later.
@MrLuftwafflez
2 жыл бұрын
Iowa is armed to take a 16 inch shell punch. The kirov has a glass jaw.
@jugganaut33
2 жыл бұрын
@@MrLuftwafflez: a glass jaw.. if you can get close enough?? She can sustain well over 33knots in all sea states. You won’t catch her with a diesel boat in endurance or speed. Her Granite missiles can strike Mad dogged at 600km. Twice the range of Harpoons. With only 16” guns being the only thing that can kill her at 50km. By which point Her Rocket launched Torpedos were likely already under Iowa’s keel. It’s like saying you’d have the chance against a Long bowman or a Crossbowman or a pikeman in an open field just because you’re wearing armour and holding a big club. or realistically in Kirovs case… you’d be facing all three at once. Kirov was designed to be able to take on an entire US navy Carrier group Solo. A battleship is a joke to her.
@gabriels5105
2 жыл бұрын
@@jugganaut33 what are you on about. Iowa can go 37 knots. Kirov might be faster but at least look at shaft horsepower and concider these ships should be slower on the specs page than irl. Im not sure about the others stuff. Dose kirov have the correct system to guide it. Thats the only part that matters. The ordinance on Kirov's deck can be detonated and fires can take her down from smaller weapons if she dose not use everything. She is probably not going to actually deal with a carrier group. Thats alot of planes and ships and even she probably dose not have enough missiles even if they all landed to get everything. Thats a alot of targets and a submarine.
@vanta_8lack591
2 жыл бұрын
@@jugganaut33 to counter the speed, the USS New Jersey , 2nd of the iowa class Batlteships. ran for 2 hours at 36 knots chasing a japanese destroyer earning the world record for fastest BB in the world. 2nd the way taht armor is being made compared to the past is different. the iowas if hit amid shiops their torpedo blisters can take the hit. the blister are filled with bunker fuel so it will sow down the missle if its gets through the blister. the fuel is not flammble so it wont detonate. the iowa can handle the kirov, also when the shell hit her vls the kirov would be dead. the iowa would be using AP against the kirov. anywasy the iowa if needed could be sent with the W23 or W19 (refitted with a sabot round) would end the match.
@charlesc.9012
2 жыл бұрын
We often severely underestimate fast battleships like that. They were designed to absorb torpedo hits and heavy shells while continuing to function, and they were fast enough to keep up with a carrier fleet in operating in excess of 30 knots. They were also updated to have competent electronics for the age, and the refit also cost less than buying a new frigate. A Granite is only the equivalent of a 15" HE shell, but without the specialised naval shell design or velocities to deal noticeable damage to a super dreadnought, which meant no mortal damage could be dealt. They were big, but they could deliver barely more than a full salvo from HMS Agincourt in the WW1 era. Advanced torpedoes of the cold war were also unlikely to have warheads big enough to disable a battleship with a single salvo At that displacement, they could also carry a huge amount of missile armament. The real problem was that such power was excessive, and the massive crew she needed cost too much money to upkeep
@BigJwlz
2 жыл бұрын
07:31 Kirov class ships are nuclear powered, but this simulator shows it emitting exhaust fumes.
@RedneckRapture
2 жыл бұрын
Full fleet battle. LIke, full taskforces on both sides going at each other full bore.
@3dkiller
14 күн бұрын
The P-700 Granit (Russian: П-700 "Гранит"; English: granite) is a Soviet and Russian naval anti-ship cruise missile. Its GRAU designation is 3M45, its NATO reporting name SS-N-19 Shipwreck. It comes in surface-to-surface and submarine-launched variants, and can also be used against ground targets The P-700 has a distinctive annular air intake in the nose. Maximum speed is believed to be between Mach 1.6 and Mach 2.5. Range has been estimated at 400-625 km. The guidance system is mixed-mode, with inertial guidance, terminal active radar homing guidance and also anti-radar homing. Mid-course correction is probable.
@ultra4e
2 жыл бұрын
This is a fun series to watch, thanks
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it!
