Dear Hank, reading the comments, I strongly recommend a crash course geology.
@pragmaticcynicism6911
4 жыл бұрын
Recycled crust also makes good croutons.
@cherierose356
4 жыл бұрын
Pragmatic Cynicism earth is made of bread, maybe that’s why existence is pain
@user-ri8ps6cl4w
4 жыл бұрын
Cherie Rose damn bro...
@debralovell7031
4 жыл бұрын
@@cherierose356 i love this, this is superior
@thedarkdragon1437
4 жыл бұрын
@@cherierose356 esistence is pain because we live in a world that has materialistic values.
@Kafen8d
4 жыл бұрын
@@thedarkdragon1437 deep
@phytoplankton2281
Жыл бұрын
the fact that you have a lot of people who deny science... really blows my mind
@Vulcano7965
4 жыл бұрын
Great to see some lesser known geophysical methods be represented here! Although I would have appreciated a bit more representative pictures of mantle xenoliths (spinel/garnet-peridotite) instead of the highly altered something shown at 02:48.
@angemcauslan2551
4 жыл бұрын
Vulcano True. Although I was a bit disappointed by his description of magnetotellurics.
@ScottBFree
4 жыл бұрын
This video should be called "we have no idea what is inside the earth"
@JB_Shryke
4 жыл бұрын
To quote the Movie "The Core" Space is easy it's empty"
@mikefelber5129
4 жыл бұрын
Jonathan Borley We can never truly have empty space
@sophierobinson2738
4 жыл бұрын
I shook my head a lot during that movie.
@AaronShenghao
4 жыл бұрын
@@sophierobinson2738 it isn't that bad though...but... Yeah...
@TheExoplanetsChannel
4 жыл бұрын
Oh
@Forgan_Mreeman
4 жыл бұрын
strange movie that was
@masterofpureawesome
4 жыл бұрын
9:40 i can't believe people are really using x-ray exploits to find generated structures in 2020....
@braydenrudin7104
4 жыл бұрын
better hope that the devs patch it in the next update
@theRealRindberg
4 жыл бұрын
I'll guess the cheaters uses it to find diamonds too... they should be banned!
@lanamarieparrilla1173
4 жыл бұрын
@@braydenrudin7104 They must use future client and to toggle. I want to see WW3 be fought by people crouching and head glitching and act entirely like they're in CS:GO.
@braydenrudin7104
4 жыл бұрын
@@lanamarieparrilla1173 Imagine someone b-hopping through the battlefield
@Areegatoe
4 жыл бұрын
Too bad it isn't possible to turn off generated structures so people stop cheating...
@XmarkedSpot
4 жыл бұрын
I dig this.
@vidroiualin2060
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all the info. Always happy to learn the different methods scientists use to get around problems, and even though I knew a few of these methods, I learned about a few others :) great content, keep it up!
@tyronfoston7123
4 жыл бұрын
I still the love the intro music
@camillecirrus3977
4 жыл бұрын
Hank: Space is see-through, rock is not. Me: Hold my NVidia control panel.
@vincentlarochelle6521
4 жыл бұрын
An anomaly in Alabama...who would've thought...
@Ulthar_Cat
4 жыл бұрын
Love the video! 💜 But uhh Lutetium decays into Hafnium? Isn’t it the other way around? 10:28
@leogama3422
4 жыл бұрын
When atoms decay by emitting a beta particle (an electron), their atomic number actually *increase* by one. In other words, a neutron is converted to a proton.
@Ulthar_Cat
4 жыл бұрын
Leonardo dos Reis Gama Ohhh! Yeah, makes sense. Thanks! 💜
@ivanborsuk1110
4 жыл бұрын
there is no other way beacause hf178 is stable, there are other erro tho
@apoorvjoshi9265
2 жыл бұрын
Best video on the topic
@jinbiezel683
4 жыл бұрын
Oh wow, I had no idea that we came that close to reaching the mantle (#1), that's really interesting and impressive!
@rogergriffin9893
3 ай бұрын
The drilling idea is going to be tried again soon. Using a specific kind of lasing it is possible to burn through rock very much faster than drilling, without clogging drillbits or melting the bits.
