This was really good. A video on Deleuze, Hermeticism and his Anti-Heglianism would be nice :)
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Yume 🙏🏼
@haroldtheescapist2865
11 ай бұрын
Bro it looks like you're just having a fun time it brings me joy with the way you present the subject with that smiling expression keep up the good work. Whoever is doing the graphics are better than your average comedian kudos
@keenanarthur8381
Жыл бұрын
Philosophy and logic are also important in many forms of Asian mysticism. For example, in some forms of Śaiva Tantra there is a practice of systematically refining one’s mental constructs (vikalpa-s) by identifying misaligned thought-patterns and gradually replacing them with thought constructs that are aligned with universal consciousness. E.g. one with a thought construct “I am unlovable” could be replaced with a “pure thought construct” (śuddha vikalpa) such as “the limitless love of Śiva is the essence of my being.” This partly involves philosophy and partly repetition of pure thought constructs. Eventually, once one’s mind has been purified and aligned with Reality, one may experience a spontaneous, non-conceptual (nirvikalpa) state of absorption in universal consciousness - a similar state as to one that can be reached through meditation or devotional ecstasy. So, logic can play a role in mysticism, but it’s a means rather than an end. Logic can also become a trap, like getting tangled up in your escape rope. Getting caught up in relatively pure/religious concepts and turning them into crystallized dogmas rather than using concepts to go beyond concepts is extremely common among mystics. I personally also think people tend to rely too heavily on reason while neglecting more intuitive and empathic qualities. “The way that can be spoken of is not the eternal Way; the name that can be named is not the eternal Name.”
@1995yuda
Жыл бұрын
Every spiritual path leads to somewhere. The REAL question you should ask yourself is "where to?".
@JMoore-vo7ii
Жыл бұрын
Well said
@mercutiomurphy2743
Жыл бұрын
psycho babble
@1995yuda
Жыл бұрын
@@mercutiomurphy2743 It is psycho babble. But true spirituality is not. Very much real.
@beerman204
Жыл бұрын
when reason and rationality reach the predictable dead end, mysticism and speculation say, "we'll take it from here". If reason is honored, mysticism grows in valuable ways, if not it loses its ability to communicate. In college I read Hegel with interest, but could not tell you a damn thing about what he believed. I'm still that way....
@odiram
Жыл бұрын
This is the most sense Hegel has ever made to me. I’ve tried reading him before, but didn’t grasp any of it. Looking at it now as kind of a rationalist exegesis of Christian Neoplatonism it all seems much clearer.
@facilegoose9347
9 ай бұрын
See Magee's _Hermetic Hegel_ for more.
@keithprice475
Жыл бұрын
Very well done indeed! Hegel is indeed a treasure trove of deep insight and you have given us more than a peek into that.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You're most welcome. Thank you for joining us.
@LookToWindward
Жыл бұрын
Indeed. A lot of strange things going on in the world today seem not so strange after all if seen in the light of Hegel (and Lacan.)
@zardoz7900
Жыл бұрын
This was gold. I had Phenomenology of Spirit, never got around reading it. I was intimidated. I never came across anything remotely as clearly and concisely laid out as this. Mind blown. Hypothetically, I'm sure that if you had to live with a bad stroke and drag yourself through the gutter, yet had a gun and was able to end it all, Hegel would be keen on just having this attitude of, just bring it on,.let's run out this course naturally. People, more often than not die slowly in gnarly ways and I guess Hegel sees some kind of purpose in that. I don't know. I wonder what his lasts words were. I wanted to edit this and ad that I think the key is to understand that the infinite is not infinite without the finite and that God would not be God if he did not bring "things"/us into existence. Also that he cancels out Truth in order for things to exist. And perhaps the fractal triads within triads has something to do with Heraclitus who'm Nietzsche was so fond of. A state of flux. Movement. I was perplexed by the flaw-ness of existence/form and decay therein. Perceived "decay"? Perhaps a nothing more than a poetic quality judgement of Daesin or The way and perhaps, if I understood it correctly one must see God in that too as part of the whole neverending process. But ALL of that MUST transcend into real life experience, whether you're stranded on a freeway with a broken car or just about to have your leg amputated due to severe dietetic induced gangrene this awareness has to be present at all times. The finite and infinite are concepts, like a drawing of a loaf of 🍞. It's not it. In other words a sort of awakening to it must occur which brings Will into the game as according to Hegel, apparently, God is always in that state of active and I tense focus and he doesn't fall into default hypnotic brain mode like we do, a mental stupor of sorts. As the Armenian mystic Gurdjief would say that people sleepwalk through life.
