I think it should’ve been 50/50 in the first case since the plaintiffs didn’t tell the defendant they were going to get a dog.
@Ana_Ines3420
Жыл бұрын
In the second case I disagree with judge Lake. They were SO specific about their TWO YEAR OLD CHILD that everybody just remembers that. They should've said we don't want to see dean animals in our garden as well.
@yolandasmith7990
2 ай бұрын
I agree with u. They did not mention a dog
@chardonnaywalker2487
10 ай бұрын
Take them to an actual civil court!
@delivertus4romnesha328
10 ай бұрын
Lmfao first dude was creepy 🤣
@chardonnaywalker2487
10 ай бұрын
He planted plants that's non toxic for kids! No a dog you got after he did his job!
@nyshairving7383
5 ай бұрын
That's sexual harassment in the first case 😮
@markquarto8159
Жыл бұрын
Women shouldn’t take things so literal
@Ana_Ines3420
Жыл бұрын
Especially, if they were good friends. She could have said it from the very first minute. But she is a conniving person. Maybe she didn't like him but she was willing to use him.
@sandrawestley4193
6 ай бұрын
Well in my day we would just do the laundry, and be grateful the bills going down, and if he had been familiar I would just say do you mind, that would have been it.
@Dbenzsanz
6 ай бұрын
Who needs a back rub ???😅😅😅
@me2mangobig
Жыл бұрын
This tric figure if he payn he should be playn
@mariannemcgee6262
Жыл бұрын
The judge seems to be just opinionated in this series, not applying law at all!
@glad6054
10 ай бұрын
And a bit theatrical
@sandrawestley4193
6 ай бұрын
Well all I’ve watched she’s used common sense, which is an opinion to those with common sense, but it’s an attribute that’s sadly lacking these days. She gets the people to incriminate themselves before she makes her decisions. Well I think she was dead right on her decision, he’s very lucky she didn’t take him to the cleaners, over sexual harassment, very lucky chap.
Пікірлер: 18