One thing I overlooked is the whole wand ownership thing. My thoughts surrounding that are: Snape would kill Dumbledore without him ever being disarmed by Draco (making him the rightful owner). However, Snape himself would later be disarmed by Harry during their confrontation after the death of Dumbledore. This would ensure that Voldemort, after killing Snape, still wouldn't be the true owner of the elder wand.
@magicchannel2478
3 жыл бұрын
I agree!
@blxziken4949
3 жыл бұрын
Wow 😳
@BanDzTheLord
3 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@SquirrelASMR
3 жыл бұрын
This video was actually super interesting. I loved it! It had so many consequences and you analyzed them so well and presented it all soo interesting! I watched with my eyes closed and it felt like I was in a movie.
@SquirrelASMR
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder, since Dumbledore would've let Snape disarm kill him, would the wand still change allegiance or would it have known that it wasn't truly earned since it could feel its master holding back?
@hunterkiller1440
3 жыл бұрын
Harry killed a student? Dumbledore: 100 points to Gryffindor!
@nothingsushere
3 жыл бұрын
lol
@xbellax3466
3 жыл бұрын
lmao
@ancientnumbat4631
3 жыл бұрын
But only if it was a Slytherin.
@tastethedifferencecheese
3 жыл бұрын
Pottah kills slytherin take an extra thousand points
@idioticdemon2619
3 жыл бұрын
LOL
@screechingtoad2683
3 жыл бұрын
If this happened, who would have checked Harry's body in the forbiden forest? If it was still Narssica, Harry would have definitly died, and Voldemort would have won
@dank_memes_101
3 жыл бұрын
Harry can't die as long as Voldemort lives cause he's got a piece of him inside Voldemort when he took his blood to regain a body. Wouldve been an infinite loops of Avada Kedavra and going back to life
@time391
3 жыл бұрын
@@dank_memes_101 I doubt even Lucius could kill Harry, because the magic that bind Harry and Voldemort. Harry could become Voldemort's immortal prisoner, tortured for eternity
@yoyomayne
3 жыл бұрын
@@dank_memes_101 no he would've killed that part of him inside Harry with that spell the first time like in the movies, leaving Harry vulnerable
@kylejones2284
3 жыл бұрын
Draco wouldnt be in malfoy manor to stall for Harry after Hermione blew his face up
@thosko98
3 жыл бұрын
Voldemort would try to kill harry again but he would lose his body due to the fact that the Avada Kedavra spell would rebound onto him, due to Harry being the master of the Eldert Wand. So Then Voldemort would be still alive but with no body, at least until Nagini is destroyed.
@hunterkiller1440
3 жыл бұрын
Worst case scenario is Harry getting expelled and becoming a Games Keeper.
@xbellax3466
3 жыл бұрын
I mean not so bad cuz he can be with hagrid
@Joreel
3 жыл бұрын
Or he may have been sent to Azkaban with a murder of Draco.
@mysteryGuySaysHi
3 жыл бұрын
With the entire wizarding community believing him to be the one who defeats Voldemort, Harry would not be sent to Azkaban or expelled from the school, but would be infamous for killing a fellow student
@tastethedifferencecheese
3 жыл бұрын
he would carry haggord's bag
@terabaap1775
3 жыл бұрын
Harry becoming Hagrid's assistant and moving around Hogwarts carrying hagrid's bags😂
@lulled1270
3 жыл бұрын
The girl’s bathroom: “Do you think Ron likes me?” The boy’s bathroom:
@emankcin1701
3 жыл бұрын
At the Headquarters of the Order: "I wonder what Dumbledore is doing right now to stop Voldemort" *Dumbledore drinking vodka in his office, singing 'Odo the Hero' while the former Headmasters in the paintings hold their ears*
@letslearn7562
3 жыл бұрын
@@emankcin1701 😂😂😂😂
@_nyx_9864
3 жыл бұрын
remember hermione once nearly got killed by a troll in the girls bathroom
@idioticdemon2619
3 жыл бұрын
*Or literally any bathroom*
@zofiaadelechua3730
3 жыл бұрын
@@emankcin1701 lmfao 🤣
@blueangel4ever370
3 жыл бұрын
Harry killing classmates out of suspicion would have certainly shook the loyalty of some people, especially not the ones really close to him if they ever found out. And there's no guarantee that it would stay a secret after the 6th part since Voldemort controlled the press
@tempestfennac9687
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, Harry was acting in self defense when he used Septum Sempra on Draco so it's not like he just used it on Draco as soon as he heard him crying and talking to Myrtle.
@terryboot7777
3 жыл бұрын
I thought Voldemort looked like Rupert Murdoch.
@88atahualpa
3 жыл бұрын
@@tempestfennac9687 Not really, by the english laws he could be accused of vigilantism and using excessive force in self defence (and after all, if you look at their former history you can call harry obsessed with draco), not to mention torture and cruelty since that spell slowly bleeds out the target, and I doubt that in court the excuse I didn't know what that spell do would hold, after all to use a spell you have to know it and how to cast it, unless Dumbledore manages somehow to cover it up (the murder of the only heir of a prominent wizengamot and sacred 28th family? We are not talking of someone like moaning Myrtle, between her and draco the difference could be similar to the one between Tom the elderly shop owner at the end of the road and a member of the royal family, and they almost closed Hogwarts for her death) I don't really like Harry 's chances
@tempestfennac9687
3 жыл бұрын
@@88atahualpa I agree those would be issues (I was responding to the comment Blue made about Harry's motives for using the spell on Draco). I'd assume murder would get life imprisonment in Azkaban but I don't know how the Wizarding world would see self defense like this (especially since they could, if they were inclined to use it, verify that Draco was going for a Crucio when Harry cut him).
@tastethedifferencecheese
3 жыл бұрын
draco tried to use the cruciatus curse on him
@ian7064
3 жыл бұрын
The only thing that I could see going differently is Belatrix being the one to ask Voldemort to determine if Harry did kill Draco. Lucius was not on Voldemorts good side at this point so I'm skeptical Voldemort would've granted him this favor. Belatrix however was his top Death Eater and likely could've used that to ask for Voldemorts help on her sister's behalf
@It_is_Okay_to_be_Sad
3 жыл бұрын
Agreed...
@JuanMataCFC
3 жыл бұрын
i don't think Bellatrix would've cared too much about Draco dying. she only taught him Occlumency to help him with the task of killing Dumbledore, not because she cared for him in any way (although it is possible she did so on Narcissa's request).