@MarcoSilesio
Жыл бұрын
this has to be the best hegel introduction I've seen in my life, blessings to both of you
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Dylan knocked it outta the park. Thank you AverageDud.
@MarcoSilesio
Жыл бұрын
@@SeekersofUnity thanks to you too
@julianhayachid
Жыл бұрын
thank you so much this was beautiful I'm a bit shocked by how shallow my understanding (no pun intended) of Hegel has been. This wise man is a true treasure trove, thanks for showing me this.
@yuvalmann
Жыл бұрын
Hi ❤
@julianhayachid
Жыл бұрын
@@yuvalmann oh hi there handsome
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You guys are the cutest.
@RainbowDevourer
Жыл бұрын
Nah, Hegel is pure dysmemics and should be tossed on the trash heap of history. His Phenomenology of Being is pure cloud-cuckoolander gobbeldygook. I mean, "pure being is indistinguishable from pure nothingness", what does that even mean? What sort of person seriously dwells on that when there are real problems to be solved in the world?
@yuvalmann
Жыл бұрын
@@SeekersofUnity Look who’s talking 😌
@priapsus
Жыл бұрын
If you were standing before me, I would stand up and applaud! This is a wonderfully lucid exposition of Hegel in relation to mysticism. Thanks for the reference to Magee. I intend to read his book on the matter.
@kennyfernandez2866
10 ай бұрын
This is the best vid on Hegel I have seen in all YT. There is no point in understanding a philosopher's concepts, if you don't elucidate how they relate to the whole of existance.
@TheEsotericaChannel
Жыл бұрын
Yep, got a blizzard coming in tomorrow - going to enjoy this one.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Nothing like Hegel to keep the blood warm ;)
@TheEsotericaChannel
Жыл бұрын
@@SeekersofUnity cozy up with the Absolute!
@phantomggg
Жыл бұрын
I would highly recommend reading Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition by Glenn Alexander Magee. If you enjoyed this video you will likely appreciate this book as well.
@LeventeCzelnai
Жыл бұрын
thx
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Check out more of Dylan’s work here: www.dylanshaul.com If you'd like to present on the channel, please email seekersofu@gmail.com
@tomrhodes1629
Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. Hegel a mystic? Any leader of Western philosophy is one who helped take philosophy AWAY from mystical revealed Truth (the way of the pre-Socratics and Socrates himself) and into the satanic, which is a manmade counterfeit that Plato flirted with and Aristotle adopted entirely. And they did this by erring to believe that man's thought is RATIONAL. It is not. That which is LIMITED is irrational by definition. And the only foundation of Reason is LOVE, because the One IS love: the communion of Thought in the Mind that is ALL, the Mind that is "GOD." It sounds like Hegel may have been misinterpreted, but the effect was the same in any case. Hitler loved Hegel! And after watching your excellent presentation, I see Hegel's fatal error clearly. Because, Reason is NOT superior to Understanding. Reason's only purpose is to lead one TO Understanding, which is revealed by the Divine and cannot be captured by limited (irrational) thought. I communicate only through my site.
@belacqua4435
Жыл бұрын
I am grateful to find this video and have a somewhat tangible footing on Hegel. It (re-)ignited my interest and love for philosophy, and now I re-started my joruney through the joy of wisdom.
