Holy heck! I work on pro audio for film/TV and am a music producer and I've never seen (heard) a plugin that was anywhere near this effective at noise reduction for voice. Thanks for making this video, Marlon! I just purchased the VX version - my first Waves purchase in over five years...
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Hahah, seems like you’re amazed as I was. Really impressive stuff with this simple plug-in. Speed,ease and good results is all we want right :-)
@laddieervin
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Indeed. I also shared your video with my friends who do podcasts and professional voice work. Thanks again.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ahhh, much appreciated! Your friends will like this one for sure.
@krispybowgod9656
2 жыл бұрын
Have you never heard of RX9?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
@@krispybowgod9656 have you watched the actual video?
@marcrivera575
2 жыл бұрын
I have to check this out, RX 7 has been my go to de-noise for awhile now. I always notice a reduction in the lows/low mids though when I have to subtract a lot. Clarity seems to be more transparent and maintains the source pretty well
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It’s a different way of denoising. I’d say more similar to unmixing.
@DirkBelig
2 жыл бұрын
I picked this up and it's quite impressive. When recording VO for my videos, I used to have to turn off the furnace/AC to minimize background noise and use an expander to silence my PC's quiet whirring. Now I just use Clarity Vx and it strips it right out. Of course the Waves haters are gonna hate hate hate hate and bleat about WUP and cry because Apple breaks all their software annually with OS updates, but for people on REAL computers, it's a deal at $30 (or less if you know where to shop to save a bit).
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Haha, yeah I agree with you. You don’t have to update WUP. I run some v11 versions without problems. On macOS updates, that’s a whole different difficult story ;-)
@VickersDoorter
Жыл бұрын
2:24 To remove ambience/reverberation the best tool I've found is DeVerberate. For live sports commentary channels I use Clarity VX, then DeVerberate. We were in a room with lots of glass and numerous background noises, but with a fine tune of the above, we had the commentator sounding like they were in a proper audio booth. We even tried tapping a pen on the desk in front of the commentary mic and you simply couldn't hear the tapping. Remarkable, particularly for $29.
@whitenoisestudio
Жыл бұрын
Yeah I wouldn’t be surprised if Waves will develop their own de-reverb. Your workflow looks very good! Clarity can really remove noises in an impressive way.
@VickersDoorter
Жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Here's that particular job last year using those two plug-ins in tandem. The voice itself is remarkably dry and clear, considering he had around a dozen people chatting around him. The crowd atmos is mixed in from rifle mics outside the control tower he was in. kzitem.info/news/bejne/kmOn3qOJnYZkZYo
@whitenoisestudio
Жыл бұрын
Ah that sounds nice and dry! impressive. You used it realtime? Was th elatency managable for you?
@VickersDoorter
Жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Thank you. Yes, that was run in real time. I ran them as VST's in vMix on an Alienware hi-spec gaming PC. I didn't measure latency, but it was not significant, but we did have the advantage of not having to lip-sync, as the commentators were off camera.
@keeonramusic
2 жыл бұрын
Great video and the plugin looked and sounded so good, I bought it. Can't wait to try it out. My new studio, still being setup, won't be that great with soft furnishings only for room treatment, so I think this will be beneficial with accidental noise, occasional traffic and family noises in the background. If anything, it will certainly decrease the number of vocal retakes needed due to accidental/unplanned noises. It will be interesting to see how often I will actually use it, but I think it will be one of those plugins that if I didn't have it, will have situations when I wish I did have it. Thanks for doing this video. Love your work!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
thanks! yeah ideally you never want to use a denoiser plug-in ofcourse, get it right at the source. But I understand that it isnt possible for everyone every time. at least clarity will do great denoising :-)
@BiggoSuave
2 жыл бұрын
If you don’t want the artifacts, dial back until the noise is under certain threshold and put a gate on it.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
that’s also a valid workflow.
@berkeleybernie
2 жыл бұрын
That's ridiculously good. Not only better than other plugins in results, but gets there so much faster, without twiddling multiple controls. Game changer for spoken word with a lot of ambient noise, like a street interview. Throw on a deverb afterwards to clean up room reflections and you're going to have a damn decent voice track. Imagine this cleaning up old archival audio like radio shows, early field recordings, telephone calls, etc. And I agree- if Waves can harness the same technology to deverb at this quality and price- wow.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
yeah you point out some scenarios where this plug-in can be a recording saver for sure. I cannot look into the heads of the Waves developers but that de-reverb seems like a very logical step. Maybe they’re checking out the reactions on this plug-in before proceeding or they will throw in a noise reduction bundle. who knows. I don’t :-)
@Sergio-nb4hj
2 жыл бұрын
Man a deverb of this quality would be a dream!!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
For sure!
@schniggedagges74
2 жыл бұрын
Send your track to four seperate busses, filter out a specific frequency range on each bus and put an instance of the free clarity plugin on each bus and you build kind of your own vx pro version...
