The dog must be thinking jees my owner talks to himself a lot.
@OFPgaming_pokehaven99
3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@haiwatigere6202
3 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought
@KDu400
3 жыл бұрын
I commented this same thing on one of his other videos the other day 🤣
@heididietrich9800
3 жыл бұрын
I bet he wishes that he would talk about dog biscuits!
@shaunbrandt5027
3 жыл бұрын
@@heididietrich9800 Dog biscuits and a long walk in the park.
@mentalitydesignvideo
5 жыл бұрын
Short answer: the plane flies back to the departure point and everybody gets their money back.
@RobinNatural1
5 жыл бұрын
Viktor Kaganovich 😂😂😂
@ceoofchonk
5 жыл бұрын
and happily ever after, the end
@Matthew-fg6dl
5 жыл бұрын
Wow Thumbs up there
@ADFGallant
5 жыл бұрын
Or worse, goes even more back to every other flights
@MrNeuroticRA
5 жыл бұрын
Viktor Kaganovich lmao good one brother
@MaltaMcMurchy
5 жыл бұрын
'First officer doggo' is adorable 🐕💜
@tonyhussey3610
4 жыл бұрын
MaltaMcMurchy Tyats the captain fool
@twizz420
3 жыл бұрын
@@woaa8117 Yeah, he's the captain.
@verttikoo2052
2 жыл бұрын
I also like to watch these dog videos 🥳 They are brilliant 👍
@DanielKatundu-y8t
4 жыл бұрын
1. That dog is alive. 2. Most of his videos start off sounding as if he is speaking German. 3. Cool vid.
@tordeskilbo
4 жыл бұрын
He is Swedish, so it honestly isn't that strange.
@Arthion
4 жыл бұрын
@Honkler In that case Dutch and Swedish accents in English sound similar to you. Most Swedes who speak English with a bit of an accent sound like that.
The strength of that pylon holding the engine is incredible. You'd think with all that force, that it would snap off the wing. Great video! Cute dog. 😀
@bahardin3992
4 жыл бұрын
@ electron. it's not just the pylon... the engine is mounted onto the pylon / wing via explosive bolts...!! the bolts are used to secure ie hang the engine to the pylon / wing BUT at same time are designed to shear off and "release" ie let go of engine in case of accident, so that the engine would not rip the wing apart..!!
@electronicsNmore
4 жыл бұрын
@@bahardin3992 I know all that already.
@fastflight2494
4 жыл бұрын
@@electronicsNmore that could have been politer
@electronicsNmore
4 жыл бұрын
@@fastflight2494 it was polite, I didn't put an exclamation point after what I said.
@fastflight2494
4 жыл бұрын
@@electronicsNmore fair point. Sorry about that
@oldman975
4 жыл бұрын
I understand that this is mostly directed to new pilots who are just beginning to learn their craft,but it is immensely fascinating to those of us who aren’t and probably will never be pilots.
@RiderAzad
3 жыл бұрын
Your dog is like "There is no one in the room. Who is he talking to?" 😅
@AaronGyes
2 жыл бұрын
They don't judge their humans for mental conditions. The good doggos just trust we're talking to someone they don't see.
@sayorancode
2 ай бұрын
Owner talking to the people in his wall again
@hurithinkbefore1340
3 жыл бұрын
The Lauda air plane, that crashed was called " Mozart". I flew with her the same route from Vienna to Sydney one year before the accident happened. She was brandnew. I never felt so safe. Couldn't believe it when it happened. I sat in this beauty. All the flight attendants were beautiful modells from the catwalk. So sad! This crash destroyed the upcoming " Lauda Air".
@bigbaddms
2 жыл бұрын
Can only imagine how amazing that was. FAs now on US airlines are generally the opposite of runway models. Nikki Lauda clearly knew how to run a class operation
@danielhartin7680
4 жыл бұрын
Dog: "I'm living the dream!"
@incubus_the_man
3 жыл бұрын
I want to be that dog when I grow up.
@haiwatigere6202
3 жыл бұрын
Really. Looks bored. Wants a scratch a snack a walk a bitch anything
@skoomd4447
3 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how reverse thrust has 0 impact on stopping distance if it's the only thing that slows you down on a wet runway.
@DutchBlackMantha
3 жыл бұрын
What I gathered is that they use reverse thrust to (partly) replace braking instead of using using both at max. So they don't try to reduce stopping distance, maybe because that would just increase the distance they have to taxi, maybe because that would be uncomfortable. If they would rely on a combination of reverse thrust and braking to land on a short runway, you've also got little margin for error. One sudden rain and you're no longer able to land.
@peterbalogh2646
3 жыл бұрын
@@DutchBlackMantha That is okay, so it is not calculated like that, but the question is not why they do not use it to further reduce stopping distance, but why is that has zero impact on it. This part is also not clear for me. If you can stop the plane with brakes on the same distance as you can stop it with reverse trust /okay, not exactly/, then adding the two up together should reduce the stopping distance. So once again, I understand that they do not do it, and I understand why they do not do it, so my question is more related to physics than let's say logic.
@bobbyjbobbyj
3 жыл бұрын
It doesn’t make sense, because he’s wrong about that part. He is confusing planning and safety factors with physics. Of course they don’t want to plan that reverse thrusting will reduce braking distance, because if it fails, they may not be able to stop safely. But any time reverse thrust thing is being used, it absolutely does reduce braking distance. That is just undeniable physics.
@albinfiskare
3 жыл бұрын
@@bobbyjbobbyj Yeah he missed that part of the explanation. If its done in dry conditions why would the breaks not get as hot? Because the reverse thrust took some of the kinetic energy the brakes otherwise had to suck up all by themselves. And if you would apply max brakes and max reverse thrust you wouild stop sooner but with hotter brakes.
@Teh_Random_Canadian
3 жыл бұрын
@@albinfiskare I understood that part. I was also confused, he explained it like even if you had max breaks and full reverse, you would take up the same stop distance as just full breaks. That part didn't make sense.