@darillus1
Жыл бұрын
is mind blowing , it's as if you've just explain somethings in plain English I've been grasping at for a long time, but could never quite pin down
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
It's an honor and pleasure to serve, in plain English ;)
@mattosborne2935
Жыл бұрын
An struggling through Glenn Alexander Magee right now, this was helpful thanks
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
🙏🏼
@MrSeedi76
Жыл бұрын
Ah, Hegel - I remember him fondly. When we had a class at university (I studied theology, philosophy and sociology) on Hegels "Phänomenologie des Geistes" I remembered something the philosophy professor had said - "when doing a class about a book it's expected that you read it at least once completely but better would be 3 times". So I read it once (being lazy) only to find out - "the class will only be about the introduction" (the first 80 pages or something like that). The prof also told us, "if you wanna study the whole book on a university level, it takes 8 semesters." I think it was one chapter in one semester. I also noticed, when you read the book quickly, it's easier to understand than reading it slowly - because often Hegel needs a couple of pages to elaborate on one idea and the text is so complex that at the end you can't remember where he started out. But the few things I did understand, actually made a lot of sense, like "die Selbstbewegung des Begriffs", which was what I wrote a paper about for my grade in that class.
@mcnallyaar
Жыл бұрын
I have not yet watched this video, but my instinct is "Yes, He most certainly was."
@MeisterBeefington
Жыл бұрын
I have not yet watched it and my instinct is, 'No, he certainly was not! No one who wrote that hideous Jesus is a Kantian book could be a mystic. Sure, he takes over certain themes from Boheme and Eckart but these are transformed into his own proto-modernist cum secularist theory. He is religiously unmusical.
@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
Жыл бұрын
_uh, how about have you READ HIS BOOKS?_
@MeisterBeefington
Жыл бұрын
@An Humble Messenger of the Law of One Unfortunately, I've spent a decade of my life reading that mofo's books.
@MeisterBeefington
Жыл бұрын
Abandon all hope ye who enter here!
@MeisterBeefington
Жыл бұрын
but I should definitely finish watching the video at some point
@Devotionalpoet
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I very much enjoyed learning about Hegel 🙏🏻✨ Very interesting what was said on reason. It seems that many of these philosophers really felt this unceasing love, yet because it’s so hard to explain they try to explain it, and do so relatively well. Even to set out to try to make a model for something that is so hard to make sense of, I give him a lot of credit for. Although she is a mystic, and not a philosopher, I very much enjoy the mirror of simple souls back-and-forth between reason and love of Margueritte Porete. The Meister Eckhart quote you featured says it all to me, I don’t need all the explanations but I do enjoy listening to the rationale. Great episode! 🙏🏻✨
@casperdermetaphysiker
Ай бұрын
This was a great video. Thanks for making it.
@SeekersofUnity
Ай бұрын
You’re most welcome 🙏🏼
@lexparsimoniae2107
Жыл бұрын
What a marvellous exposition! Thank you!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You’re most welcome. Thanks for joining us.
@StefanosLaopodis
Жыл бұрын
Excellent. My warmest congratulations!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@agucci
Жыл бұрын
The mystic of the Law will philosophize wisdom. Hegel was very good at putting into words difficult subjects and topics and matters
@Purwapada
Жыл бұрын
I may be wrong, but I get the impression that Hegel makes the mistake of conceptualising the absolute. The absolute is non conceptual (although it can neither be said, nor not be said to be). To paraphrase the samdhinirmocana sutra I think Hegel would really have benefitted from reading some of the works of Nagarjuna, because Hegel makes the error of 'The night in which all cows are black' which seems like a nihilism, but missing the point that the absolute is 'sunyata'. (Edit, just got to the part where he is criticised, and they say the same as I did lol). The part at 26:50 is identical to the prajnaparamita sutra. "All being and non-being are equally empty" (form is emptiness, emptiness is form). (the same is true of feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness). All is sunyam
@Sound557
7 ай бұрын
This was a great video, I hope you succeeded in getting your doctorate.
