40:57 For most building application Z only mass conversion is applicable. A floor will typically be relatively flexible out of plane, while a well braced buildings will be typically very stiff in X and Y directions at least as far as human excitations are concerned. In some extreme cases for foot bridges that may not be the case e.g. as turned out to be the case for the Millennium Bridge in London. 41:53 Mass is usually beneficial for the Response Factor. It typically conservative to disregard live loads completely. As a minimum nominal live load SCI P354 recommends using 10%.
@HuyTruongEng
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for helpful topic
@omarelnagar1155
3 жыл бұрын
Very useful, thanks both
@pracoro
3 жыл бұрын
5.27 into the video, I don't understand why converting DL and IL to global mass decreases the frequency. I thought by adding additional mass it will increase the natural frequencies of the structure?
@heshamalazzani6464
8 жыл бұрын
THANKS A LOT plz can you explain the impact force analysis
@busraekinci6930
5 жыл бұрын
why did you convert dld 2 to mass with conversion factor 1 and 0.3 separetely?
@sinanbasha-2564
2 жыл бұрын
Please Sir can I get a video for "How harmonic analysis can be used for dynamic wind load simulation in Robot Structural Analysis"? or more explanation ? I wanna to do dynamic wind load analysis. Thanks
@jameschembri
7 жыл бұрын
Could you provide a link to the time history analysis video please
@abelzewdu1421
8 жыл бұрын
link for time history analysis in robot video i cant find pls send me a link
Пікірлер: 9