If you didn't like something in the video (anything, even a small flaw), or what made you dislike it, write me a reply, I really need your help to improve my content!
@awildmal6944
5 ай бұрын
Nothing I disliked but in the beginning I noticed that it says "Why Electric Cars So Powerful" and if it's a question that you're gonna answer I'm pretty sure it should be "Why Are Electric Cars So Powerful?" (With "Are" because otherwise it sounds and looks incorrect
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, thank you very much for drawing my attention to this error. English is not my native language and sometimes I make annoying mistakes. I will try to avoid them, thank you very much for the advice 👍@@awildmal6944
@es10_
5 ай бұрын
ICE: Delivers power that increases overtime EV: Delivers Maximum and Fixed power instantly
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yeah, bro! This is the most concise description on this topic, very cool! I hope you enjoyed the video) Also, if you subscribe to the channel, which I will be very grateful for, I welcome you to our KZitem family! We still have a lot of interesting auto content ahead!
@Naczo
5 ай бұрын
i don’t think the title makes sense
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
I edited the title. I apologize for the inaccuracy. Thank you for drawing my attention to the mistake in the title )
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
I redid the title again, hope it's better?
@aidnt9053
5 ай бұрын
The title is so wrong: "Why are EVs so easily overtaken by cars with internal combustion engines? Let's find out!" EVs aren't easily overtaken, it's the internal combustion powered cars that get overtaken by the EVs!
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, my friend, thank you very much. English is not my native language and I accidentally wrote something wrong and didn't even notice. Now I have already corrected it, thanks again for your help) Also if you subscribe, then welcome to our KZitem family) (I will improve my English so that there are no more such mistakes)
@e-berry
5 ай бұрын
You could have also talk about how easier it is to put power down the wheels. In EV cars, you can easily have one motor per wheel on an electric car which you can precisely modulate to have the best possible traction control in case of slipping at the start (like the three motors in tesla plaid), whereas ICE cars either have to individually brake each wheel or even cut the accelerator a bit.
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, you're right. Since electric cars can afford to install electric motors even on each wheel, their handling is greatly improved. This gives them an additional advantage for a quick start. But in cars with ICE, it is no longer possible to limit the speed of any one wheel, so you either have to reduce the speed for all wheels or slip the wheels at the start. Very good point, thank you for drawing my attention to it! I also have another test planned to compare electric cars and cars with ICE, so if you are interested, you can subscribe so as not to miss it )
@e-berry
5 ай бұрын
@@vertviger Already did, your channel has a lot of potential :)
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
I'm very, very happy) If you think that the channel has potential, then I will continue to make videos no matter what! Thanks for the support, friend)@@e-berry
@Waterdog553
5 ай бұрын
Nothing like coming home and finding out vert uploaded another banger, day keeps getting better, dont forget to sub and like guys this is peak content🙏
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for such kind words ) I am very pleased ) I'm very glad that my videos bring you joy and you enjoy watching them, I will continue to delight you with interesting content )
@aresivrc1800
3 ай бұрын
Power is the product of torque and RPM. A combustion engines torque (with pedal on the metal) depends on the air flow inside the engine and the resulting combustion gas pressure that depresses the pistons. At low RPM, the airflow in the intake system is comparable slow so an naturally aspirated engine can only induct a limited amount of air. One can assume arround 60 % of the displacement. So a 2.0L engine actually just inducts 1.2L of air per full cycle on all cylinders. This is why the turbocharged 1.0L Ecoboost feels like a classical 2.0L engine.... it actually burn a very similar amount of fuel and air when high torque is demanded but still has the efficiency benefits of a smaller engine when at low loads with is basically the majority of on road driving. When RPM rise, the air in the intake system moves faster, leading to a certain push of air inside the cylinders. Because there is less parasitic drag on this pushed in air than on the vacuum pumped air, engine efficiency and power output increases at medium RPM. This is why most naturally aspirated petrol engines have their highest efficiency (at full throttle/load that is) at arround 3000 RPM. For the same reason, their tend to have peak torque at 4000 RPM or so. Engine speed higher than that further increase power even as torque begins to fall again. Because for a while, the increase in engine speed compensates the decrease in torque at high RPM. But why does torque decrease at high RPM? The air inside the intake system has never been faster and never pushed harder into the cylinders than now. But at the same time, the actual opening times of the valves gets shorter and shorter as the enginen cylces faster and faster. So fast in fact, that the expanding fire inside the combustion chamber is increasingly