@MyMissFaariaZainab
4 жыл бұрын
It is very informative video, thank you
@deathdude035
4 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see a picture of an actual molten world still in its primordial years. I wonder how long it will be before we get one.
@gwenbliss129
Жыл бұрын
Pure imagination.
@pointyorb
Жыл бұрын
I'll put my estimate at 5-10 years
@stillprophet7529
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine how fun scientific papers were if they used terms such as "crust stuff" and "mantle stuff"
@AikiraBeats
4 жыл бұрын
Yassss that should be a thing
@rizkikurniawan3027
3 жыл бұрын
Scientist : *crack open earth crust Scientist : Why do I hear boss music? *Massive health bar appears in the sky
@fandydiadline
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Hank Cooper.
@toms.6283
4 жыл бұрын
I think we all know the dislikes are from flat earthers
@galaticemperor9881
4 жыл бұрын
Tom S. Hate to think there are that many but you are most likely correct
@bidishadey3815
4 жыл бұрын
And some hollow earthers, some ice-core earthers. 🤦♀️ and they are serious!
@thisisme2681
3 жыл бұрын
I came to the comments just to see if there were any hollow earth or flat earth comments to laugh at 😂
@knunyabeasewhacks8744
4 жыл бұрын
As a man who likes to live on land, it would be interesting to know why we don't live under water when it comes to "rocks" floating on magma.
@siyacer
4 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on the Frey effect? It's an effect where apparently people can hear microwave radiation in certain circumstances, even if they're deaf. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be many videos on this topic, and they seem to be riddled with crazy conspiracy theorists.
@berryberrykixx
3 жыл бұрын
I should add that I taste this metallic taste even without contrast. I've had enough to already know what to expect with contrast and the only thing I experience with that is feeling like I've peed myself. lolol
@esaedromicroflora1247
4 жыл бұрын
excellent content
@ResidualSelfImage
3 жыл бұрын
keeping the Earth's mantle molten hot is what gives the Earth its magnetic field and the Van Allen Radiation Belt - the necessary thing that makes photosynthesis and life on Earth possible ...
@brandonkelley6500
4 жыл бұрын
Maybe you can do a 7 ways we know about biology (transport membranes, neurotransmitter function) or chemistry (not the stuff they teach the history of in chem class, but how we know about electron orbitals, or hydroxide shifts, etc)
@TeaRex12
4 жыл бұрын
What kind of ridiculous people dislike the videos?! Amazing content as usual Eons team! This geologist ways digs these vids. Hehe
@indridcold8433
2 жыл бұрын
The people that dislike these videos are because they get defensive when they hear the word, "crust," a lot and they think of their underwear.
@tanzibulhasantonmoy9706
2 жыл бұрын
Good
@anonymous3738
6 ай бұрын
When I was a child, I thought the center was like the one at the beginning of Ice Age 4. I even thought the current landmasses were created in the same way.
@colubrinedeucecreative
Жыл бұрын
Where can we discuss this or ask about it? I would doubt my comment would be answered. I was wondering if we should drill toward the center of the gravitational weakspots, instead of trying to dig at the deepest sections of the earth? I saw a huge place off the coast of florida. I also wonder why we haven't created some kind of probe that can dig and maybe change the physical matter of the dirt to reduce its size or something and be nuclear powered so it could dig until it got somewhere. Do we have anything that could survive swimming through lava? If we could we could send it through a volcano couldn't we?
@zawsrdtygbhjimokpl6998
4 жыл бұрын
while a bit unrelated, do you think humanity will invent gravity sensors for common use as you can't trick gravity as long as you have mass?
@militantpacifist4087
4 жыл бұрын
ThE eArTh Is HoLlOw
@steelshower7949
4 жыл бұрын
Militant Pacifist no it’s filled with donuts and tacos
@kevinmartin7760
4 жыл бұрын
Regarding the timing of the formation of Earth's crust, how do we know the planet was ever completely molten? If it started as solid rocks coalescing, then heating from the center due to gravitational contraction and radioactivity, how do we know that the surface ever melted completely (or nearly so)? Isn't it possible that there were always some large patches of solid material though not necessarily the same material as time advanced?
@freemind..
