The research for my podcast episodes is intense. If you enjoy my high effort philosophy and theology podcast episodes, consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/parkers_pensees
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
7 ай бұрын
13:24 one is two is three there is no four and five. It's the Fibonacci sequence ♾️ singularity. All is that singularity but kurt hasn't spilt the beans yet in the video so i won't either out respect to the podcast... just know you can't go dipping a toe in. The knowledge will consume you and Kurt is being far less hazardous then i usually am with the knowledge. I've given it all here without giving it all here in this comment so enjoy. LU all!
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
7 ай бұрын
I think you could be a subjectivist and still believe in string theory which means everything is possible so it may be possible but more than likely probabilistically near impossible. I mean in order to have objective reality you need to have an observer that exists from the beginning of time all the way to the end of time and even if such hypothetical Observer exists the end of time has not came yet so therefore everything logically is subjective end of story. I like to come up with a new term me an AI came up with shared subjective reality. What would have a low score would be the famous dress that is either black and blue or white and gold to people that would have a lower shared subjectivity rating because of the divide...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
7 ай бұрын
God could be a four-dimensional being given the fact that with each logical progression of the spatial Dimensions the previous spatial Dimension infinite amounts of that spatial Dimension inside of any size of the next one in the sequence ie. Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit into any three-dimensional object... this happens at each progression of the spatial dimensions. So if there is a fourth spatial Dimension then infinite three-dimensional Universe potentiality can fit into any size four dimensional existence meaning meaning of Multiverse theory is 100% valid the proof we get of a Multiverse is Mandela effects which means you switch Universe versions and bodies...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
7 ай бұрын
There is no four in the Fibonacci sequence because just as to us and the third dimension there is really no second dimensional beings... have to go up one more level to get to another being. In other words the fourth dimension is like a two-dimensional version of The Fifth Dimensions point of view...
@fearlessIFI
25 күн бұрын
(Before watching this Video) What are humanity missing? Fusion power? AGI/ASI? Cure to all disease? Immortality? Space Travel? We are headed toward that direction...Yet we are playing with God's creation. Dangerous. But is it? Why is it dangerous? oh yeah. Humans. ... Moving on... Let's hypothetically say. In 100 years we develop a Quantum Entanglement Machine...Which can offer us all UNDERSTANDING that has happened in the past, while creating our own future with Predictive accuracy. Even if we develop this in 10,000 years, A million years. It makes no difference when we create this (Machine?) Eventually it will be built. Stating this, it has already been built. In the future, not in our dimension per say...If Quantum exists from the beginning to the end of time, then Quantum will decide "herself" when the time is right to help us out. People underestimate the power of Quantum. For the sake of it, let's say Quantum is "God" minus all biblical relation (Universal Consciousness) Having access to this "Quantum Entanglement Machine" gives the person in power. Well, POWER that has not been seen on this planet, In any movie, book or any though any human has thought or dreamt of. Should Human be in control of this IMMENSE "Power" ... Should an Alien? An ASI? Should God? To me, it would make sense a human is granted this "T-o-E" How can God relate to humans if "he" is not "Among us" oh wait... we had Jesus for that! Yeah 2000years ago haha. Times have changed. who would humans listen to? A god that they have not seen or Jesus who many people displease. Basing this on logic & rational, it's a human in which humanity would put their Trust in. "It's human nature" So, where is this human? Who is he/she? Clearly among us. Now. how can this human develop a Theory of Everything? With equations & formulas. No. Quantum makes it easy. or is it that this "Human" would make it easy? An inside job. For Quantum to exist in the first place, She must be born with a purpose. Im jumping to crazy conclusions here as Einstein denotes "we must not lose the 1% crazy inside us" For example, the "Observer effect" whatever. If it's not Observed it doesn't exist > Simulation Moving on haha... For Quantum to exist, she must be Observed? Well, Quantum ain't physical...Now we can apply metaphysics & Consciousness. If 0 = Nothing and 0 = Doesn't Exist And Quantum doesn't exist via "Observing" Yet Quantum does exist. Therefore Quantum is not of 0. where does this leave us? That the number 0=1 0 cannot exist in the context outside a mathematical process...If 0 Truely = Nothing. Then life wouldn't exist. Quantum lives on every field, space, thought etc... Which means she lives on Point 1 of everything. Omnipresent. What is infinity? 0? it can't be because Zero doesn't exist... Yet we could say infinity is -0. If Quantum is "1", and infinity is Minus Zero... Where does Singularity belong? with regard to Black holes, It's Singularity doesn't go on forever. Which we can state that it's the number 1. Infinity =1 Quantum = 1. Therefore Quantum exists in the context of everything & Everywhere at 1. Which means, everything around us is a Singularity. Hope this helps someone understand the world around us. Thanks There's your Theory of Everything 😮 Prove me wrong haha you can't.