@l.n.3372
3 жыл бұрын
@@JuanMataCFC Bellatrix also taught Draco Occlumency to screw over Snape, since Bellatrix didn't want Snape "stealing all of the glory" to replace her as Voldemort's favorite. Bellatrix is definitely selfishly motivated when it comes to helping anyone.
@kieranriddle9120
3 жыл бұрын
Also Lucius was in Azkaban in that time.
@kieranriddle9120
3 жыл бұрын
@@l.n.3372 she did felt something for her sister though. So she could do it for Narcissa.
@mayukhdutta9393
3 жыл бұрын
A quick request: How does the Wizarding Economy work? Do people have to pay tax to the Ministry of Magic? Is that how they pay the ministry employees and Hogwarts professors or the headmaster? How does Gringotts work? I mean, you deposit whatever you have in your vaults. So is that free of cost? Or the goblins use the gold for investment purposes? But it does sound unlikely that goblins would draw money out of the vaults for investment purposes? What do they do that for? Wizarding economy spins my head to be honest.
@Will12041
3 жыл бұрын
That would be intresting
@Lollaksyotuube
3 жыл бұрын
They just make more gold using the stone ;)
@RobertFerro3
3 жыл бұрын
I’ve always seen it as the ministry just uses magic to duplicate the money (like the curse that was on bellatrix’s vault, I don’t remember the name of it), but they do it to only a reasonable extent to prevent inflation and to pay the minister employees.
@arthurbriand2175
3 жыл бұрын
Who mints the money? Who, actually has that great economical and political power?
@mayukhdutta9393
3 жыл бұрын
@@RobertFerro3 that isn't how an economy works. If you mint money without keeping any gold reserves, you'll get a hell of an inflation. Duplicating money doesn't make sense. Do you even know how much money they have to duplicate for that purpose? That'll be a hyper inflation worse than Germany's in 1920s. Plus, you can't duplicate money, seeing as you can't create gold or something like that. Gold, silver and the copper used to make Knuts stand as an exception to Gamp's Law of Elementary Transfiguration. The only exception is Philosopher's stone, and there's a reason why Nicholas Flamel keeps it safe. And let's not forget that in the Wizarding World, there aren't many professions, at least compared to the the muggle world. And it's safe to assume that most people work under Ministry, or at least strive to work there.
@birdiepitchfeather63
3 жыл бұрын
When you first talked about this spell I immediately started wondering this. You read my mind!
@MsKatieMD
3 жыл бұрын
I can't read a spell without shouting it like they do in the movies. I have no control over this reaction. I'm not embarrassed.
@aarjavjain1379
3 жыл бұрын
Harry Potter Theory be like: Legilimens 😂😂
@MsKatieMD
3 жыл бұрын
@@aarjavjain1379 😂😂 Yeah maybe not that one
@dubsonly
2 жыл бұрын
@@MsKatieMD same here we in this together
@jershonfinke6568
3 жыл бұрын
Narsisa telling Voldemort that Harry is dead after there first confrontation. I think that is a little bit important. So Harry never left the Frobiden forest alive.
@JuanMataCFC
3 жыл бұрын
it's actually the second confrontation. Draco (despite recognizing him) refusing to give Harry up after the trio were brought to Malfoy Manor by Snatchers is the first.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Actually he would have. He was in possession of the Hallows and his mothers love was inside Voldemort, which keeps Harry alive.
@JustSomeSlavicBoy
3 жыл бұрын
@@lexilovesjesus9129 Hallows did not have that power. Dumbledore himself said that it wasn't gift from death but just powerfull objects from powerfull wizards. There is no prove that they have the power. Only reason he stayed alive was becouse Voldemort took his blood so Harry cannot die before Voldemort.
@goldenstatewarriors9418
2 жыл бұрын
@@JustSomeSlavicBoy I'm pretty sure after the scene in the forest, the protection was nullified. Every part of Harry except for Voldemort's soul was protected by the blood in Voldemort. From what Harry said in the final chapter, it implied that neither of them had any magical protections and that the only remaining factor was the Elder Wand. Here's why I believe this: If the protection had indeed continued the same way it had after Voldemort's initial encounter with Harry, protecting him till he was 17 as long as he considered the Dursley's place home, then Voldemort would've suffered the same fate he did the first time. He wouldve gone back to the state of being less than human only able to possess others. And that didnt happen. Voldemort was very much still standing and alive after he used the Killing Curse on Harry. After the forest scene, Harry did not have the protection of his mother. In fact he did the same thing for the remaining survivors by sacrificing himself for them. The only reason Voldemort finally lost to Harry is because of the Elder Wand. Therefore, if Narcissa didnt lie to Voldemort about Harry being dead, Voldemort then kills him. Or more likely, in this scenario, as she wants revenge, she kills him herself quietly, and then tells Voldemort he is dead.
@sauhamvyas7361
2 жыл бұрын
He was always alive, even if someone else checked. If Voldemort would've hit him with the killing curse again,he would've met with the same fate he did 17 years ago,because as long as Voldemort has Harry's blood he cannot kill him
@Fyreshield
3 жыл бұрын
Defining “protect Draco from harm” is definitely important. Imagine if he got the Hogwarts equivalent to a paper cut, or tripped and broke his nose, or got hurt playing Quidditch.
@robicahany8058
3 жыл бұрын
My father will hear about this!
@glebjohnson9057
3 жыл бұрын
She also says "Will you do all in your power..." so no vow would be broken if he can't do anything.
@patrickhackett7881
2 жыл бұрын
Lucius Malfoy was in Azkaban so no one in power would have cared that Draco was killed besides Harry-haters like Umbridge and Harry's friends and teachers. Dumbledore wouldn't have let a murder divert Harry from his main task of murdering Voldemort, no matter how much he disliked Harry after this.
@gwenettezyreneperez6196
3 ай бұрын
Well that's the reason the malfoy aren't in gryffindor there just words never any action to prove their claim. I mean lucius didn't bother to care when Draco was transformed into an animal by moody.I think Draco naive to think that his father could save I wish someone wouls slap him to reality.
@gwenettezyreneperez6196
3 ай бұрын
*Would
@tracethibault7402
3 жыл бұрын
I love that you edit Harry's eyes back to his original eye color
@YellowBear-kx1ff
3 жыл бұрын
I like it as well.
@boopityb00p
2 жыл бұрын
WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT?!