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
You could! Or use waves’ free studiorack to split the bands or use effectgrid.
@leiineskaufmann
2 жыл бұрын
I always had huge quality problems because of background noises, this is a gamechanger for me, i instantly bought it
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
This will most definitely help you
@GloveBunniesVideos
2 жыл бұрын
Pretty amazing! I'v had vocal tracks with clock ticking noises that I had to manually edit for hours. This is definitely a time saver!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Clarity VX is good for sure, but its not the end to all solution. There will still be situations where you need to go in manually or try other software.
@GloveBunniesVideos
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Good point!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
yeah
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
The best vocal denoisers of 2022: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2aJjr6yrpnqpdqQ What is your favorite denoiser PLUGIN?
@shogunarki1139
2 жыл бұрын
Acon :)))
@DavidKfilmmaker
2 жыл бұрын
Rx advanced. Not sure there is any of trust on a feature
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
@@Rhythmattica you know, this is a plugin comparison right………….. There is no comparison with spectralayers, wavelab etc in here as well. Heck, why not compare with editing or eq-ing. gating! Or maybe recording properly, that’s the best fix. But completely not the point of this video. You still didnt answer what I did wrong.
@hiphip9145
2 жыл бұрын
당신은 RX8을 제대로 사용할줄 모릅니다. :D
@danielwetzs9317
2 жыл бұрын
ns1, but rarely. My music needs some extra noise, otherwise it would sound too artificial too massaged. Amp or mic noise or bleed is no issue to me. You just have to track or record your music in an appropriate environment, so such plugins aren't used very often here. I think such plugins might be more useful for poadcasts, interviews, documentaries etc
@shogunarki1139
2 жыл бұрын
Acon have a special place in my heart The second place is maybe ERA
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Sweet. Maybe i need to do a shootout between acon and this one. I must say that this new wavs plugin really blew my mind on how well it does denoising.
@shogunarki1139
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Acon Extract Dialogue vs Waves New BANGER PLUGINs That will be a great thumbnail :))
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ow you wouldnt know what works as thumbnail and what not. It's a complete science. Unless you're a YT expert, than you may help me ;-)
@emanuel_soundtrack
2 жыл бұрын
the papier example is really impressive. I use a lot NS2 but this looks awesome. The fact that you didn’t had a bad audio already recorded in the computer like me and need to cook water for this tells you are a pro haha
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
heh, well its that when I record myself i make sure I get it right at the source. But I cant use the really bad audio i have from clients due to permissions and all.
@emanuel_soundtrack
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio i prefer to record next t0 vacuum cleaner, car traffic, or ventilators like suggested in the propaganda of Waves
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Why not record yourself in a dishing washer? That would be something interesting.
@emanuel_soundtrack
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio haha I would not like to imitate Stockhausen or John Cage so easily , it would be not authentic , not avant-garde
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine 4’33 with vacuum cleaner sound.
@MerajTypeBeat
2 жыл бұрын
Such damn good videos from you, and it’s weird how KZitem turned off post notifications that I had on for your channel. Either way, it’s back on and continue the great work, brother! 💯🔥
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Well YT is weird at times. I still uncover comments in my ''held for review'' tab after weeks where they werent there before ;-/
@jungjinbu
2 жыл бұрын
Oh!, I'm Shocked! :) This is incredible!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It is!!
@ferdinandobarisciano6934
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much for the comparison with Izotope Rx
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
you’re welcome!
@shogunarki1139
2 жыл бұрын
Let's be honest this is an ok plugin I like this one but the best thing is that now Waves understand what we need and they starting to change They start to understand what we want and what we love from BABY AUDIO or Izotope, I'm not saying they are stealing ideas or anything but they surely follow the right track Waves is still one of the VSTs King, what they lack is creative effects and this is the thing that I hope they can improve in the future Very promising indeed!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
This is more than an ok plugin i'd say. The examples prove how effective it is in denoising. Of course tthis is not an original plugin at all, just as the cr8 sampler. But as long as they create something which works really well or better than the rest, i'm cool with that.
@alsoeris
2 жыл бұрын
this waves version of noise cancelling seems to be better than rx9, even with noise learning
@shogunarki1139
2 жыл бұрын
@@alsoeris Hard to compare Honestly, I've never used RX for live recording (Because it is so CPU and RAM taxing) so I will never compare them, each one has its purpose. If you still do want a comparison then ERA will be fairer I still love RX by the way xD
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Seems like it! I did choose more noisey and difficult ones on purpose. Let those plugins sweat and see what they can do ;-)
@rekayrovera
2 жыл бұрын
When you love waves but you don't wanna break the bank, NS1. When you are lottery winner, Clarity Vx Waves is on some "Let's piss off David Slate' mood this year lol.
@paszTube
2 жыл бұрын
The paper rustle removal example is pretty impressive!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I know, right? the music removal might even be more impressive. evacués that is really complex.