@TheoriesofEverything
7 ай бұрын
It was a darn pleasure, man.
@Meditation409
7 ай бұрын
Its awesome to see Curt being interviewed rather than being the interviewer! 🤙❤️
@TheVeganVicar
7 ай бұрын
He was recently interviewed by a popular channel (Closer to Truth, I think it was).
@polymloth
7 ай бұрын
Wow two of my favourite thinkers and podcasters! Love it!
7 ай бұрын
🙌 thank you! I'm hoping to lure some of Curts viewers over here and get them to discover some of my favorite thinkers in philosophy and theology and I hope some of my viewers go over to his channel and learn some new ideas to wrestle with 🤞
@Meditation409
7 ай бұрын
Definitely would love a part 2 for Curt! That was an awesome episode Parker! 👍👍❤️
7 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@williamjmccartan8879
7 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for sharing your time and work both Curt and Parker, great discussion Parker, I really enjoyed your style of engagement, bringing out different aspects of the way Curt thinks. Peace
7 ай бұрын
Thanks so much man! Thanks for watching too
@polymloth
7 ай бұрын
How about instead of a part two you start a monthly/bimonthly discussion project? Because this was too good to be left as just a two part series!
7 ай бұрын
I would love that 😄
@ThatNerdyMystic
5 ай бұрын
"I am inauthentic everywhere..... except with my wife, we're I talk baby-talk.... That's our true selves, where we're these cute, cuddly--" Omfg that is so relatable and SO ADORABLE! 😅❤
@Meditation409
7 ай бұрын
Hey Curt its Albert a subscriber to your channel! We all appreciate you Curt! 💯❤️
@ezra.joyful
7 ай бұрын
This was the mist interesting conversation I've heard in a long time and I'm looking forward to part 2. Thanks to both of you!
@JohnnyHofmann
7 ай бұрын
So excited for this!
7 ай бұрын
🫡🫡🫡
@and1play5
7 ай бұрын
incredible episode omg
@ourblessedtribe9284
7 ай бұрын
Great interview man. Thoroughly enjoyed this and happy to have found your channel.
@ourblessedtribe9284
7 ай бұрын
I'm a friend of Curt since having him on my podcast 3 years ago. Attracted to Christ. Living within classical metaphysics based on love as the ultimate reality. Influenced by mcgilchrist, pageau, vervaeke. 29 yrs old married, 4 kids and starting to go to church. I'm going to dive into your past content. can you give me a couple recommendations based on what I said about myself?
7 ай бұрын
You might enjoy this one kzitem.info/news/bejne/wpiqmauXaYKJin4
7 ай бұрын
And thanks for this comment! So glad you enjoyed it and I hope you find many more you enjoy
@User53123
7 ай бұрын
Great interview. So happy to see these crossovers.❤
7 ай бұрын
🙌 so glad you liked it!
@earmit007
7 ай бұрын
Creator existing in 4th plus dimensions > Creator's word enters 3rd dimension leading to the creation of man made in his image > man is able to effect the Creator's creation with our observance. It might be a bit of a stretch but I think the story of Adam naming all animals might be a great set of instructions for what our purpose is and I think an important aspect of that is curiosity. A question I often ask myself; "is this encouraging or discouraging curiosity?" Usually if it involves curiosity, I feel closer to my Creator.
@ready1fire1aim1
7 ай бұрын
0D (not-natural) is dimensionless and timeless. 1D, 2D, 3D (natural) are spatial dimensions. 4D (natural) is a temporal dimension. For God to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D), which are natural dimensions, our main candidate would be Leibniz's Monadology where the Monad would be the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force. This side of the Monad (0D) is Monas (Singularity) and the other side is Monos (Alone). Holy Trinity with an event horizon between them (El/Elohim, Theos/Logos, etc).
