Shari’ah prohibits men and women meeting together, mixing, and intermingling. Islam prohibits the crowding of them together, and the revealing and exposure of women to men. #brohajji #islam #muslim
🤣🤣🤣🤣Bro is a menace... when bro hajji zooms in when they looking at the females💀💀I Love this channel- it either leaves me in laughter or anger . But i learn something every vid.
@meelash1
5 ай бұрын
Yoooooooo, that was hilarious 😅
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
@@meelash1 we should have husnal dhun, these are men who have dedicated themselves to the book of Allah and Islam, honestly they could have been looking down but the angle and camera may make it look like they were looking at the sisters. Allah knows best.
@farhatkhan23
5 ай бұрын
They cannot join music concerts openly, so this is new bypass 💀😑
@_HamzaShaf
5 ай бұрын
Bro hajji just some sincere advise wallah, blur the women
@muhammadabubakr648
5 ай бұрын
May Allah reward you for this
@PiewPiew306
5 ай бұрын
Ali Dawah is acting like a pride fir3awn. He is above criticisms.
@fullsendit292
5 ай бұрын
like a baby the way he keeps bringing up sajid in every other video
@abyrahman6610
5 ай бұрын
The scholars of the past would sweat out of fear when passing fatawa. This Yasir Qadhi dude passes fatwas with such ease and confidence, always saying "in my opinion" "according to me" etc and completely disregarding other scholars that it should make you think twice before listening to him. Beware of such people!
@SonGoku-io7sh
5 ай бұрын
Thats not enough to avoid a scholar. Scholars don't always need to provide every daleel when they have a talk somewhere. However we should avoid scholars based on past actions or if we have enough ilm ourselves to disagree. For example, in your opinion you should avoid Yasir Qadhi. Where is your daleel? If you follow it through logically, you see how absurd this is.
@HAliH-po1gk
5 ай бұрын
@@SonGoku-io7shDo you take from Muhammad ibn Karram and Jahmi bin Safwan? Were they just giving their own ijtihad?
@SonGoku-io7sh
5 ай бұрын
@@HAliH-po1gk So because I said that scholars don't need to give a daleel at all times, you think I'm a heretic? You are either misunderstood what I was saying or an outright idiot.
@abdullahassaffah
5 ай бұрын
Yasir Cody has a atheistic mindset of everyone has a choice and say whatever they want they have the freedom
@abdullahassaffah
5 ай бұрын
@@HAliH-po1gk ask them where eis the daleel is is is bad what proof did yasir Cody have to declare them bad wrong these are two faced atheistic influenced modernists liberals
@mrstandupguy
5 ай бұрын
The ‘young buck’ 😆
@Yessirrr3
5 ай бұрын
PLEASE keep making these free mixing videos you don’t understand how bad it is in the states….if you speak out on this they exile you… tons of clique-like behavior that is exiling well-intentioned Muslims from their communities… this is why there’s such a huge marriage problem here, we try to justify the ends with the means and think by doing haram we will get what we want. Liberal Islam in America is becoming a pandemic.
@MuhammedDenix
5 ай бұрын
I think it is becoming a pandemic everywhere, Akhi. Even in Turkey, which is where I'm from. Not referring to Erdogan specifically although he is quite liberal, the Turkish Diyanet, which is a pro Ataturk institution, also has this liberal sort of attitude. I'm afraid that if the Dajjal does come in our time we seek refuge in Allah from his fitna, the vast majority of Muslims will follow him. This is how nations become corrupt. First we make marriage difficult by saying he must deffenitly have a job (yes I know the walli does have the authority to refuse based on that reason however a temperary waver should be given until he is able to get a job.) What I mean is, say they're in school, the Husband and Wife can live and have an intimate relationship maybe in the house of one of the parents and then he can gget a job once he has finished his school. Then, we come up with pointless things such as nikah contract for college students check Yasir Qadhi's video of that on youtube, the title is exactly how I've written it. What he means is, they can get married but not live together which is dangerous as without no consimation, if a talaq is given, the marriage breaks immediately. Then we come up with jahil beliefs like you can marry when you are 18 or over whereas some of the sahaaba got married earlier than that, not saying it's necessarily a fard to get married at 9 years old but you get the point. Then we throw a lot more difficulties and you see the point. This is how zina becomes common. Then we throw liberalism into the mix and you see the result of these preachers like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Sulayman, Shabir Ally, etc. things. May Allah protect us from this, but what if the generation of Muslim speakers after these people actually legalize zina? Some people have already done that, and even worse than that, gay marriage! Yes I know it's a minority even amongst liberal groups but what if it becomes the