@mrspock2al
4 жыл бұрын
I was in a DC8 many years ago. The pilot wanted to quickly lose altitude to avoid a thunderstorm and reversed thrust in flight to quickly land. I was amazed while none of the other passengers seemed to understand what was happening. Never forgot it.
@charliebrown6161
4 жыл бұрын
Alan Snider DC 8s can reverse the inboard engines as they do not have speed brakes
@HartmutWSager
4 жыл бұрын
@@charliebrown6161 A DC-8 most certainly does have spoilers (aka speed brakes). Erroneous deployment of the spoilers shortly before landing in Toronto is what crashed Air Canada flight 621, a DC-8, in July 1970, killing everyone on board.
@huudielbo728
4 жыл бұрын
@@HartmutWSager I worked on the DC8 some years ago and although I agree about reverse thrust, I do not recall and airbrakes.
@carbon1255
4 жыл бұрын
@@HartmutWSager There are quite a few variants of DC-8 with radically different features. Some criticism of that denzel film with the extinguisher for example not cutting the engines, genuinely was possible on that earlier style of DC-8. In this case only the first few out of the factory had airbrakes, as it was removed before full deployment.
@HartmutWSager
4 жыл бұрын
@@carbon1255 Indeed, there are quite a few variants of DC-8 with different features, just like there are in most other plane series too, but are we even talking about the same item here? You have again referred to "airbrakes", which I took as a mislabelling of "speedbrakes", which itself is a mislabelling of spoilers. If you are referring to spoilers, practically every large jet aircraft of the last 70 years has them (to diminish lift right after touchdown). Otherwise, what are you referring to with "airbrakes"? Obviously not the reverse thrust mechanism (though the term "airbrakes" might be apt there), since you are separately referring to reverse thrust. Please clarify. Love your logo! But, you didn't want to "be dated" with Carbon-14? No spare neutrons handy?
@reekrouse5672
5 жыл бұрын
The doggo so cute
@MentourPilot
5 жыл бұрын
He is indeed.
@hamoodtatari
5 жыл бұрын
Mentour Pilot yesss lol
@adastra289
5 жыл бұрын
He'd do a great First Officer.
@aarocka11
5 жыл бұрын
Pet the damn dog!
@jamiehanrahan4705
5 жыл бұрын
He's cute, but he needs less caffeine :)
@ElijahH7101
5 жыл бұрын
This actually happened a while ago on a 767 in mid-flight and during cruising, it caused a massive bad chain of events. The aircraft reached extreme G-forces and then broke up and crash into a mountain range, unfortunately, killing all on board.
@Cingearth
Жыл бұрын
Lauda air was the airline !but nikki the owner found the fault and got compensated by Boeing !
@antoniogreen4151
Жыл бұрын
As in Niki Lauda the F1 legend?
@MGZetta
4 жыл бұрын
The dog is like: huh rejected take off? How about rejected me :(
@PatKittle
4 жыл бұрын
Mark Grudt -- :-)
@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
3 жыл бұрын
My dogs show up to band practice and lay out in the middle of the floor... Labs. Gun dogs. Not afraid of noise AT ALL. I have one that follows me around when I vacuum.
@slaphappyduplenty2436
4 жыл бұрын
A trust reverser would be if you got on the intercom before flight and said “Hello, this is uuhhhh your captain speaking, and uuuuuhhh this is my first day as a captain uuuuuhhh have a nice flight”.
@waqarghulam3548
4 жыл бұрын
Slaphappy Duplenty hahahaha 👍🏻
@RejectedInch
4 жыл бұрын
epic!
@haiwatigere6202
3 жыл бұрын
You very clever
@jamielonsdale3018
3 жыл бұрын
I'd be able to relax under those conditions. If he said it was his first day as first officer, I'm boarding the next flight. I don't know of any crashes where it was the first officer's first day, and I don't want to learn of one through first hand experience 😂
@wattson451
3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha
@Aeronaut1975
5 жыл бұрын
I thought you said "Trust reverser", I immediately thought of my wife ;D
@PrograError
5 жыл бұрын
divorcee?
@davedrace9959
5 жыл бұрын
lol
@grizzlygrizzle
5 жыл бұрын
Dude. Lots of us have been there. Those who haven't, they have no freaking idea.
@MagnificentHakan
5 жыл бұрын
Lol me too
@eloisebrynlee
5 жыл бұрын
Eternal Tech Me either! Can I ask what MGTOW is though... 🤔
@nolagrl35
3 жыл бұрын
It’s absolutely amazing the amount of knowledge needed to know to fly a ✈️. Love the videos and the 🐕
@paullawtable
4 жыл бұрын
I hope there was a present under that tree for your dog.
@tomwhyte
5 жыл бұрын
But what I really want to know is when the runway is dry and you enable reverse thrust and there is loads of air driving forward why doesn’t that slow down the plane but when it’s wet it does. I understand how the brakes work and that they need cooling but when it’s wet why do the reverse thrusters slow down the plane but not when it’s dry 🤷♂️ Please like so this can be answered Thanks
@dlandon2000
5 жыл бұрын
He's overgeneralizing or not explaining fully. When it's dry the thrust reversers will obviously still provide a force which will slow the plane more, it just isn't nearly as big of an influence when it's dry versus wet. Just like when it's wet you'll still get braking force even though it's less but it's not zero.
@tomwhyte
5 жыл бұрын
David Landon ok thanks so much for your help final question why is there a difference in the amount of thrust when it’s dry compared to wet is it due to the fact they just add more power?
@dlandon2000
5 жыл бұрын
@@tomwhyte Air conditions affect the power of engines in a few ways. Colder is more power because denser air, some water can actually add power because it expands into steam but that's a fairly small increase. As I understand it wet conditions shouldn't impact power significantly.