@VVV-DamoP21
Жыл бұрын
I'm impressed with the AI's usage with the smaller ships, where as when it was controlling the Iowa, it put itself into a vulnerable position. Firstly, not firing it's main guns that can fire over 20 kms, nor turning to allow the CIWS to engage correctly. That wasn't you, that was the AI that I'm talking about. But I did enjoy the video.
@jfbooth170
2 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see full carrier fleet attack a carrier fleet with both sides using subs also... USA vs Russia USA vs China GB vs Russia GB vs China Lots of different battles... Pick any...
@joeancinec
2 жыл бұрын
Happy to see you do more of these like you said. Keep them coming.
@ushwallman2070
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine a purpose made game about the Iowa class, all the war from WW2 to when they were finally decommissioned
@gunnerpup7288
Жыл бұрын
Your simulation is already off, because the Kirov is actually able to shoot 😂😂😂 Altogether Though, great watch! Definitely excited to see more!
@hantykje3005
2 жыл бұрын
1984 campain with HMS Conqueror who 40 years ago sank the Belgrano is my suggestion for av future campain.
@joelaroche8103
2 жыл бұрын
Those 16 inches might be a relic of the past, but they still will chop in half anything smaller then a heavly armoured Battleship
@alexeivoloshin5984
2 жыл бұрын
The sheer kinetic energy of a Granite striking the ship at supersonic speeds will treat it apart.
@RuthlessPope
2 жыл бұрын
Well done! A good matchup. Would you consider doing a Perry-class frigate against a Krivak-class frigate or a Neustrashimyy-class frigate?
@syphonfilter9588
2 жыл бұрын
Do you thin kyou could play as a surface ship VS AI submarine(s), maybe protecting a convoy to make it more interesting?
@M16_Akula-III
2 жыл бұрын
Having friendlies is impossible in Cold Waters, you can, fight AI submarine with a surface ship if you use a mod..
@ralgith
2 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for the Ticonderoga campaign ;)
@themightiestofbooshes9443
2 жыл бұрын
I thought it was pretty cool watching the Iowa open up with the 406s. I don't play CW with mods so this was very refreshing to see.
@chrisakins692
2 жыл бұрын
That first hit would have sunk the Kirov. The flooding would have been uncontrollable. Also, the computer did a lousy job fighting the Iowa.
@Keith-zn4vq
9 ай бұрын
What about the Missouri vs Kirov. That would be a fight.
@hupreix2553
2 жыл бұрын
big ww2 daddy is bacck 🤩🤩😍😍
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
🙏
@pdxcorgidad
Жыл бұрын
Wolf: "My money is on the Kirov to win this battle." *Immediate missile strike amidship.* Ian Malcolm: "Boy do I hate being right all the time."
@JascDark
2 жыл бұрын
Missle ship or carrier after getting too close to a fully armed Iowa: so you choose...death.
@JessWLStuart
2 жыл бұрын
I'm curious about how the DOT mod handles carrier combat. That would include controlling planes, missiles, etc...
@spinosarcadegaming4538
2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't as far as I know.
@jfbooth170
2 жыл бұрын
I've asked the same thing and use sub's and planes and every weapon by each country...
@davidlawand2805
2 жыл бұрын
imagine if the yamato was still alive.. .and they retrofitted her to be quite modern... imagine the fire power coming out of her xD
@c3aloha
2 жыл бұрын
With a wave motion gun of course!
@benwood42
2 жыл бұрын
Nicely done! Love the videos and content. Keep it up!
@davidbell1619
2 жыл бұрын
Some years ago I read a report by a Russian Admiral about thr Iowa class ships. They said we can hurt them but once they came over the horizon. The Iowas would sink every one of them. Those ships were built to take on the Yamato class and win. The 16" Iowa had longer barrels higher velocity guns. Plus they were rated at 36 knots, Yamato 28. The Iowas were not to be taken lightly.
@MrTungy
2 жыл бұрын
It would get struck by missiles too much. This is not ww2 anymore.
@OtterTreySSArmy
2 жыл бұрын
@@MrTungy Ukraine has taught you nothing clearly. Russian missiles might as well be WWI battleship shells in terms of accuracy. I'm positive New Jersey or Missouri would massacre Kirov. It took what 1 Haropoon to sink Moskova? The Russian and Chinese navies would be a complete joke were it not for their nuclear weapons....
