What evidence do these people have that proves these bone are not of Poly origin. Do they not see some islanders out there 8ft 9ft tall? Aue! What's your thoughts on all this?
@ngatibroffessor1840
3 жыл бұрын
All nonsense...the lack of evidence to support their claims simply arent there and many claims are based on speculation, conjecture (or they could have scenerio's) or unvalidated hear-say.
@ngatibroffessor1840
3 жыл бұрын
Posted by tangatawhenua16 tangatawhenua16.wixsite.com/the-first-ones-blog/single-post/2044/08/20/Sidestep-Accusations - We have finally been openly labelled as grave robbers by someone on the internet. This is both good and bad. Bad - because it reveals the ignorance of those making such claims as they obviously fire off without reading or understanding context based on their assumed superior racial or cultural standing; and lets be honest, we all do that at times don't we? Good - because it raises questions and debate. This draws people into what is really going on. When we finally release what's inside the cave, the internet is going to go crazy (as it does with all sorts of things). The coverage is going to be worldwide and especially when we reveal who we are openly. Then the media circus will begin and all the journalist clowns will be sucked into statements like 'grave robber'. You know what? We want that to happen. There will be more supporters than detractors but we actually want individuals and organisations to make suggestive statements, false claims, and malicious accusations against us. That will open our cause even more and many will be astounded at what we found, how we found it, how we dealt with what we found. It will embarass some who made accusations but we won't go into that in any detail ar this point as we don't want to give anything away. But today we want to examine one phrase - 'grave robber'. The individual who made that statement comes from Wellington and is a very outspoken part-Maori on the internet; all under a psudenum, as well as a mask - (not sure why he's hiding behind either). We've found out quite a lot about him. He has opinions on all manner of things and that's good. Even if someone doesn't agree with anothers opinions, I'd rather hear from those that have opinions that the masses that sleep and have none. But his agressiveness online and his foul language toward individuals who disgagree with his opinion betrays him. That's why he hides behind the name mb1968nz. Now I have opinions on the net too; but in my real name. This guy hides, he's just a coward. Yes, it is true that in regards to this dig, we hide behind tangatawhenua16 because it is simply too dangerous to use our real names once we find the evidence until it's recognised offcially (we have already been threatened with physical harm, but we know who by and it's all painstakingly recorded). And with guys like this who hide behind false names in normal life, with normal debate, they become dangerous because they think they are anonymous. He might be to you, he was to us too until now. We watch everyone. If we used our name prior to the release, it would give much away and the project might be stopped. After we name ourselves and present the evidence, we will also make available all the names and posts of aggressive opponents. It's a safety thing. Some others know this already and have cooled off. Back to our kaiwhakapae. We do understand the intent of the phrase he used and we suppose that is fair enough - if he were right. He refers to what we believe is a human bone we found in the fill. Now this fill only blocks the tube leading to the cave. The cave itself is an unfilled cavern. The human bone is very old, may have been previously burned in a fire, and is very long. It does not belong to those inside the cave, for it came in with the fill from the outside; elsewhere in the countryside. To be a grave robber, first there has to be a grave. We aren't in a grave. We are in a filled phreatic tube therefore this bone was not found in a grave. It was found in pieces where it was chucked in with the fill after a digger dislogged it from other remains under the earth as it dug down a bank to fill a truck. It wasn't taken to a burial area as 'it isn't one of us' - that is because the individual would be between 7'6" and 7'11". The bone is treated now with more respect than it was before it was lifted from where it came from by a mechanical digger. Secondly, to be a robber you first have to take something that isn't yours by force or threat of force. We simply found it while not looking for it, the same way we found the moa bones. There was never any expectation that anything would be in the fill that came from outside as our goal is what lay further in, unbroken and undisturbed. Our kaiwhakapae might be intelligent on a manner of things, but he's opinionated on just about everything on the net while hiding behind his pseudonym, but he needs a dictionary to get past his bias and predjudice. This bone, which has been reassembled, equates to an indiviual who was here prior to the first Polynesian arrivals and was about 7'11 tall (if a male). And while that bone is of no consequence to us (as it doesn't prove the existence of 8' skeletons further in but does hint of them), it is still treated with whakaute until we can find where it came from and return it . So what's the project or purpose of tangatawhenua16? (in case you don't already know) tangatawhenua16.wixsite.com/the-first-ones-blog/single-post/2044/08/20/Sidestep-Accusations
Пікірлер: 3