@sp0rkay
5 жыл бұрын
@@dlandon2000 Effects of humidity on turbine engine performance have been extensively tested. Moisture content itself has no direct effect on combustion, however atmospheric conditions associated with humidity have a negative effect on performance due to decrease in air density associated with rise in humidity. Condensed moisture is a bit different in the fact that H2O as a liquid is non-compressible, and therefore has even more of a negative impact on turbine engine performance due to volume it occupies in the compressor stage that could be compressed air. This reduction in total air(oxygen) has the same negative effects as lower air density on overall thrust/performance that is not offset by said moisture changing back to steam.
@Brigadelokcom
5 жыл бұрын
Tom, it is explained, watch again ;-) "Reverse thrust is not used to reduce the distance but to help reduce heat on brakes" means that they do not try to get the shortest distance and rather use the same distance, applying less brakes, thus generating less heat (you know, the time needed for the discs to cool down versus the short time available between rotations...). On the other hand, on wet runway, the brake on wheels is poor since the anti-skid releases the brake to avoid loss of control and going out of runway. You can compare that to the ABS on a car (with the difference of the amount of energy -mass/speed- involved). So you need an alternative way to kill speed AND keep on the runway; the reversers slow you down and the wheels keep the trajectory. Remember the planes wheels are quite slick and really subject to aquaplaning, then the job of braking is transfered to reversers so less adherence is required for the wheels. In wet conditions, heat is a lesser issue than on hot dry days. So, wet or dry runway, reversers actually slow down the plane, but for different purposes than shortening the distance. Hope this helps.
@xygomorphic44
3 жыл бұрын
Me: Can an airplane do X? Pilot: Let me tell you about a bunch of times when X happened and everybody died.
@jamesbarca7229
5 жыл бұрын
When you said that "on a dry runway the thrust reversers don't reduce the landing distance at all", I think you confused a lot of people.
@michael.forkert
4 жыл бұрын
James Barca Of course the thrust reversers do work the same, it doesn't matter if the runway is wet or dry. Anti-physical bullshit.
@cessealbeach
4 жыл бұрын
WET OR DRY the reverse's come on..
@bobbyjbobbyj
3 жыл бұрын
He probably did confuse a lot of people. And he was wrong about that. He is confusing planning and safety factors with physics. Of course you don’t want to plan to need reverse thrust to stop before the end of the runway, but it’s undeniable physics that if they are applied, it will reduce the braking distance.
@TrekCannon
3 жыл бұрын
As an aircraft engineer myself I love your vids. It's interesting to see a pilot with your level of mechanical knowledge. Great job highspeed
@allartvogelesang316
2 жыл бұрын
I was a passenger on a DC8 where the thrust reversers broke off on one engine immediately upon landing in Calgary many moons ago. The aircraft crabbed sideways and hopped up and down in the air. Rather scary. I was on a flight from Vancouver to Montreal and after 8 hours of waiting while they were repairing, they announced they were transferring us to another aircraft and we all cheered.
@vincentgilbert8550
Жыл бұрын
That was always a thought of mine. What if one side fails. Do you careen down the rest of the runway like a childs pinwheel.
@twiggy27111976
5 жыл бұрын
I found this fascinating and informative as an aeroplane geek, but I think your dog was bored senseless 😂 I think you should re-upload with subtitles for the pooch 😂😂😂
@sheereenaali8448
3 жыл бұрын
Then How does a Plane Stop Faster on a Dry runway Using Reverse Thrust in X-Plane 11
@LilHaseProductions
5 жыл бұрын
13:11 for the actual title question
@leroyhall4401
4 жыл бұрын
thank you
@andraslibal
4 жыл бұрын
lol
@rhinoareaction7587
4 жыл бұрын
Thx
@phasmagaminggr9121
4 жыл бұрын
When I pressed the time stamp an ad pupped up
@jsteinman
4 жыл бұрын
People like you need to be appreciated
@Kaakao
5 жыл бұрын
On the DC-8 you don't have in flight spoilers / speed brakes to slow down the plane on descend. The plane only has ground spoilers that activate when you have weight on wheels. In flight you can engage the reverse thrust on the inner (n 2 and 3) engines. It's a interesting plane to fly compared to more modern designs.
@markburckhard553
2 жыл бұрын
True - I got my flight engineer rating on the DC-8 and you could use idle reverse inflight on the #2 and #3 engines. Some crews would not do it, and Douglas apparently was concerned enough about a stuck reverser inflight that they put an "emergency stow" switch on the captain's overhead panel.
@MichiganWildcat
5 жыл бұрын
Your dog is cracking me up! He's just laying there like a kid
@RL-os9xl
5 жыл бұрын
He’s so cute! Look at him biting his paw😆
@ogalienman
3 жыл бұрын
?
@bottaboom8611
3 жыл бұрын
OMG, L-O-V-E your sweet dog! What a complete doll 😍😍😍
@tondog9070
5 жыл бұрын
It looks like your labor doodle is experiencing asymmetrical ear deployment:-)
@grantp287
5 жыл бұрын
That’s some fine bone apple tea
@danielgarcia9371
4 жыл бұрын
How on earth did you spell asymmetrical correctly but not labradoodle?
@grantp287
4 жыл бұрын
Daniel Garcia probably autocorrect lol
@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
3 жыл бұрын
@@danielgarcia9371 That's a poodle, I believe. Not an overpriced mutt. Lol
@harmonicajohn1059
3 жыл бұрын
Is a “labor doodle” considered a working dog breed?
@river1403
5 жыл бұрын
Patxi is such an adorable pup ❤️
@MentourPilot
5 жыл бұрын
He definitely is. Laying here with me right now.
@daviedmond4639
5 жыл бұрын
he's really working the camera in this one ! lol
@Ymril
5 жыл бұрын
Patxi? Are you a bask country lover? :)
@dpm-jt8rj
5 жыл бұрын
@@MentourPilot Pretty soon, Patxi is going to need to hire his own agent! He could have his own KZitem channel!
@danontuba9
5 жыл бұрын
what is this breed? very sweet.
@Major-Kong
5 жыл бұрын
Ask the crew and passengers of Lauda Air flight 004 when it fell out the sky from 30000+ feet due to one of the thrust reversers activated due to a faulty solenoid.