mainstreem view in say, 50 to 100 years time? You know, in today's day and age, it's way easy to pay a certain money to a prostitute to have sex with her for a couple of hours or the whole night, or to go to a bar and do the evil act, or to get a girlfriend etc and do the evil act. All because we have strayed from the methodology of the medieval scholars. I'm not saying we should force our girls to get married when they are 9 years old and make them end up in abusive relationships, but if a girl or boy wants to get married at that age, we should encourage them and open the doors for that, provided we know their spouse is an upright person, of course, and take other considerations into account such as compatibility. Then we have some deviant innovators who reject the marriage age of Aaisha Radiallahu anha and the list goes on. We need to reverse the equasion. Today, zina is way cheaper than nikah. And unfortunately, a lot of our well meaning Imams, without them realizing, may have been deceived by the imams like Yasir Qadhi. So the equasion should be, nikah is cheaper and zina is costly and expensive. Which it is. The scholars mention a lot of consequences of zina, such as feeling in depression, feeling ones chest constricted, unwanted pregnancies, physical diseases that's also according to a hadith of Rasullullah as well, a tarnished personal and family reputation, the breakup of families, etc. And even if we assume a certain individual is not afflicted with those consequences, and still lives a fully happy and fulfilling life, that is in the world. His reward will be anguish, depression, and torment in the Barzakh, on the day of judgement and in hell. May Allah save us!
@Abdullah_0083
14 күн бұрын
I wonder why liberal Islam is prevalent in America but Salafism is prevalent in the UK and Germany. Maybe these liberal scholars are mandated by the US government idk
@tsmk6599
5 ай бұрын
I've always noticed how the majority of the time these liberal speakers that like to water down the religion are mainly American/Canadian etc. It's hardly ever found in the UK alhamdulillah but now it's getting here because of social media spreading these soft speakers all around the world that appeal to mainly women. Until recently we've never seen these types of events take place in the UK and now Tiktok and other apps alike have made it more appealing to UK muslims
@hassanalinoo
5 ай бұрын
You are right.
@iymuslim
5 ай бұрын
To be honest akhi, you are actually doing a lot of great work, by exposing this rubbish. But I fear that your dawah will be mixed with sins because of the excessive ridiculing and name-calling. How much more impactful would your dawah be if you spoke with straight facts and no offensive gimmicks. May allah unite us all in Jannah
@MuhammedDenix
5 ай бұрын
Yeah I agree with you Akhi, but I can understand how emotional people feel about this nowadays. But yes, he needs to be wiser and go deeper into these issues.
@MuhammadSohailArif
5 ай бұрын
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Brother whilst I appreciate this video about free mixing being prohibited which I totally agree with. But does your video with that lady recently not qualify as free mixing? Cannot remember her name.
@TheFatMan
5 ай бұрын
They were hundreds of miles apart and the conversation wasn't private. It was posted online
@MuhammadSohailArif
5 ай бұрын
@@TheFatMan so if I video called your sister over video call would you be ok with that?
@1Ummah1924
5 ай бұрын
Kudos to Bro Hajji for persistently bringing attention to this issue. It's truly disgraceful and shameful. If they're unwilling to put their own wives or daughters in front, doesn't that reveal hypocrisy? Man it gets crazier everyday! In bengali we say “behaya okhol”
@hudhayfahrehman9208
5 ай бұрын
I know you have already done this multiple times akhee...but tag Ali Da'wah and bitter truth show. Dont stop. Keep reiterating and emphasising the point.
@BroHajji
5 ай бұрын
I’ve tagged him in other videos as part of my free-mixing series. This is dedicated to the Qalam liberals and the Martin Luther.
@RumonHoque-v8t
5 ай бұрын
Totally agree brother if our people of knowledge set the presidence so westernised liberal which is alien in the deen of islam tbh there is no shari benefit in having them look at each other what is this astagfirulah these same men on panel will not allow it for there own woman folk then why the double standards
@muxishine
5 ай бұрын
There's a reason why women love these "du`aat"
@muhammadabubakr648
5 ай бұрын
The sad reality is those Du’aat are just crowd pleasers majority of the time
@SteveBundalston-nq1us
5 ай бұрын
I have to be honest here, the fact that Bro Hajji is calling out certain things, even though he could probably benefit more by remaining silent, shows sincerity on his part. May Allah keep us all sincere, and steadfast on his Deen, Aameen
@user-ee3vi8cw9u
5 ай бұрын
Subhanallah that guy talking sounds like a little western feminine boy. Talking all sweet and emotional. Just unmanly showmanship.