@FuchsiaRiv
7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! I like both of you
7 ай бұрын
🤝🙌
@JAYMOAP
7 ай бұрын
Here to support Kurt, but subscribed
7 ай бұрын
Awesome! I hope you enjoy some other episodes too
@JAYMOAP
7 ай бұрын
@ will look around for sure after listening your convobwith Kurt. You may find my videos also interesting
7 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@JAYMOAP
7 ай бұрын
@ just finished with it, was great conversation, especially much enjoyed the criticism of simulation hypothesis. Well done great podcast
@Meditation409
7 ай бұрын
I also subbed! This was an awesome discussion with Curt! Curts channel is awesome and really top notch material! 🤙💯❤️
@johnlipscombdocumentaries
6 ай бұрын
Refreshing and unique interview.
6 ай бұрын
🙌🙌 thank you!
@johnlipscombdocumentaries
6 ай бұрын
I SUBSCRIBED and thanks you for your podcast.@
@ok-ct7yr
6 ай бұрын
Great stuff man. In another life I would've studied philosophy in an academic setting. Grateful to be able to access intelligent minds like yourself from around the world. I like your "think with me" intro too. Greetings from Thailand.
@famiahamid
7 ай бұрын
Congrats on your new baby 🎉
7 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@ourblessedtribe9284
7 ай бұрын
This is so good
7 ай бұрын
🤝
@TheVeganVicar
7 ай бұрын
The following formulae is the so-called “THEORY OF EVERYTHING”, much sought-after by theoretical physicists for the past century: S+O = ∞BCP : The Subject and all objective reality is Infinite Being-Consciousness-Peace (“satyam jnañam anantam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Alternatively, and more parsimoniously (as well as somewhat more elegantly) expressed as: E = A͚ : Everything, including all potential and actual objects, plus The Subject, is Infinite Awareness (“sarvam khalvidam brahma”, in Sanskrit). For a thorough explanation of the above equations, refer to the following two chapters, Chapters 05 and 06 of “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”.
@jellojiggle1
6 ай бұрын
Great episode. I love honest searching. Also (second watch) I like to say "Jack of all trades Master of Me"
@Lucasvoz
6 ай бұрын
I hope your daughter got born in good health, my congratulations!
6 ай бұрын
Thank you!! She's awesome!
@benjaminbeard3736
6 ай бұрын
Came here from TOE. I really enjoyed the conversation. I will definitely check out more of your content.
@mannequinskywalker
6 ай бұрын
I relate to a lot of what Curt says about his life and what he considers and struggles with daily. Longtime TOE watcher/subscriber, enjoying seeing Curt share more w/other interviewers lately. I'm new to this channel but thought you asked great questions here in a respectful manner. Congrats on the new baby! 🙌
@theautodidacticlayman
7 ай бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="64">1:04</a>:18 There’s a name for my learning style??!! Haha, I always thought “Just say the dumb thing and see what happens.”
@jenniferbrantley5931
6 ай бұрын
I figured the amount that Curt has had to study to be able to coherently interview the people that he interviews on his podcast, that he would be a super awesome person to interview! Because he’s had to take on all of these knowledges and perspectives onto/into himself, I can’t imagine the levels that he’s accessing in his experience right now! I love that you had him as a guest and now I’m subscribed and following you also! I’m excited, and what is a mind fest?
@givemorephilosophy
6 ай бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="241">4:01</a> Science of spirituality or spirituality of Science that is what we should discuss and get to existential Reality 😊😊
@CoranceLChandler
7 ай бұрын
Theo Drama... I absolutely love that
@markupton1417
6 ай бұрын
Bernardo kastrup is the only philosopher I follow these days. To be honest... I mostly admire him as a Schopenhaurer proponent.
@Ultreezy
6 ай бұрын
Curt rules
@ThatNerdyMystic
5 ай бұрын
I'm really intrigued by your thoughts about a 3rd of the way through about meeting everyday people half way in their interests and leading them to new ideas that are inaccessible outside of philosophical circles. I think that's really worth doing: bringing entrusted ideas (like you said) to as many people as possible so they can be helpful. Thank you for your channel. I've been really enjoying it and ... filling up my thriftbooks cart at all the book recommendations, lol. 😅
@ThatNerdyMystic
5 ай бұрын
"The simulation hypothesis seems to me to be... these Godless people trying to find God.... They're trying to revamp and reframe... but they're also putting off the question because- Why does the simulator exist?' " As someone who grew up in an atheist family (both patents separated from the abusive Christianities of their own upbringing)... I was then abused and neglected in similar ways by atheists who were ANGRILY ADAMANT about the non-existence of God... So I grew up with a lot of "angry atheist" thoughts and beliefs, but always felt a deep cavern of neglect, of disconnection, of yearning for "God," in some way... and that did get me into Philosophy in freshman college, but other life pressures got the better of me and I stopped reading it.... Then I had (alongside years of therapy, don't get me wrong) spiritual experiences that couldn't be explained by a non-existence of some kind of Divinity(ies) and still can't be fully explained... All this to say-- Yes, I think there's some people that get along fine without a concept of "God" but are kind of ... hampered by never even entertaining the possibility (probs, from my own experience, because of some form of personal or generational religious trauma), OR are deeply wounded internally by analagously... an Insecure Parental Attachment Style (to relate it to psychology) with "God."