@flagmichael
5 жыл бұрын
@Bernhard Jordan Indeed - but *much* lower altitude.
@clarityracc
5 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that focused on the dog more than him
@SAM-ft8xd
4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@TheScouser1234
3 жыл бұрын
lmaf i. was trying o decide if it was sleeping or did he die hehe hope not..
@PeetPeeet
4 жыл бұрын
Lauda air 004 is worth a mention, among others. Thrust reversers have interlocks on them now because there have been a few accidents due to inadvertent deployment.
@nbvw3
4 жыл бұрын
"It deployed!"
@EinkOLED
4 жыл бұрын
He mentions it 17:31
@Demon_Wolfie
4 жыл бұрын
Me: **sees the title** Also me: **has flashbacks of Lauda Air 004**
@richardn6588
3 жыл бұрын
same
@mrmattandmrchay
5 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have a question. I've always wondered what would happen if you attempted to do a barrel roll in a full motion flight simulator? As the simulator floats on 4 hydraulic rams it can only pitch and roll the cabin to certain angles - it cannot physically turn the cabin upside down! So I'm assuming it would stop banking at a certain angle and remain there until the bank or pitch returned to within range. But if you continued to bank over vertical (so the plane is upside down), there will come a time where the bank 'as indicated in the flight deck' will be the opposite to the actual physical angle of the flight sim. Do you see what I mean? The plane will be at Left 60 degrees at the limit of the hydraulic rams, continue banking... 70 degrees, 80 degrees, 90 degrees (vertical) and continue rolling upside down. Impossible for the rams to place the flight sim at this angle. Then what if you just kept banking until the bank came back into the scope of the hydraulic rams, this would almost be in the opposite direction to where the rams were left - does it quickly flip to catch up? (hope that makes sense!). Anyway, that's my question if you are able to answer (perhaps in a new video?). Great videos by the way, always watch them.
@cyh4031
5 жыл бұрын
I'd be curious to know that as well.
@mrbadx19
5 жыл бұрын
i hope it ejects you out of the room, with extreme prejudice for being an idiot.
@HotelPapa100
5 жыл бұрын
Bank of the pod is NOT equal to the bank angle of the plane. In coordinated curves the is NO bank (at least as I understand it). Banking is used to give the acceleration sensation of uncoordinated curves. Say you drop a wing, but don't initiate the corresponding yaw, and even counteract the yaw that would be induced by roll-yaw-coupling with opposing rudder input. That makes the plane hang oddly in the air (and you in your chair, thus can be felt as a lateral acceleration). Simulating this acceleration is what the tilting mechanism is for. (Similarly back and forth for speed acceleration and braking.) In coordinated flight, the projected image is rotated to give the correct sensory feedback, not the pod. All that being said: A simulator of course can NOT simulate all the sensory feedback of aerobatics. Just imagine the g-forces in a loop or a tight curve. There's no way to simulate that for an extended time in a tethered pod.
@ezanchi5422
5 жыл бұрын
Interesting question!
@tisktisk3616
5 жыл бұрын
mrmattandmrchay the I
@Slyze33
5 жыл бұрын
Correct me if i'm wrong, applying reverse thrust allows you to reduce brake's input and thus limit heat's rise. But if you apply maximum reverse thrust and maximum brake, aren't you supposed to stop faster?
@Markle2k
5 жыл бұрын
There's no point in that if you stop short of the taxiway.
@stefan514
5 жыл бұрын
@@Markle2k his point is, that the guy in the video said that reverse thrust makes zero difference on a dry runway, which makes no sense.
@ashwinmohan4503
5 жыл бұрын
I agree with Slyze33, applying thrust reversers on full and full brakes WILL DEFINITELY shorten the landing distance. Mentour clearly said there is no difference.. This does not compute!! Maybe we are missing something here.
@Argosh
5 жыл бұрын
@@ashwinmohan4503 the brake settings specify a rate of deceleration, so from a pilots point of view the statement is correct. The pilot won't actually decide how hard the brakes are worked he only decides how fast he wants to stop.
@Markle2k
5 жыл бұрын
@@stefan514 The "guy in the video" is an instructor pilot for an airline. I agree that it wasn't phrased as well as it could or should have been, but the context is "what do we do in line operations?". This isn't a video or a channel for people who are interested in 130-0 deceleration runs with $100M aircraft for shits and giggles. The answer is, "we use reverse thrust to reduce stress on the wheel brakes" which is EXACTLY what he said in the video.
@bboucharde
5 жыл бұрын
This happened right after V-2 on a flight from Sao Paulo to Rio (in Brazil), and everyone on the twin-engined airliner died.
@eduardoy272
5 жыл бұрын
This was a sad accident. TAM Airlines flew a nice fleet of Fokker 100, one of them took off from São Paulo Congonhas airport. Reverser on the right engine deployed and the pilots did not have the training to overcome the situation. Auto thrust brought the lever to iddle, this would solve the problem, but the pilots did not link cause and consequence, so they forced the thurst lever to full power again, loosing control and crashing on some houses in the neighborhood.
@realdavidii
5 жыл бұрын
A Lauda Boeing 767 crashed because the left engine's thrust reverser opened in mid-flight, it was Lauda Flight 004
@mack7676
5 жыл бұрын
Exactly the incident I was thinking of
@realdavidii
5 жыл бұрын
Yea
@DavidSmith-vr1nb
4 жыл бұрын
He covered that towards the end.
@ellenorbjornsdottir1166
4 жыл бұрын
Could shut it down... but you'd not know it was happening
@seanbad9457
4 жыл бұрын
First time I watch one of your videos, and was impressed you knew the 10ft or below radar alt thrust rev deployment was possible. I know guys licenced on type who don't believe me when I tell them that. After the Lauda incident, there were two AD's I distinctly remember directly related to that crash, that came out on the B732's I was working on at that time. One was a mechanical lock on it's JT8 buckets and the other had to do with passenger seats. I once watched a BA B744 have 2 engines go into uncommanded thrust rev right after rotation. The mechanical locks that were incorporated on the RB211 after the Lauda crash meant the reversors only extended about 2 inches before mechanically locking. Of course the power automatically reduces in said engines, but she was able to climb out with full pax and around 118 tons of fuel. I say around 118 tons, because thats what we used to fuel our B744 for the same route.
