Stephen Meyer Iam from pakistan and iam Offended with Darwinism and matirialism , Your Work is amazing You are a great personality , Love you and your Work for Biology and science
@thecloudtherapist
3 жыл бұрын
God bless you, sir! 🙏
@charlespackwood2055
3 жыл бұрын
Love Stephen Meyer's mental integrity & his ability to think for himself.
@terrywright7754
3 жыл бұрын
Thank GOD for Dr. Stephen Meyer. He and his colleagues are a bright light in a very dark and hopeless materialistic world.
@tompostma1840
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. Thank you and all at ID Institute for your effort in the rediscovery of the Truth. From Africa (where we still believe in a loving, merciful God, and the personal responsibility that comes with it)
@KenJackson_US
3 жыл бұрын
You can't listen to this just once. You have to pause and think and listen again.
@dudeman1455
3 жыл бұрын
I’m with you!
@MrMemejojo
3 жыл бұрын
You can add to that the source of information can only be one God not two or three Gods as they can cotradict and we can see many disorders in physics laws and so on..
@steadfastneasy26
3 жыл бұрын
@Discovery Science I am so so grateful that there are brothers like these. Their training and intellect reside at the same level or higher than anyone they may debate. It must be some kinda feeling knowing you are walking onto a stage with the Truth.
@malvokaquila6768
3 жыл бұрын
I lost my faith in college and your work has blessed me greatly.
@tycer9754
3 жыл бұрын
I freaking love Stephen Meyer. But shouldn’t it be painfully obvious to every single human not to mention scientist that matter can’t come from non matter, information can’t come from non information, life from non life, or thought from non thought. It’s never happened ever. This alone should be enough to sway every human that has pondered such things, but yet Meyer still faces criticism and ridicule for using deep scientific, logical and philosophical methods to FURTHER prove the obvious. I don’t know what these people want, they have never seen matter spontaneously appear, information pop out of nothingness, any animal turn into another body plan type of animal, or life sprout from a non life ooze and they still won’t accept the clear and obvious fact that there MUST be a creator and there MUST be some kind of non-material-non-universe that this creator exists in. Yes. It’s fantastic and amazing that such a “realm” would exist, and that such a being could create such an expanse like the universe, but this crazy thing is actually far more logical than whatever science and materialism can put forth. Jordan Peterson ponders how Eschers hands could draw themselves, and the clear obvious truth is that they can’t. All effects in our universe have a cause, every law and theory we have requires it, therefore something completely “other” is needed to explain our existence.
@rubiks6
3 жыл бұрын
"... matter can’t come from non-matter, information can’t come from non-information, life from non-life, or thought from non-thought..." I have added your words to my toolbox. -------------------------------- "I don’t know what these people want ..." They want to remove God from the picture at any cost, even at the cost of sacrificing reason. The Bible calls them "haters of God." The passage of the Bible most often repeated within the Bible - "You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive." For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed; lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them." - Paul, in Acts 28 quoting from Isaiah 6.
@thecloudtherapist
3 жыл бұрын
It does and it should but people love their sin, so they leave their reasoning in the car park. It's that simple.
@calonstanni
2 жыл бұрын
tldr
@george5807
3 жыл бұрын
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. (Romans 1:20)
@Gabriel.Ponce.De.Leon.777
3 жыл бұрын
It’s so obvious, and they took all this time to start considering God; the only one who gives life and hope to their lives.
@Arminius420
3 жыл бұрын
More like there is no excuse for believing or justifying a claim with zero evidence backing it up.
@mrsmilesaway
3 жыл бұрын
Materialism is dead. The materialists know that themselves. It won't be long now till science makes that leap where materialism can't follow and then the breakthroughs will come. And progress will come.
@tubespirit7
3 жыл бұрын
Dr. Meyer, doing God’s Work. Thank you for your wisdom, your clarity and for shining the light of modern science on a cloud of ignorance!
@dont4143
3 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work researching God's awsome Creation and explaining it on a average person's level.
@spiritualparadise4887
3 жыл бұрын
Or in simple terms: "“You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” (Rev 4:11).