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
Lol your insecurity and ignorance on what it means to be a man is on full display. That man who is a hafidh of Quran and scholar would rip you to shreds and is also an athlete and former wrestling champion.
@AbuKhadeejahSP
5 ай бұрын
More video about my student Shamsi Bensafi and the Madkhalis Pseudo-Salafis
@soujurix2555
5 ай бұрын
I diaagree a lot with Saajid, but this time I agree with him. This Ali needs Da'wah, multiple times. I would like to know which 'Shuyukh' gave him this permissibility.....
@mjrstar3757
5 ай бұрын
What about sisters who go to work and have to associate with their male colleagues?
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
Don't ask logical questions that expose the fundamental disconnection from reality that these bros have and their fundamental ignorance, misapplication, and shotty understanding of fiqh and usul.
@Faisal-g6z
5 ай бұрын
The Muslim scholarship in the US seems to be poor, they have tried to make it liberal
@sufyan2297
5 ай бұрын
This is where you and shamsi are 100 percentage right!
@القرانالكريم-ظ4ك6ز
4 ай бұрын
This is astonishing - didn’t know it was this bad. All this time I thought most was sitting quite separately at a distance in the dark without a barrier - these environments are completely Haram. Astagfirullah - May Allah save us from deviation.
@syedz9072
5 ай бұрын
Shaykh Al Akbar Ibn Al Arabi is Heretical Sufi?? This is wrong.....
@abdullahassaffah
5 ай бұрын
There's ibn arabi who was a kafir then there's ibn al arabi full name Abu bakr ibn al arabi who is a different scholar he was good
@Lola-qh6lt
4 ай бұрын
Salam btother, JazakAllahu Khairan Kathira. This is such an important but often concealed topic. Please give some book names or PDF links, so I can study this topic. Its a request, i need this.
@anasbeshir9698
5 ай бұрын
FYI umm sulaym and umm haram are sisters so if one of them is his ASWA aunt through rida'ah then the other one is too. And the hadith regarding Asma he ASWA didn't ask her to ride with him, he gave her his riding animal to ride and he would guide it to the home of Asma and Zubair. There's another hadith by Asma when she reached puberty and the prophet ASWA semi-admonished her and told her to cover properly.
@nes8336
5 ай бұрын
This person 0 knowledge how you watching your video just waste of time
@PiewPiew306
5 ай бұрын
The best women are those who do not see the men and who are not seen by the men. - Fatima Zahra (س) Ahkam-un-Nisa
@uzairali6990
5 ай бұрын
Word of truth
@shahidaahmed6139
5 ай бұрын
Thank you brother for bringing all this to our attention. Im shocked in one of the pics how women are sitting on the floor with no manners.
@H_G2013
5 ай бұрын
Keep up the good work Bro Hajji this is a big fitna which is seeping in from USA
@HellllooKittttyyyyy
4 ай бұрын
Jazaka Allah khair for Defending Islam
@AdamAdam-gx6pt
5 ай бұрын
Commixure uno even bro hajji got razzled…
@Faisal-g6z
5 ай бұрын
Brother what's the Nasheed at the end?
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
this is your opinion, nothing from the Quran or hadith is presented so you cant say something is categorically haram without that. its simple, this is a difference of opinion.
@BroHajji
5 ай бұрын
Free Mixing kzitem.info/door/PLZjQgCP-RJfIdYALcpgW_JZ69bQF4MGJ0 A whole playlist full of evidences.
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
@@BroHajji Again you can have evidences from scholars but if it is not directly from the Quran or hadith then this is a difference of opinion. We know there was mixing during the time of the prophet in various circumstances. Context and need determine an issue like this. Would you prefer sisters to be out in the streets and pubs because excluding them from Islamic gatherings leads to that which is a huge issue in the UK with sisters leaving Islam. We're not as extreme in the US and have struck a balance which keeps our sisters in the fold of Islam. You guys in the UK could learn a thing or two from how to navigate legitimate differences of opinion and understanding that the sharia is to be applied within context. You can't copy and paste a fatwa from (a scholar) from a time that no longer exists.