@petershaw6727
2 жыл бұрын
Surgical de-click within the RX application and a dose of de-rustle would do a better job. I would be interested in VX if it wasn't a realtime only plugin. Sometimes one needs the ability to print, whilst maintaining metadata integrity.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Users who will choose this plugin aren’t interested in using a second standalone program. That’s were clarity shines. Also : any daw can probably do off line processing, cubase can. There’s also the option to bounce or render in place in a daw after you have set your denoising with a plugin. Clarity can achieve the de click and de rustle within 1 plugin and 1 simple dials. Much faster workflows. That said, if rx is a fixed part of your workflow there’s nothing wrong with that. I just wished the whole rx was ara2 compatible like spectralayers so it can be used within a daw.
@petershaw6727
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Is there a Pro-Tools AudioSuite option? I don't see the 'Render' option on this plugin. Can you do a video demonstrating it please? I'd buy it if there was an AudioSuite plugin. As far as I've seen this plugin is focused on the mixing stage, meant to be run live, for easy and quick de-noising. I guess it's great for the fast turnaround documentaries, where a dubbing mixer does pretty much everything. However, for feature films and dramas the dialogue editor ensures that the mixer doesn't need to de-click or de-rustle anything. De-noising, yeah. However a dialogue editor would try a bit of De-noise to see if it can be fixed instead of having to be re-recorded, hence needing the ability to render multiple clips that have been edited, with handles and switch back when satisfied the mixer can clean it up. It does sound good, but it would only be one tool in my arsenal of numerous restoration plugins, if there were an AudioSuite option too.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
it's waves so rtas seems likely. Th eplugin doesnt have render ofcourse, that is something which is taken care of by the DAW, not the plugin. In for instance cubase you have off line processing on a clip, the freeze option, render in place option and of course exporting and then importing. But this is all handled by the DAW .
@martingoldmannmusic
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review - just installed it, gonna test it with some plane noise, dishwashers and washing machines in the background. (Mainly I will use it as an alternative to Izotope RX for my day job in video production.)
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Sweet. If budget allows, when you like the plug-in ofcourse, I would seriously check the vx pro as well. in default you have the exact same results as the “small” bx, but if needed you can tweak way more. I used pro on a live vocal this week, not the one in the video, and I let it work harder on the low end and very high end and was more gentle on the vocal range. worked really well and I could edit out the few small bits in between the words easily.
@martingoldmannmusic
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio jep - if the small one is working fine, I might consider an upgrade ;-) Did a first test with my vacuum in the background. Worked out well - however at full throttle I think I hear some artifacts in my voice. But that is better than messed up audio.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ofcourse. The first goal should be that you never have to even use denoising. But reality is that you need it from time to time. The artifacts come with heavy use, which is also logical. That's why the pro version is so handy, you can dial back areas which dont need that much processing and with that reduce artifacts.
@martingoldmannmusic
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Definitely - good quality input is my main priority :) On the other hand I receive a lot of smartphone video from my customers who use those videos for internal communication. There is always some cleaning to do ;-) Anyway, I like Clarity VX so far. Guess I will have a look at the pro version any time soon :)
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ow yeah. That's the unfortunate reality we live in. I assume you also have developed quite the skillset to polish turds ;-)
@nicolasfieldsoundservices
2 жыл бұрын
wow! this sounds way better than my RX7 dialogue noise reduction.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
The RX9 dialogue isolate does it almost as well: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2aJjr6yrpnqpdqQ
@BirdYoumans
2 жыл бұрын
Second comment. Is it just me or does the simple one just sound better? This is the second video I watched on this, and came away both times thinking that.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t say so since the “pro” version uses the exact same algoritmes as the simple one. I used really difficult material for the pro in this video.
@BirdYoumans
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio It does seem like what you say should be true since it supposedly uses the same algorithm and costs 8 times as much, but I was just going by what my ears were telling me and it was very close. I do realize that the pro has a more sophisticated approach dividing up the spectrum etc and has the ability to leave the noise vs the voice. But to my ear the back ground did not totally disappear like it did with the simple one and of course the simple one can't leave just the noise so there's that if you're looking for noise instead of the voice. Maybe it was just an illusion on my part. Both examples I heard were indeed difficult examples and the result with both was hard to believe. I was so impressed at how the vocal remained largely uncolored. Remarkable really. Hard to go wrong with either one.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ah , no THAT conclusion is totally right, with that the background doesnt completely dissapear with multiband with these settings. Because that is what you use it for. You change the balans to remove noise in certain parts where you leave more in other bands to make sure the remaining audio sounds better. You dont always need 100% removal of all bands at all times because the remaing audio would sound too bad. Its always a balancing trick between artifacts and noise and ideally you dont want to use like this at all.