@mathewlanier8352
3 жыл бұрын
🙏🏽 amen
@PInk77W1
3 жыл бұрын
You have formed all things by Weight measure and number. Wis. 11:23
@tarek_shallody
3 жыл бұрын
" and in themselves and in the horizons surely there is signs for those who contemplate" Quran.
@rhondawilson7370
3 жыл бұрын
Mohammed and his band of marauders took quite a bit from God’s Words. If they would have followed the God that created the Universe...
@eltonron1558
3 жыл бұрын
Materialism, cant explain mind, consciousness, or even charisma.
@user-vf5mx8fh8j
3 жыл бұрын
Also, morality and numbers.
@benediktk.8228
3 жыл бұрын
But this is the god of the gaps fallacy. If science can't explain something yet it doesn't mean that magic/god is the right answer. People have always attributed phenomena they didn't understand to a god, gods, ghosts or whatever, but how often , after scientific investigation, has god emerged as the right answer? Never. God is constantly shrinking as science discovers more and more.
@jamescalifas1745
3 жыл бұрын
@@benediktk.8228 you and many others were simply not designed or meant to know who created you or why … accept it and move on
@yishif1244
3 жыл бұрын
@@benediktk.8228 isn't it a science of the gaps fallacy?when people say oneday science will know?when their are fields that can't even be answered by science at all?
@thomaswaheed5541
3 жыл бұрын
@@benediktk.8228 If materialism and pansychism are false then either dualism or idealism are true and both are very god friendly.
@michaelm9038
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr. Meyer (or is it Doctor?) for the hard work you tirelessly carry out. I think for many people it’s hard to come to terms with the idea of a being that transcends time and space. Everything we know from our existence is that everything must come from something else. That it’s not possible for anything to be created from nothing. But at the same time it’s not possible for this process to continue indefinitely. There has to be a dead end at some point (I’m sure there’s a better term for it). So reasonably speaking it’s necessary for a being that is not confined to space and time to kick things into motion. Even the very concept of time had to be invented and started at some point. Again I express my gratitude to you.
@robertpfeifer3445
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! Finally an intellectual lecture on life's origins without the political ideological agenda driven materialistic evolution theory.
@rob2475
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent reasoning as always from Stephen Meyer. May I also say though, that we can go even further with the identity of the designer. This designer also inspired the writing of the Bible. The earliest manuscripts available even give us the personal name of this designer. Yes, his title is God, but his name is Jehovah, as many modern day Bibles still tell us. For example at Psalm 83:18. This ‘designer’ is a person. Something he wishes his intelligent created beings to be aware of. He also wishes us to get to know him and the one he sent, his son Jesus (John 17:3)
@skippylippy547
3 жыл бұрын
This is an excellent video! 👍 Thank you.
@leroybrown9143
3 жыл бұрын
Get ready for the Darwin of the Gaps arguments and appeals to fictional pagan deities like deep time, (intelligent) natural selection and evolution by "creative" mutation.
@les2997
3 жыл бұрын
The "God of the gaps" argument as used by Darwinists is an example of suppressing the truth. The fact is the science made some gaps much larger not smaller.
@GreatGatling
3 жыл бұрын
Mutation is a damage
@CellCODE
3 жыл бұрын
well said😀
@moses777exodus
3 жыл бұрын
A statistical impossibility is defined as *_“a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument."_* The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of a functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more *Rational and Reasonable* to conclude that the cell was not formed by undirected random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that undirected random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.) Furthermore, of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/ 10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more *Rational and Reasonable* to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer while trying to determine the origin of the universe. A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely *Irrational and Unreasonable* hypotheses are what many of the world’s top scientists _‘must’_ believe in and promote because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, Information, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic subjective ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millenia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by discoveries in Quantum Physics.
@zorot3876
3 жыл бұрын
An atheist will believe in anything except God.
@emilyrl.
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Stephen Meyer.
@DenisOhAichir
3 жыл бұрын
Simple, rational and convincing. This man knows what he is talking about.
@dantheman909
3 жыл бұрын
Great video. Keep them coming
@jenniferloving9054
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Dr. Meyer!