@tugbuggy
5 ай бұрын
Tell your friends Mohammad hijab and ali dawah if they think there mixed gathering podcast is so good. They should both have their wives on it? Or do they not apply the shariah as strictly to themselves as they do to their wives? Same to the other duaat
@BroHajji
5 ай бұрын
I agree بارك الله فيك
@desertezz
5 ай бұрын
Everything isn't for everyone, our religion and fiqh is vast. It's fine if they don't want their wives there one can at the same time recognize the difference of opinion on an issue and stop acting like this issue is clear cut directly from the Quran and Hadith and attacking other Muslims who hold a different opinion than you.
@MegaMucahid
5 ай бұрын
Salam Alaikom khoya Mohammed Barakallahu feek
@yousefshehata6330
5 ай бұрын
This is a classic case of الإسلام حكم ولم يحكم
@farhatkhan23
5 ай бұрын
Martin Luther😂
@AS-zc2qi
5 ай бұрын
Shifa Abdullah was one of Prophet Muhammad’s female companions, whom Umar entrusted with a leadership role in monitoring and supervising commercial transactions in the entire marketplace of Madinah, the first capital of the Islamic empire.
@BroHajji
5 ай бұрын
The story is not true و قد روى ان عمر قدم امرأة على حسبة سوق. و لم يصح فلا تلتفوا اليه. فإنما هو من دساس المبتدعة في الأحاديث. احكام القران لابن العربي المالكي
@AS-zc2qi
5 ай бұрын
@@BroHajji I responded to you english and now you respond in arabic lol. is this your attempt to convince me your staement is valid, your full of arrogance.
@programmerhub2415
5 ай бұрын
@AS-zc2qi if you read the reference using translation tool builtin you would've knew better he referenced the source
@amaan-the-analyst
4 ай бұрын
@@AS-zc2qi Perhaps one of those fabricated story by Akram Nadvi like hundreds he created.
@maryamvilla2rent219
5 ай бұрын
Useful video. Jazakallah
@Tinolg7
5 ай бұрын
Narrated `Aisha: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to offer the Fajr prayer and some believing women covered with their veiling sheets used to attend the Fajr prayer with him and then they would return to their homes unrecognized.
@SonGoku-io7sh
5 ай бұрын
This doesn't show 100% that the guys were looking at the females. They may have glanced in front of them or looked at the audience without pinpointing someone. Sure there should not have been women there in the first place but unless you have clear evidence there is wrong doing, you should leave it to Allah.
@BroHajji
5 ай бұрын
The whole hour they were looking at females. I only presented example of clear transgression. This is an Islamic event and they have sisters in the front row. Would they allow their own wives, daughters, sisters and mothers to sit in the front rows? What’s good for the goose, it’s good for the Ganda. This isn’t a university campus, as I can appreciate it’s not in their control. Funny enough, there was a barrier for other brothers, but for the speakers the sisters were in plain sight and under their feet 😆 Review the video below:, and check it out yourself. kzitem.info/news/bejne/jouY4KWDpmWBmqwsi=eGpOh5bC2-jMQmgM
@SonGoku-io7sh
5 ай бұрын
@@BroHajji No I understand there shouldn't be sisters there, no argument there. There just isn't clear cut evidence that the brothers were looking at women in a certain way, not that there are many other areas to look when you are in that position but it is what it is. Would have been nice to see one of them decline the invite to the stage. Ultimately its better not to throw suspicion in these matters and make excuses as much as possible.
@Muwazabdulkalim
5 ай бұрын
All of that is besides the point
@SonGoku-io7sh
5 ай бұрын
@@Muwazabdulkalim what?
@faysalahmed9157
5 ай бұрын
Looking at a woman's face and hands when there is a genuine need and no desire feared is allowed according to number of classical scholars, i.e., Hanafi and Maliki. I will present the classical Hanafi view here: Basic Fiqh of Looking at non-awrah (other than areas which should be covered for the masses) of Opposite Sex 1. In the Hanafi school, it is permitted (although disliked without need) for a man to look towards the face or hands of a woman, and for a woman to look towards the non-awrah of a man, if there is no fear of desire or physical inclining. 2. If one looks out of physical desire or inclining or fears this, then it is unlawful to look. 3. The exception is in cases when it is unavoidable, such as for witnesses in court or to look at someone one is intending to marry when there is hope of the marriage taking place, but only if one's intention is to fulfill one's objective, even with desire, not to fulfill one's desires. 4. The definition of 'desire' is: any physical inclination of the heart. 5. It is not a condition that it is a strong physical desire or that it is accompanied by sexual thoughts or physical arousal. 6. Lack of desire iat one one looks towards them as one would towards one's child or towards a beautiful tree. [Source: al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya (5.329-330); Ibn Abidin / Haskafi, Radd al-Muhtar `ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar (bab shurut al-salat)]
@MuhammedDenix
5 ай бұрын
Just to clarify something, having a barrier such as a screen or curtain is not actually an obligation, so long as the two sexes (male and female) are separated and there is no free mixing. However, and scholars in a particular region may have to clarify this, if there is a huge fear of free mixing because of the lack of a barrier, then it may become obligatory to put one, especially nowadays. This is why, although Hanafi ulama such as Mufti Taqi Oothmani say the Niqab is not in principle obligatory, still women are obligated to wear it due to the fitan and temptation in our times.
