For the love of God, give us an eyepiece with more magnification than the average long-range riflescope! If I want precision spotting at 22x, I'll just ask my spotter to use his riflescope. Make a 40-plus-power reticle eyepiece and I'll gladly buy it!
@VortexOpticsUSA
3 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the feedback! We're not aware of any plans for something along those lines at this time, but we'll definitely pass the request along.
@prcc
3 жыл бұрын
@@VortexOpticsUSA Thanks guys, I really appreciate how responsive you always are.
@VortexOpticsUSA
3 жыл бұрын
@@prcc You bet! Let us know if we can help with anything else👊
@hillpuller
4 жыл бұрын
Good luck measuring a target accurately with a reticle that has .2 mil hash mark spacing. At 300 yards and beyond it isn't going to happen. You were so close Vortex, if you would have just given me 2 or 3 mils worth of .1 mil hash marks anywhere in the reticle I would have bought it. Now I have to buy a Burris Signature HD with a mil reticle and I'm not happy about that.
@Tee-Ess
5 жыл бұрын
Very exciting, but I can't find the MRAD piece anywhere
@outlandersystems552
5 жыл бұрын
For all that is holy in this universe, please add an MOA reticle to the Viper Spotting scopes.
@Johnsormani
Жыл бұрын
why would someone want an MOA reticle anyway? especially for spotting
@dontask8979
5 жыл бұрын
Well done! To the point, everything covered and made entertaining without overdoing it and loosing all the value AND... still just over 2 minutes.
@VortexOpticsUSA
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it! :)
@TeezleySPT
5 жыл бұрын
Yessss. Just need it for my Viper HD
@VortexOpticsUSA
5 жыл бұрын
This one won't work with the Viper HD but we'll pass that along to our product dev team!
@cmtoutdoors2398
5 жыл бұрын
nice!!
@danielsingh303
5 жыл бұрын
Damn, not for the Viper HD 😶😑
@VortexOpticsUSA
5 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately not. :(
@MrCannonls
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Bought a razor 85 in the hopes this was coming. Been waiting like crazy. Awesome job.
@rosibelrodriguez3364
2 жыл бұрын
$$$$ ?
@Big4x4
5 жыл бұрын
I’m assuming this won’t work in the Gen 1? 20-60x85?
@RiMoniqueL
3 ай бұрын
How do you zoom in??? Mrad
@zachsowersfilmandphoto6659
Ай бұрын
You can zoom in on a calibrated reticle eyepiece without more layers of glass. Think second focal plane vs first focal plane scopes.
@carlofthemountain1598
3 жыл бұрын
would love one for the 11-33x 50
@VortexOpticsUSA
3 жыл бұрын
That would be pretty sweet - we'll definitely pass the request along!
@carlofthemountain1598
3 жыл бұрын
@@VortexOpticsUSA I'm loving mine for hunting but a MRAD reticle for range use would be awesome
@peb762
4 жыл бұрын
Is it FFP?
@VortexOpticsUSA
4 жыл бұрын
No - it's fixed power, so FFP or SFP doesn't matter.
@DrLuigiPhd
4 жыл бұрын
Why only 22x? Wish they had a scope that could take advantage of 60x zoom and have the reticle built in At least the gen 1 version was 30x
@VortexOpticsUSA
4 жыл бұрын
Just because a scope is capable of more magnification doesn't mean it always should use it. 22x is still A TON of magnification. Take into account the fact that most of the precision rifle guys aren't even going that high on their riflescopes when shooting at distance and it starts to put it into perspective - you're literally making things down range 22x bigger than they appear with the naked eye. There would be two problems with going with higher mag. 1) in order to maintain the reticle's proper scale in relation to the image size when it's being magnified 60x (For example), the reticle would appear to be massive. Think of a FFP riflescope - when you zoom way in, the reticle appears to be quite large and takes up a good portion of the field of view. Most riflescopes don't go up beyond 24-27x or so. Now crank that way up to 60x and the reticle would be incredibly obtrusive. 2) Spotting scopes aren't being used for shooting or putting precision shots on a tiny spot down range. They're designed for spotting. To spot effectively you need to have a decently large field of view, which a lower magnification can give you. This allows you to spot bullet trace as the bullet makes its way to the target, bullet impact if/when it doesn't hit the target so you can actually call proper corrections, and it allows you to spot targets, if you're transitioning between targets, much more quickly.
@DrLuigiPhd
4 жыл бұрын
Vortex Optics wouldn’t the FFP argument be kind of a moot point. The only time you see it get too big is in scopes that have 4-6x base zoom. A 20-60x scope is only 3x base magnification. It would just have to be thinner to start. We use the Gen 1 model to spot 1000+ yard shots and at 30x we can’t see our hits. We can see our misses when it’s dry because it kicks up dirt. Making it variable would make even more versatile. Though it was kind of odd that you guys reduced the power range on the gen 2 Razor to 27-60x. Gen 2 has less fov at min power than gen 1
@VortexOpticsUSA
4 жыл бұрын
@@DrLuigiPhd That would seem to be sound logic, but it's not necessarily just how big the reticle would appear to get at that high of magnification, but how much of the field of view it would be taking up. if you had the magnification fixed at 60x instead of 22x, your FOV wouldn't be big at all, so the percentage of that smaller FOV being taken up by a reticle would be far too much. That is, unless we made the reticle inside impossibly small. Optical design is always a matter of tradeoffs - if you try to simply "Increase" one very specific variable, it will inevitably affect all the others, and may produce a worse result somewhere else. In this case, to get the best performance for the vast majority of applications and have the pro's outweigh the cons, we went with the fixed 22x
@DrLuigiPhd
4 жыл бұрын
Vortex Optics I figured it was something to do with size of how small you could get the reticle. I can't wait till the technology allows us to etch a reticle that small. You should throw that puzzle at your engineers. FOV doesn't matter a whole lot when you are on target and your shooter isn't missing by a mile. Currently we made it work by adding a smartphone adapter and using the digital zoom on the camera to get closer. Also allows a shooter to spot their own shots with video.
@VortexOpticsUSA
4 жыл бұрын
@@DrLuigiPhd Reticles are already a matter of microns small - far, far thinner than the human hair to the point you often can't even see them with the naked eye when they're not actually inside a scope. That's pretty tiny already :) Sounds like a good trick you guys have there.
@1989inception
4 жыл бұрын
Should have made it for the 65mm for how much me an others have spent on one..
Пікірлер: 32