4 жыл бұрын
Kevin - Supposedly, the material infall caused enough heat to melt all of the solids. This is how they claim the heat originated, and would be the process enabling heavier elements like iron, nickel and the radioactive elements to sink to the center.. even though most of the iron and all of the radioactive minerals we find are at or near the surface. The whole story is science fiction with ZERO proof and with many arguments against its validity. Consider this.. Radioactive decay can't even boil water without being enhanced thru manmade processes. No way can it ever melt rock! Even if it could, are we not told that lava is magma that got pressed up from the mantle? Are we not told that radioactive decay has kept that magma molten for billions of years? How is it then, that *LAVA IS NOT RADIOACTIVE??* What happens to minerals when they are melted? They lose their crystalline structure and become glass. If the world were ever a ball of melted rock, it would now be a ball of glass. Minerals will only form in water. Melts make GLASS.. not minerals.
@freemind..
4 жыл бұрын
@@nahadoth2087 - You say my views are so wrong because they conflict with what you learned in school. You're missing the point. I disagree with the consensus view, because it ignores conflicting observations. It is entirely based on inference and supposition. Until someone produces OBSERVABLE proof of the super-hot interior of the Earth, I'm not buying it any more than I would other science fiction stories. Can you explain how melted rock that is kept hot for billions of years by supposed radioactive decay isn't radioactive? Has anyone EVER shown through the Scientific Method that radioactive decay can even generate enough heat to melt rocks and metals at all? No. Has anyone EVER in the history of the world OBSERVED anything remotely close to that kind of heat being produced that way?? NO! Can you explain how mines getting hotter with depth is proof that the interior of the Earth is super-hot, but deep cave systems and oceans get COLDER with depth? Somehow heat magically radiates through continental crust faster than it radiates through oceanic crust which is only 1/5 as thick? That makes sense to you? How are there deep earthquakes 600-700km into the Earth where materials should all be ductile or molten instead of brittle enough to fracture. They happen all the time, yet no one wonders if maybe it's not as hot as we think down there?? Has anyone ever shown that granite and the vast majority of minerals can be produced from a magmatic melt? No. Yet it's a foundational pillar of the natural sciences!? They can all be perfectly reproduced in water, but nobody dares risk upsetting the establishment by talking about a water-covered Earth. Have you ever melted rocks and seen them become glassy? You think time reverses this? It doesn't. Minerals heated beyond the Curie Point of 570 degrees Celsius lose their magnetism and piezoelectric properties. 95% of the Earth's crust is quartz-based, and maintains those properties despite supposedly having been melted. Can you explain how we have non-vesicular basalt deposits on the surface of every continent in the world, yet it only forms that way under at least 9800 feet of water? Have we ever seen a planet forming from an accretion disk? No. Any giant globes of magma anywhere in the Universe? No. Has anyone ever demonstrated that hyper-velocity objects smashing together will melt into one larger blob instead of shattering and scattering? No. Has anyone identified an allotrope of iron that would allow for it's existence at supposed core pressures? No. Has anyone ever shown the core dynamo mechanism to actually work at core pressures and temperatures? No. The list goes on and on!! My suggestion to YOU is to stop blindly accepting what the "reputable sources" are saying, and start employing critical thought and deductive logic.