@BirdYoumans
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio I can see where that could be useful for certain situations. As you say, with audio it's always a balancing act for sure. Thankfully for my needs it's just simply removing the "noise" in my room caused from fans in my video lights and that isn't too difficult since it's not very loud. And for that I want it all gone. I just wish I had this three years ago when I started doing my livestream that I pre produce. The lights are necessary but they do make a bit of noise and I have used a gate to "remove" it, but of course the noise is still there when I speak, just masked so it's not too noticeable. Eager to use this because I'm guessing it should now disappear from what I'm seeing in these extreme examples. My problem is nowhere near this extreme.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
You'll be fine with the normal VX version, I removed very loud extractor hood noises with it with ease, so fans from lights wont be an issue.
@KordTaylor
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! You really went the extra distance with the demo files. Are these available? Thank you.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! No the files arent available seperately. Sorry.
@MFKitten
2 жыл бұрын
This tech has been available to people with gaming GPUs for s while now, in the form of Nvidia RTX Voice. It's a real-time GPU driven application made to remove background noise and keyboard noise for voice chat. It's using the same neural network based technology.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Its great to see its now available in the DAW world as well. The waves plugin is very much CPU driven though.
@MFKitten
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio the technology is available for anyone to take and work with, but training those neural networks and changing their guts and stuff is a super detailed and complex thing. Waves will have used a massive library of samples for the network to listen to in order to separate a human voice from just about anything else. So this is very much Waves' take on things!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah waves claims a million of hours of “training”.
@instrumentenfreak
2 жыл бұрын
This is insane! Thank you for sharing your experience.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@officialbasura
2 жыл бұрын
I'm an RX user, have been for years but this is truly impressive especially the paper noise part smh could have really used this for this round table dialog piece I was working on for a client a week ago because you are correct, I couldn't remove it with RX! Sorta, I mean, i had to go into the editor and manually paint out all the paper sounds smh. Great stuff here!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah derustle didn’t do the trick right :-)
@officialbasura
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio NOPE! Also totally just bought this a few hours ago for this VO recording I was given, done off an iPhone and mannnn I can confidently say as a long time RX user I would not have gotten the results I got with Clarity VX. I feel invincible now lol
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Haha I can imagine! I’m also an rx user but clarity is so much easier and faster. Probably better as well
@neovxr
2 жыл бұрын
the RX denoiser did not advance that much from the very old Cool Edit denoising tool. the declicker and dehummer aren't too bad though. so this new one by Waves is really a lot of innovation.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I think older ones are more phase/ dynamics based and the clarity uses a more vocal isolate method. But don’t quote me on that.
@CMprod1
2 жыл бұрын
Edison noise removal still the best thing I've used!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
it’s handy for the FL users for sure.
@Nhmusicoffish
2 жыл бұрын
This video is intriguing! Good work! I’m using rx vocal noise remover for now but I might have to check this waves one out! Is it good for treating vocals in a kind of untreated room?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Hey! Not really, its not meant to remove ambiance or echo. Mostly suited for dirty noise sources.
@Conqlusion19
2 жыл бұрын
Now please a Plug-in for removing drum bleed - especially high-hats on snare. Would be a game changer
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Split EQ or for instamce Fabfilter Saturn 2 will do the trick.
@peterderecichei
2 жыл бұрын
This is nice. Personally I use the RX tools, and think they work alright. Once I get my hand one this one though, I’ll be stoked to try it, but I’ll probably only use it for dialogue, since there is way too much artifacting too be used for vocals/singing
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It is! Ideally you dont want to use a tool like this at all ofcourse. Just to save a recording.
@BLUNTZnBEATZ97
2 жыл бұрын
If this Makes Recording For Audiobooks easier....I need this..
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
First objective should be to always make sure your recordings sound as optimal as possible. Tools like clarity are there to fix , which should always be a last resort.
@ricerice245
2 жыл бұрын
you can split your vocal into high mid and low buses and put a 29$ clarity vx on all of them and now you have a multiband version like the 129$ one
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
$249 even. But with denoising I would be very hesitant to use a different multiband method, the chance to get artifact and colored sound isn’t worth the effort.
@donwells8465
2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Wouldn't isotope rx9 dialogue isolate be a better comparison. but then again, dialogue isolate is found in the advanced release that is far more expensive than the $30 waves is asking for.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Fair points, and is dialogue Isolate not only usuable inside the rx editor? not as plugin in a daw?
@donwells8465
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio great point! I'm so used to the rx workflow, i didn't even think of that. This waves plugin is a must-have for davinci resolve.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah. This plugin is ideal if you need to get work done. I personally really dislike needing to work in 2 daw's to achieve something which could be done in one.
@andreas-franke
2 жыл бұрын
Wow! Seems to be very effectiv!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It is!
@DerekPower
2 жыл бұрын
I do notice some artefacts here and there - inevitable - but I'm very impressed =]
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yup , absolutely, especilly when you have heavy processing or the background noise is really loud. Liek you said, inevitable and impressive results for sure.