@Eagles_Eye
5 жыл бұрын
the dog is like "look at me, im so cute" * stares at the camera * "are you looking??"
@Farlig69
4 жыл бұрын
Love your doggie - what a proper little teddy bear, so cute!!! 🐶🐶
@BillClinton228
4 жыл бұрын
He should have his own channel
@harsep
4 жыл бұрын
Farlig66 ya he treats the doggie like a teddy bear an inanimated object. Should give some video time to the dog by petting the dog giving it some attention .
@glenn7350
3 жыл бұрын
At 11:44 the dog has the same reaction as my GF has every time I’ll start talking shop
@gammaraider
4 жыл бұрын
I always love it when the thrust reverse is used, especially when it's wet out. Sounds and feels amazing. I'd be the guy craning his neck to look at the engine haha
@TheKaidynB
2 ай бұрын
Same same
@AttilaTheHun333333
4 жыл бұрын
If I would have a dog like that I’d call him Alf.
@budwhite9591
3 жыл бұрын
I hope it’s because he eats cats!
@justicewarrior9187
5 жыл бұрын
What if your thrusters go into full afterburners mode and the Top Gun song starts playing in the background??
@EMichaelBall
5 жыл бұрын
Which one? :-)
@justicewarrior9187
5 жыл бұрын
@@EMichaelBall Danger zone
@MrKinir
5 жыл бұрын
Then you start flying backward. It's very difficult, only a handful of pilots can fly backward. You also need a rear view mirror installed.
@genebohannon8820
5 жыл бұрын
@justice warrior. Your sarcasm kicked in like a set of afterburners. But what if.....?lol
@annasstorybox7906
5 жыл бұрын
Then you will quite likely end up in a flight sim x video by Aiforceproud95...
@EveryTipeOfVideo
5 жыл бұрын
Awesome video!! Answered all my questions 😁
@RahmanSajid
5 жыл бұрын
EveryTypeOfVideo 😀
@MentourPilot
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent!! I’m happy to hear that
@MrTheedarkhorse
4 жыл бұрын
13:10 You're welcome Also, lookup Lauda Air 004
@Fxnarji
4 жыл бұрын
thank you very much sir!
@jursamaj
3 жыл бұрын
Mentour mentions the Lauda flight at 17:28.
@tinytonymaloney7832
3 жыл бұрын
When the propellors change pitch angle to reverse thrust there must be a huge amount of pressure at the hub bearing for a few seconds. Been in a turbo prop and you can feel like you are being wrenched out of your seat for a moment until the aircraft slows down. Love the moving cuddly toy beside you, very realistic, looks like a real dog trying to get affection from his master 😀😀
@mileshardeem2375
3 жыл бұрын
@1:38 I'm confused, if you have breaks and they stop you in X distance given Y speed why would additional breaking force provided by reverse thrust NOT slow you down quicker than the breaks by themselves. Is there some aircraft rule that will dynamically reduce breaking when also reverse thrusting to maintain no more than some G's of breaking force? Can you explain, the explanation you provide is either missing something or false and implies breaking the laws of physics. I suspect what you mean is that CERTIFIED landing distance required is NOT impacted by the benefit of thrust reversers. The certification is done and required to be capable by the aircraft using only breaks. And then like you say that makes them mostly critical operationally in wet or ice conditions on the runway when the breaks can't actually be fully utilized. Also some quick Wiki-ing says that reverse thrust can reduce landing role by a quarter or more. Wiki article title "Thrust Reversal".
@犬の大将
5 жыл бұрын
When I read “thrust reverser open in flight,” I thought of Air Lauda Flight 006 before selecting the video.
@AlexCS2
5 жыл бұрын
Ethan Fairweather I thought he would mention it
@diegonathaniel1054
5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@janfrosty3392
4 жыл бұрын
I was just about to type, “What happen to Lauda Air” as well. I use to fly Lauda air Sydney to Vienna on that very 767, luckily no on that flight that crashed over Thailand. I recall that after this crash Boeing made changes so no revers trust was able to be deploy at 40k feet.
@KironVB
4 жыл бұрын
Niki Lauda absolute legend and caught Boeing with their pants around their ankles.
@judebrad
3 жыл бұрын
Lauda Air Flight 004
@komkom3425
5 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how reverse thrusts don't affect landing distance on dry land, like it's still a counter force, it SHOULD REDUCE , and in simulators thrust reversers actually can stop the plane
@machintelligence
5 жыл бұрын
The could be used to reduce the landing distance, but instead are used to reduce the braking effort and save wear and heating on the wheel brakes.
@heronimousbrapson863
5 жыл бұрын
Perhaps thrust reversers are not any more effective than wheel brakes on a dry surface?
@TheWindigomonster
5 жыл бұрын
They still reduce landing distance, but runways at most major airports are long enough that they aren’t needed - instead, they’re simply used to assist the brakes in slowing the airplane down so the brakes don’t heat up as much.
@markvolpe2305
5 жыл бұрын
Some thrust reversers can actually back up a plane from a standing position.
@Sonos45
5 жыл бұрын
When driving a car do you press the brake pedal as hard as possible every time you stop? If he goes full brake and full reverse thrust every time he lands a plane I doubt he'd have a job for long.
@scotty2307
5 жыл бұрын
When I was in my early 20s, I am now in my mid 50s, I flew from Orange County, CA. to Sacramento Metro on an Embraer Brasilia. When the pilot was entering the landing pattern he did, in fact, bring the prop pitch in to beta. Whether by mistake, or because he needed to slow the aircraft quickly. I was sitting just behind the port wing, and had a clear view of the port engine. I could hear the change in prop sound, I could see the change in the prop silhouette, the engine did begin to shudder significantly, and visibly, and I could feel very significant deceleration over many seconds. I have since asked a few airline pilots about this, and have been told that this would NEVER happen, but I know what I experienced. I think that those pilots were just talking the party line. At the time this event occurred, I did already have some small aircraft flight experience. I have not before, or since, experienced that sort of deceleration over such a long period of time. I can say that it was quite an effective way to slow the aircraft.