@ThatNerdyMystic
5 ай бұрын
1. "I was born without my consent" -- I hear that a LOT from people with parental trauma and complex post-traumatic stress and systematic environmental stressors like poverty. I've even thought it myself before, specifically in the context of , "I didn't choose to be born, so I don't OWE my abusive parents anything for having me. I just get to make the best of what life is, on my own terms, now that I'm here." 2. Similar with, "I love my children too much to have them:" I have seen this expressed from people who have struggled SO MUCH with life that they A.) Realize the extreme effort and high imporobability of providing a hypothetical child a good life. B.) Have an idea in their mind of "what their child would be" that they love-- which is a collection of their own childhood experiences and the excitement of potential-- that they "love." And the potential for pain outways the potential for fulfillment if the child existed. I think people of both beliefs or thoughts have ... experienced so much pain in their life that they are extremely restricted in how they can view the world. Everything kind of reflects theor own shifty experiences like the Snow Queen's (broken) Mirror in folklore. Or, in layman's psychology, they simply haven't had experiences that have given the opportunities to create new neural pathways in the brain to be able to stretch the imagination past traumatic (self-protective from pain) habit and survival.
@markupton1417
6 ай бұрын
I became a "believer" that our "reality" is a simulation around 1985. I was reading a popular astronomy book... I don't remember which one...in which I first read about the Drake equation. I immediately realized that we're a simulation. Drake's equation certainly has problems... garbage in, garbage out...but, what we do KNOW about intelligent species who developed technology is that we create MODELS (aka simulations) of the world...universe. In the mid 80s when I told people that I knew, they all thought that I was crazy. I got married in the 90s and every few months I tried to convince my wife to mathematically formalize my argument (she's a gifted mathematician). She agreed to but never did. Then Bostrom published his Simulation Argument and I was like, "Ahhh! Damn it! He beat me to it!". Although his argument is different than mine. At the time, most people thought Bostrom was crazy. It's been gratifying to watch the world at least give the idea some serious consideration.
@markupton1417
6 ай бұрын
Subbed for the Nietzsche moustache....
@MamaMia84oo7
7 ай бұрын
That mustache has its own zip code.
7 ай бұрын
😅
@chyfields
7 ай бұрын
Simulation theory is the theory of everything. (A simulation created by a matrix of variables across the entire spectrum).
@chyfields
7 ай бұрын
NB A simulation designed by a Creator that manifests like a dream.
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
6 ай бұрын
[14 months ago the observable universe went from "locally real" to "not locally real" and why that matters to Religion vs Science debates]: *"It is impossible for a contradictory thing to be true.* A non-contradictory thing could be true or false, depending on context, but at least has the *possibility* of being true." - relevant quote for context ❌️Contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (Knowing Good; functions; limit built into every operation)❌️: 1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are the exact same character. 2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton/Einstein calculus). 3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton/Einstein physics). ✅️Non-contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (Knowing Good from Evil; relations defined by constraints; limit is a separate operation)✅️: 1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are polar opposite characters. 2. Zero is fundamental and nonzero numbers are not fundamental (Leibniz calculus). 3. 0D is locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are not locally real (Leibniz physics). [🐶Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Religion]: Interpreting the Bible with the Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character as the exact same character generates near 70,000 contradictions (see reason project) and requires heavy apologetics. A Bible interpretation which includes near 70,000 contradictions (impossible to be true) is what a snake-oil salesman would sell you. 🐍 [🐴Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Science]: The standard model of physics is Einstein's 3+1 space-time, which are considered locally real, where 0 is considered not locally real...been that way since Newton for zero vs nonzero numbers. Problem is...quantum physics proved the observable universe (1D, 2D, 3D and 4D) is actually not locally real...and that was over a year ago! (Yes, Leibniz was correct after all.) 🦧 [Layman's terminology of locally real vs not locally real]: locally real = more real (Leibniz said "necessary") not locally real = less real (Leibniz said "contingent") [Closing arguments]: The Materialism/Empiricism package brings with it all the contradictions, false dichotomies, paradoxes and literally "life's biggest questions". It's been a year why is everyone still using Logic, Calculus and Geometry that is contradictory at the most fundamental level? If both Religion and Science removed their "Materialist/Empiricist-perspective shades 👓" (which hasn't been true for a year) and put on their "Realist-perspective shades 👓" (which has been true for a year) they would not only cease to argue...they'd agree with each other (world first 🪙).
