I respect Roy Keane for this. I thought he would've said Scholes outright.
@justarandomdude3201
2 ай бұрын
Same here
@rikardsaje
3 ай бұрын
Tough decision, both players were excellent and quite different.
@aadesh61
3 ай бұрын
Paul Scholes is a pure midfielder for me,
@bootlegpete7984
2 ай бұрын
@@aadesh61And Stevie is a pure baller.
@jarradmorgan8549
Ай бұрын
Now if it was Denis Irwin haha.
@weiht6767
23 күн бұрын
Roy didnt play with the controlling midfield version of Scholes..
@tedbundie7199
Ай бұрын
Fair play all 3 were good it's all about money now so
@stedros
4 ай бұрын
Says it all really
@NBl-qw8cg
20 күн бұрын
Gerrard massive influence on liverpool but scholes was at a higher level with better teammates
@ianharris8806
Ай бұрын
Wrong comparison, Gerard would of been a natural replacement for Roy Keane not scholes
@truevanpencil5403
29 күн бұрын
He could’ve played scholes role 100% but scholes was arguably the best in the world in his position. He was more limited than Gerrard though and admits he wasn’t an athlete like Gerrard was. Scholes was sublime though, they both were but very different.
@edmondsimon9220
24 күн бұрын
@@truevanpencil5403 brillant explanation
@sportsfans4476
3 ай бұрын
Stevie G❤
@BelfastManUtdTherapy
20 күн бұрын
Paul Scholes after Roy Keane left the club literally RAN premier league games every week, consistent, no frills just dominated every midfield we played even when up against the great Steven Gerrards Liverpool midfield play. Paul Scholes set up attacks and helped in recovery. Stephen Gerarrd wasn't running games against the big teams. He was inspirational yes, but Paul Scholes is an all-time great. Carragher admitted Liverpool were outplayed and outrun in the 2005 against a top ac milan team. Where was steven gerrard? Why did he get over run except for anfew inspirational moments in the run-up games and the final? Inspirational is good enough for Liverpool Fc but thats why he never won yous a premier league. Scholes v gerrard isnt seriously on the table if you talk to zidane, xavi,iniesta,pep. Stephen Gerard is a Liverpool great. Stick Paul Scholes in the centre for Liverpool, your chances created would have doubled. Very simple Sir Alex wanted class and greatness not inspirational and fighting spirit.
@MrBrasserie
7 күн бұрын
wtf you on, Scholes in that liverpool side wouldnt do anything. not cause hes a bad player, but cause gerrard was the all time hard carry for liverpool. stick gerrard in that united side over scholes youll never know hes missing.
@arpitkulshreshtha3513
2 ай бұрын
Gerrard : Was most complete midfielder ..as Jamie correctly said..No.6 ..No.8 ..No.10 ..Right Left...he could do it all..and may be circumstances at Liverpool really forged him into one.. Lampard - for me was the Striker of Midfielders..if that phrase makes any sense..he in comparsion to other two wouldn't drop and take the ball off defence..then pass..swivel..then spray it wide etc...but when the ball was dodging around in the opponents box I haven't seen any other MF...sort out his body and come into a striking position as quickly as Lampard...that's why he was striker of midfielders..because he had that instinct to just do the right thing in the opponent's box... Scholes..ofcourse the long range passing or striking everyone knows and debates about...but the point that he spent first 10 years in a 2 midfield with Keane...that allowed United to go into matches with 2 strikers..that contribution doesnt get measured as a stat like goals/assists...but it was immense..and he was what I said Lampard wasn't dictating play...taking the ball off defence...swiveling passing it ahead..then running and playmaking in the final third...!
@chocolate101f9
18 күн бұрын
Are you out of you mind??? Scholes was the best Period
@MoraAdmiral28
2 ай бұрын
good argument from Carragher, if you put Gerrard in United or Chelsea team instead Lampard and Scholes i think they really get even better.
@IvorBrynMike
Ай бұрын
I disagree Gerrard couldn't control the game or pass like Scholes did in the united team they were different types of midfielder Gerrard was a jack of all trades Scholes was a master passer and controller, Gerrard's impact undeniable but what Scholes did doesn't get highlighted because it set the tone not necessarily to have impact
@truevanpencil5403
29 күн бұрын
@@IvorBrynMike gerrard didn’t control games he dominated them just in a different way to scholes. I’m not having Fergie wouldn’t have made him Robson mk2. Fergie, like with Gazza, would’ve made him even more of a monster in a team of stars. It’s scary to think about really. He would’ve won it all with Jose but Fergie would’ve harnessed him better imo
@stnbch3025
24 күн бұрын
@@truevanpencil5403 Xabi Alonso dominated the game, Gerrard highlighted it.
@yatoragg2431
Ай бұрын
Xavi Zidane Pirlo best midfielders in the world says Scholes is the best in the world ….legends respect legends,the mastermind behind Uniteds game was Scholes so he wins leagues Gerrard may win some games but Scholes is different ….i learn how great he is now that United is crumbling down…Zidane was asked ‘whats its like being the best midfielder in the world’ he said ‘ask Paul Scholes’
@truevanpencil5403
29 күн бұрын
Scholes picked Gerrard. Gerrard was an athlete and scholes admitted he couldn’t have done what Gerrard did for Liverpool. Scholes was the worlds best in 1 position, Gerrard could be MOTM in any position.
@JoeSawyer-ge3xf
5 күн бұрын
Honestly the PL debate should be carrick v scholes v mcmanaman.
@leebonnick7052
2 күн бұрын
He’s clearly not anywhere near Zidane’s level come on 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Пікірлер: 27