@JMcdon1627
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning that the DC-8 can deploy thrust reversers and descend rapidly. I remember reading about this in an aviation magazine in the mid to late 1960's. Now, my pilot friends can stop thinking that I made it up. Happy Landings, Mack
@IvanovichIvanov
3 жыл бұрын
it is not full reversal. it's more like scratching your back when your butt itches.
@drsimonmatsunyane9810
4 жыл бұрын
Anyone who agrees with me when i say, probably this dog could fly a plane, since it has sat down in these serious lessons about planes😊😊😊
@ED-es2qv
3 жыл бұрын
I can tell you that, if that dog were a man, he would think he was ready to fly just from watching all the simulator time.
@pegleg2959
3 жыл бұрын
Well if the doggy is able to fly, then I should be able to fly, as I've been paying attention just as much attention as him.
@assassin879
4 жыл бұрын
The little dog is saying I've heard this before and he's facepalming lmao cute dog
@adrienpyrono3923
4 жыл бұрын
Pornographers
@tschoy9388
4 жыл бұрын
The dog is boring, I know.
@danielsiwerov2151
5 жыл бұрын
Does reverse thrust in dry and hot conditions really not minimise the landing distance? In my undestanding of physics, its just one more force added to the others like spoilers and brakes to slow down the aircraft. I really think you will achieve the shortest landing distance with all forces combined, including reverse thrust, no matter if its dry and hot. But maybe I am wrong here. An answer would be super helpfull :D Great video as always :D
@andyross37
5 жыл бұрын
Flaps produce lift.......essential at slower speeds. Ground spoilers destroy lift, therefore gluing the aircraft to the ground.....again, they're essential and help to slow the aircraft down. I agree that with brakes, reverse thrust and ground spoilers combined you'd achieve the shortest landing distance
@adam.millerchip
5 жыл бұрын
I had the same confusion, but I think he means there is no difference *for the same landing distance*. The thrusters add more force, so the brakes can work less to stop in the same distance.
@jameskoralewski296
5 жыл бұрын
Spoilers do very little to stop the airplane. You are right, it is the combined use of all braking systems that maximizes stopping power. That's why you'll notice, if you hang out at an airport and watch some landings, that the pilots use both brakes and thrusters to stop passenger planes.
@andyross37
5 жыл бұрын
There has been a number of runway over run accidents caused by pilots forgetting to set the spoilers
@andyross37
5 жыл бұрын
@@jameskoralewski296 The primary purpose of the ground spoilers is to maximise wheel brake efficiency by "spoiling" or dumping the lift generated by the wing and thus forcing the full weight of the aircraft onto the landing gear. The spoiler panels also help slow the aircraft by producing aerodynamic drag.
@F-Man
3 жыл бұрын
I’m gonna say that, on most aircraft, if the thrust reversers deploy in flight, things are not going to be absolutely fantastic.
@jmrx12
2 жыл бұрын
He tried to be diplomatic about it, and not scare anyone, but basically if the "one in a billion" scenario of a thrust reverser deploying at cruising altitude happened-plane will definately crash and burn.
@No-pm4ss
5 жыл бұрын
I always find your videos very interesting. But I feel like the pace of your videos are really slow, like these 20 minutes should be packed with fascinating stuff. That's how Vsause got big, or the channel 'Daily Dose of Internet'. Even though you answer the posed question, I still feel clickbaited with this attitude that I'm forced to watch the entire video to get the answer. I still respect what you do but maybe you'd consider this.
@Mike-dk7wj
5 жыл бұрын
Dogs looking like their owners and vice-versa.
@iknebli
5 жыл бұрын
I understand that there are airports that restrict/forbid the use of thrust reverser for noise abatement reasons. Is this really the case? Do you fly to such airports?
@MentourPilot
5 жыл бұрын
Yes, this is very common, especially during nighttime. There is always a clause "except for safety reasons" in those rule though.
@KarthikNakul
5 жыл бұрын
The use of reverse thrust for pushback was banned for this reason as well
@kingspunkbubble
5 жыл бұрын
I often hear this from my local airport, Southampton. We had a real corker the other night, very loud at a distance of 8 miles.
@jameskoralewski296
5 жыл бұрын
I've never heard of this restriction at any airport.
@Onew92
5 жыл бұрын
Mentour Pilot So i just wonder how can you slow down the plane without using reverse thrust?
@stoffls
5 жыл бұрын
I remember the Lauda Air incident well. As far as I remember the pilots had the time to check the handbook, when the indicator for the thrust reverser came on - and it stated that there is no action necessary. So they probably might have had time to shut down the engine before losing complete control - if they would have known that this is the correct action. I think Boeing until then believed, that such an incident would not be possible and that the thrust reverser indicator could only be a malfunction of the panel. Tragic mistake. Niki Laude proved then in many simulator tests, that the pilots had no chance to regain control and the fault was clearly with Boeing. Thanks again for the great video! And your dog is just lovely!
@bigbaddms
5 жыл бұрын
The pilots reduced power to idle and even cutoff the fuel, but not fast enough. In the sim, they showed that the crew would only have 3-4 seconds to shutdown the engine before a catastrophic failure. They missed that window by only a couple seconds. Extremely tragic. Niki Lauda is a hero, forcing Boeing to fix this problem once and for all.
@person.w9780
5 жыл бұрын
Bits of what I think is the CVR to that crash are on here.
@technophant
4 жыл бұрын
How many times does he say thrust?
@daleadams6097
5 жыл бұрын
Did you purposely get a dog with the same hair color as you?? Lol serious question
@ElDukeAy
5 жыл бұрын
Go to 13:08 to get to the topic at hand, thumbs up me.