@dorotabenesova5212
2 жыл бұрын
@@boopityb00p Why not to say that?
@Jay-Da-Giant
2 ай бұрын
@@boopityb00pbecause if you read the books Harry had green eyes like his mom while Daniel Radcliffe had blue eyes in the movies
@jorgecarbajal8076
3 жыл бұрын
7:37 Of course Voldemort would kill Lucius if he tried to kill Harry. When it comes to Harry, Voldemort has the “Nobody kills you but me” mindset.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
@Jackerson Roze 😂😂🙃😂
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
@Jackerson Roze aw yeah! XD Bella: I've got Potter! Avada- Voldy: DON'T! Don't hurt him! Only I can..." Harry: omg u guys 😂😂
@mikshinee87
3 жыл бұрын
That no nosed tsundere, Voldemort.
@moonstonepearl21
3 жыл бұрын
Yea if Harry ended up killing Draco by accident due to this, it would have been a disaster for so many reasons. Even with it not being intentional, Harry would still have to deal with the immense guilt, and the same for Snape. I agree that Snape would not have died from the vow due to the "protecting to the best of his ability" part, but he would still have to add another person he was partially responsible for killing who he cared about to his psyche. It was due to a spell he created that another student found and unknowingly used. Even though Snape didn't directly or purposefully kill Draco, he would still have some moral responsibility in this scenario. I didn't think about what Snape would do with Harry, but him covering it up would actually make sense. His life would be in danger otherwise ,and he would have to protect the one out of the two boys left he swore to protect. It would make the Harry/Snape relationship even more complicated.
@dolphinwarlord6908
3 жыл бұрын
What if Sirius proved his innocence in prisoner of askaban or people believed him that Peter was the traitor
@az1202
3 жыл бұрын
YES
@jackzimmerman7987
3 жыл бұрын
Great idea
@ichbinzwardummaber
3 жыл бұрын
I mean I still doesn't understand why he wasn't proofed innocent. All three kids new it, lupin knew it and even Dumbledore knew it resulting in Snape (probably) believing it. A statement by thenm all should had proved thie truth or not?
@ichbinzwardummaber
3 жыл бұрын
@Mr Doctors13 (sry if wrong, it has been years since I read the books). But why didn't Snape believed it. Did he question Dumbledores decision-making?(this question is maybe easy because the ministry is pretty ignorant) but why did they believed earlier that Sirius killed Pettigrew and the muggles by less evidence
@ackerose
3 жыл бұрын
@@ichbinzwardummaber They don't have evidence. If they had Peter then the Ministry would believe, they don't take memories into consideration. Snape heard Lupin saying that he betrayed Dumbledore throughout the year, so he didn't believe them at all.
@trenwilson6613
3 жыл бұрын
What about the scene with Harry and Narcisus in the woods. Wouldn't she have said that harry was alive and Voldimort kill him a second time?
@az1202
3 жыл бұрын
But Harry would still be alive and Voldemort would be so confused lol
@maskedmagician5620
3 жыл бұрын
@@az1202 and give a chance to put on the cloak and escape lol
@scottymcmacc4888
3 жыл бұрын
Harry can't be killed by voldimort because his mother's blood runs through him
@az1202
3 жыл бұрын
@@scottymcmacc4888 ya
@trenwilson6613
3 жыл бұрын
@@scottymcmacc4888 Which was nullified in "Goblet of Fire" during the ritual at the graveyard, you know, that whole thing about Voldimort being able to touch Harry.
@rhaenyralikesyoutube6289
3 жыл бұрын
I believed that if Draco had died of the sectemsempra curse, Severus would be freed from that portion of the unbreakable vow, because the vow was worded as "...to the best of my ability I will protect Draco." This would mean that Severus had not arrived in time to cast the countercurse to save his godson.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Dracos godfather was Snape?
@daniellemusella1594
2 жыл бұрын
@@lexilovesjesus9129 It's not said outright in either the books or the movies. However, the closeness of their relationship, coupled with the likelihood that Lucius was a semi-mentor to Severus during their own school years, mean that it was heavily implied. The idea just makes sense. (11/2/2021)
@todlless50
3 жыл бұрын
Hmmmmm.I think it would change greatly. I mean if Harry killed draco. When Harry is caught by snatchers and taken to the malfoys. Draco couldn't stall n say he wasn't sure. Or even if the malfoys found out Harry killed draco when Harry sacrificed himself to die in the forest to voldemort. narcissa defo would not of lied n Harry would of been killed again by her. I believe that if Harry had killed Draco with that spell Harry would of been killed and Lord voldemort would of had no horcruxs left so could of been killed in the end by neville Longbottom but Harry most definitely would be dead imo.
@philkab6914
3 жыл бұрын
Dear friend, please refrain from using "could/would/should/might/... of". That doesn't exist. What you mean is "could/would/should/might/... have". Thank you.
@todlless50
3 жыл бұрын
OK grammar police. My opinion Is still the same so you do you phil kab x
@philkab6914
3 жыл бұрын
@@todlless50 That's the spirit
@muhammadzeagham4092
3 жыл бұрын
Voldemort can't kill Harry because of Lily's protection because Voldemort took his blood
@oopharb7237
3 жыл бұрын
Question I've been asking myself for a long time (it's actually 2 but both are related to the same topic in HP); 1)Did in the time of colonization, the ministries of magic in the UK, France etc. control the colonies as well? Did they control it in a governor-style? For example- who did control India until 1948? 2)When there was major war in the muggle world (WW1, WW2, the cold war), were the representative ministries of magic in conflict as well? For example- did during the cold war, did MACUSA and the soviet ministry were in conflict?
@lucasiglesias1894
3 жыл бұрын
They briefly touch upon the second point in The Crimes of Grindelwald
@oopharb7237
3 жыл бұрын
@@lucasiglesias1894 really?how?
@lucasiglesias1894
3 жыл бұрын
@@oopharb7237 Grindelwald predicts WWII, shows it to several wizards which prompts them to join him. Arguably his idea of wizards domination over muggles stems from his views on how barbaric they've become and how that could affect the wizard community.
@riverskipworth2657
3 жыл бұрын
so, he wants to stop the holocaust? And they're try'na stop him from stopping the holocaust?? That's heavy.
@oopharb7237
3 жыл бұрын
@@riverskipworth2657 Who is "he"?
