Imam Ahmad bin Muhammad as-Sawi al-Maliki who died in the year 1241 AH(1825AD over 170 years ago) in his book “Hashiat al-Allamah as-Sawi” which is part of the interpretation of Al-Qur’an “Tafsir al-Jalalayn”, in his tafsir to the ayah [35:6], says: “This Ayah was revealed about the Khawaarij who misinterpret the Qur’an and Hadeeth, legitimising the killing and confiscating the property of other Muslims (under the impression that they are mushriks and upon kufr). As it is seen now, the equal, who are a group in the land of al-Hijaaz (its a region in the west of present-day Saudi Arabia) called ‘al-Wahaabiyyah’, who think they are following the truth but they are liars whom which the Shaytaan overwhelmed and made them forget the dhikr of Allah. They are the followers of Shaytaan (Hizbush Shaytaan). Surely the followers of Shaytaan are the losers and we ask Allah, the all generous, to amputate their origin.”
@hashiramasayan162
Жыл бұрын
Jazakallah khair brother well explained!
@wii_
Жыл бұрын
Well Made :)
@somahmed123
Жыл бұрын
Who is this sheikh.
@MuslimEducationAcademy
Жыл бұрын
I’m not too sure. I came across him online.
@TrueCreed
Жыл бұрын
This Vile and base man slandering sheikh Mohammed reminds me of the hadith narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “There will come to the people years of treachery, when the liar will be regarded as honest, and the honest man will be regarded as a liar; the traitor will be regarded as faithful, and the faithful man will be regarded as a traitor; and the Ruwaibidah will decide matters.’ It was said: ‘Who are the Ruwaibidah?’ He said: ‘Vile and base men who control the affairs of the people.’”
@MunazraTimes
Ай бұрын
@TrueCreed, Allahu Akbar. The age of lies n liars being accepted is upon us. Khariji Kafirs masqurading as Muslims n as followers of Salaf are believed but Islam, Muslims n Islamic scholarship is rejected because a Kafir, a Khariji Kafir, an apostate from Najd said his Islam is only truth.
@MuftiMasala
Жыл бұрын
Masha'Allah
@ahluttawheed
Жыл бұрын
Imam Ah-Shawkani about sheykh Muhammad ibn ‘abdul-Wahhab: “And in the year 1215H I received from the aforementioned person from Najd two light volumes which he sent to our respected leader, the Imaam (may Allaah preserve him). One of them contained the treatises of Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab, all of them were about directing to sincerity in Tawhid and warning from Shirk which is practised by those believing in the graves. And these are beneficial treatises, filled with evidences from the Book and the Sunnah. And the other volume comprised a refutation of a group of negligent ones from the jurists of San'aa and Sa'dah, they corresponded on some issues with him (Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab) connected to the foundations of the religion (aqidah) and a group from the Companions, so he responded to them with detailed, corroborating, verified responses indicating that the one responding is from the bona fide Scholars, knowledgeable of the Book and the Sunnah, and he destroyed everything they constructed (in argument) and invalidate everything they compiled, because they are negligent, biased partisans, and thus what they did became a humiliation for them and upon the people of San'aa and Sa'dah. Thus is the case of whoever put himself forward and did not know the true worth of his own self....” al-Badr al-Tali' (Cairo, 1348H)
@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92
11 ай бұрын
Shawkani was a Salafi. Obviously he’d praise him.
@ibnnader8373
10 ай бұрын
Imam shawkani retracted his opinion later in his life. In the beginning he thought they (the wahabis) were good, but later on he saw their true side and changed his opinion. Especially when he saw what the sons of MIAW were doing. Same applies for imam sanani. Watch the video of bro hajj about this topic
@ahluttawheed
9 ай бұрын
@@ibnnader8373 i saw be sure
@ahluttawheed
9 ай бұрын
@@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92 salyam
@ahluttawheed
7 ай бұрын
@@ibnnader8373 show me dalil
@theSN0o0B
Жыл бұрын
Because he wasn't an Ashary
@MuslimEducationAcademy
Жыл бұрын
No, because he was extreme in his verdicts
@user-yv4mq3rc7c
6 ай бұрын
@MuslimEducationAcademy لا يوجد شيء اسمه اسلام متطرف ايها الصوفي المشرك الاسلام اسلام
@JumpaKage
5 ай бұрын
@@user-yv4mq3rc7c he was a delusional takfiri, doing takfir on anyone that opposed him. Not just the sufi’s, he did takfir on Maliki’s, Hanafi’s, Shafi’i and more. This guy was a massmurderer. Do you know anything about history?
@flaror3496
5 ай бұрын
@@user-yv4mq3rc7c قال قاسي في حكمه، لم يقل "اسلام متطرف"، واعطني اثبات انه سوفي، وهم ليسوا بكفار بالمتبدعين، واخير من كفر اخاه فمنهم من هوه كافر
@ahluttawheed
Жыл бұрын
Shortly the name of this video: “let's judge him by the words of his enemies” but you don’t understand that if you’ll judge people by ghe words of theirs enemies you must say that before him Muhammad son of Abdullah صلى الله عليه و سلم was crazy poet. He was recognized by as-Shawkani, as-San'ani and other scholars but who is this miskeen who says that he wasn’t scholar?