@RichardDownsmusic
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! You answer years and years of confusion truly enlightening 🙏
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for joining us Richard. Dylan is a gem.
@ramyafennell4615
11 ай бұрын
Wonderful. Thank you. That distinction you make at the end between Schelling and Hegel is very edyfying...the nuances are so fine and you manage to expose them so well. As a Vedantist for me Hegel is a Jnani...the path to the divine via Knowledge...but this path is insufficient on its own...because experience IS. I always find myself wishing Parmenides could wave his wand over us stragglers in metaphysics.
@michaelbuckner9846
9 ай бұрын
Congrats. This is a great explanation of Hegel’s views.
@SeekersofUnity
9 ай бұрын
🙏🏼
@leafreilich2288
Жыл бұрын
a wonderful teaching. i hope to find more of your lectures
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Lea. Please do.
@paineite
Жыл бұрын
Very nice work on your part. For me there is no doubt that Hegel, Heidegger and many others are recapitulating Buddhist philosophy/ideology. properly understood. Two but not two; not two but two. The object and subject are one entity so that if you worship something apart from your own pristine connection to LIFE itself, you are engaged in a provisional practice and not the essential practice. I
@marymcgranaghan9918
Жыл бұрын
I like that you mention contemporaines
@cryoshakespeare4465
Жыл бұрын
This was wonderful! I think the CTMU (Cognitive-Theoretics Model of the Universe) might the most comprehensive use of reason in grasping the mystical and rendering it understandable.
@nowhereman6019
Жыл бұрын
I've been on such an ongoing deep dive into philosophy and mysticism lately that seeing a video titled "Was Hegel a Mystic" kind of made me snap a little.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
I hope it did you good.
@rabihosseiran4708
Жыл бұрын
Very nice presentation. Thank you. It is a big challenge to talk about this great philosopher. My comments: Why not talking about mediation to recenter the mystic issue in Hegel philosophy? Confusions and critics unfortunately had never stopped against Hegel philosophy, mainly because of his approach tending to reach the Absolute and the Infinite. This might be the main common terms with the Mystics, despite various critics telling us that the God of Hegel is not the God of the true religion. On the other side, the main difference, in my opinion, is that Hegel understanding of mankind and history, was envisaged by him as a whole, while mystics being more a strictly individual ascendant pathway. As we say in french "tous les chemins menent a Rome".
@PinoSantilli-hp5qq
11 ай бұрын
Nicely done!
@asielnorton345
Жыл бұрын
Good one. Definitely one of my favorite channels.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You're most welcome. Thank you for joining us.
@angelitoramire
Жыл бұрын
What a great well explain valuble video. Thanks a lot for this gift, God bless you!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Glad you appreciated it Angel 😇
@anonymoushuman8344
Жыл бұрын
This is excellent and really helpful. It's good to find mention of Magee's Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition. J.N. Findlay's later discussions of Hegel in The Transcendence of the Cave (his second series of Gifford Lectures) and Ascent to Absolute are also good in this connection. Both have been republished by Routledge. Also, Cyril O'Regan's The Heterodox Hegel (SUNY Press, 1994), difficult though it is. You probably know these texts already . . .
@jonyspinoza3310
Жыл бұрын
Wowzer 😮absolutely fascinating!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Jony.
@liammurphy2725
Жыл бұрын
I have not deep dived lately, into either philosophy or mysticism, I'm scared of drowning in a sea of poorly understood maxims. I'm thinking that tis is way beyond me so good luck with your studies and I hope you make a great life for yourself. ( I kinda rock Stoic )
@withnail-and-i
Жыл бұрын
Can't go wrong with just slowly studying Plato and his interpreters on your terms if anything. Heidegger said something like one should read Aristotle for 10 years before attempting Nietzsche, and I'm personally comfortable studying only ancient philosophy for a while as a hobby, and not trying to cover everything like people who do it full time.