@kevinmartin7760
4 жыл бұрын
The only reason all the iron and radioactive elements we have "found" (as in, managed to touch/handle/manipulate) are from the crust is that the crust is the only place we've mined for such materials. if we had the technology, we could extract a practically unlimited supply of nickel and iron from the earth's core, thousands of times more than what's in the crust, but we have no way of extracting it. The stuff in the crust is there because it is in the form of oxides and other compounds which are lighter than the pure metallic form, so they float to the surface when things are fluid. How do you know radioactive decay can't boil water without manmade enhancements? How do you think geysers work? Those "enhancements" involve getting enough radioactive material in one place and limiting the rate at which the heat can escape. The generated heat can't escape, so the temperature rises. Same thing in the core of the planet; the core is huge, and even though there isn't much radioactivity per (say) cubic metre, there are a lot of cubic metres so overall there is a very high decay rate. Furthermore, although the ground is not a great thermal insulator, there's about 6000km of it between the center of the earth and the surface. As you know, insulation holds heat better as it gets thicker, and 6000km of molten (or not) rock makes a good insulator, so the heat generated by the radioactivity can't escape, and instead accumulates to raise the temperatures and eventually melt the rock. And yes, lava is (slightly) radioactive; everything is, including you and me. Most of what we encounter is not, however, radioactive enough to cause health concerns, and this would be true if you had a sample of the core material as well. What happens to minerals when they are melted? They lose their crystalline structure and become liquid (not glass). You get glass when certain liquids are cooled rapidly from their liquid state. When you cool them slowly, you get the formation of crystals. Perhaps here you're confounding "crystals" and "minerals": although there is a lot of overlap, not all minerals are crystals (e.g. obsidian), and not all crystals are minerals (e.g. the ice crystals that form snowflakes)
@kevinmartin7760
4 жыл бұрын
If you're going to support your case with "observations" you should use correct and accurate observations, unlike in your previous comment where you stated (wrongly) that lava is not radioactive. There is a vast gulf of difference between zero and almost zero (the latter includes "too small to measure"). Yes, matter has been observed over and over generating heat through radioactivity in systems small enough to measure experimentally. The properties of heat and temperature in matter have been observed and verified through the scientific method over and over as well in systems small enough to measure. Such measurements and experiments have resulted in formulas which have never deviated substantially from any observations. Part of the features of these formulas is that they allow you to scale your predictions to much larger systems such as the core of a planet. Oceans get colder with depth because convection carries away any heat. Cold surface water from the poles sinks down to the depths. What "deep cave systems" do you specifically refer to? How deep are they compared to deep mines? How cold are they? How *do* *you* explain the heat in deep mines if they are not being heated from deeper layers? The thickness of the crust varies; in certain areas there are pieces of solid crust 600-700km deep which have not heated enough to become ductile. They get there through plate tectonics (which has been verified by actual measurements of shifting continental positions). The minerals that make up a rock like granite (generally, mica, quartz, and feldspar) likely can be made up individually by crystallizing them from a solution in water. but just because you can form the various crystals does not mean you can form the compact mixed bonded crystals that form a piece of granite. You previously argued that "Radioactive decay can't even boil water without being enhanced thru manmade processes" yet here you are positing a process that requires artificial and contrived conditions to work. The Curie point is the temperature where a ferromagnetic material stops being ferromagnetic (i.e. it stops reacting to a magnetic field in a manner than enhances the magnetic flux). There is no single Curie Point for all materials; it depends on what material you're discussing. In any case, transition through the Curie point is reversible: as soon as the material cools off, it reverts to being ferromagnetic. Altogether this seems like a non sequitur here. We are actually measuring continental drift, which, over long periods of time, can explain how any rock formed anywhere can end up anywhere else, including the deep-formed basalts you mention.. No, we have not seen a planet form from an accretion disk. But that doe not mean it doesn't happen. It is indeed a theory, but it is one that is consistent with measurable facts. We have not seen any giant globes of magma anywhere, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. My original posting was indeed asking about evidence of the complete melting of the planet, rather than being molten at the interior with some molten surface areas but always having mostly solid crust. There is a big difference between critical thought and ignoring actual evidence. Proper critical thought really should involve offering alternative theories that explain all the observations that are explained by the theories you are critiquing, and you have not done so. In philosophical terms, a theory can be neither right nor wrong, all it can do is explain everything we see. If it does, we consider it a correct theory. If it contradicts something we see, we consider it an incorrect theory (or we limit its scope, e.g. Newton's laws of motion are correct for speed much below the speed of light).
@noureldinissa3228
4 жыл бұрын
I really like Hank, but I haven't seen micheal in a while. Why isn't he hosting anymore?
@Dirsmuutio
4 жыл бұрын
He was hosting a video very recently, maybe two videos ago.
@FahvergnugenRS5
4 жыл бұрын
That’s a lot of sources haha. If I had to do that for every one of my videos I’d die!
@hausy
2 жыл бұрын
Keep an eye on those Japanese drilling near Hawaii, just in case.
@alexanderwilisow3633
3 жыл бұрын
Recycled crust also makes good croutons.
@osotanuki3359
4 жыл бұрын
In hanks own words, "anything is see-through if you just shine a bright enough light at it" Why don't we just shine a light at earth?
@cudaman-yq7pq
4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like the movie "Crack in the World" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crack_in_the_World
@foodforthesoul1326
4 жыл бұрын
This isn't science, it's faith.