@mfkrwill
2 жыл бұрын
damn, i was trying to get my boss at the news station i work at to get the rx bundle so we had some better audio restoration tools than what is in premiere, and while something like rx declip would still be nice, this is a bit nuts when it comes to noise
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
yeah it is. I would convince him to get the VX pro then, more flexibilty, although the ''small'' vx is already a beast.
@fatchulanjaza2433
2 жыл бұрын
Wow this guy replied to every comment
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
That’s called insanity.
@BirdYoumans
2 жыл бұрын
What is astonishing to me is how it leaves the voice largely uncolored and removes virtually all the background stuff. The RX wasn't even close to as good. Lots of coloration in the voice while not removing the background noise very well. I don't think I would even use the RX. This Wave plug is amazing. 'Bout all I need to say other than I just got it and can't wait to use it on my next video.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It is insane. I dare to call this THE best plugin for audio noise removing. The RX Dialogue Isolate is probably just as good, but that one is only available in RX Advanced and not as seperate plugin.
@BirdYoumans
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio I agree. But in the comparisons I saw with the RX, either the guys making the video did not know how to use the RX, or the Clarity just simply blew it away. I could hear coloration of the vocal every time in the RX. Seemed to lose highs a bit and maybe a bit "squeezed" for lack of a better way to describe it and just did not sound as good as the clarity. And again, never really got rid of the background altogether in extreme examples. Not to mention more complicated to work, and that might have been the problem. An expert, not saying the guys making the vids weren't experts since I don't know them, might have better results, but if the clarity is that much easier to use, then it's still no contest in my book. Did I say I love this clarity thing lol?!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Again totally right. The arguments against clarity in favor of rx are mostly: '' you're using RX wrong'' but if clarity can do it with 1 dial instantly instead of needing to work on audio for 15 minutes it is a no brainer to use clarity. That said RX mouthdeclicker is on all of my videos and I still use the denoising of rx for non voice related stuff.
@DigThat32
2 жыл бұрын
Wow! Student films are about to get a boost! 😆
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Haha lol. Maybe they will even get stereo!
@SoundMax
2 жыл бұрын
Круто работает плагин! Нужно будет приобрести себе такой 👍
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Preferably via my link ;-)
@KeithCopeland778
2 жыл бұрын
Impressive! I use RX8 for voiceovers but I'm going to try Clarity VX!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
if you have less severe noise rx will of course work perfectly fine. It is a good bundle. But yeah, clarity is impressive.
@VOByRobbins
2 жыл бұрын
I use NS-1 for my VO's I think this will really help in the summer when My AC is on and blowing in the booth, bought the standard version last night! -- Waves rocks!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Clarity will be excellent for that!
@TheReal_E.IRIZARRY
2 жыл бұрын
This plugin x Techivation T-De-Esser Pro have actually replaced my hardware dbx286 vocal channel strip de-noiser gate and de-esser.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
yeah the T-De-esser is great! I use it on my voice for my videos.
@user-cl7jq2jp7x
2 жыл бұрын
Tnx for your video!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
And thank YOU for watching!!
@mimojapan
2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. It may finally help me get rid of beer server hums at live gigs :D
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Lol. Remove the vibe ;-)
@anttoniwikstrom
2 жыл бұрын
Impressive! Must give it a go.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@pyabhashoart-design4920
2 жыл бұрын
Awesome, I wonder what would be the difference between Clarity VX / VX Pro vs Accusonus ERA Noise reduction / NR Pro.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Haven’t tested that because accusonus will stop in a while and all products will become unsupported.
@dagty11
2 жыл бұрын
What what would be the difference in a background sound removal and ambience removal? Just curious, great video!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Hey Mason thanks! Well it certainly overlaps. background noise can be hum, airco, street noise. With ambiance I’d say it’s more like reverb or echo.
@dagty11
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Makes a lot of sense, thank you for clarifying!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome!
@sundamusik
2 жыл бұрын
It seem like an ok plugin, would love to see a comparison vid between all the denoisers. Btw i know you're dutch, but in welke stad woon je dan? Groetn uut t hoge noordn, bless
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
All denoisers? that's a lot ;-) Focus for this video was the plugin itself and I snuck in rx because it's very popular. Joa kom hier uut 't oost'n - winterswijk. AJU!
@DavidKfilmmaker
2 жыл бұрын
I have a lot. Once we start doing our feature I’ll compare the ones I have
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Nice. Same here thanks to this channel.
@rautshsale1948
2 жыл бұрын
interesting indeed. waves has clearly been lacking in the denoise department. wondering how the dereverb will sound, which is what i'm more looking forward to one "suggestion" i'd love to add for reviews for these types of plugins specifically, is to use something like delta solo in reaper (not sure if delta solo is the universal name?) - but i think that hearing just what the effect is doing, or specifically how much of the voice is also being removed, is important to properly judge such a plugin
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I get why you want delta, but in the end, all what matters is how it sounds after you use denoising. Especially in broadcast or where you have voice only. There will always be a tradeoff and that is why i showed before and after examples with the plugin.