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
6 ай бұрын
[infinity and zero, God, soul]: in·fin·i·ty MATHEMATICS a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞). (In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects). What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary? a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity. b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it. Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)? Well, 0D is outside of space and time: 0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless 1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions 4D (natural) = temporal dimension Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language. Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1. Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them. In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension). "Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)". A) The postulated soul, 👻, has 1. no spatial extension 2. zero size 3. exact location only B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension. Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
6 ай бұрын
[Important point 👉 (dont forget)]: 0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions. 0D monad (Creator event horizon) 1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions 1D line 2D width 3D height 4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions 4D length 5D breadth 6D depth 7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions 7D continuous 8D emission 9D absorption 10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon) It is impossible for anything 1D-9D to approach 0D or 10D due to their event horizons. 10D contains a placeholder 0 (not locally real) for its event horizon. Only 0D is locally real on this side. The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God. The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God. Anything we know about black holes (Destroyer) we know the opposite of that is true for monads (Creator). It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; Singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; Alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real or "more real") The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity (Elohim; possessive; God's) in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity (Elohim; plural; gods) in Genesis 2-3 who constantly messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷♂️). Elohim was "syncretized" to simply mean El during the Babylonian captivity. To avoid this simply use the Latin, "unsyncretized", counterpart Deity for possessive (God's) and plural (gods) context. Nephilim are sons of the false Elohim associated with Yahweh (the BAAL, or LORD, of the gods).
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
6 ай бұрын
[Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]: Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.* It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people. [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force. 2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions. [Monad in mathematics, science and technology]: Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
6 ай бұрын
"Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man." - the revelation of Peter THE WORLD RULER TRIES TO KILL ME And then a voice of the world ruler came to the angels: “I am god and there is no other god but me.” But I laughed joyfully when I examined his conceit. But he went on to say, “Who is the human?” And the entire host of his angels who had seen Adam and his dwelling were laughing at his smallness. And thus did their thought come to be removed outside the majesty of the heavens, away from the human of truth, whose name they saw, since he is in a small dwelling place. They are foolish and senseless in their empty thought, namely, their laughter, and it was contagion for them. The whole greatness of the fatherhood of the spirit was at rest in its places. And I was with him, since I have a thought of a single emanation from the eternal ones and the unknowable ones, undefiled and immeasurable. I placed the small thought in the world, having disturbed them and frightened the whole multitude of the angels and their ruler. And I was visiting them all with fire and flame because of my thought. And everything pertaining to them was brought about because of me. And there came about a disturbance and a fight around the seraphim and cherubim, since their glory will fade, and there was confusion around Adonaios on both sides and around their dwelling, up to the world ruler and the one who said, “Let us seize him.” Others again said, “The plan will certainly not materialize.” For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And as for the plan that they devised about me to release their error and their senselessness, I did not succumb to them as they had planned. And I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me, yet I did not die in reality but in appearance, in order that I not be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me, and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered merely according to their sight and thought so that no word might ever be found to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, happened to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. Their thoughts did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the rulers and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.
@user-qk3sc8rq9r
7 ай бұрын
Thank God the second coming has come to straighten things out for the peons here on earth. Thank you jesus.
@Skidderoperator
7 ай бұрын
WHY YOU FLIPPING US OFF???
7 ай бұрын
Lol there are two fingers there
@ragevsraid7703
7 ай бұрын
You guys actually think Curt has a theory of anything, i hate listen to him now. He also wears a tinfoil hat, no way to know if the theories are vaild or word salad horse s hit.
Пікірлер: 84