@ethancole9868
3 жыл бұрын
Dracos mother less we forget lied to voldamore in the forest bc Harry told her her son was still alive. In this case she wouldn’t have lied which leads me to believe Harry would be killed this time since the holcrox in him was destroyed
@eberlix
3 жыл бұрын
Harry didn't not die because of the Horcrux though, but because of Lily Potters Love-Protection that is bound in Harry blood (Voldemort then used that same blood to be "revived" so that protection spell is kept, aslong as Voldemort lives)
@BadTilo
3 жыл бұрын
@@eberlix Correct 420 points to 69
@kareemalsawalmeh4296
3 жыл бұрын
I think one vital moment you did not address is narcissus lying to Voldemort when she confirms Harry’s death. If he was the one to have killed her son, there’s no way she would have covered for Harry like she did in the story.
@generalkenobi1332
3 жыл бұрын
It was today, June 4th, that the golden trio went through the trapdoor and stopped Voldemort from getting the Philosopher’s Stone.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Aww! Congrats tiny golden trio!
@jamesmalaspino
3 жыл бұрын
I think they could have easily covered up his death by outing his previous attempts at Dumbledore's life, and explaining "sectum sempra" away as another assassination attempt gone awry. They could say he was dabbling with dark magic that he didn't quite understand in order to kill Dumbledore, and this time the dark magic backfired on him and cost him his life.
@AltairZielite
3 жыл бұрын
Voldamort trying to sleep, wakes up to harry in his mind: "I killed your assassin, and had it blamed on you. Good luck with the Malfoy family."
@Haarriii
3 жыл бұрын
Bro your way of speaking just gives me chills Love ur videos ❤️❤️ Video idea: What if Dumbledore had been minister of magic and not headmaster?
@kristinking3725
3 жыл бұрын
Voldemort would have came to power if Malfoy was killed by Harry. If Malfoy died, Severus wouldn't have helped Harry. He would have seen him as his father James Potter. He would have taken Harry and the corpse of Malfoy to Dumbledore. It would have been revealed to Harry from that point of the plan to sacrifice Harry to save the Wizarding world. Harry would have been so disgusted with himself and drowned with guilt that he would have found Voldemort himself. Harry would have let Voldemort kill him and when he went into limbo Harry would not have had Dumbledore to encourage him to go back and live. He would have taken the train to go on. It would be up to everyone at Hogwarts to kill Voldemort. Which may or may not have been successful.
@prime3141
3 жыл бұрын
@Greg & Forge *Snape
@idioticdemon2619
3 жыл бұрын
*ah yes, mass murder*
@mikshinee87
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know, Kristin. Snape is a man who has been show to act in an a selfish, childish way as though he was not in fact an adult. Maybe it would be like you said. If Snape had always acted like a soldier fighting a war then even if he hated Harry more then ever before, he would know that there is no stopping Voldemort without him. Forgive me again, but you forgot the matter of horcruxes, not all are yet found. Who would find them? So Harry cannot be offed before this is done. Dumbledore doesn't have the time. Snape has to stay by Voldie's side. I guess Harry would see his death as penance and would not come back from the "train station". Maybe the love spell would work anyhow since it did after Lily died? Don't know. Maybe a killer's love is too tainted.
@kristinking3725
3 жыл бұрын
Yes it appears I missed a few important points. The unbreakable vow being the first thing. If Malfoy died and the unbreakable vow was considered broken then both Malfoy and Snape would be dead in the bathroom. To me, I feel as if Harry would think he killed them both. I think he would find someone to help. McGonagall, Madam Pompfrey, or even Dumbledore. I think it would be the first adult he could find/trust. I believe Dumbledore would be in a bit of a bind from that point. Harry would be traumatized more so than seeing Cedric dead. Maybe Harry would think he was just like Voldemort. There's too many paths that could happen to know for sure, but the only way for Harry to win from that point on would be if Dumbledore got to Harry in time. Before Harry did something reckless or stupid. If not then I'm sure Harry would be on the losing end to Voldemort.
@godzillagamer75
3 жыл бұрын
One thing that this would affect is Harry and Ginnys relationship. After that Ginny probably wouldn’t want to date Harry because he killed Draco. Or maybe she would overlook it as an accident. No idea.
@eberlix
3 жыл бұрын
I think something similiar would apply to James P. and Lily P., would she marry the guy that bullied her childhood friend, if she knew about it? And how would Ginny find out it was Harry, if everyone blames Voldemort?
@godzillagamer75
3 жыл бұрын
@@eberlix I don’t feel like Harry would accept that
@Lollaksyotuube
3 жыл бұрын
@@eberlix What do you mean "if she knew about it?" She was the one who defended Snape in that one memory.
I agree that snape wouldn't die from the vow had Draco died in a way he couldn't prevent, however doing Draco's task of killing Dumbledore would still be active since the vow was snape would have to do it if Draco was unable to do so.
@rosebud7233
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think Snape would have worked with Harry to cover it up. I think Dumbledore would have worked to cover it up, and a Snape would have, begrudgingly, gone alone with it.
@TheAlphatitan
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah Snape despised Harry and would probably try to get him expelled or worse sent to Azkaban
@cornwallcrafter8410
3 жыл бұрын
@@TheAlphatitan I agree, Snape hates Harry and would never work willingly with him.
@NeoDeXs
3 жыл бұрын
@@cornwallcrafter8410 But he did originally, not like he went and told everyone outloud that he did a mortal spell, they just left.
@marie.naturallysims2179
3 жыл бұрын
Snape would have been killed due to the unbreakable vow he made. One of the promises was to protect Draco from harm.
@JuanMataCFC
3 жыл бұрын
@@TheAlphatitan while i don't think Snape would've willingly covered for Harry, i also don't think he would've tried to get Harry expelled. yes Snape gave Harry numerous detentions throughout his Hogwarts time, but he always knew he had to keep Harry safe. i feel like Dumbledore told Snape he could treat Harry as badly as he wanted to as long as he protected him from any kind of danger (including being expelled).
@stefanfritsch4858
3 жыл бұрын
You forgot something important, if Draco died there Snape would have become the true owner of the Elder Wand by Killing dumbledore. Wich means that Voldemort actually could be the true owner in the end. And that maybe could change the end of it all.
