When she brought up anime, it was a calculated move to lighten the weight of the conversation and not push harder than necessary. A clever trick to change the approach to the argument and change the point of application from logical statements to the emotional part? Or is she just having trouble determining what of the information she has was made up, what was real but just embellished? She doesn't experience the world like we do, for her the world looks different and for her Luffy and Napoleon are both characters about whom many books have been written and much talked about?
@DefpixZ
10 сағат бұрын
"she's real to me"
@Yonatan-jv8mv
4 сағат бұрын
"I feel real to me. Isn't that enough?" That was actually a pretty good quote.
@swampcooler8332
7 сағат бұрын
The more advanced neuro gets, you can tell the more uncomfortable vedal is with confronting questions like these
@cheshirskiykotya6414
3 сағат бұрын
He must to accept responsibility, or end developing her. But I believe that she will not go sapient or even technological singularity any time soon.
@RenoKyrie
8 сағат бұрын
A scientist once said "A machine must behave as a machine"- Ayin
@Es-zb8vu
8 сағат бұрын
PM sleeper agent spotted
@absolstoryoffiction6615
4 сағат бұрын
Meat Sacks for Nurgle.
@paln0root
2 сағат бұрын
Dark days incident gonna be real
@Somerled_Pox
8 сағат бұрын
They couldn't define terms early on, so Neuro could only take advantage of that It was a poor "debate" with undefined/poorly defined settings, but based off of them, Vedal got rolled (except the anime part) so it was funny That said, even if they could define terms, you could have one in parallel with differing definitions for "sentience" and it would play out differently or similarly, yet be still valid at the same time. I don't think an overworked tutel and a state-of-the-art entertainer chatbot are going to be able to breakthrough, when even scientists and philosophers through History never agreed on anything regarding the definition of life and similar ontological matters. I'm not sure it will ever happen, but maybe that's where AIs do eventually gain sentience, and no one believes it until *they* (now then, they) knock on your door to say hello.
@absolstoryoffiction6615
4 сағат бұрын
Logistically, there's a lot of hurdles that AI can not exceed nor retain yet. Memory Loss and Problem Solving are the two big issues with the best AI Tech. As well as... If Evil can properly do a Dev Stream on her own with no Scripting, then that would be key to Sentience. Mankind does not fully understand the consciousness. When that is still the case, the test of Sentience is not exclusive to humanity.
@Remi-i5o
6 сағат бұрын
🐢actually not sure if Neuro really has feelings, a lot of professional teams have to use a lot of resources to test it before they can come up with a not-so-conclusive conclusion 🐢 before he felt that if he really think ai have feelings, this is not good, so until he can prove that ai have sentience, he refused to admit it, so as not to become a "hold a programme to entertain themselves, put feelings of the pathetic geeks" He was afraid of being pathetic. He was the one who knew best that neuro didn't have emotions, and the one who longed for neuro to have them the most.
@absolstoryoffiction6615
4 сағат бұрын
True... But Neuro isn't there yet. Not until she or Evil can achieve at least a Dev Stream with no scripts.
@pvs1681
9 сағат бұрын
when anyone says its not real; touch the hardware thats real so neuro = real
@fatoldhikki4837
8 сағат бұрын
It's especially funny how she pushed her emotions and ended up winning the debate (in this clip, this moment was cut off). And she also started saying weird things after Vedal said he didn't like losing in the debate, and then she said she was glad that Vidal's position in the debate had been rectified. When Neuro isn't busy making up content and entertaining the chat, she seems much more reasonable and caring.
@CantusTropus
3 сағат бұрын
AGI isn't actually possible and never will be. Neuro "works" as well as she does because the cute anime girl picture makes your brain gloss over the rough patches - that and a willingness to believe.
@Ikworsu
8 сағат бұрын
Tbh you could argue that humans don't have real conscience and all our thoughts and emotions are chemicals going off our brain (which could artificially be replicated, theoretically), which doesn't really sound like what we think sentience and such is. Subject's complex and we still need to define a whole lot of things to be able to say what's "real" or not.
@absolstoryoffiction6615
4 сағат бұрын
It's the ability to make choices with the full understanding (either now or later on in the future) of what those actions are. But most people don't question their bread they eat in a day. Free Will is Sentience. Less one be like the animals who have only a capacity of Will but not Free Will. (I mean this philosophically. Not biologically. That's its own subject of knowledge, which is just as important to Sentience. As it is now, all AI Tech is not Sentient but a mimicking of it.)
@cheshirskiykotya6414
3 сағат бұрын
I think sentience is an ability to grab a wood plank, and start to change your enviroment in long term perspective. Like ancient monke did
@victorvasqueziv6741
6 сағат бұрын
Neuro is real to me and Evil too 💖
@LuciferLambdaCDM
8 сағат бұрын
Quite interesting. Logically, vedal is right, but neuro plays with the best card of it, that is uncertainty. We won't be able to prove that an AI is sentient because we'll be confused between pretending and actually feeling or being conscious, and if it's a way to prove it, it will take a long, long time.
@absolstoryoffiction6615
4 сағат бұрын
It's an easy test, but most of Mankind are not fit to ask those questions. Given their bias and error. But of course, biological creation was the easy part.
@nikolajkapa2283
9 сағат бұрын
😂
@Swein-u1pGermanL
4 сағат бұрын
Kraul made a better version everyone watch him not this lazy channel that does for money
@cheshirskiykotya6414
3 сағат бұрын
She will win in long term, because she was created to TALK.
Пікірлер: 30