@@BroHajji I'm not getting the two issues confused. Avoiding ikhtilaat is a fact as I referenced before. And to make it clear, having a barrier is a good thing, though not an obligation within itself. The proof for this is that in the time of Rasullullah sallallahu allay he wa sallam, there was no barrier in the masjid. The women simply prayed at the rear, where the men would not see them. And as I've said, scholars (not liberal people like yasir Qadhi) but traditional ulama would have to look at the situation. For example, if having no barrier will lead to intermingling of the sexes, then it will be an obligation etc. This is the duty of the scholars to sort out. And just to be clear as well, it is pirmissible for men to take knowledge from women. For example, many of our medieval scholars like Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiya had female teachers, it's reported that he had 40 female teachers. Though of course, there should be no intermingling of the sexes. One of the greatest ways of doing this is to make the men exit the classroom first, then the women. Or have two entrances, one for men and one for women. However, men studying under women, or women studying under men has several conditions. 1. There should be no fear of temptation i.e. no intermingling as you clearly pointed out. 2. Women have to speak in a normal tone, not in a sweet, beautiful voice in line with Quranic injunctions. Unfortunately, many women try to beautify their voices in that sort of way nowadays. 3. If this is not possible to do, perhaps the best way of doing this is for men to ask the questions audibly and for women to write their questions down on a paper so the men can pick the paper up and read the questions. 4. Just to clarify for the Brothers and Sisters another issue. How about the recitation of the Qur'an from a female Qari? How about listening to her, or learning from her recitation? There are two views. Some ulama say if he is not tempted by her voice and obviously if he's not alone with her, then he may learn. For example, Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, on the hadith of the two slave girls singing to Rasullullah, confirms this. Other scholars prohibit recitation of Qur'an by women where there are men. Imam Shafi says it is dislikable for a woman to perform salah loudly where there are non-mahrum men. Whatever the case, I personally do not prefer to listen to female qaris to be on the safe side. Another thing that matters here is the age of the woman. For example, a young man listening to the recitation of a woman who is, say, 100 years old will not be tempted as it is not possible to be tempted by her. The point I'm trying to make is, although men learning from female ulama is permitted in the Shariah, we need to make sure there is still no intermingling. This can be done if she is in the womens row and gives a lecture when men are present. If it is not possible to hear her, there can be like a microphone in which she can speak into so long she does not speak in a soft voice. It is narated that Aaisha radiallahu anha would teach the men and women, and she would have a vale inbetween the men's row and the women's row to separate the sexes. And if the situation is so bad that women cannot attend the mosque due to fear of temptation, then there are other ways of learning, such as by finding female only gatherings.