@Enderjuusto1
3 жыл бұрын
No, snape would'e died due to breaking his unbreakable vow
@kimmyc247
3 жыл бұрын
@@Enderjuusto1 not exactly... he vowed to protect Draco to the best of his ability. But if Harry used sectumsempra and Snape was not made aware of it or could not be there in time to deliver the counter curse he would still survive because he worked off of the information he had at the time. its a loophole in the vow. If he had said he will protect Draco no matter what. then yeah he would be dead
@l.n.3372
3 жыл бұрын
@@kimmyc247 But you forget another loophole: to the best of his ability. If Snape knew beforehand that Harry had the Half Blood Prince textbook and Snape did nothing about it, then that violated the "best of Snape's ability" part of the Unbreakable Vow. And Snape did know about the textbook once Slughorn praised Harry's potion making skills: Snape easily could have deduced beforehand that Harry had the textbook when Slughorn was boasting about Harry's amazing potions skills at the Slug Club Christmas party in December. So, Snape was kinda negligent if he never confiscated the textbook from Harry at any point afterwards. Thus, it really wasn't to the best of Snape's ability at all.
@kimmyc247
3 жыл бұрын
@@l.n.3372 like I said. if he was aware of it. But from what I remember. Snape wasn't aware of it until after Harry used his spell on Draco. So again it does come into a loophole of its own.
@l.n.3372
3 жыл бұрын
@@kimmyc247 Yes, it all depends on when Snape found out that Harry had the textbook. But your argument is under the possibility false assumption that Snape didn't know the truth until Sectumsempra. My argument is the opposite: Snape easily could have known months in advance and he still did nothing to prevent it. I think that Snape was aware of it for months beforehand. We even see at the Christmas party how suspicious Snape was after Slughorn was boasting. If Snape was suspicious and did nothing to confiscate the textbook, he's negligent and at fault, and thus broke the Unbreakable Vow. He only didn't die because he saved Draco's life immediately, but that was pure luck that he was nearby when moaning Myrtle was yelling about murder in the bathroom.
@ollielawson1948
3 жыл бұрын
Would his heart become less pure because killing rips the soul?
@blueangel4ever370
3 жыл бұрын
@@denizkenger52 Unintentionally or not, he meant to harm Draco so he was far from innocent. I believe it would have stayed with him forever, I can't believe you really forget who you kill
3 жыл бұрын
I dont think ripping soul works like that. Because Harry did not know Sectumsempra's effect. He did not send it for killing. Also even if he sent it to killing, purpose is important. Righteous causes (like revenge) wont work like getting pleasure from murdering.
@judy7090
3 жыл бұрын
When Voldy killed Harrys Mom, he accidentaly produced a Horcrux, right? Maybe Harry would have produced a Horcrux by killing Malfoy? The only living thing around would probably be Snape... Imagine Snape being Harrys Horcrux 😅
@judy7090
3 жыл бұрын
I don't really believe that this would happen but the Idea is kinda funny
@moonstonepearl21
3 жыл бұрын
It's hard to tell what the exact rules for the soul ripping are. Remorse fixes it. Harry would ahve that so if it did fracture, it would repair eventually. However, I'm not sure it would have cracked in the first place because it was not intentional so not technically murder. We hypothesized the same for Snape killing Dumbledore because Dumbledore asked Snape to do it, so his soul would likely be unfractured. Granted, in theory if commiting murder breaks your soul in this world, then all bad deeds would do some sort of damage, so harry would likely have some sort of more serious issue with his soul after this. I would think it would heal, though.
@ViperG2099
3 жыл бұрын
I love these theories! They go so in depth and go into details I didn’t even notice!
@Orangenkraft
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think Lucius would dare ask Voldemort to procure evidence of Harry killing Draco. All Deatheaters were scared shitless to even ask the Dark Lord for a breathmint. And I don’t think Voldy would agree either. What would he get out of it?
@-timothydexterthegreatestp5391
3 жыл бұрын
Doenst matter its actually that he would do it just so he can let Lucius suffer the fact that he knows who the killer is but can't do anything about it.
@BlueBlockStudios
3 жыл бұрын
Draco in heaven: 'my father will hear about this!'
@srivaishnavee
3 жыл бұрын
lol
@Wellch
2 жыл бұрын
If Draco got into a fistfight with a girl and lost, he won’t whine to his dad. Draco would be too ashamed.
@BlueBlockStudios
2 жыл бұрын
@@Wellch true
@bgoobies2795
3 жыл бұрын
It's always seemed weird to me how Snapes copy of Advanced Potions was even available to students, especially after he was the Potions teacher for so long. Surely he would have noticed it was there and wanted to keep it hidden? Or did he leave it there intentionally?
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Interesting! Yeah what about other teachers potions books?
@l.n.3372
3 жыл бұрын
It wasn't available to anyone: Slughorn gave it out to Harry accidentally. Snape never meant for it to be handed over to students. That's why it wasn't found until Snape taught DADA: when Snape taught potions, he wouldn't have given out his own textbook to a student by accident.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
@@l.n.3372 Very true. In the movies it's shown as if it was just another potions book in the cupboard, but I believe Slughorn gave it to Harry in the books
@l.n.3372
3 жыл бұрын
@@lexilovesjesus9129 Slughorn did give it to Harry in the books: it was in a pile of leftover second hand textbooks. Since Harry and Ron didn't buy their own copy yet, Slughorn loaned them 2 copies from the store cupboard. However, Snape never would have made that mistake if he was still teaching potions. It only happened accidentally because Snape moved to DADA and Slughorn didn't know about the Half Blood Prince textbook in the cupboard. Snape probably kept his old book around for recipe tips for his previous NEWT classes, since he always wrote the recipe on the blackboard.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
@@l.n.3372 Oh! Yeah you're right, mate
@SquirrelASMR
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if Harry tested sectumsempre on Ron in bed, like he did with levicorpus. That would be funney.
@ivancerecer5758
3 жыл бұрын
Ron's last words as he sees his blood spill is "Bloody Hell"
@yiocho220
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know if I should like this cause its true but OMG...
@nolansnichenook
3 жыл бұрын
Well the spell was at least marked "for enemies" (at least in the movies, Idr if it was marked in the books)
@SaitoSai
3 жыл бұрын
@@nolansnichenook I read Half-Blood Prince a few months ago. As I recall, it was marked "for enemies" in the book, too.
@animaguin9830
3 жыл бұрын
It said for enemies
@mcig98
3 жыл бұрын
I imagine Ron and Hermione would have been horrified to hear the news, Hermione perhaps even furious, but I have a hard time imagining Dumbledore's reaction
@Sharon-pb7so
3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps they could use the time turner to go back to the boys bathroom scene and Harry just walks by the door instead of going inside. It's not like anyone *living* witnessed Harry casting that spell only crazy Moaning Myrtle. I'm not sure if you can go back in time to save someone if a person died though.