@Drfresh1402
2 жыл бұрын
Check out acon latest dereverb- the best.
@le_beatbox
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Using Delta can be super useful to get weird textures for sound design!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I can image. Having the audio of what is removed will give unique sounds.
@danielwetzs9317
2 жыл бұрын
I think the focus is not on music production, but could also be used here and then, though. As to mouth or smack noise or plosives I use Eventide SplitEQ, as to hum noise NS1 is good enough for me. No one would record vocals of a song with traffic noise in the background
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
My preferred method to remove a one off click or plosive has actually been with spectralayers inside Cubase. I just paint out that noise exactly how I want. I found that to work actually the quickest, plugins need to be dialed in as well which take time. The plug-in obviously focussed on voice overs, but my guess is that is also aimed at the home recording user. The threshold to record at home, with all the recording disturbing noises who come with that, has seen an explosive growth over the last years.
@juancarlosgar3423
2 жыл бұрын
This is like magic 🥵🤙🏼
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Haha i wouldn’t put it that extreme but it surely does amazing denoising on vocals.
@diegoalejo15
2 жыл бұрын
amazing! did you test it with a guitar?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Hey! No test on vocal only since that is what this plug-in is tuned for. But would be interesting to test!
@Wclipsssss
2 жыл бұрын
noise in your tracks should be dealt with proactively as best as possible instead of reactively however i do think this is a great option when you can’t just go back and re-record something without the noise
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yes absolutely. But if you have ever worked in for instance broadcast unfortunately you often have to deal with audio which is recorded pretty horrid. Clarity will be great for that.
@theMixElite
2 жыл бұрын
Can't you literally put the 29$ version on a multiband chain?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I see where you’re coming from, but with denoising I wouldn’t do it. The chance for one big artefact fest is too huge. Speed and conveniance is another factor. CPU usage as well, this plug-in is not cpu light.
@PeacefulLemon
2 жыл бұрын
Let's hope it can remove the hihat noises from artists who put their headphones volume obnoxiously loud
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
gehehehe. I sense a bit of frustrating first hand experience here.
@abrotherinchrist
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if you could get even better results by stacking two different noise removal plugins from different companies.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Probably. if you do some processing so teh next one in line would perform better. A bit liek stacking compressors. Only this is denoising and the less of that the better of course.
@rocketleaguesa9358
2 жыл бұрын
i like it TY for the vid
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Me too! Thanks for watching!
@Big_Nigs64
2 жыл бұрын
pretty impressive
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yes it is. It blows out basically any other comparable plugin.
@ChaosSummoner
2 жыл бұрын
you are not using RX8 well, you should use de-rustle if you want to remove noises like papers, but looks a very good VST, I still prefer RX8 just because you can edit in a very precise way if you use it stand alone and thats what I do, good video!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
yeah, no. You would expect that right? I used the plugins, because that what this video is about. Also: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2aJjr6yrpnqpdqQ . RX9 Dialogue Isolate is about as good. De-rustle plugins are usually meant for clothing rustle sounds, not somethng as severe as this paper.
@NoobFLProducer
2 жыл бұрын
Waves are ahead of the game on this one. :)
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
In the seperate plugin world for sure.
@YngHstlr
2 жыл бұрын
Why are you increasing the threshold on the izotope plugins? Rather than lowering it? And not using the learn function? Seems kinda misleading. #ad
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
learn functions is used and I used al sorts of setting combinations combinations including threshold. I actually really tried to get the best result with rx. If you don’t like the outcome, fine, but it is what it is.
@ForTiorIJohnny
2 жыл бұрын
wow, i was thinking there needs to be a plugin that works as well as Nvidia´s RTX Voice feature in their broadcast app. this seems to be it. too bad it´s by Waves. i´m not a fan of their authorization system. also, how well does it work on harsh vocal syles?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Hey there, it's for voice so for harsh vocals it probably woukld work as well.
@ForTiorIJohnny
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio good thing there´s a demo. i´ll have to check it out.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
That's the best way to find out :-)
@ForTiorIJohnny
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio i tried it out on some heavy screams and it does work. not quite as good as on a clean voice or singing track though. if you go too high on the reduction it takes out quite some top and bottom end. so personally i wouldn´t use it to actually clean up takes for an actual song. i´d rather make sure my recording setup is up to par. but i imagine for live streaming, to get a clean voice and not worry about extra noise, this is fantastic. as a vst you can load it right into OBS.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Seems logical it would take off some of the high and low end on extreme setting swith harsh voice, that does get into ''noise'' parts. Of course you want t make sure you record as good as possible, tools like clarity are there to fix. But better make sure you dont have to ;-)
@MCAlvesPortugal
2 жыл бұрын
Great plugin
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Agree!