@mills8102
Жыл бұрын
If you're at that point, you should be more afraid of ignorance. Study a wide enough range of "maxims" to see that in their contradictions, there remains truth that they cumulatively circumscribe.
@mediocrates3416
Жыл бұрын
Study science and make your own sense. So much regurgitation, so little progress.
@liammurphy2725
Жыл бұрын
@@withnail-and-i Yes. I thought our presenter looked a bit deadened by the weight of his knowledge. ''The Truth shall set us free'' or burden us. But we seek a version of it purely because we feel a need? I read a lot and think not so much but I do like a bit of mental provocation. Thank you.
@liammurphy2725
Жыл бұрын
@@mediocrates3416 Sorry to hear you're struggling. As for progress thats a purely personal call to make. So good luck and take your time when looking at how quick you feel you are progressing.
@menestrelapo
Жыл бұрын
Great video !
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it 🙏🏼
@filozofijazazivot
Жыл бұрын
Awesome work
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you friend 🙏🏼
@jurajbakyta705
Жыл бұрын
Finally a good vid on Hegel. Thanks.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it. Welcome.
@Hamza_Fennine
11 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@SeekersofUnity
11 ай бұрын
🙏🏼
@PaulMcMinotaur
Жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for your work towards helping God become!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Paul.
@ChristianSt97
Жыл бұрын
every major youtube philosophy channel (Metamorphosis 77, Weltgeist and Seekers of Unity) is now making videos on Hegel. very interesting...
@weltgeist2143
Жыл бұрын
Julian de Medeiros always did But CCK and Epoch dont atm, do they?
@Zack-id1xo
Жыл бұрын
Because James Lindsay is popularizing this from the critical standpoint
@Zack-id1xo
Жыл бұрын
Critical of Hegel that is
@verkisto
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! How about a library tour at some point? 🙂
@thecratergood
Жыл бұрын
I’m not a philosophy major by any means, but basically the modern consensus of Hegel’s dialectic is that it’s a framework of how reality is expressed rather than it being a method of rational application like most claim it is?
@ericalves5514
Жыл бұрын
i would love to see you talking about Cul-Han's response to Hegel in contrast with the Zen tradition.
@ready1fire1aim1
Жыл бұрын
Yam, also known as Ym and Yaw (YHW), is the Ugaritic god of rivers and the sea. Also known as Judge Nahar ("Judge River"), he is also one of the Elohim or sons of El, the name given to the Levantine pantheon. Others dispute the existence of the alternative names, claiming it is a mistranslation of a damaged tablet. Despite linguistic overlap, theologically this god is not a part of the later sub regional monotheistic theology, but rather is part of a broader Levantine polytheism. He is also known from Egyptian sources, which present him as an enemy of Set (at the time viewed as a heroic slayer of monsters and similar to Levantine and Anatolian weather gods). Yam is the deity of primordial chaos and represents the power of the sea, untamed and raging; he is seen as ruling storms and the disasters they wreak. The seven-headed dragon Lotan is associated closely with him and the serpent is frequently used to describe him. Despite his antagonistic role in myths, Ym was sometimes invoked in theophoric names, indicating some degree of cult, which sets him apart from another similar figure, Tiamat. As Ym's myth is generally believed to be older than the Enuma Elish, it's possible Tiamat was partially patterned after him. Of all the gods, despite being the champion of El, Ym holds special hostility against Baal Hadad, son of Dagon (or El). Ym is a deity of the sea and his palace is in the abyss associated with the depths, or Biblical tehwom, of the oceans. (This is not to be confused with the abode of Mot, the ruler of the netherworld.) In Ugaritic texts, Ym's special enemy Hadad is also known as the "king of heaven" and the "first born son" of El, whom ancient Greeks identified with their god Cronus, just as Baal was identified with Zeus, Yam with Poseidon and Mot with Hades. While Baal Hadad was the lead god in Ugarit, in the Baal cycle it is Ym who is favored by El, and he even briefly rules over the other gods. Baal only rises to power after vanquishing him with the help of his allies Kothar-wa-Khasis, Astarte and Anat. Yam's ultimate fate is unclear, as the text makes references to both death and captivity, and in later sections of the myth Baal talks about Yam as if he was still alive and a possible threat. While in the past researchers, especially those belonging to the myth-ritual tradition, interpreted the myths of Baal, Ym and Mot as a representation of the cycle of seasons and thus related to fertility rites, this view is challenged in more recent scholarship as incorrect or simplistic. His name comes from the Canaanite word Yam, meaning "Sea." 🕊
@darillus1
Жыл бұрын
in life we emerge out of the infinite into the finite, and in death we return to the infinite
@ericjohn277
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video. It seems to me at best a stretch of the imagination - at worst an abuse of interpretation - to reframe Hegel's mysticism as somehow solely materialistic.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Eric.
