1. MA Bronze 2. KEF 350 3. Klipsh RP 600 Thanks for the test.
@beyoundsound
2 жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio, bright and balance !!! the winner !!
@jacksinsel8798
2 жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio will always have the best look finish and Soundstage at it's price point. I love the grill to protect the tweeter. Overall great design for some bookshelves.
@zeppzepp1234
3 жыл бұрын
EVO for warm sound and Bronze for lively sound, bigger not always means better, but always having the proper scale.
@padmeshsethuraman5617
2 жыл бұрын
It's a cake walk for Monitor Audio bronze 100.
@arnonym823
2 жыл бұрын
Heard so much about the Bronze. It would e so exciting to Heard MA Silver 100
@williammiebach1798
3 жыл бұрын
Easy for me. The KEF Q350 has the most natural overal presentation of this bunch. Not the flashiest, but the most honest.
@eschultzz
2 жыл бұрын
As a metal and rock fan, I found this so interesting. I pay a lot of attention to how distorted guitar sounds through speakers. RP600s Were really good, a little bright. RP500s Were worse than I was expecting. Tinny and bright without enough mids. Q150s were acceptable, but a little congested. Q350s were surprisingly good and open sounding. A great option if you might be sensitive to certain upper frequences. Metal music can get fatiguing with all those cymbal hits. This would be a great choice for that without sacrificing some of the qualities of the other "rock" focused speakers LS50s were really bad IMO. Nasally and super congested. Wharfedales were the worst IMO. They just took the life out of the music and felt muted. Probably great for acoustic or jazz though. Monitor Audios are awesome. They sound big and full. Bass punch with the energy and high frequency clarity of RP600M.
@jacksinsel8798
2 жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio for the sound Stage look and finish. No comparison.I think the best well rounded out of the bunch. I would personally go to the Monitor Audio Silver 100s. Very refined especially for vocals and instrumentals and horns.
@mircea5013
2 жыл бұрын
Do you really think that what you're hearing on youtube, through god knows what gear you have, and recorded by god knows what microphone - is accurate? People, these tutorials are fun, but they have absolutely no correlation to what you hear in the real world. That microphone might record things differently, it might accentuate some frequencies, your headphones/speakers will also add colour to the music. There is no way you can judge speakers like that.
@pdemetriou92
3 жыл бұрын
... I love my MA Bronze 100 & 200’s! 👍👍👍 ...
@Longbody1000
Жыл бұрын
Wharfedale are the best as they produce a more natural sound and are warmer. I can only listen to hi treble for a while before switching off
@olivieroli9750
2 жыл бұрын
For me 1 Monitor Audio Bronze far outclasses these competitors 2 KEF 350 3 EVO 4.2
@AbsoluteFidelity
3 жыл бұрын
Evo 4.2, followed by the Q350 then surprisingly the RP500M. Im an english speaker kind of guy so the last one is surprising, and the LS50 just lost the plot here. The RP600M is just rubbish, the Q150 sounds small, the Bronze 100 sounded a little too bright with its 'copy and paste' treble. I have the LS50 and Im sure it doesnt sound like that though. Might be selling it off and getting the Wireless 2 if I can pawn my left nut. Or the Metas, since I already have amps. And I wont need to pawn my balls for it. Try doing a comparison of the Wharfedale Diamond 12.2, I just bought it a couple of months ago and Im in love with how it sounds. Its touted by many reviewers as the best speaker under 500 bucks and I totally agree. In fact I like it more than my LS50, maybe because my amps are not powerful enough to drive them to its full capability.
@snakeobias
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the RP500Ms sounded really good, not as high pitched and high-end focused as I've heard elsewhere, or even compared to the 5600. I liked the Q350 a little more than the 4.2 in this demo, but that might be because it was on the floor. It sounded a little flat.
@briancoffelt8778
Жыл бұрын
Q350 and Bronze were my fav's
@marcusbrombach379
2 жыл бұрын
Super comparison! Thank you! In my view it's: 1st MAB 100, 2nd Klipsch 500, 3rd KEF 150. Maybe I have a bad taste but I don't think so...😅
@DeshalPussella
2 жыл бұрын
1). Q350 2). EVO 4.2 (Rolled off highs, may be due to marantz warm sound signature) 3). Bronze 100
@Mykhaylo1958
2 жыл бұрын
1) EVO 4.2 2) Klipsch 500 3) MA Bronze
@handokosetiawan2803
27 күн бұрын
KEF Q350 the best !
@viktor2782
Жыл бұрын
And I took myself Wharfedale EVO 4.2 ... I have not come yet. Now I worry, I did a wonderful choice or not ...? The room is small. With the Yamaha R N 402 receiver ... Thank you zp rollers. Huge work.
@bbg619
Жыл бұрын
so how's the evo 4.2? do you like it?
@viktor2782
Жыл бұрын
@@bbg619 I bought over the internet. Haven't arrived yet...
@Flightsimmovies
Жыл бұрын
How is it now do you like it?