@rassange2831
2 жыл бұрын
Can I use this plugin on Audacity or Audition? Is this plugin a good idea for audiobooks on ACX?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
This is a plugin to FIX audio problems. So if you have those, then yeah.
@vannmensa
2 жыл бұрын
this is dope great plugin
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@juicy_oranges5529
2 жыл бұрын
I'm just questioning if this is actually better / different compared to the Auditions' inbuilt noise suppression plugin, which always does a really good job for me
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Depends on how heavy you need denoising. Clarity can do very extreme denoising without artifacts. Many other denoising plugins will denoise perfectly fine with less extreme noise.
@juicy_oranges5529
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Thank you for the answer!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome!
@ServerAcademy
2 жыл бұрын
Is there an equivalent for Adobe Audition?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Audition supports vst and au plugins, so you can use clarity.
@Jvaldes609
2 жыл бұрын
That’s pretty amazing.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Fully agree on that.
@emanuelsebastian
2 жыл бұрын
Está bueno pero me podrías recomendar un pluging que haga lo contrario, quitar las voces de una canción porfa es para el cole
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Start here: kzitem.info/news/bejne/kayN22WeqaV4m4o or kzitem.info/news/bejne/uH9qroebiZ5_pHY
@RagingGamingBear
2 жыл бұрын
Can it do this live? Like Nvidia Broadcast?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Within a daw, yes. With a bit of letency added.
@douglasvoice2268
2 жыл бұрын
How is it for removing auto traffic (especially trucks and motorcylces) noise?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Best way to find out is to try it out. There's a trial available. I assume , since you ask this question, that you have that type of noise recorded.
@Fastvoice
2 жыл бұрын
I guess your cooking noises example would have worked a tad bit better if you'd narrow the width to strictly mono. That's what I tried with this plugin and didn't have to move the reduction wheel as high up as I had to with wider width to get good noise cancelling. Usually you'll need just the mono signal anyway with only one voice.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
could be, turning up the dial , selecting the correct algorithm + “single” usually is enough as you can hear in the video. The cooking. noises are mono anyway, left right channel have the same audio.
@Fastvoice
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio You're apparently at least one step further into the details as I was able to get. I've not yet found out how to get the screen version where the width button is completely vanished. Any hints?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Well the answer to that is completely mind boggeling: use it on a mono track ^^
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Ha, it’s way less exiting. Just use the plugin on a mono track.
@Fastvoice
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Thanks - that was also one of my ideas. So I already used it on a supposedly mono narration track in GarageBand. At least the track seems to be mono. Time for some further investigation on my side. 😉
@ThatIrishCowboy
2 жыл бұрын
that is absolutely amazing. I wonder if getting this would help when splitting tracks from a full mix if you don't have the stems. If I split a track maybe using this could isolate the random artifacts you hear from instruments after splitting. Or would that be more ambience?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I didnt find it to be that great for vocal removing. Vocal isolating worked better, but if the music is too loud then it won't work as well as a dedicated ''unmixer''.
@Beats-avishek
2 жыл бұрын
🙄🙄🙄🙄This is revolutionary ❤️
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It’s very good.
@mobthegamer5391
2 жыл бұрын
Clarity Vx makes iZotope's RX Denoise look like a useless free plugin... I LOVE IT!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
In these examples for sure. Rx dialogue isolate can do about the same
@ohokiwi493
2 жыл бұрын
how does this stack up with era 6 denoiser and brusfri looking forward towards the feed back warmly Johanne new Zealand
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It’s been a while since I used Brusfri. I remember it not being that much better than izotope rx and Clarity, with these examples, outperforms rx. I won’t compare with era 6 since all accusonus’ products will be sunset.
@MOSMASTERING
Жыл бұрын
What paper rustle!? Amazing!
@whitenoisestudio
Жыл бұрын
Yep. It removes that really well.
@Chasermusic
2 жыл бұрын
COOL!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely!
@sunyclubband4203
2 жыл бұрын
with the Rx9 you have to loop the noise zone and put learn in the plugin, but even so, I don't think it's at the level of Waves Clarity VX, incredible how powerful this tool is
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah learn is in most cases a must, die that for this video as well. Gave the best results. Clearing, with these example, outperformed the rx plugins.
@BrunoNeureiter
2 жыл бұрын
There's also an adaptive mode
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
True,m that gave worse results so I chose learn for these examples.
@bugsh9188
2 жыл бұрын
I'm curious how it would work with DI guitar tracks getting rid of that little bit of EMF...
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
it probably will remove a lot of the EMF, but i wouldnt know hot the guitar will be affected. Clarity VX is really tuned ( and trained with) voice and vocal.
@joakimjocka8022
2 жыл бұрын
damn, my bedroom recordings are about to get a whole lot better
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
You're waves' targeted demographic ;-)
@GenilsonOficial
Жыл бұрын
What about the Accentize DeRoom Pro? Clarity sounds better?