@HumanBeanbag
11 ай бұрын
10:47 "can I intrest you in a pair of zircon encrusted tweezers?" - Frank Zappa
@macingtoncharles6949
4 жыл бұрын
Lol cracking the Earths crust with a nuke 😂
@thesussyfoodcridictofameri2687
4 жыл бұрын
i support this
@augustwest5356
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah we all wanna know exactly what's down there but nuking anything is ALWAYS a bad idea. Why not just pour oil all over a big ass pile of coal and try and burn through the crust if were gonna destroy the planet any further. If you're gonna go stupid you might as well go big.
@95TurboSol
4 жыл бұрын
The earth isn't made of distinct layers, we've known for a long time via seismic waves that the earth has massive blobs in it's interior that transitions through multiple layers, even to the surface, it's all lumpy down there, the graphic at 1:08 isn't even close to what reality is.
@robertoarmstrong7317
4 жыл бұрын
NOT TRUE: I dug myself to China once to get out of eating vegetables and I shook the hand of a baby Panda and then came back home.
@dominikkatona7386
4 ай бұрын
1:09 Sorry, what is the difference between molten and liquid? As far as I know, the Earth's mantle is solid.
@JD96893
4 жыл бұрын
There is only so much we can get from seismic waves! At some point we have to start drilling!
@search895
4 жыл бұрын
Lots of material into the mental
@wdwerker
4 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the Brunswick Magnetic Anomaly was a consideration when they built the Kings Bay Submarine Base ? Demagnetizing the steel hull makes the sub harder to detect.
@jamesthompson2712
4 жыл бұрын
in short, no. the anomaly is intersects a significant portion of the GA coastline. Primary considerations were proximity to rail and electricity as kings bay was originally a munitions facility but was converted to submarine base in late 70s or early 80s. Degausing requires much higher power. However, the entire coastline of GA and SC do provide a nice magnetically diverse environment for subs to operate.
@41CV
2 жыл бұрын
Great video Hank. An observation, however. Is there ANY specific reason why as soon as you finish one sentence you have edited the clips so that the next sentence starts without any sort of pause? Makes the content rather hard to listen to after a while with the constant 'bang, bang, bang' sort of effect imho.
@Iz0pen
10 ай бұрын
Don’t let the Japanese drill through the mantle near Hawaii! Didn’t you see Godzilla!?!?
@mccabber24
4 жыл бұрын
Japan wants to "try near Hawaii" eh? *HMM*
@EverythingScience
4 жыл бұрын
I'm gonna assume it's not 7 sizes of shovels
@mccorrect3470
7 ай бұрын
Diamonds are actually made in labs too
@TetraSky
4 жыл бұрын
The only thing I got from this video, is that the mantle is full of diamonds. Time to go where no man has gone before and dig a hole in my backyard to the mantle.
@jesusramirezromo2037
4 жыл бұрын
Dianonds aren't rare The crust is also full of them The thing that makes diamonds expensive is artificial price inflation
@wildone9561
4 жыл бұрын
This man is gonna do alot of digging, that'll inflate the price, a 1000fold.
@freemind..
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. except that diamonds are created in diatremes in the crust.. not in the mantle. The diatreme isn't just a tube to shuttle them out from the mantle. It is literally where they grow in heat, pressure and water. Diamonds can be grown in days or even hours... but they won't form at all without water.
@johnchandler1687
4 жыл бұрын
I thought that Pellucidar 's sun was at the very center. That's what Edgar Rice Burroughs said.
@AshenDruid
4 жыл бұрын
We basically live on the shell of an egg, except it's full of magma and the yolk is probably solid metal
@moonliteX
10 ай бұрын
i have never understood why diemonds are cut. to me it is like a valuable car that someone cuts up "because to them it looks better"
@moonliteX
10 ай бұрын
i men ... OF COURSE it is more valuable before the cutting WTF
@xadahgla
Жыл бұрын
Piano!
@nanram588
4 жыл бұрын
By this time the plates tectonics should go around couple of times already!