@viktor2782
Жыл бұрын
@@Flightsimmovies Alas. Haven't listened yet. Only in a week will be able to listen. I will write
@thomasb4128
3 жыл бұрын
Warm sound: KEF Q350 best. Lively sound: MA Bronze best.
@WXSTANG
2 жыл бұрын
I liked the Bronze overall... btw... throw those focals in the mix! ;)
@thomasward00
3 жыл бұрын
Monitor audio Bronze 100 sounded best
@alialamri8525
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you man I really appreciate it, because everyone has different teast 👍.. For me audio monitor, ls50 and Evo 4.2 are the best👌❤️
@ВасилийИванов-х2в
Жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio is played more smoothly to my taste of all.
@Константин-ь5э8к
11 ай бұрын
Q350 , kliph, и monitor audio, вот что мне понравилось
@vevoda22
Жыл бұрын
1.Ma bronze 2.Kef q 350 3.Klipsch 600m
@Andrew_Nekrasov
Жыл бұрын
KEF Q350 👌
@manasil20092009
Жыл бұрын
Which one will be a better choice for a 20*13*9 room with denon 4700h Klipsch 620f(fronts)+Klipsch R52C centre+Klipsch R51M surrounds Or KEF Q350 fronts+KEF Q650 centre+Q150 surrounds
@user-a33kixd2wq44
6 ай бұрын
MA is bright and clear, has a modern design. KEF Q350 is similar. KEF LS50 is so surprisingly thin at vocal. Klipsh has a good look (MA and KEF in white are still better for me), but the sound is not my cup of tee. Wharfedales looks so old-school and cheap.
@oskarfranko6519
3 жыл бұрын
N.1 is Bronze 100 big and rich sound and than Q350 but this one is more balanced.
@eprojectEllie
3 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing!
@stevencollins2978
2 ай бұрын
What are songs please from what band
@DougMen1
3 жыл бұрын
Sorprisingly, in this comparison, I like the MA Bronze, the Q350, and the RP500M the most. The RP600M is the worst, followed by the Q150. The midrange on the EVO and LS50 sounds too nasal to me, and the LS50 Meta is much, much better than the older LS50 used here
@JPWinters
3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much this.
@snakeobias
2 жыл бұрын
me too! Although I think I like the Q350s a little more. I thought the Evo sounded a little flat, bit could be because it was on the floor. But even the high end seemed a little more rolled off than normal. I don't want to spend so much at the moment on a new pair of speakers, so I'm edging toward the Q350s.
@КириллДонкан-й1з
Жыл бұрын
Please tell who's is the song "Remember me"?
@JPWinters
3 жыл бұрын
Lol the Klipsch RP-600 sounds so crappy. The Monitor Audio's take the crown here.
@TheSkysolid
Жыл бұрын
Why is the sound quality bad? Is it about media or mic? It sounds like 96kbps mp3...
@johnbeaker8721
Жыл бұрын
You're listening to heavily compressed youtube audio, of course it's not high quality....
@user-a33kixd2wq44
6 ай бұрын
The same for my headphone. just sounds noisy and flat. But I still can hear some difference between those speakers 😂
@paladinonicolas
3 жыл бұрын
Para ustedes cuál fue el mejor? Me interesa mucho porque estoy buscando uno de estos modelos
All are either dull, sharp or have so much mid that I can't handle them. What the hell do I do now? I'm sticking with my Tannoy Gold 8's. Just killer flat representation and articulate AND warm when you need them to be. I will say the KEF in this video are all missing pronounced cymbals and some of the pings in the music are just flat out missing. The monitor audio have it all but way to much mid and top in your face.The Klipsch are the worst in this video which is odd because the Q150 have always sounded muted with to much cabinet resonance. And again the Q150, 350 and LS50 here have mid-range overtaking the bass and highs. So i guess I would pick the Monitor audio as second to Tannoy powered Gold 8's. On top of that I have lost track of which mic you are using to record these videos. So that changes the room and the room changes the transfer of sound. So these videos are just fun as apposed to actually hearing the speakers in room. Thanks for the videos I enjoy them all just the same.
@hofmarskal
11 ай бұрын
Whats the point? You will hear your headphones or your own speakers. You have to be in the room to hear the speakers. In stead of this, im sorry to say pointless music playback. Give your personal opinion😊
@foblivio
3 жыл бұрын
Love these comparisons! Is there any chance you can add time markers like Will Frank did in the comments to this video?: kzitem.info/news/bejne/q4GhmXqQrpN5q4o
@eprojectEllie
3 жыл бұрын
thanks, I put the timecodes. I will not forget it next time~
@endrizo
2 жыл бұрын
monitor bronze 100
@teokon5165
Жыл бұрын
The change is too quick
@audioman6007
3 жыл бұрын
I don't like any
@audioman6007
3 жыл бұрын
This video is proof this guys mic is junk.
@MARVELOUDIO
2 жыл бұрын
The differences in spectral sound balance are quite large and each speaker has its own signature! The playback room own sound signature colors the result too! And of course the recording itself has a big influence on the perceived overall sound balance! More controlled conditions are required!
Пікірлер: 61