Junghans, Stowa, and Grand Seiko quartz are the best values in today's watch market imo
@realman444
8 ай бұрын
I totally agree but do not forget Roamer (they made the bracelet all other company buy from third party-that is way can give for cheap price-and 7 years warranty
@UnknownGunslinger
7 жыл бұрын
Wow! A glowing review! Are you guys going to review the Form C? Why did they make the Form C with Quartz movement?
@JohnMcKLV
6 жыл бұрын
Guessing they would have to charge MUCH more for an auto movement on a chrono.
@BradleyHansonPhotography
2 жыл бұрын
I bought the Form C chrono in white and love it. I prefer automatic watches, but it's such a beautiful and clean face, especially for a chronograph. It's also much less likely to have service needs as mechanical chronos are such complicated movements.
@VersedNJ
4 жыл бұрын
If I didn’t have a Nomos and 2 Max Bills one a chronoscope the other plain in anthracite. I’d buy this watch.
@BradleyHansonPhotography
2 жыл бұрын
I have the Form C Chronograph and wish it had the luminance on it. It's a beautiful watch. My only minor complaint is the lack of legibility with the silver hands on white, so this Form A with the numbers and lume would be great.
@Irnbruist
7 жыл бұрын
stellar watch for this price point!
@aironeyem
7 жыл бұрын
I would like to see one of your video review of the classic max bill solo tempo ;)
@joshuaorbito
4 жыл бұрын
May I ask what size wrist you have?
@Thanks_for_posting.
4 жыл бұрын
Classic
@ashleyslingers2814
7 жыл бұрын
Great review
@abhishekgoyal4590
4 жыл бұрын
Someday will own one..🙏👍
@augiedoggie
5 жыл бұрын
Wish they did the lume pips at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 like on the Max Bill. Then this would be a no brainer. Otherwise I'm still torn between which one of the two I like more.
@xon3E
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah... but this one has sapphire crystal, the max bill on the other hand has coated plexiglass which can't be polished with polywatch. That's a big nope for me
@crosscastle100
5 жыл бұрын
The Dameuhr clock face numbers are not large enough
@thewheelieguy
4 жыл бұрын
If you're going to tell us about neat details on the strap, take it off and show it to us! It was rather frustrating hearing you go on about "neat shading" while just showing the plain top face of the strap, not the edges or underside.
@9time007
7 жыл бұрын
The date ruins the dial. It should have taken the place of 3.
@b.sharp.
5 жыл бұрын
it did tho lol
@cm96yyc
5 жыл бұрын
@@b.sharp. Vinay means that its not aligned like the rest of the numbers. It should be closer to the edge.
@Cortesevasive
5 жыл бұрын
@@cm96yyc The date window is so small that they could have fitted both date and 3* . Well its stock ETA2824 nothing to expect .
@tonyl7000
5 жыл бұрын
This watch shouldn't even have a date.. or atleast use a movement where the date that actually falls where the 3 should be. The date is so out of place.
@HarryUnchained
5 жыл бұрын
well, that's what you get with the big watch that use a small movement.
@johnkim3050
Жыл бұрын
21mm band? Why
@amcluesent
7 жыл бұрын
Date window position spoils it. Anyway the Tissot Everytime Swissmatic looks identical and is half the price
@JohnMcKLV
6 жыл бұрын
Typography on the Tissot is totally different. . . it looks like a dial on an air pressure gauge in a coal plant. There's a reason Junghans won design awards for the Max Bill, and Tissot has not for that watch.
@alexanderwinzer1352
6 жыл бұрын
the look is not everything, please remind the calibre of the Swissmatic... that´s not compareable with this ETA 2824
Пікірлер: 31