@whitenoisestudio
Жыл бұрын
Clarity is most and for all a denoizer, Reroom pro a de-reverb. Different applications mostly.
@GenilsonOficial
Жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio I understood. Thank you very much.
@DayyFinesse
2 жыл бұрын
Is this similar to the renaissance vox plugin? 😳 because the vox allows you to block sounds out like fan noises.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
no not really comparable. rvox does gating which is a very simple concept in comparison to the advanced denoising of clarity.
@patiencezero1025
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I felt misled about RX. Great tools but not the miracle tool it's often promoted to be.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
A tool is a tool and some work better for a job than others. So rx will work best in some occasion until something comes along which does the same job a bit better ;-) but rx is absolutely good, no doubt. I would never use clarity for mouth de clicking for instance. Rx does it perfectly fine.
@san4800
2 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you use adaptive mode in RX De-noise?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Because that gave even worse results while I tested. So I used learn, gave the best results with these examples.
@royklerks1266
2 жыл бұрын
Wonderul GUI sounds promising …!
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It's really good. And I mean that seriously.
@RaezaJones
2 жыл бұрын
Maaan Rx massacres the vocal, Clarity is just amazing I'm buying this pluggin ASAP...
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
In this context it was a pretty big difference.
@oriomenoni7651
2 жыл бұрын
How does this work with instruments like saxophone?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
The plugin is tuned for voice and vocal. So you can try it on sax, but no guarantees it will work as well as on vocal.
@thegeenius
2 жыл бұрын
wow.. pretty damn interesting,, & once again,, keeping price point in mind,,
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
When you only need a denoising, this is a heck of adeal with of course with a very attractive price point. If you need more types of noise removal, like de-reverb, you’d probably end up with a bundle like RX.
@omarnaser8291
2 жыл бұрын
Wow
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@MartinBergnerGuitar
2 жыл бұрын
Is this working on instruments aswell? Or just for human voice?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It’s tailored for human voice. You could try on instruments, no guarantees it will work.
@MartinBergnerGuitar
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Ah thats what I guessed, this is really impressive nonetheless! Cleaning up the vocals like this by basically just pulling one knob is actually insane! lol
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Its insanely good for voice and the best plugin which does this right now i'd say.
@jeffrey.a.hanson
11 ай бұрын
Not easily impressed, but this impressed me. Waves gets sh*t but let’s be honest, who doesn’t love simplicity. They’re like the Boost pedals of the production world.
@whitenoisestudio
11 ай бұрын
This is the best plugin by Waves in at least 2 years in my opinion, and counting. They really set a new benchmark for the other developers with this one.
@estrecords6844
2 жыл бұрын
Waves Ns1 works best for me😇😇😇
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Have you tried them side by side?
@estrecords6844
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio it's better than Ns1😅😅
@therealcann
2 жыл бұрын
Can i use it to call with friends on discord ?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Only if you have a Plugin host to run it on, otherwise nvidia broadcast or krisp will do what you need it to do.
@VictorVedmich
2 жыл бұрын
What if compare pro and plug-in from uad C-Suite C-Vox™ Noise & Ambience Reduction? What’s the best?
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
I don’t own UAD plugins, so I can’t say.
@ShaiFishman
2 жыл бұрын
No comparison, Clarity is MUCH better than C-Vox
@VictorVedmich
2 жыл бұрын
@@ShaiFishman thanks
@ReemX44
2 жыл бұрын
What does this do diffrenet then nvidia broadcast that is already around for a while...
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Is Nvidia broadcast a plug-in to be used in a daw?
@ReemX44
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio you can make it your default microphone in windows which will make it so you can record sound that will be without background noise from the start in real time..
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Yes. So it's not a plugin which can be used in a daw. Which will be the main application for this plugin and users who need to fix audio after recording.
@pongtrometer
2 жыл бұрын
have you tried it with instruments....
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
No, the plugin is tailored for vocals and marketed like that as well. You can always try of course.
@LDdrums20
2 жыл бұрын
Comparing the voice denoiser to the waves one is not a fair comparison. The right one would be the voice isolate I think or the one that uses ai
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
It’s a plugin comparison and in that context it’s fair. Not comparing a standalone daw vs this plugin. There are 100 other ways to compare denoising, for this video it’s the plugins.
@LDdrums20
2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio got you! Fair enough
@adrianvalenzuela2711
2 жыл бұрын
NVidia broadcast does it better and for free if you have an NVidia gpu, still a cool program tho.
@whitenoisestudio
2 жыл бұрын
Better? Beg to differ. Is nvidia a plugin you can use inside a daw to process after recording? No it isn’t ;-) Different usecase.
@nimck6642
2 жыл бұрын
Now I'm just gonna be saying to myself, "let me try to remove this paper rustle" in your accent all day
Пікірлер: 436