not that much faster than the piston going downwards by the engine RPM. This decreases the amount of force transmitted to the piston and as such reduces both torque (and thus power output) and efficiency (less of the combustion created gas pressure applies force to the piston due to lack of time). You can imagine this like a car crash on the highway: At low engine speeds, the PistonCar moves only at 30 kmh.... the CombustionFireCar drives 200 kmh and slams into that "PistonCar", delivering most of its energy into the "PistonCar" and as such greatly accelerating it. Now we have high RPM, so the "PistonCar" moves at 190 kmh. The "CombustionFireCar still drives 200 kmh and will still slam into the "PistonCar"... but it will hit it both later and much weaker, meaning that far less force is actually transmitted. You still had the energy consumption of accelerating the "CombustionFireCar" to 200 kmh, making this modus operandi pretty inefficent. At high engine RPMs, internal combustion engines in fact advance the ignition. Because the burning of the fuel takes a moment to take place, you want to have peak combustion pressure when the piston is at Top Dead Center. At high RPMs, you as such need to ignite the fuel while the piston is still traveling upwards which will hurt overall efficiency. The valve timing needed for good low RPM efficiency and power output is different from the valve timing needed at high RPM for peak power. This is why variable valve timing exists, because without it, you can only optimize an engine for either low speed or high speed. A combustion engines also has a lot of moving parts and every single one of those moving parts creates friction, so mechanical losses increase with engine speed. All of this leads to a pretty small useable RPM range. The engine needs a minimum idle for smooth operation and can only rev to arround 6000 RPM (on a mainstream car) so at the most you have maybe 5000 - 5500 RPM rev range, which is why we need so many gears in an ICE car. But now lets look at the electric motor of the type that is commonly used in electric vehicles. Unlike a combustion engine, torque is not produced by the pressure of an expanding burning gas but by electromagnetical force. This force soley depends on the amount of electricity flowing through the motor, so an electric motor has PEAK torque right at zero RPM. So power output scales directly with RPM. An electric motor at 500 RPM will have twice the power output of an electric motor at 250 RPM because it stays at peak torque all the time. It is also faster to power up / power down an electromagnetic field than to change the combustion process. In an non direct injected petrol engine, fuel is injected at the beginning of the intake stroke. This means, that it will take a full engine revolution before it burns and as such we can only reduce torque from that cylinder in the next cycle. So if you quickly release the accelerator in an petrol car, the engine will at least burn any fuel so far injected into it, leading a a few more full torque power strokes. Only in the next injection cycle, fuel is reduced and only then, torque drops. An electric motors electromagnetic field meanwhile can be changed much faster. So fast in fact, that electric sport cars use this to further increase braking power. You see, it takes a moment for the brake pad to make full contact with the disc. Valuable time.... to bad we cant do anything about it and we might in fact even have a powerful petrol engine adding a few more power strokes which will further decrease initial braking performance. But now lets have an electric motor. The Electric ECU detects that you want to brake and changes the magnetic field inside the motor from "accelerate" to "brake". The brake pads havent even touched the discs yet, but the wheels already incur heavy braking as the motor has turned generator, creating possible hundres of KW of braking power that will slow down the car significantly already before the friction brakes come into full force. Oh, and we can use the created electricity to recharge the battery and increase range. But why do the ICE car - usually - win in top speed? Because they need gearbox with many gears in the first place, allowing them to keep the engine closer to peak power which is required for very high speeds. But also because electric motors lose torque at high engine RPM, if for entirely different physical reasons: With raising RPM, the back EMF of the motor increases. In a way, the motor partially turns into a generator at high speeds which is unwanted because it means that you spend electricic power not on output but on fighting Back EMF. Yet this is unavoidable. The efficiency advantages of not needing a multi gear gearbox in the drivetrain also make it very attractive to spin up the electric motor to very high RPM, this however increases back EMF and results in lower torque at high RPM. This is why electric cars for a given power output suck at top speed.... the motor has very high RPM but torque and as such power output drops, leading to a natural top speed limit. This is why the Vivace E even with the limiter removed, is comparable slow in top speed for its rated power output. Yet the torque curve of electric motors remains perfect for driving a car. What you really want is strong acceleration... top speed isnt really a benefit outside of the race track. You want something that can pull good inside the legal speed limit and electric motors are more than capable of doing just that. In addition to consuming 3 times less energy than a combustion engine. EVs are the future.