@catoelder4696
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Muito obrigado!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You're most welcome. Thank you for joining us.
@MrTTnTT
Жыл бұрын
Many points in Hegel are identical to points you can find in Peterson's Maps of Meaning. A crucial difference is Hegel's insistence that we can know (and by extension: that there definitely is) an Absolute. Peterson shows much more restraint by grounding his book in evolution and memory-systems, with the bottom layer being procedural memory because the actions we do must be able to survive. He looks at the same patterns and reaches similar proximate conclusions (compare: voluntary encounter with the unknown to the last Hegel quote about confronting the negative), but without asserting that it is more than a procedure that works, which for that reason has stuck around. Peterson leaves that question open. This was a great presentation, with valuable examples and insight into Hegel, not least with the Foucault-quote near the start. But I am still no fan of Hegel. I think the actions of those who announce death as the most dreadful reveal a deeper fear of uncertainty.
@sebastiankocaman7051
Жыл бұрын
Mashallah Brother! Well done lecture! But shouldn't Hegels "Weltgeist" be part of a short journey through his alleged mysticism? At least it always stood out to me as a quite mystic term in his writings.
@phantomggg
Жыл бұрын
I read the Kybalion before reading Hegel and I would highly recommend this approach. I believe this removes the initial difficulty people have when first engaging his writing and makes it more accessible.
@cannonfodder8287
Жыл бұрын
The Kybalion is a hoax. Stay away from that book.
@phantomggg
Жыл бұрын
@@cannonfodder8287 I’ve heard that criticism of it, but as an intro to the 7 principles it has utility. Understanding the concept of polarity specifically illuminates Hegel’s union of opposites. Without that foundation I would’ve been lost reading him for the first time.
@Yatukih_001
Жыл бұрын
All the great philosophers and scientists, artists, mathematicians, musicians, physicists of ancient times and past centuries were mystics. Here is why. Mysticism is the best philosophy! But it´s also the toughest philosophy which is why so many mystics are hated. All of the great mathematicians and physicists, musicians, painters and architects but brutalists of the 20th century were mystics. This is, because realists are mystics. Rationalists are mystics. People like Edward Jenner are not. That is why they fail to make inventions which work. If they do manage to make something original it usually leads to disaster, because they are not studying mystical truths. This is why Hegel was a mystic. Because he knew that to produce quality content, you have to be a mystic. Narcissists, psychopaths and sociopaths fail to become good mystics because quality content is beyond their ability to fathom. Thanks for the video. Kind regards from Ásgeir in Iceland.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
🙏🏼
@The_Broddha
Жыл бұрын
24:20 is there anything you can say about the decagram presented here? I've always had a fascination with it but have struggled to find much regarding the use of it. 8, 9, and 12 pointed stars seem more common and have more in the way of symbolic usage
@kennyfernandez2866
8 ай бұрын
To conceptualize the absolute is to be it, is to experiencing it. Just because you are reading Hegel and considering the ideas does not mean you are interacting with the concept itself. The living concept.