@mattsgrungy
4 жыл бұрын
"Space is see-through, rock is not" [citation needed]
@llewtheelder
4 жыл бұрын
Can anyone point me a to a source that could help me understand the following... how basically chunks of dust and rock floating in space coming together turn into a large ball of molten rock that then cools to form the crust. Im wondering how it came to be a big molten ball. In my head asteriods and other space debris came together to form a round body and grew due to gravity attracting more and more material, but in my head i see a solid ball forming, where it would be internal pressures causing things to turn molten. Obviously im missing some part(s) of the narrative. Thanks in advance for any pointers.
@freemind..
4 жыл бұрын
It didn't happen that way. That is science fiction. Have we ever seen an astronomical body forming from accretion? Nope. *Minerals form in water.* Minerals are crystals. When melted, they lose their crystalline qualities and become amorphous. They become glass! If the world formed from a ball of magma in space, we would be living on a ball of glass. *Melts make glass.. not minerals.*
@francishubertovasquez2139
9 ай бұрын
Another exciting thing and possibility, what if dinosaurs were preserved in one of the compartment areas of the hollow Earth preserved and sent there to thrive like Noahs arc of the deep. Another question, why do Abaddon wants to conquer Satans kingdom strategically located in the Earths core with his other members on the surface of Earth planting his seeds and propagating. It is because of the enormous amount of energy in the Earths core and its very strong gravitational pull according to his mindset if conquered would enable him to project his influence and power not only on the Earth surface but also in the universe by the aid of our moon projection.
@rkpetry
4 жыл бұрын
*_...you left out everybody's-favorite the Russian Kola Hole-12 km deep, 800°K, water slogging-in from way-down-deep, microscopic plankton halfway-down...but no Kola Nuts…_*
@nothingMansoulofGod
Жыл бұрын
amen🙏
@davetoms1
4 жыл бұрын
Wait, how does Lutetium (71 protons) decay into the heavier Halfnium (72 protons) as mentioned at 10:20 ? Mind blown!
@personzorz
4 жыл бұрын
A neutron decays into a proton, emitting a beta particle
@ivanborsuk1110
4 жыл бұрын
@@personzorz yeah, and mass rises by four from 174 to 178 from god's will
@personzorz
4 жыл бұрын
@@ivanborsuk1110 Those numbers are the average mass of an atom. It decays into 174 Hf, which has a half life of 2 quadrillion years and is one of the rarer naturally occurring isotopes. Most of it is 178, 179, and 180.
@Utubesux
4 жыл бұрын
U forgot the the Deep core drillings that the Russians did in the late 70's- early 80's, that was the furthest Land based drilling,and is now a Tourist attraction....Check it out young man. 💎👍
@ramshacklealex7772
4 жыл бұрын
They gave those their own video several years ago: kzitem.info/news/bejne/27Bs3GqFn6GCqag
@Al-cynic
Жыл бұрын
but the mantle drills up to us.
@Flex4LX
2 жыл бұрын
Long story short: We dont know 💩. We simply infer it through data patterns.
@christianheichel
4 жыл бұрын
first 30 seconds. It sounds like something from Because Science with Kyle Hill. The only supervillain I know
@pkthtguy587
4 жыл бұрын
Aww yuz
@Iococo
2 жыл бұрын
how much u wanna bet this guy loves weezer
@MoskusMoskiferus1611
4 жыл бұрын
The Deeper The Deppresion the more you can see The Deepness of Earth
@ramshacklealex7772
4 жыл бұрын
I've seen a few people in the comments mention that the Kola Superdeep Borehole wasn't brought up. They already gave it its own video: kzitem.info/news/bejne/27Bs3GqFn6GCqag . I think it may literally be their most watched video ever.
@purplealice
4 жыл бұрын
Does anybody remember the Mohole?
@gregorysagegreene
6 ай бұрын
The latest in 'distraction rock' is my comment popping up at the bottom here while you're trying to watch this video.
@kingnevermore25
2 ай бұрын
Hell is inside
@donnierussellii4659
4 жыл бұрын
Well Dante went there and wrote about it, so.
@Sylkis89
4 жыл бұрын
Idk why but this video gave me a thought: Volcanoes are pimples of the earth
@DemonFox369
4 жыл бұрын
Just waiting until they invent X-ray for inanimate objects.
@sirwaldo999
4 жыл бұрын
If we could just find a truly dormant volcano near one of the poles this wouldnt be such an issue
@bidishadey3815
4 жыл бұрын
sirwaldo999 what would that solve?