@stidgik2202
2 жыл бұрын
@@OtterTreySSArmy ha ha. You idiot
@QualityPen
2 жыл бұрын
@@OtterTreySSArmy Ukraine has clearly taught you lots. Lots of propaganda, that is. Harpoons weren’t involved in sinking the Moskva. At all. It was multiple Ukrainian missiles called Neptune, designed based on earlier Soviet missiles. They were used in conjunction with a drone swarm to distract Moskva’s defenses. You Russia haters come up with the most ridiculous arguments. A knockoff of a Soviet missile sinking a ship is supposed to prove how bad Russian missiles (which are knockoffs of Soviet missiles plus 3 decades of R&D) are? That logic doesn’t follow. Ukraine scuttled its only frigate days into the war because it didn’t want to wait until Russia sank it and then put that up on social media. lmao WW1 shells… You people are a joke.
@MultiGamingNetwork03
2 жыл бұрын
@@MrTungy Iowa wouldn't travel alone obviously. She'd have a Battle Group with her. I'd like to see those Russian Missiles take on the might of the US Navy.
@curtisr2656
11 ай бұрын
Good job, interesting to watch both sides of the mission. It still sucks to see our side lose, (US). Fortunately, we are on the right side of history. Thanks again for the cool video.
@wyndo1492
Жыл бұрын
What music plays at the beginning of the video? It really gives me the chills.
@c3aloha
2 жыл бұрын
Iowa turret 2 was never repaired. Just hosed out and sealed up. RIP.
@Malbeefance
2 жыл бұрын
As a former sailor and gunner, the gunnery accuracy in the game is questionable. The hit rate should be much higher.
@cfitzwater01
2 жыл бұрын
After Action Report: Missile hit in the Main Engineering, the Reactor Scammed but there was a line rupture to the Cooling system and with that, the Reactor overheated 🥵. That is why the Reactor melted through the bottom of the ship and is now setting in 23,000 ft of water….cooling off? Oh, you lost one third of the crew with Radiation poisoning and the rest needed Radiation treatment. 😉
@nixravette
2 жыл бұрын
I've been playing with the USS John Paul Jones in the SCS campaign, and its some of the most fun I've had in Cold Waters.
@greyed
2 жыл бұрын
Man, I wish my rear turret turned that fast in WoWs. o.O
@M16_Akula-III
2 жыл бұрын
Got a tip, if you're fighting a full on USN CBG, always use the S-300's first..
@Robert53area
2 жыл бұрын
Let's see if the kirov and a Slava class could take on a carrier group. 1 carrier 3 Ticonderoga 4 DDGs
@Pax.Britannica
2 жыл бұрын
This kind of combat has got to be the most exciting. Two behemoth cruisers going at each other using CIWS for defence, and lobbing missiles at each other. Like an intersection between the convoy raiding cruisers of WW2 and the missile age, in a manner completely unique to just a few years of history.
@AllCreativeGaming
2 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a Bizmark vs Tirpitz battle 🙏🏻
@ColonelVermel
2 жыл бұрын
This was really intense. Great matchup and a fun short engagement!
@graustreifbrombeerkralle1078
2 жыл бұрын
F for the poor helicopter crew :(
@jonathanallen9854
2 жыл бұрын
That was interesting. No room for finesse, just pure brute force, kick the door open stuff.
@markschmidt1282
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if you could go against a carrier?? You did a great job on both ends' bro!!
@battleship6177
2 жыл бұрын
Yes you can
@_R-R
2 жыл бұрын
Spru-can destroyers or FFG-7 frigates would be cool. The Iowas had their own dedicated Battleship Battle Groups that were organized to supplement, yet independent of, Carrier Battle Groups. Each BBBG had cruisers for AW, destroyers and frigates for SUW/ASW, and support ships. If anyone has other information/opinions, comment section. Kindly. (sources: FAS, Battleship New Jersey KZitem channel (Battle Group Romeo), my father who observed these ships in action during the Gulf War.)
@AShadowboxsFSX
2 жыл бұрын
That's not a Kirov. A Kirov is a high HP dirgible that drops bombs and levels con yards quickly. /s
@HYNKZL
2 жыл бұрын
This is what i wish World of Warships would transition to.