@PixelsofLight
3 жыл бұрын
Great video! My family loves your content. I use it to lead discussions with my kids. In this video, reference is made to this being part of a series. Do you have a link to the full playlist? Thank you!
@midnighthymn
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent as always! Love this channel.
@kyleebrahim8061
3 жыл бұрын
From a moral standpoint, I don't think we want a society that knows God exists rather than one that believes. At the same time, I don't think we'll get definitive answers to the extent of knowing God, it might just be that our physical being is what stops the conscience from knowing that someone is behind the beginning and the end. Yet all that is left for us to explore is probably the best part of the unknown, and I'll take this interpretation of science(ID) until disproven.
@sethhampton2452
3 жыл бұрын
I very much enjoy listening to and watching Stephen Meyer!!
@delicheres
3 жыл бұрын
“ In the beginning God created the heaven and the Earth “ all is said , first sentence of the BIBLE !
@speedoflight9005
3 жыл бұрын
Amen. People like Dawkins and Neil deGrasse are just blind angry people against "the idea" of God. Is not very difficult to realize who is their master. Stephen Meyer is a man enlightened by The Holy Spirit.
@paisleymakonen6521
3 жыл бұрын
After watching many intelegent design vidios i debated with the very successful family scientist from Boston about evolution. He was stumped and had to admit that his faith of darwinianism had flaws.
@rejectevolution152
3 жыл бұрын
Remember its important to not only show them that materialism is an impossibility for life and how flawed evolution is, you also must end the debate with scripture. Scripture is powerful and those who God is working in will be receptive to it.
@sassy3923
3 жыл бұрын
Let's never be ashamed to acknowledge that the Intelligent Designer is the biblical Creator.
@steveocvirek6671
2 жыл бұрын
That was really a fantastic point about any creator of life on Earth would have to exist before the foundation of the cosmos since the cosmic fine-tuning had to come first. Excellent excellent!
@johnhageman2377
3 жыл бұрын
Great message!
@herbcounselorh7734
3 жыл бұрын
Well done! There is a God and He is alive. May God bless.
@juaniravaioli
3 жыл бұрын
SO GREAT
@gedofgont1006
3 жыл бұрын
Dr Meyer hits it out of the park every time!👏👏👏
@sparkyy0007
3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant mind.
@stephenkaake7016
3 жыл бұрын
ID lays the ground work for the belief we live in a simulated reality
@Oatmeal_Mann
2 жыл бұрын
I agree, but is a computer or a disembodied mind simulating this reality? Would be hard to say. The former sounds like science fiction, and the latter sounds like Advaita Vedanta or Vishishtadvaita within the Eastern philosophical tradition.
@floydwhite1338
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I am going to have to listen to this at least 5 times before I can properly load it in the arsenal for evangelism lol. Great job family keep up the good work.
@urso3000
3 жыл бұрын
the truth: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
@rubenanthonymartinez7034
3 жыл бұрын
Jehovah: Alpha and the Omega of the universe
@erinbyrd5377
Жыл бұрын
I think you're an INFP. Excellent job.
@6theday
3 жыл бұрын
Faith grows with "loving God with all our mind." We live in a generation that we have so much empirical evidences of the biblical God that the other previous generations only got to guess or even dream about. The main question is how we can achieve our next generation to learn our God in the public education settings and normalize this knowledge of God through science to the public. We can contribute this process by supporting the scientists and institutions who are working towards the same direction. I pray more people come together to push this movement forward.
@jimborowy8160
3 жыл бұрын
You go Steve, modern apologist for God! Plus you have to account for the upholdong of this creative life as we call it. Does anyone know how to start breathing or a heart?
@thecloudtherapist
3 жыл бұрын
Great video - thank you, Dr Meyer. Could you please postfix these talks with a simple line that says "and positing God does NOT mean the end of our enquiries. Quite the contrary, if we do so, we can then proceed with even greater confidence and reassurance to explore all forms of science with more intensity, dedication and conviction that God has made all things intelligible and with order, so we may understand them and have dominion over them, for the betterment of all humanity." Something along those lines in order to avoid the usual accusations of God of the gaps etc.