@Blitterbug
9 ай бұрын
Those crazy Japanese are gonna unleash Cthulu
@SnowFire05
4 жыл бұрын
3:02 Minecraft made me realize this
@sanvigupta6141
4 жыл бұрын
He looks like John Green. Just an observation...
@mongomoonbladder8023
4 жыл бұрын
Hank's his brother 😁
@silascochran9705
4 жыл бұрын
I can't even listen anymore because this is insane absolutely insane why would anybody do that
@loaiyar6113
4 жыл бұрын
you can't because there is Bedrock surface down there
@amhedinger
4 жыл бұрын
The Japanese are big on Hawaii
@filonin2
4 жыл бұрын
That's not the right definition for xenolith but I guess it's close enough. The rock inclusion doesn't have to be from the mantle and could be any rock not from the magma, most often country rock.
@fattybastard2000
6 ай бұрын
Earth Grows.
@Bubba_fett
2 жыл бұрын
I once heard that the peridotite in the mantle was under too much pressure to be molten, but rather like the consistency of a snow cone is to liquid. Its when the pressure subsides that it is allowed to 'flow' usually creating pools from which volcano's will form. It makes more sense than a liquid mantle if you think about it. A liquid rock mantle would be very unstable and the continents would float about a lot quicker. Passing the orbit of Jupiter would cause the core to rock around as well if it were a fluid. Not easy to find info that goes in depth though, just the usual 'pop' stuff.
@damien4197
4 жыл бұрын
"Drill through a weak spot in the crust"... ...do you want Kaiju? Because that's how you get Kaiju.
@iLLeag7e
4 жыл бұрын
Definitely gonna spawn a Kaiju. If you only get a Kaiju, consider it a blessing.
@damien4197
4 жыл бұрын
@Anna안나 Godzilla is a Kaiju... it's literally "strange creature" but generally refers to a class of monster in the vein of Godzilla. My reference was more Pacific Rim, though.
@chelsey8737
4 жыл бұрын
@@damien4197 YES ah I hoped it was a Pacific Rim reference. I freaking love that movie
@russianbot8423
4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@Jamie-iq1vl
4 жыл бұрын
Ayy archer
@timsullivan4566
4 жыл бұрын
HANK: "Space is see-through; rock is not." NEUTRINO: "Speak for yourself."
@augustwest5356
4 жыл бұрын
Would have been funnier if you didn't force it into that tired ass meme format but still funny!
@oscararias6448
4 жыл бұрын
August West this is KZitem, the home of tired ass meme formats.
@timsullivan4566
4 жыл бұрын
@@augustwest5356 So just rewrote it to be pithier though unapologetically again forced into t.a. meme format. Without a no-brained template I tend to drift into 500 plus word pieces requiring of the reader both extraordinary patience and an appreciation for a somewhat understated style of humor. To my discredit I have recently decided to concentrate on the easier type, given that scores or even hundreds of likes for 1 or 2 minutes of typing (what with me having sausages for fingers) is less likely to disappoint than 1 or 2 likes for 10, 20 or more minutes of typing and revising.
@mishael1339
4 жыл бұрын
Was looking for this, thanks
@flopsnail4750
4 жыл бұрын
Rock is not see through. Light cannot travel through rock. Neutrinos are not photons therefore neutrinos being able to pass through rock has nothing to do with being see through because neutrinos are not particles of light.
@greenredblue
4 жыл бұрын
If you’re watching on a phone, you can hold your finger up behind the bottom of the screen and it’s like there’s a happy little Hank finger puppet talking to you. I only slept 2 hours last night...
@Equa11ysurl
4 жыл бұрын
I tried it. You’re not wrong. Slept just less than 5 hours last night.
@robertchristian7020
4 жыл бұрын
same difference those two hours of sleep made you yoda!
@OtakuUnitedStudio
4 жыл бұрын
That is dumb, but more important hilarious.
@SouthBayLA1310
4 жыл бұрын
I don't get it...
@OtakuUnitedStudio
4 жыл бұрын
@@existenceisillusion6528 turn your phone to have it go full screen, then put the end of your finger behind your phone.