@tokenlau7519
5 жыл бұрын
If thrust reversers didn't slow down aircraft at all on dry landing pad, they would also not slow down aircraft on wet one. So it cannot be true that they do not slown down aircraft on dry landing pad at all.
@nelsonvecchione2621
5 жыл бұрын
Reverse thrust acts against the forward travel of the aircraft, providing deceleration. SHORTER LANDING DISTANCE...
@andrewsmall6568
5 жыл бұрын
I watched it 3 times because at first i understood it how you said, but in fact i think he meant something else. For a hypothetical 1000m roll out you can achieve this by 100% brakes... or thrust reverser's and 80% brake. The roll out distance is kept constant, but he uses less brakes to ensure they are cool enough for short turnarounds.
@tokenlau7519
5 жыл бұрын
@@nelsonvecchione2621 Exactly, so saying that it does not slow down an aircraft at all when conditions are dry is incorrect.
@gravyboat2370
5 жыл бұрын
I was confused by this statement also
@Guust_Flater
5 жыл бұрын
@Kerry Metts Wrong....any force, not in the travel direction, will help to slowdown the airplane. That the ABS of the pland doesn't get sctivated has noghing to do with it. Thrust reserve can be seen as an extra brake and thus will help in slowing down the plane.
@MurphyTheGamer4life
5 жыл бұрын
I had asked myself this question myself when I accidentally engaged reverse thrust in X-Plane 11 today. Great video.
@maikoleton
4 жыл бұрын
Murphy The Gamer l like your dog
@TheSpacecraftX
3 жыл бұрын
Boeing refused to admit for a long time that they were at fault for the Lauda Air in-flight deployment.
@JazzLowrider
4 жыл бұрын
At 2:00 you said it reduces landing distance on a wet runway, but not on a dry one, that doesn't make sense at all, Reverse thrust does shorten the landing distance regardless of wet or dry runway, and it saves the brakes all Pilots agree .. could you clarify what you're saying ?
@gregorymaher6053
5 жыл бұрын
Actually, the Space Shuttle trainer aircraft, a highly modified Gulfstream 2, had the capability of reverse thrust in flight. Not sure if it came that way or if they modified for that. But, they took astronauts up to 38,000 feet and threw the engines into reverse to simulate the rate of descent of the orbiter. Normal glideslope for an airliner is about 3%, for the orbiter, it was about 22%. That's headed downhill quite fast.
@willracer1jz
5 жыл бұрын
On the C-130 Hercules you can't go into the beta range in flight. The C-130 the Navy landed on an aircraft carrier back in the 60s had the beta lock disabled so that the prop would be in reverse by the time it hit the deck. The C-17 does use its bypass thrust reversers to do high angle combat descends.
@stavinaircaeruleum2275
5 жыл бұрын
Id love to see that video
@xander395
5 жыл бұрын
You can youtube C-17 airshow" and see it. Unfortunately, from the ground, it is a bit anti-climatic until they use the revereser to actually back up on the ground immediately after landing. Its hard to know a "steep combat approach" from a normal unless you actually fly them. In the plane however, it is a bit more exciting. Having a cargo plane that nose low with reversers out is... a different experience. C-17s are the only aircraft I know of that are built to deploy reversers in flight (and have procedures to do so). I could be wrong though... There may be some hot and spicy (chinese) or vodka (russian) flavored variants that can do it as well. I am biased... but I doubt they do it very well...
@jacobjahr9573
5 жыл бұрын
Can't go into reverse in flight on the C-130, P-3 Orion or C-2/E-2 aircraft. He's normally spot on in all of his videos, but this had me shaking my head more than a couple of times.
@RicoL-ry5xi
5 жыл бұрын
7:34 the dog is so cute :D
@parapsychologist5402
5 жыл бұрын
Great Video always wanted to know that. By the way, I think your dog wants it's own KZitem Channel.
@AH-sr5px
3 жыл бұрын
Causes a crash, happened in 1991 to B767 following undiscovered design flaw.
@RobertNixAlternativeArtist
5 жыл бұрын
Thrust reversers opening at high altitude cruising speed=disaster.
@prakhar6334
4 жыл бұрын
He: talks Me: Aww... look at how cute that dog is
@AmaroqStarwind
4 жыл бұрын
I want airplane tyres on a drag racecar.
@andraslibal
4 жыл бұрын
@@nefarioulyte9996 because he does not understand the different requirements and design choices to satisfy those requirements :)))
@MrSupercar55
4 жыл бұрын
Commercial jetliners have much larger tyres than top fuel dragsters. Even if you did somehow fit those to a top fuel dragster, the wheelie bar wouldn’t reach the ground because the back end would be too high up, so you would flip over backwards as you accelerated.
@thomasreed8710
4 жыл бұрын
Those tires are HUGE and weigh a ton. I've delivered them on my truck and I know. Something like tires on an earthmover. They have to hold hundred of tons smashing down on them again and again. Your puny gasoline engine probably couldn't even turn them.
@ellenorbjornsdottir1166
4 жыл бұрын
no you don't
@DavidMcbrady
5 жыл бұрын
I love how well you explain in detail. Thank you for taking your time to explain the detail. !
@colt2206
3 жыл бұрын
The dog has become a aviation expert listening to all these videos.
@sonnyburnett8725
5 жыл бұрын
Don’t know if it’s still done this way, but when I was flying the Jurassic and classic B-737’s runway RTO and landing figures were based on brakes only so T/R added a safety measure. Not to imply they don’t reduce landing distances because they do quite well. We used to power out of some gates on rare occasions when a tug was not available. As for deploying the T/R before touchdown, besides being a bad idea a pilot considering it should fly/land that particular airplane a few times beforehand to confirm the T/R deploy simultaneously. If they’re not synchronized which happens you’ll hit the ground on the side that deploys first. Maybe to the point of damaging the A/C.