@Graviton-cc9bn
7 ай бұрын
He was certainly mystic. His philosophy is very close to kashmir shaivism, although the later is coded in theistic language.
@Teckno72
Жыл бұрын
I got a book to read on Hegel. Like no other book I’ve ever read (excepting those in other languages ) have I had trouble reading and understanding and using this book. Suggestions?
@michaeldillon3113
Жыл бұрын
One of the greatest mystics of the last century -sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏- said that the best combination in a person is a loving Heart and a rational mind so rationality and mysticism are not contrary .
@katherinekelly6432
Жыл бұрын
Toronto Nanaimo is yummy. If Hegel had been introduced to it, his rationality would most surely have been challenged.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Half baked or rare?
@Tzimtzum26
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like Lurianic Kabbalah/Chassidus. Interesting
@FreedomandRights4US
Жыл бұрын
If so I'd better start reading!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Got no it ;)
@skullnetwork4482
Жыл бұрын
Hagel absolute or God looks more like ibn arabi ibn sabin and adi shankara
@l0gaRythm
Жыл бұрын
Why is philosophy so detached from reality? I have no idea what you are trying to tell me 😅
@conforzo
5 ай бұрын
We are men and thus laymen. The absolute is the totality of which we are but a small part. Can we blame the fish for not grasping the totality of the ocean where it lives? No, of course not. So why would we intuitively grasp the totality of existence?
@gregorsamsa7777
4 ай бұрын
@@conforzoWhat a beautiful way of putting it.
@Locreai
Жыл бұрын
And now I hope to find some hegel at the used book store
@johnbizzlehart2669
Жыл бұрын
Subjective rationalism👍
@apes4days254
Жыл бұрын
A lot of his ideas are very Spinozian.
@alihan9412
Жыл бұрын
I did not know Casey Affleck was in to Philosophy
@substanceform4123
Жыл бұрын
Humans for thousands of years: "damn these mystical truths are pretty complicated and profound.. tbh not sure they can even be fully comprehended or explained" Hegel: "skill issue"
@jichaelmorgan3796
Жыл бұрын
Looks like a happy guy
@Hermes1548
Жыл бұрын
He's talking of Hegel as if the man were a scientist like Einstein, when Schopenhauer already saw that he was a Prussian theologian.
@KeithMakank3
Жыл бұрын
OMG we in adyiata im about leave the matrix lol
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
😉
@Bookthief666
Жыл бұрын
🔥🔥🔥
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
@nenrit-elijahgreen3571
Жыл бұрын
I can say he writes like a mystic. Every time I try to read his shit I go a bit crazy
@xrjx1511
Жыл бұрын
Nothing is "no thing", so nothing is not a thing in this world. Nothing does not exist except conceptually. I think this is one of the main reasons why people do not recognize God because God is everything which is difficult to grasp and God has no opposite. Being has no opposite but everything in being has an opposite. Humans typically know things through their opposites. The fish doesn't know its in water until taken out of it, until he experiences the relative opposite of water.
@KeithMakank3
Жыл бұрын
Lol this got esoteric real fast
@charlesleseau
Жыл бұрын
I don’t know if he was a mystic, but he was clearly reincarnated as Werner Herzog.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Say more?
@charlesleseau
Жыл бұрын
Just making a poor joke, and one that I realized couldn’t be very unique as an observation. I simply think Hegel looked like Herzog, with nothing much more to say about it. Explaining jokes, though, means they lose luster, and mine didn’t have much to lose. Thanks for the excellent video.
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
☺️🙏🏼
@christiandoscher1016
Жыл бұрын
Only God could "be" nothing. It is this dashing threshold of rationality that makes the difference. Subtractive. Sum thing from Nothing. This casts the shadow of the cubic 6 face world we roll in. Dice show us this.