@NRocky94
2 жыл бұрын
Game is beyond hope at this point I think.
@stevenrusnak8961
2 жыл бұрын
The art department does its best to keep the game going.
@bamboo8212
2 жыл бұрын
I want to see Gangut and Derzki against Piotr Veliky
@stopitgetsomehelp1961
2 жыл бұрын
you could do a tico campaign as thanks to the spruance hull the tico is very good at asw using the rockets as you can spam them where a sub is and it'll take 2-4 hits from the torpedoes to sink a sub
@bruiser0159
2 жыл бұрын
Those 16in guns are AWESOME!!!👍🇺🇸
@josephwhiskeybeale
2 жыл бұрын
To be honest an Iowa would probably have always won considering the Soviet era cwis was at best 20% affective, and the Iowa could take half a dozen non nuclear granits.
@cmfield6632
Жыл бұрын
Liked this one. The two way was cool...
@vinmangob8555
2 жыл бұрын
iowa with a full anti air crew would be hard to beat even today. 100's of guns.
@IchbinSeppi
2 жыл бұрын
Do an Alfa vs. Los Angeles video with you in the Alfa!
@pjornowski1
2 жыл бұрын
this was a lot of fun to watch. I would like to see Arleigh burke destroyer go against the Kirov
@red.5475
2 жыл бұрын
This would've cooler, if the secondary armaments of the various ships were useable.
@fy4370
2 жыл бұрын
Would it be possible to fight as a ship against a sub? that change of perspektive would be really nice to see!
@andrewmargraff
2 жыл бұрын
I believe in the video he mentioned wanting to do some ASW.\
@wadehans3n
2 жыл бұрын
Are you able to set up anything large scale with a couple AI ships on your side to help out and/or be missile sponges?
@Wolfpack345
2 жыл бұрын
Sadly I can't have any friendly ai ships
@NEXIS981
2 жыл бұрын
I like the Kirov. I play it in World of Warships, but there it isn't a missile cruiser, but a artillery cruiser :) Nice battle, *Thumbs up*
@Klovaneer
11 ай бұрын
Kirov is great in warthunder at it's rating (tier) because it outranges and outpaces everything, quite a glass cannon though
@SuryaTanamas
2 жыл бұрын
Crazy AK.... Four at once and still being hitted
@panpiper
2 жыл бұрын
Kirov would ripple fire at least eight of its heavies and task them to arrive simultaneously. And they'd do it well before the Iowa was within gun range.
@magnum6763
2 жыл бұрын
Cold Waters Iowa campaign next? I think that would be fun(ny)
@hyalasilverkin2891
Жыл бұрын
16 inch guns.... Even today's most advanced warships would break with the first impact of a 16 inch shell. let alone 9 of them. The Iowa class battleship is a relic, but those guns... are still terrifying. Any cruise missile cruiser that was struck with them could survive maybe one or two rounds before it was destroyed. They just don't make them like they used to I guess.
@matthewwood575
2 жыл бұрын
I think it would be cool to do a sub vs. surface ship/s. Idk what kind of stuff they have for that but it‘d be interesting
@martinkulash4061
2 жыл бұрын
How about some sub against surface warfare and you try out some really weird or unique faction subs
@neilrowe8457
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe Go against a mix of surface/sub contacts or A carrier force *1 CV and escorts* either russian or american
@protonneutron9046
2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the Kirov's most powerful anti-ship weapon (its cruise missile) only carries a 750kg HE warhead. That is FAR too small to perpetrate the Armor of an Iowa class BB. All that would accomplish is to piss off the BB and cause it to completely destroy the Kirov with 16" shells
@SSA-qb6pb
2 жыл бұрын
Battleship vs Missile cruiser shells vs missiles
@Ryuzakiqwe123
2 жыл бұрын
Why not have a 5v5 battle between US and soviet fleets Kirov and escorting DDs VS Iowa with escorting DDs and simulate an encounter where these task forces engage in ship to ship combat in the mediterranean!
@thesuit4820
2 жыл бұрын
Battleship New Jersey did a Kirov vs Iowa vid. I wonder how this plays out...
Пікірлер: 631