@ThrottleKitty
4 жыл бұрын
The earth's core is hollow and full of dodo birds, that's why when we killed the ones on the surface it caused a global warming
@AikiraBeats
4 жыл бұрын
But I guess we left some stranded
@iLLeag7e
4 жыл бұрын
Huh. Yep seems legit.
@shaymayca1
4 жыл бұрын
What people don't realize is that they moved down there to avoid the rule of the Reptilians. However, the reptilians left earth awhile ago. Reptilians are a powerful race, but not even they can go up against the forces of conspiratorialists, flat-earthiers and anti-vaxxers combined. The alien conspiratorialists and flat-earthers are onto them, and the anti-vaxxers ruined their military budget by refusing to buy into 'big Pharma'.
@iszslayermaxx9912
4 жыл бұрын
Lets use our heads people. The earth can't be hollow if it is flat.
@ThrottleKitty
4 жыл бұрын
@@iszslayermaxx9912 Tell that to your mom, she's hollow and flat at the same time
@planescaped
4 жыл бұрын
I'm not fat... I just live in a high gravity anomaly zone...
@gl1500ctv
4 жыл бұрын
"Space is see-through, rock is not." - Hank Green, 2020
@TheAetherOne
4 жыл бұрын
Quartz: Am I a joke to you?
@zedantXiang
4 жыл бұрын
But is it Vsauce music
@thounilo
4 жыл бұрын
Lulz
@Chevycamaro-rg6sd
4 жыл бұрын
AxxL god damnit AxxL get out of here
@freedomcanada8397
3 жыл бұрын
Someone write that down, put it in a book.😂
@marteenie7189
4 жыл бұрын
geology made me used to the words “crust” and “cleavage”. it also taught me that identifying rocks is rlly difficult
@jessicaevans7847
4 жыл бұрын
Hehe cleavage
@anwardaud
4 жыл бұрын
Regular people : rock is rock!
@arianna2243
4 жыл бұрын
I was shocked that there wasn't an app for rock identification!!
@vegetorat
4 жыл бұрын
Apparently I'm a natural then, because I have no problem at all identifying rocks. I still think I should've pursued a degree in Geology, the professor even told me so after the class, but I had my head up my ass.
@gustavrischmuller2569
4 жыл бұрын
Classic rock, blues rock, punk rock, arena rock, indy rock, etc? Yeah, the lines are blurred sometimes.
@bloo4315
4 жыл бұрын
Japan? Hawaii? I smell something...
@redregrow905
4 жыл бұрын
Thats what i was thinking too
@Xurikyo
4 жыл бұрын
Pearl Har- hmm yeah, very perplexing.
@duanewente457
4 жыл бұрын
lol scrolled down looking for this comment right after he said that
@nerdywolverine8640
4 жыл бұрын
Tectonic plates?
@JessyRenae
4 жыл бұрын
@@duanewente457 me too!
@Aeturnalis
4 жыл бұрын
As for drilling, the USSR drilled the 12km deep Kola superdeep borehole near the border with Norway in the 1970s, but stopped when the drill heads kept failing because of the high temperature of the rock at that depth; they reported that is behaved more like plastic, and as a machinist, I can attest to the difficulty of cutting plastic (it's softer than metal, but the swarf likes to get jammed up in the flutes of the cutter). Still quite impressive, especially for the time.
@j.bailey5619
Жыл бұрын
I just came from the scishow video about this!! lol
@ObamanableSnowman
11 ай бұрын
That's a lot of potential for heating in cold climates tbh
@MegaBrokenstar
9 ай бұрын
The fact that it behaved like plastic is fascinating, because the rock in the mantle is in fact bizarrely plasticky in its behavior.
@NotASeriousMoose
8 ай бұрын
@@ObamanableSnowmanWe use it, but its not that much more efficient than just using a regular heat exchanger using air. And the initial investment is quite large.
@ramshacklealex7772
4 жыл бұрын
"Space is see-through" Cosmic Background Radiation would like a word.
@jayhill2193
4 жыл бұрын
Our instruments pick up these interferences but our eyes can't, so it is technically "see-though" ;)
@ramshacklealex7772
4 жыл бұрын
@@jayhill2193 Ah, technically correct, the best kind of correct ;)
Пікірлер: 1 М.