@thespiritofhegel3487
Жыл бұрын
Barba non facit philosophum. Mysticism = belief that union with or absorption into the Deity or the absolute, or the spiritual apprehension of knowledge inaccessible to the intellect, may be attained through contemplation and self-surrender. I can think of a couple of quotes to put a spanner in the works: 'The true shape in which truth exists can only be the scientific system of such truth. To help bring philosophy closer to the form of Science, to the goal where it can lay aside the title 'love of knowing' and be actual knowing-that is what I have set myself to do'. 'Of the Absolute it must be said that it is essentially a result, that only in the end is it what it truly is; and that precisely in this consists its nature, viz. to be actual, subject, the spontaneous becoming of itself'. - 'Phenomenology of Spirit'
@RE-kk2cq
Жыл бұрын
Rationality fails where knowledge and understanding of Ra ends
@-TheInfamousOne-
Жыл бұрын
Oh shit. Now do Gurdjieff.
@carsattitude
Жыл бұрын
you need a book "Holy Quran"
@tomrhodes1629
Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. Hegel a mystic? Any "leader of Western philosophy" is one who helped take philosophy AWAY from mystical revealed Truth (the way of the pre-Socratics and Socrates himself) and into the satanic, which is a manmade counterfeit that Plato flirted with and Aristotle adopted entirely. And they did this by erring to believe that man's thought is RATIONAL. It is not. That which is LIMITED is irrational by definition. And the only foundation of Reason is LOVE, because the One IS love: the communion of Thought in the Mind that is ALL, the Mind that is "GOD." It sounds like Hegel may have been misinterpreted, but the effect was the same in any case. Hitler loved Hegel! And after watching your excellent presentation, I see Hegel's fatal error clearly. Because, Reason is NOT superior to Understanding. Reason's only purpose is to lead one TO Understanding, which is revealed by the Divine and cannot be captured by limited (irrational) thought. I communicate only through my site.
@deanswift9132
Жыл бұрын
Advaita Vedanta strikes again 😂
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
😉
@battragon
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like precisely just another guy trying to make "God" sound rational.
@christiandoscher1016
Жыл бұрын
Hegel, Hebrew, Z axisism.
@evanalexan
Жыл бұрын
Why do you talk so slow
@mark4asp
Жыл бұрын
The academic love cult for Hegel happens because academics need to make ideas up for their careers, papers, books and to be considered experts. Hegel gives academics almost infinite degrees of freedom; to satisfy these needs. I'm more based in empiricism. For me - important ideas are essential ideas giving us epistemic foundations for our beliefs. Hegel contributes ONLY negatively here - by befuddling people's minds with anti-rational epistemics. There's no "rational kernal" in Hegel. Marx was wrong.
@tekdaystar345
5 ай бұрын
no. he wasn't let's all pretend to have read hegel in peace and not say such dumb shit.
@nebula1100
Жыл бұрын
I hope Dylan becomes a reappearing face on this channel. This was an absolutely wonderful lecture, and a wonderful introduction to Hegel. Bravo!
@Silent-Speaker
Жыл бұрын
This is 'Absolutely' fantastic! A great representation of a fascinating subject. Thank you for sharing ❤️🙏
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
You're most welcome Leo. Thank you for joining us. Glad you enjoyed it.
@werraas12
Жыл бұрын
That was an astoundingly clear presentation of Hegel. Will be thinking about this one for a while...
@LetsTalkReligion
Жыл бұрын
Brilliant!
@SeekersofUnity
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Filip. Dylan did a fantastic job.
@user-ff8mh2ju8x
6 ай бұрын
It's funny, it is possible to understand Hegel but you need a personal experience of the Divine. Next level prank. Great intro to Hegel, thanks!
@destinyfive
10 ай бұрын
I am glad to find another person who also got that from Hegel, but then I got my PhD in transpersonal psychology, where as much as possible is mystical. 😂
@lizgichora6472
Жыл бұрын
Being! ' Union of Spirit and ascending to Spirit ', forgive all and be in all for that is love. Experience of the spirit is always in union when we forgive and let go. Thank you.
Пікірлер: 356