@abdullahassaffah
5 ай бұрын
@@MuhammedDenixyou clearly got things disastrously wrong and mixing things up
@MuhammedDenix
5 ай бұрын
@@abdullahassaffah As I've said, I haven't gotten anything mixed up. I clarified what I meant. And I mentioned a few of the rulings of the scholars regarding some other matters. As I've said, and I'll clarify this again, Bro Hajjy is not a scholar in any way, shape or form. Yes, I do think he has done a lot of good work and I don't dispute that. But he gets overly too emotional amongst these subjects and doesn't dive deep enough into these issues. There are a lot of issues regarding this. Regarding women attending these dikr gatherings and the like, I already mentioned that if there is a fear of free mixing and the like then they should be prevented. I did not at all disagree with the rulings regarding ikhtilaat. All I said, and I don't mean any offense to Bro Hajjy or anything like that, he is no scholar. Remember, how these rulings should be implemented, we need traditional scholars of our era to way in on these issues. Regarding a barrier or the lack there of - yes I think a barrier to separate men and women, even conservative scholars like Bin Baz said it is not obligatory. Now I'm not a salafi by any means, but I just want to show these issues are extremely deep. Of course what these liberals like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Sulayman, miftaah institute etc do is extremely\ wrong. I mean I don't know what's inside Yasir Qadhi's heart, but regardless, it is creating a lot of fitna amongst people. Bro Hajjy rightly called that out, and may Allah reward him for that. But he needs to be calmer. However I don't find him as consistent as much as I would like him to be. I'll give you two examples. In one of the videos, he was with Shaykh Fadil Sulayman you know the Egyption guy who made the bridges translation of Qur'an, who has some relationship with the liberals like Shuruq Naguib, Salwa El-Awa because remember he also got a phd from the kuffar. I could be wrong, but in the conference titled evening with the Qur'an, this feminist Shuruq Naguib was saying some stuff against traditional interpretations of gender. Why ddidn't Fadil Soliman do a video about that? I have a hunch he Fadil Soliman may have some liberal views, why doesn't Bro Hajjy clarify that. At the same time, Bro Hajjy refutes people like Nu'man Ali Khan whereas Fadil Soliman, in his lecture about pondering the Qur'an, actually confirmed what Nu'man Ali Khan actually said, without making a video that clarifies his errors! Another example. Bro Hajjy refutes liberals such as Yasir Qadhi, yet he supports people like Yusuf Al-Qaradawi! Examples include the following. 1. Bro Hajjy lashed out at Hamza Yusuf for saying the Shariah should be modified. Yet this was the view of Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. I'm not refuting Al-Qaradawi because he was an Ikhwani, but rather because of what he taught. 2. Now I have a feeling that Bro-Hajjy believes the amir of the nation should be a male, which is established by the ijma of all of the scholars of Islam - it has been only recently that people have tried to rethink this. So why does Yusuf Al-Qaradawi allow this well not just bidda, but grave violation of the fitra of the human beings? Yes, even though people like Mawdoodi had their errors, he did not reject this at all! And there are other conditions as well, such as him knowing politics and war i.e. having military training - see tafsir ibn Kathir. I say military training because modern people might think managing war in terms of organization but if you think according to the medieval context, that also means knowing how to make military strategy and how to command an army, which are both essential skills. What's even graver than that is he Yusuf Al-Qaradawi allows women to stand in elections i.e. democracy! A, Democracy is an act of kufr and shirk because it prefers the law of the majority over the rule of Allah. B, it gives women too much power which they are not mentally capable of. Don't forget, in terms of intelligence, men have been granted superior intellect - not in all areas of course, but in many areas such as leadership and the like. Of course, a woman may intellectually be a better aalim than a man, but those are two separate issues. So Bro Hajjy should clarify what he thinks about these issues. 3. No doubt even graver than that was when Yusuf Al-Qaradawi actually gave a fatwa to the effect that Muslims can serve in the armies of the kuffar such as the British and Americans in Afghanistan as chaplins and other roles. So what he's actually said is, whether he realizes or not, is that Muslims can kill the Muslims. So he pretty much sided against the people of Afghanistan and against the Taliban. Of course, we can disagree with some of the Taliban policies, but my point still stands. 5. Even graver than that is what Yusuf Al-Qaradawi says about Allah. He made a comment in one of his tapes to the effect that if Allah decides to get himself elected, 99 percent of the people will reject him hence he will not win the election. Now, if he meant that Allah will lose, this is an act of Kufr and makes him a Murtad. If he meant that figuratively i.e. Allah would not lose as he can never be defeated but that people would still oppose his laws, perhaps then it wouldn't be an act of kufr but still a very baatil and dangerous way of saying things. It is for this reason that some people, and not all, have actually called Yusuf Al-Qaradawi a Murtad i.e. apostate. Now the Salafis do have their own issues and I have a lot of displeasure with what they're doing. But something does have to be said abouj all these issues.
@hcrisis
2 ай бұрын
Brother, wouldn't the presence of a physical barrier be needed in the absence of a "barrier" of space/arrangement? What I mean is that the way the sahaba sat in masjid an nabawi meant that no barrier was needed, since women were not visible due to being behind, and leaving first. These side by side arrangements (let alone while recording), expose women to the view of men, which the shariah fights against, and is a fitnah. So by free mixing, do you also include the unnecessary added risk of women being in the view of men? Also considering how the voice of the women speaking with each other in a soft manner would also be in listening distance?
Пікірлер: 94