@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92
11 ай бұрын
“He was recognised by Shawkani and Sana’ani” they were both Salafis. Shawkani was a Salafi and Sana’ani was Ahl al-Hadith. Obviously they’d recognise Ibn Abdulwahab. Astaghfirullah. May Allah’s curse be upon him. The true scholars were against him. Smh
@arsyie
10 ай бұрын
@@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92naudzubillahi min dzalik
@Prayformetobeagoodmuslim
6 ай бұрын
@@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92i thought u sufis guys said salafies never existed until miaw came though? We are only 200 years old made by the British according to ashari sufis right? Hhhhhh
@Naqshbandi_Haqqani92
6 ай бұрын
@@Prayformetobeagoodmuslim I don’t know about the British but these extremist salafis started to become a Fitnah under Ibn Abdulwahab, the one who called for his followers to kill all people who rejected his “Islam”. The one whose followers committed the most horrific atrocities in Karbala, the likes of which have never been seen before within the Ummah
@JumpaKage
5 ай бұрын
@@Prayformetobeagoodmuslimall those so called “salafi” btw the name only exists for 200 years since they claimed it to be theirs😂. The scholars of the traditional madhahibs were all against him. Why not consider becoming a shia? Its closer to you salafi takfiris then us sufi lovers😢.
@user-jm2ki2lh6h
24 күн бұрын
This is the biggest lie, backed a book full of lies
@GentlemanLife-Beyotch
2 ай бұрын
Brothers and sisters must start doing their own research! Our movement (Wahhabi) is nothing more than a calling back to original Islam and following the Quran directly. Alhamdulillah 👑
From the best, clear and precise words according to investigative scholars; are the words of 𝗦𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗸𝗵 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗮 𝗶𝗯𝗻 𝗔𝗵𝗺𝗮𝗱 𝗶𝗯𝗻 𝗛𝗮𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗹-𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗶 𝗔𝗹-𝗛𝗮𝗻𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗶 (𝗱: 𝟭𝟯𝟰𝟴𝗛) 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗪𝗮𝗵𝗵𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘀: “A fringe sect (firqah shādhah) that attributes itself to the Hanbali School. It originates from the Najd region, the same place where the horn of Shaitān will emerge, as has been narrated in the hadith… They limit themselves to quoting the Book and Sunnah without any understanding of the guiding principles mentioned previously, nor do they know the introductions to sciences let alone their objectives and principles… They teach their children this claim to ijtihād from a young age and encourage them to have the audacity to cite as proofs the apparent meanings of the sacred texts while abandoning everything else relevant beyond that. Doing so out of ignorance and arrogance. They might sometimes deny the claim to ijtihād and cite the words of Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah alone as proof. Whereas, the mentioned Imam dissented from the Hanbali School on a number of issues in which he stood alone, and was qualified to exercise unrestricted ijtihād concerning these specific issues. Except that these masā’il were never recorded as being his separate legal school like the masā’il of the four legal schools were recorded (established). Thus, there are issues that he loved to debate but never issued them as a fatwa to anyone. Examples would include: - holding three divorces in one sitting to be one, even though the wording is specifically “three”, “one thousand” or more, - declaring it impermissible to travel anywhere besides the three masjids, - prohibiting seeking help (istighātha) from the prophets and pious people. And other issues besides these that are mentioned elsewhere. Thus, these issues of divergence are neither from the Hanbali School, nor is there a narration from Imam Ahmad to support them, and the Hanbali jurists have explicitly stated that he -Ibn Taymiyyah- is not to be followed in these masā’il. - Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahid Al Azhari
@eesaabdurrahman1569
Жыл бұрын
Seeking help from the dead at their graves is shirk. That’s really what this all comes down to. Humans love to break with Tawheed and supplicate to adored dead people. Anyone who prohibits the people from this ignorant practice is going to be hated by the ignorant.
@eesaabdurrahman1569
Жыл бұрын
All you guys are doing is parroting other people who say Salafis are deviant but provide ZERO evidence. No Quran, no Sunnah. It basically boils down to: they don’t blind follow an official madhhab position.
@flaror3496
7 ай бұрын
@@eesaabdurrahman1569How does god have a leg and a hand at the same time? It is the same as stating god has 2 eyes that are both different in their capabilities, one sees something and the other sees something else, how do you reconcile such limited concepts of being with an all perfect god like the salafis do?
@eesaabdurrahman1569
6 ай бұрын
@@flaror3496 I don’t need to reconcile anything. Allah says it, I believe it. Allah has a hand, HE said so. I do not believe He ever said He had a leg. So you’re straw manning there. Allah is All-Hearing. But His hearing is unlike our hearing. Same with His hand. You are the one who needs to reconcile the fact that you disbelieve, question, and distort the words of Allah. How can there possibly be a problem with believing and affirming the words of Allah as they were revealed? Can you answer THAT?
@eesaabdurrahman1569
6 ай бұрын
@@flaror3496 straw man. Literally no one has said “leg” or “2 eyes both different”. Literally NO ONE. You are making up nonsense.
Пікірлер: 91