Fantastic breakdown, I don't recall any other videos comparing these two LPVO in this manner. I really dig your perspective/experiences in your videos.
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! My intent with this content is to give the real information, not the typical content that’s mostly entertainment.
@mateostuntfolers
Жыл бұрын
Thank bro, all answers simplified that I was looking for. You helped me a lot to choose gen 2. Cheers!
@justsomedude556
Жыл бұрын
Having owned both I totally agree on the 0-100 and 100-beyond. Not everyone understands that some scopes are better at 1x and some are better at max magnification. Match that to your gun and you’ll get good results.
@colenielsen5112
4 ай бұрын
Awesome video, thanks!
@marifkhan1
Жыл бұрын
I bought Gen 3, I love my. The dot is very bright at one power.
@ravenguard7484
Жыл бұрын
Great video. I’m in the processing of trying to figure out my optics. Curious about your mounts and their heights.
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
I have a video available below. If the answer isn’t in there let me know. kzitem.info/news/bejne/wINst5dve5mfn2U
@signkutter9218
Жыл бұрын
In my world, 1x6 is the sweet-spot for LPVOs. SFP is the most useful. If I sm going to be shooting at the outer limit of 5.56 range, I use what I consider a MPVO (2x10) with parallax adjustment like the Vortex PST 2.5-10X32, this scope blows out any 1x10 at distance for clarity and brightness
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
Have you directly compared a PST to a Razor?
@AlbanyRaiders
Жыл бұрын
I have both myself and completely concur with the analysis. Gen 2E is a perfect general purpose optic while the Gen 3 works a lot better for the SPR role. I do wish the center dot on the Gen 3 was a little smaller, but thats nitpicking on my part.
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
I really do like the new ATACR 1-8x reticle…
@MRD0889
Жыл бұрын
I always felt that second focal plane LpVO should only have 2 maybe three magnification settings TBH, only because after owning a second focal plane optic and quickly selling it to go back to first focal. Having a capable 1x is the point of an LPVO, so both first and second planes need that. But as for the use of thier respected BDC's .. what's the point to have 2x to 5X on a 6X or 2x to 7X on an 8X second plane if they don't line up, and not by 50 yards but by a lot depending where you zeroed you're main dot/ chevron. If a second focal plane LPVO reticle is nicely sized, you can easily use you're main dot like a red dot up 200 yards, running and gunning just to get hits is easy up to 100 yards. That's what I was able to do with my 1X/8X strike eagle. but when it came down to using my BDC I had to zoom to max power, and I saw no use to have that magnification of 8x for a 350ish yard shot -_- making shake like Michael J Fox for a shot like that. when I got the latest Strike Eagle 1x / 8x I felt at home. dial-up up to 4x for that 350ish shot and easily rang that steel. when it came to 25 to 100 yard shots it was dumb east with that T shape stadia lines and and the reticle tiny. I feel that would open the market more for shooters on how they prefer to use their LPVO depending what they're using it for.
@emmanuelarnold5690
Ай бұрын
👍
@emtothedee
Жыл бұрын
How far out are you confident in shooting with the 1-6 on reduced sized targets? (12”)
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
1.5-2x per 100yds is a good rule of thumb. With the Razor that puts us at 300-400yds. I’ve gone further with it but the reduced (realistic) target size fits neatly into the 1.5-2x rule.
@RobZtaco
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like Travis Haley’s lost brother talking lol
@marklosentes7988
9 ай бұрын
what is the brand of that genIII mount with trijicon RMR ?
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
9 ай бұрын
Reptilia
@s13ef9
Жыл бұрын
replaces an eotech.... Impossible I say! Excellent video, thanks for all the info.
@ARes13FOX
Жыл бұрын
i know right haha
@jamesstephenson2346
Жыл бұрын
Eotech is junk, so..
@ACGBLR
Жыл бұрын
Well III > II so there you go lol. Thank you for the info.
@ryaniam22
Жыл бұрын
Have you (or anyone) compared these to the vgog 1-6 and 1-8?
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Жыл бұрын
VCOG has a poorly marked reticle and isn’t daylight bright. I’d avoid that optic.
@ryaniam22
Жыл бұрын
@@AmericanAdlerauge1775 OK noted. I like the idea of the built in vcog mount (especially for the marines) but it's overly heavy. Razor 1-6 looks good.
@ryaniam22
Жыл бұрын
I think spr's are better off with non lpvo scopes such as meoptas 1.7-10×42 or similar. Even 1.5-6×42 or 1.5-8×42 scopes by zeiss, meopta, and others destroy lpvos in ease of use, eyebox, clarity, brightness and still are lighter than most of these lpvos. They don't have those huge stupid target turrets than literally no one ever dials with. Lpvos could drop 5 oz if they dropped the useless heavy internal turrets.
@jamesstephenson2346
Жыл бұрын
Those power ranges ARE lpvo. What are you babbling about?
Пікірлер: 28