@kurrycane1483
5 жыл бұрын
*video ends* Wait wha? I was lookin at the dog the whole time :/
@trevorgwelch7412
5 жыл бұрын
Air France 🇫🇷 Flight 358 Crashed Into a Revine Toronto International Airport August 02/99 . No Deaths but 12 people with serious injuries. It was not meant to land during high winds and lightning storm ⛈. Pilot error. Lots of water on the runway. I was one mile away when it happened. Extremely Windy and Raining Hard . Air bus 340 . Toronto Ontario Canada 🇨🇦
@samkahill2845
5 жыл бұрын
touched down in the middle of the runway in torrential rains, as a result overshot the runway.
@-a-8423
3 жыл бұрын
How is it possible that the reverser makes *no* difference in dry conditions? Surely there is *some* measurable difference that it makes, no?
@solapowsj25
3 жыл бұрын
Plus ➕. There are many other problems that make it necessary to make further innovate changes in design.
@OAleathaO
5 жыл бұрын
0:11 - "...and what would happen if a thrust reverser was deployed in flight?" The more important question is, "How can that dog be soooo cute???" lol
@skytrainii8933
5 жыл бұрын
The DC-9 series 30 actually always deployed their thrust reversers in flight as a matter of routine. Watch videos of the “9’s” landing. Take note when the reversers are deployed. You should see they are deployed after the mains are on the ground but before the nose is on the ground. We would pop the reversers without adding power on touch down and let the drag of the reversers gently lower the nose to the ground. Once the nose was on the ground, we then would add power to provide negative thrust. The DC-9 is not officially on the ground until the nose is down. That is because it did not have a WOW switch on the mains as with most other large commercial aircraft. It has a “Ground Shift Mechanism” on the nose gear. So as far as the aircraft knew, we were deploying the reversers while the aircraft and all the systems were still in the air. The longer series 80 DC-9’s didn’t do this because the engine exhaust were so close to the ground at landing attitude, the reversers would actually strike the ground if deployed and break off. This fact was learned the hard way by Hawaiian Airlines.
@vincesbardella3838
5 жыл бұрын
"As a matter of routine"? Hardly. The aircraft operating manual prohibited it, and a captain would be disciplined by the company, if detected or reported. Also, he would be in serious trouble if he had to cancel the reverse for a go around, in which case a full 8 seconds would be required for the engine to transition from reverse idle to take off thrust. I also have a type rating (And 8,000 hours) in the BAC 1-11, with the Rolls-Royce Spey engine, which was approved for use of reverse thrust in flight, as the idle to full spool-up time was only 2.8 seconds, as quick as propeller thrust. It was also approved for the use of idle power on approach, because of that advantage. This resulted in very quiet landings, with no reverse and long roll-outs, traffic permitting, and the terminal was at the far end of the runway. (10L at PIT, for example)
@vincesbardella3838
5 жыл бұрын
And, if you're wondering, Mohawk, Allegheny, USAir.
@Entertainment-Knowledge
5 жыл бұрын
pup is huggable. i most of d time looking at him/her while you're talking.
@tiemen9095
3 жыл бұрын
The space shuttle pilots were trained in a modified Gulfstream II that flew with its thrust reversers deployed and its main landing gear down. This, in order to simulate the poor aerodynamics and high descent rate of the space shuttle.
@vmatthews9437
Ай бұрын
more graphics needed ; pet distracts the attention ; move around ...... ===== matts'
@gordonanderson9163
5 жыл бұрын
I remember we had 2 or 3 aborted takeoffs in a Sabena A310 out of Dakar around 1983. I was in the front seat in business class and saw the captain leaning out of the door and looking back at the port engine. I said hello and asked what was going on and he apologised for not getting us back to Brussels. he said he kept getting a reverse thrust warning light on one engine before V1. I laughingly said 'I like it here' let's just stay'. That is what happened, in fact as the crew were running out of hours and the engineers needed more time to be sure that the problem was a faulty indicator. One engine going into reverse would have been fatal. There was also a big gap between attempts in order to let the brakes cool.
@p51mustang24
5 жыл бұрын
Better to take a faulty light seriously, than to just conclude that all is fine.
@ceemsc
5 жыл бұрын
NASA used to simulate Space Shuttle landing approach for training pilots using Learjets with Thrust Reversers activated.
@heto795
5 жыл бұрын
This should have been mentioned in the video.
@ai4gk
5 жыл бұрын
They were "modified" T-38s. Perhaps the " modification" was the ability to activate the T/Rs in flight.
@engineeringoyster6243
5 жыл бұрын
They were modified Grumman G-II aircraft. This line of aircraft are now produced by Gulfstream Aerospace.
@eduardoy272
5 жыл бұрын
AND all of the landing gears down
@sumdrumbum
4 жыл бұрын
Come for the aviation, stay for the adorable dog :)
@Lampe2020
2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video, now I know what you are talking about when you say "reverse thrust" in any other video, although the name already indicates something like that ;) The dog is so cute!
@TheRabbitFear
3 жыл бұрын
10,000ft per minute, I imagine people would be stuck to the ceiling
@amywong9685
5 жыл бұрын
As always, your explanations are on point and very well for me as a "normal" curious passenger to understand. Thanks for taking all the time and patience! :)
@Borchert97
5 жыл бұрын
I just have to say, I found this channel only because of my interest in supersonic air travel and interest in the Concorde and thanks to a couple of your high quality videos on the subject, I continued watching more and more of your videos any time I have a question or curiosity regarding air travel. Your content is phenomenal! I'm borderline addicted to your videos, I can't stop watching, they all seem so interesting and captivating! Also, I'm a huge automotive enthusiast and it's interesting to see how much translates from the auto world to the aircraft world. I have a pretty good understanding of a lot of things you talk about, such as when you talked about brakes and braking in this video.
@cnordegren
5 жыл бұрын
Yet puppy is back yet again! Love these videos.
@nottomsdiscontinuedchannel3710
3 жыл бұрын
Greetings from Thailand! Lauda Air 004 has occurred here.
@starvingartist6754
3 жыл бұрын
Are pilots trained to understand every word said by the control tower ? Because i cant make out even half of what they say or what the pilot says , its all too fast !
Пікірлер: 2,7 М.