When a leader/founder hands off control of a company there is usually a push by the new leader to change things. I feel this is partially to make the company more "his/hers" from the prospective of making the company an extention of who they are and to show or prive authority to others in the company. 80% of mergers and acquisitions fail. I have been part of a few transition and built/sold my first company by age 24. It was obvious to my that the after the sell of my first company the changes the new owners were making was not going to work. The company failed inside of 2 years. From the prospective of purchasing a company, I resceny finished a year of consulting for Busche Industries after their purchase of Xtreme Fabrication. Busche Industries had never purchase a Fabrication/Automation company. The slow process of understanding the situation from a prospective of mostly silence and careful listening to people and customer has seen that company grow 3x in the last 2 years. Ego... in buisness the most important thing is the truth. If people are afraid of how the truth will be received they either will not speak or will tell you what u want to here. New leader often sabotage themselve by letting ego get in the way. The idea that the didnt found the buisness often makes them feel like they have something to prove. -David Dennis
@WhitbyStuff
3 жыл бұрын
What do you mean you can't remove it? Languages deprecate syntax.
@fred.flintstone4099
3 жыл бұрын
Very rarely, this breaks backwards compatibility and upsets many people. People were already very upset about the transition from Python 2 to 3.
@pawelpow
3 жыл бұрын
@@fred.flintstone4099 languages like swift deprecate stuff left and right if there’s a valid argument made to remove it.
@rickh3714
3 жыл бұрын
I am the :=
@robopoet
3 жыл бұрын
Coo coo ka choo
@kilianklaiber6367
2 ай бұрын
I agree with lattner, the walruss operator is only designed reduce the number of lines. The same is true for list comprehensions. I think it reduces the readibility of the code.
@kilianklaiber6367
2 ай бұрын
The same is true for lambda functions. I think python would be better without this "syntactic sugar".
@TheBigonner
3 жыл бұрын
Obey the :=
@eg042680
3 жыл бұрын
Concisify
@tauceti8341
3 жыл бұрын
I don't really know at all what they're saying, but I think my brain likes it, I've never coded before, but my dad says I have his "coding" genes LOL
@fred.flintstone4099
3 жыл бұрын
You should try it out. Python is a good programming language to start with, because its not only for developers, you can code without have to care about advanced progamming language concepts, types and patterns. Just simple stuff like lists, dictionaries, if conditions and for loops.
@djordjesimovic8537
3 жыл бұрын
Walrus operator shirt ftw!
@kylekyle
3 жыл бұрын
Haha, what is that look? 2:23
@casualuser5527
Жыл бұрын
Every time lex opens his mouth, I cringe. Ask your questions, and let the guest talk.......skipping is so tiresome
@jaftem2x
3 жыл бұрын
An assignment in the middle of an expression is flat out ugly.
@fred.flintstone4099
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, and confusing. And while it can be used by accustomed, seasoned Python programmers, it is going to be startling for new users and people coming from other languages whom may find it very foreign.
@_general_error
Жыл бұрын
How this guy designed a language? He does not seem like he can actually break down computer-languaged related questions into deterministic subsystems. He's just mixing it all up, he's like a politician. Now he determines, what is or isn;t "syntactic sugar" without even considering that other might come from a different place, I don;t like one person dictating me, when and what I can call in what way. Important is to understand the problem, not the solution.
Пікірлер: 22