@vertviger
3 ай бұрын
Oh, man, this is probably the biggest comment in the history of my channel! You have a very good and detailed understanding of this topic and I am very grateful to you for sharing your knowledge with me! I learned a lot of new things from your comment, for example, that the electric motor itself slows down the car when we release the accelerator pedal and that in a car with an internal combustion engine, even when we release the gas pedal, it still continues to drive on the 1st stroke of the engine at the same speed, because the engine cannot change as quickly as the electric motor can. Thank you very much for this! You explain everything in great detail and now I know much more about this topic thanks to you! ) Also, do you have any ideas for new videos on the channel? What would you be interested in watching? I will also add you as a verified user on the channel to show my appreciation to you! 😉
@aresivrc1800
3 ай бұрын
@@vertviger Thank you for liking my rambling wall of text🤩and for making me a verified user. I am sadly short on time right now and still have to watch the rest of your videos but I will gladly offer suggestion if I can think of any. :-)
@vertviger
3 ай бұрын
@@aresivrc1800 Ok, thank you very much, I will be grateful for any ideas! 😉
@bleach4945
5 ай бұрын
Nice vid, to improve, reduce waiting times for example in the intro. There are pauses of some seconds in which you don’t say anything which are too long in my opinion. I only want to help
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yeah, I understand, bro. Thank you very much for your help ) Can you please write down the timings of what moments you think are too long? Following your advice, I tried to make as few of these moments as possible in this video, so I need you to show me exactly where there are these moments in this video. I really appreciate your help and your desire to improve my content )
@nerfgodbigguy1405
5 ай бұрын
At the end of the day you will many see e carz accelerate faster then gas cars overtake when in the top end. Reasons like pauses in between powerstrokes and having to change gears and clutch transmittion as well as having that go through a whole system of : piston, con rods, Crankshaft, clutch , gears (multiple) , driveshaft, rear axle (and mabye even front axle if you have 4wd) , then to the wheels. And i guarantee there alot of lost energy in that transfer and there a system for that as you would probably lose 20 hp or even way more in that process (which is why manufactures test the power of the engine outside of the car and then test it inside the car. An e-car has just the motor connected right to the wheel so there is little to none loss of power though some kind of system. And that the motor has a continuous power delivery so there sometimes isnt no tourque curve and its just a straight line on a graph. Which is why is better ,but all that torque is definetely needed as e cars are REAL HEAVY. There are some advatages gas cars have againts e cars but this isnt what we are talking about though. Great video on the topic though 👍
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, that's exactly what I was talking about, you've got it right! Generally speaking, the efficiency of the mechanism of cars with internal combustion engines is much lower than that of electric cars, which is why there is such an inequality. Glad you liked the video)
@nerfgodbigguy1405
5 ай бұрын
@@vertviger now what would happen if you put a electric motor through those transmittions and drive shafts and axles ( basically take out a gas engine from a car and replace it with an electic motor ) , would be cool of how much a difference that makes to the power output. It would definetely show how much power deprivation happens in these systems in combustion cars. 👍
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
@@nerfgodbigguy1405 It's a very interesting idea. I'll have to check whether changing the engine in the car will change any other components, or whether it will be the same as in a car with an internal combustion engine (only I will need to put a battery) Oh, this really excited me, I'll have to check and if it works, I'll definitely make a video on this topic!
@nerfgodbigguy1405
5 ай бұрын
@@vertviger I don't know if this will work in beam as i was referring to a realife situation, but i guess it could work in beamng.
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
I was watching my past videos now. We met for the first time on the Internet 3 months ago. How much we have been through together! You have become my true friend. You supported me in difficult times, provided new ideas, communicated with me. I am very pleased to communicate with such an intelligent person as you and I am very grateful to you for everything! 😊
@willdoestechthings2651
5 ай бұрын
Very good editing and video, please don't take what I'm about to say as an insult but as a suggestion, work on your English a bit more, especially for the intro, correct grammar would be "Why Are Electric Cars so Fast"
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, I know, English is my weak point. I understand that this is deafening to native English speakers. I will improve my English skills, thank you very much for the advice 👍 Also, if you subscribed, welcome to our KZitem family, we have a lot of interesting things ahead of us )
@fps_films
5 ай бұрын
this video is good
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Thank you very much, friend) I am glad that you liked the video, I will continue to please you with interesting content. Also, if you subscribed, I welcome you to our KZitem family)
@AndrewTSq
5 ай бұрын
Most EV's I have driven only do like 160-170km.. so the ICE cars pass you on the highway
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yes, the batteries for electric cars are not so advanced as to provide electric cars with a decent competition with conventional cars. I heard something that Toyota is developing batteries that can be used for 1000 km, but it's scary to imagine the voltage at which such electric cars will need to be charged! If you subscribe, then welcome to our KZitem family, I have a lot of interesting car content!
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Let's recharge some electric cars! 10 likes and one electric car is fully charged. We've already charged the Tesla Model S and BMW IX, Rivian R1 , Volkswagen ID4 , Mercedes EQS ,Tesla Model X and now the Volvo XC40 is next!
@Bro-vs5mk
5 ай бұрын
All fun and games until the electric car dies after 4 miles
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
Yeah, xD. especially in winter )@@Bro-vs5mk
@Nuke-MarsX
5 ай бұрын
@@vertviger well teslas arent impacted by winter really, only 1-2% range drop
@vertviger
5 ай бұрын
@@Nuke-MarsXYes, Tesla is a little different. But electric cars from manufacturers that used to make cars with internal combustion engines are more sensitive to temperatures, I think.
@Nuke-MarsX
5 ай бұрын
@@vertviger yeah I think most EVs that are not Tesla are worse in everything than a Tesla except in build quality sometimes
Пікірлер: 43