@bloodofmyblood
3 жыл бұрын
My s/o and I have written an entire story about this situation! It's so interesting to think that Draco could have died at Harry's hand, and to see Harry spiraling downward, thinking he's an evil person, perhaps finding out early that he's got a bit of Voldemort within him.... possibly falling down the path of darkness, like Anakin did.... O M G Y E S P L E A S E.
@VirtualVirtuoso101
3 жыл бұрын
5:17 isn't another part of their vow that Snape would have to finish the task the Dark Lord gave Draco if he was unable to do so?
@JustSomeSlavicBoy
3 жыл бұрын
5:53 that is not true Snape killed Dumbledore becouse they needed the dark lord to fully trust him.
@jkrause365
3 жыл бұрын
Since we know that Snape was a double agent, I always interpreted Dumbledor's death as a previously agreed upon mercy killing between them. Let us not forget that Snape was also in the unenviable position of protecting Harry, as well.
@liampowell5014
3 жыл бұрын
No need to interpret, he straight tells Snape he’d need to kill him if Draco can’t do it lol
@epicfan1598
7 ай бұрын
I mean its literally stated in the book as a previously agreed upon mercy killing so thats not just interpreting the situation. Thats literally what happened.
@Tu.mi.tienes.loco_Loco.contigo
3 жыл бұрын
Poor Draco, to me he’s not the boy who made bad decisions, he’s the boy who had no choice’s at all
@soham4741
Жыл бұрын
Yeah well, what about the part where he tried to torture Harry with crucio?
@Tu.mi.tienes.loco_Loco.contigo
Жыл бұрын
@@soham4741 what about the time where he also saved harry and not give him away to the death eaters. Or when Harry could not just give him a moment crying in the bathroom, but he didnt
@cheesecakelasagna
2 жыл бұрын
Harry with Sectumsempra is me after learning a big word and trying to use it every chance I get.
@WyattRodebaugh
3 жыл бұрын
Have you guys done a theory on Crookshanks? It says Crookshanks could talk to Serius in the Prisoner of Azkaban, but how?
@TheAlphatitan
3 жыл бұрын
Apparently he was a maladictus so perhaps there was some animal language he could use with Sirius. But Sirius said he was able to convey his desires so I guess he kind of showed him and they communicated through signs and different sounds
@lucasiglesias1894
3 жыл бұрын
Animagi being able to speak to animals while transformed kinda makes sense though.
@LostBrit_292
3 жыл бұрын
You Sir, are a master legilimens. I was just thinking this a few days ago whilst listening to the last few chapters of HBP book on audible.
@jackl3in
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair snape created the spell so he would’ve been somewhat responsible for Draco dying Edit: the question here is tho, does the vow apply to actions from before it that have consequences later. I realize draco was harmed dearly by the spell and snape was fine, so perhaps not
@vaelegoro7782
3 жыл бұрын
What if Harry decided to stay dead when voldemort used the killing curse in the Forrest?
@anthonymastrocola9659
3 жыл бұрын
Yo I need to see that video
@GTARanger1992
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't Neville still kill nagini and then Voldemort is still vulnerable to death whether harry is alive or not
@vaelegoro7782
3 жыл бұрын
@@GTARanger1992 perhaps but who would kill voldemort in that scenario and if Harry was the owner of the elder wand and voldemort successful killed Harry he would become its true master which would be a major game changer would voldemort have still lost or could he have won
@GTARanger1992
3 жыл бұрын
@@vaelegoro7782 well I guess it's a winning the battle but losing the war kinda scenario all his horcruxes are gone and I'm sure he would be paranoid about it til his actual death
@vaelegoro7782
3 жыл бұрын
@@GTARanger1992 Maybe but there are alot of other ways the scenario could go which is why I think it'd be an interesting video topic
@BjornV1994
3 жыл бұрын
A small thing and I say small thing that you didn't mention, was the fact that Snape, in his own belief would been next in line to kill Dumbledore, should Draco fail or die before he could complete his task. So, there isn't really a question whether or not, Snape would have killed Dumbledore. It would go straight to the when part.
@kerrick7621
3 жыл бұрын
Sectumsempra is wicked, really a nasty curse Snape cooked up. Was literally watching HBP yesterday!
@davidssubwaycookies190
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if this happened then in deathly hallows narcissa gives up Harry to Voldemort saying he's alive 😬😬😬
@sihyunkim7721
3 жыл бұрын
She probably would keep him alive just to let him feel the guilt more and in the end kill Harry by herself. Otherwise in the forest Voldemort would have just kill stealed.
@Aali-bee
3 жыл бұрын
She would have said someone else to do that and they would have said s He is alive
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Harry still would've survived. Voldemort had Harry's mothers protection inside him that kept Harry alive
@levy9595
3 жыл бұрын
Draco is the one who let the death eaters into hogwarts in the first place via the vanishing cabinet. He never would have finished fixing it if he died in the duel with Harry so the battle of the astronomy tower arguably wouldn't have happened.
@emilywayo2413
3 жыл бұрын
so dumbledore would have died of poising
@levy9595
3 жыл бұрын
@@emilywayo2413 perhaps, or he would have been killed by snape at a later date to endear him to voldemort regardless. But the death eaters don't sneak into hogwarts if Malfoy dies here which was the whole point of this hypothetical video
@AlphaGeekgirl
3 жыл бұрын
Why didn’t Snape use Septumsempra on Voldemort when he knew he was about to kill him?
@richardg8376
3 жыл бұрын
Snape knew Voldemort couldn't be killed while Harry was still alive due to him being a horcrux. Trying to kill Voldemort at that point, assuming he even succeeded, would have wrecked the plan that Snape and Dumbledore had been building for years. In the best case scenario, Voldemort still wouldn't have fully died, would have gone back into hiding presumably and the whole cycle would have started again. Snape basically had to take one for the team so that the remaining horcruxes (including the one inside Harry) could be destroyed before Voldemort could finally be confronted.
@nahidaparvin962
3 жыл бұрын
I love his soothing voice.
@lucasiglesias1894
3 жыл бұрын
I think you missed Narcisa's part after Voldemort killed Harry, she wouldn't have lied to Voldemort to save her son. Then again she would've probably escaped after her husband's death.
@JarJarBricks01
3 жыл бұрын
Well then somebody else would have checked his body and still revealed he was alive.
@lucasiglesias1894
3 жыл бұрын
@@JarJarBricks01 exactly
@Joreel
3 жыл бұрын
I think Harry would have been devastated in his own way at the knowledge that he killed Draco, even if it wasn't his intent at the time. Harry may have thought Draco was an arrogant person, but even he wouldn't have wished him dead. In the movie as well as the book, Harry was in shock of what he'd done to Draco. Hermione and Ron would have probably tried to give him as much support as they could, but even they would see Harry in a much darker light after that which would have caused a rift between them in the end I think.
@nicoleparry5103
3 жыл бұрын
If he had killed draco, he wouldn't have survived the Forrest, narcissa would have had no reason to pretend him dead and probably would have killed him herself
@noblephnx7
3 жыл бұрын
If Harry had killed Draco, or had gone through with killing Bellatrix after the death of Sirious, would this action have damaged Harry's soul? or would it have loosened the connection between Harry and Voldemort?
@judgementwings
2 жыл бұрын
No. Because Beatrix definitely had ill intentions.
@vb4896
3 жыл бұрын
Famous Harry Pottahh can't even go to the bathroom without killing anyone.
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Oh my Merlin-
@Alex-lr5eh
3 жыл бұрын
Its literally 0.25 am and i have school 7.50 tomorrow. But still watching cause i am just addicted to these videos.
@megancashatt
3 жыл бұрын
Quick question: Lucius’s wand was broken by Voldemort so did he use someone’s wand or get a replacement? Since in the video you said he would try and kill Harry with the killing curse which then Voldemort would kill Lucius. Or would his wand not be broken at all? 2nd Question: Say Harry goes to the forest to be killed since he is a horcrux. When Narcissa notices he is alive would she alert Voldemort since Harry killed Draco (I think so)? If so then Harry would be dead leaving someone else like Neville to kill Voldemort since all horcuxs are destroyed. I think Draco’s death does have a large impact on the rest of the story. As Narcissa’s actions and loyalty put the fate or outcome of the war on edge. And whatever happens at Malfoy Manor could’ve gone in a whole different direction. Also fans would be pissed.
@megancashatt
3 жыл бұрын
@@denizkenger52, oh...what a fun adventure (sarcasm as it sounds like a horrible loop). But I think this shows how Draco’s life can affect the plot of the story as it affects other characters' actions.
@az1202
3 жыл бұрын
@@megancashatt Harry is protected by his mother’s blood in Voldemort, so as long as Voldemort is alive, Harry is fine, so he still could have defeated voldemort
@megancashatt
3 жыл бұрын
@@az1202, oh yeah your right. After the video, my just had a bunch of questions.😂
@justlooking1299
3 жыл бұрын
The spell he needed during the battle of Hogwarts . What does he use ? Lmao
@lexilovesjesus9129
3 жыл бұрын
Harry used expeliarmus
@CB-THE-OG
3 жыл бұрын
Your videos always keep me hooked, and I’m trying to read the Harry Potter books (again) at the same time! Great videos!
@paigelarson9279
2 жыл бұрын
Half blood prince will always be one of my favourite HP movies and it’s the best of Tom Felton’s acting
@nikanyxspitzer
3 жыл бұрын
What if Harry's Sectumsempra killed Draco? Well, his (Draco's) father wouldn't be hearing about that anytime soon!
@cheesemaximoff
3 жыл бұрын
I love these videos!! ❤️
@5w1ft3r7
2 жыл бұрын
1 thing you missed is that, if Narssica knew Harry killed Draco, she wouldn’t have lied to Voldemort about Harry being dead because she wouldn’t have asked “Draco, is he dead?” And Harry wouldn’t have nodded because he already killed Draco, so the story would not have gone the same way after she had said he was alive.
@yoyomayne
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't that make Snape the master of the elder Wand and eventually voldemort, meaning he'd be able to kill Harry?
@maximillian875
3 жыл бұрын
Oh, boy! A what-if scenario! ...HEY! What's going on with them KZitem captions?
@meilimarcucci7843
3 жыл бұрын
I dont know why you said it would not alter the story line very much, I think it would change drastically because there would be no Malfoy Heir, but would also change the sight Harry would have in the future.
@liamholmes9169
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair draco almost killed Katie Bell and Ron Wesley.
@srivaishnavee
3 жыл бұрын
I think if Draco died then harry potter would also die because at the last Narcissa asks harry if Draco is alive but if Draco was dead she would not ask and say that harry is alive, harry will be in an impression that Voldemort is still inside him so he will take the killing curse again then he would die and the story would not be good so if Draco lives, harry also lives is this correct?
@anshikadabral2002
3 жыл бұрын
Hey today is draco malfoy's 💚birthday make a video about him also
@Andrew_Freeman
3 жыл бұрын
If I remember right The Binding promise was something to do with Snape protecting Draco as he performed the task of killing Dumbledore and if Draco was unable to do so then they would step in and kill Dumbledore. If that is accurate than Harry killing Draco would not have notified the curse but instead have left State responsible for killing Dumbledore seeing that Draco was now unable to do so
@FrostDJakki3529
3 жыл бұрын
I will not miss a single HP theory video!!!
@jackzimmerman7987
3 жыл бұрын
Be like Harry accidentally made the book a horcrux
@zestfn1971
3 жыл бұрын
I watched the Half-Blood Prince yesterday for like the 7th time and this video came out yesterday lol.
@mrbluesguy2853
3 жыл бұрын
Hey man, been watching your channel for quite a while. Just wanted to let you know that I love what you’re doing and hope you keep it up :)
@coded6799
3 жыл бұрын
But, eventually, when Voldemort's soul in Harry would have to be removed by Voldemort performing the Killing Curse on Harry, Narcissa wouldn't vouch for Harry because she wouldn't ask the question "Is Draco safe? Is he in the castle?" because there would be no Draco, and the anger of losing both Lucius and Draco would be enough to let Voldemort know that Harry was alive, so that Voldemort could perform the Killing Curse that this time, would kill Harry.
@Sharon-pb7so
3 жыл бұрын
No, because the Elder Wand still recognized Harry as the true owner so he couldn't be killed with it. Voldy could borrow a wand though and kill Harry.
@coded6799
3 жыл бұрын
@@Sharon-pb7so yeah, that's possible. he could have taken another death eaters wand.
@gurzeenatkhanna446
3 жыл бұрын
@@Sharon-pb7so but harry got the wand from draco so if draco was killed by harry then snape would be the true owner of the wand because he would have killed dumbledore and then when voldermort would have killed snape and then he would have been the true owner of the elder wand which would mean that harry would die
@chrispatrick414
3 жыл бұрын
This is what I've been waiting foooooor
@augustlambersy8912
3 жыл бұрын
Can your next "what if" video be "What if I were magical, and could enter the wizarding world?". I think this video would be interesting and fun since it's more personal :)
@friidrottskarlsson3878
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think that Snape would made up a false story about how Draco died, he hated Harry and would have loved to see him sent to Azkaban
@realjoemavro
2 жыл бұрын
I doubt he would've wanted Harry sent to Azkaban, but he would've tried to get him expelled from Hogwarts.
@mikehance6086
3 жыл бұрын
Then dracos mom wouldn’t have lied and said he was dead and voldemort would have killed him and the war would have bin lost
@jordancorbineau3827
3 жыл бұрын
Loved your video ! But what would happen then in the Malfoy Mansion in Harry Potter 7 ? When the spell on Harry's face disappear and after escaping the cellar to rescue Hermione Harry shows up along Ron and confronts the Malfoy and Bellatrix. In the original story they chose to call the Dark Lord for some redemption but here, if Harry had killed Draco, I think they would battle to death. Or maybe Dobby would show up just like in the book/movie to save the day just in time ? ahahah I'd like to know your thoughts about that :)
@seanmcshee2599
3 жыл бұрын
most students in the Great Hall wear robes. When Draco enters the Great Hall as Harry is talking to Katie, Draco is wearing a sweater vest - making him stand out from other students in the great hall. The remembrance of Neville longbottom refers to him not wearing robes. Is there any significance to whether students are wearing robes, sweaters, or sweater vests?
@DravenGal
2 жыл бұрын
Why is it never mentioned how Snape’s death spell didn’t kill Dumbledore instantly? He was still alive when he fell off the tower, we see it in his eyes.
@FraternityOfShadows
Жыл бұрын
1 - It's just a movie. They didn't kill the actor, sheesh! 2 - Actually, this would be actually explained in book 4, when Barty Crouch Jr. explained the unforgivable curses (specifically Avada Kedavra), and later, with crucio. You have to MEAN it. You have to WANT the other person dead for the spell to work - Snape didn't really want to kill Dumbledore, but he was a powerful wizard, who probably had used this curse before, and he managed to create a blast enough to knock Dumbledore off the tower. Simple as that.
@DravenGal
Жыл бұрын
@@FraternityOfShadows I suppose.
@zbanul10
3 жыл бұрын
What would happen if someone hit Voldemort with Adava kadavra. Would he’s soul leave his body or would it just tickle him
@user-or5ke5yn4w
3 жыл бұрын
Hmm, with Katie and Rosmerta - is this the only time when an impreriused person casts Imperius herself on the other person? Kind of a writer’s blunder if that is possible - Voldy just could Imperius 10 people and tell each of them to Imperius 10 more and etc. The war would be easily won this way. If there is an explanation why not - a video on this would be interesting.
@victorvvc1925
2 жыл бұрын
To be fair, I don't think Harry is stupid enough to just stand there until Draco bleeds to death, he'd try to do something. He'd probably run to get help, maybe Dumbledore or Hermione, or if not any other teacher, he'd rather deal with any punishment than let someone die by his hand in such a horrible way. He's lucky Snape was following them though, I think he's the only one who knows the counter spell... On the other hand, Harry was protecting himself as Draco was using the Cruciatus Curse against him, Malfoy is not the innocent victim here!
@rsb2040
3 жыл бұрын
Love it! Great videos! 👍
@saschageneugelijk2905
3 жыл бұрын
I think you missed something big in the story, cause if Narsissa would know that Harry killed Draco, she wouldn't have said in the forest that he was dead (in the deathly hallows part 2), but she would have said that he was alive or she would have killed him. Right??
@ilovedragonball2435
2 жыл бұрын
Damn man. I didn’t even consider this but a good video. Really good
@mmhmmmyearight7183
3 жыл бұрын
Severus saved himself Draco and Harry in the scene
@brunster5950
2 жыл бұрын
Video Starts 4:00
@xc5pl2
4 ай бұрын
If the bouncing ferret has been killed by Snivellius' curse, then it would have been in self-defense due to the fact that Harry was nearly hit by crucio by said ferret. Riddle has given explicit orders that no one was to touch Harry Potter. Therefore, Harry's protection of love would have made him have and displayed remorse for his actions in the duel. You have to remember that it was a period of civil war at the time and the ferret could have asked and sought out help from Dumbledore at any given time as well!
@popiston8773
3 жыл бұрын
Great video! I’ve been thinking since I saw the movie in the cinema, how is it possible that Harry was not expelled from the school for attacking other student and almost killing him?
@arthurbriand2175
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you noticed, but he gets special treatment very often. He gets 50 points from the headmaster when he sneezes...
@newversiongamers1017
3 жыл бұрын
Can you make a vedio on what would happen if Dumbledore didn't touch the crused ring
@LordSothMajere
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if killing Draco would have done something to the horcrux within him? Maybe make it more potent now that his soul was fractured? And that, in turn, would amplify the effects on his psychi? Suddenly he's more recluse. His guilt builds up within him, making him paranoid that others know. That others judge him. He starts bring spiteful of them: how dare they judge! Don't they know the pressure he was under? He had no choice! This spitefullness turns to anger. Suddenly he's being more aggressive and rash. He's now casting spells he would never consider before. Powerful spells, dark spells, reckless spells: heedless of others' in the way. He starts self-justifying the use of these. And suddenly, he becomes that which he sort to destroy. A dark lordling in his own right. All the while, he justifies his actions while the amplified horcrux slowly slowly warps his persona completely.
@alexandrorocca7142
3 жыл бұрын
Dumbledore knows everything? Yeah, long after the facts, otherwise his students wouldn't be constantly in mortal danger or being tortured by a teacher.
@panchatronv0.534
3 жыл бұрын
Pretty on point and I agree with all points
@sammein4287
3 жыл бұрын
Haven’t read the books so maybe it’s different in them but when Voldemort kills Harry in the forbidden forest and gets resurrected by the stone and dracos mother go’s to see if he’s really dead wouldn’t she tall Voldemort that he’s still alive meaning Voldemort would end up winning. But idk i could be very wrong.
Пікірлер: 819