@think-islam-channel
3 жыл бұрын
If there is a multiverse, then it too is fine tuned, since it bears within it fine tuning.
@johncollins8304
3 жыл бұрын
If there is a multiverses there must be fairies at the bottom of the garden...somewhere.
@MonteVanNortwick
3 жыл бұрын
the fact that human minds cannot conceive of concepts that do not have a beginning and do not have an end demonstrates that our minds are limited and thus we cannot rule out a pre-existing powerful intelligence that we cannot conceive. Especially since the evidence we do have supports such an idea.
@FlgOff044038
3 жыл бұрын
In Australia Lysenko Rules within our "Academia".
@syedhasan6321
3 жыл бұрын
Qur'an surah 67:1-2 (1) تَبَٰرَكَ ٱلَّذِى بِيَدِهِ ٱلْمُلْكُ وَهُوَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ قَدِيرٌ (2) ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلْمَوْتَ وَٱلْحَيَوٰةَ لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ أَيُّكُمْ أَحْسَنُ عَمَلًاۚ وَهُوَ ٱلْعَزِيزُ ٱلْغَفُورُ (1) Blessed is He in whose hand is dominion, and He is over all things competent -(2) [He] who created death and life to test you [as to] which of you is best in deed - and He is the Exalted in Might, the Forgiving.-
@ErikBiskopst
3 жыл бұрын
Great content. But there is something wrong with the audio. Sounds like a gate that is left on unintentionally.
@thomaswaheed5541
3 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video on Psychopaths ? because they are tossed around very often as imperfect design.
@takaverse8347
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder what a mathematician perspective on fine tuning and probability would be
@siemhaa
3 жыл бұрын
Many mathematicians in the 60ths of past century already have looked into calculating the probability of information evolving randomly and the probability of the universe finetuned to these amazing specifications. Needless to say they confirmed that this can not come into existence randomly. Not in a gazillion years. Anyone calling this pseudo science is an ignorant idiot.
@sparkyy0007
3 жыл бұрын
I'm not a mathematician but if the total mass of the universe was off by just one dime, the universe wouldn't be here...it's that tight.
@samb5009
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that is what I was thinking.
@Birdsplant
3 жыл бұрын
May you continue to walk in the noble footsteps of our Father Prophet Abraham and all the Prophets as they were fearless, and single minded in speaking the truth, about the existence of Creator of the Universe.
@zyxzevn
3 жыл бұрын
I prefer the idea of layered theism, or rather layered consciousness. While connected there is some freedom in each layer. Until we reach the level of our personal self. In biology we see a similar structure. Individual cells work together and form an organ. And the organs work together to form a body. Maybe biology can reveal how it all works. There are different levels of cooperation and unity, while each part als has some individuality.
@BerishaFatian
3 жыл бұрын
Two questions that trouble me about the fine tuning argument. *Why life exists only if the universe is fine tuned?* *And why do we see the possibility of the universe not being fine tuned?*
@alifqadrmuhammad4542
3 жыл бұрын
ALL Living entities has the ability to adapt which means there is the ability to learn. This used to be known a very very very long time ago.
@MrArtist7777
3 жыл бұрын
If we simply listen to what the creators of this world said about the universe and origin of life from people who have seen and spoken to them, it becomes very clear how it all works. This world was designed and created just like other worlds, over billions of years and more worlds are being created, as we speak, with humans being introduced to them as well. This pattern has gone on forever. The designer of this world lives on another planet, and humans populate much of the universe, along with millions of other species, many that don't exist on our planet. Technology is like a circle, we learn and develop things to come back to natural means. The creator knows how to communicate, travel and accomplish things that seem natural, learned over billions and billions of years, through the highest forms of technology.
@aadilqayoom6872
3 жыл бұрын
This video deserves more likes, view s, but as always people wish to believe in impossible that is denying Allah SWT
@CellCODE
3 жыл бұрын
Who fine-tuned the Universe & created biological information? For me the answer is evident and clear: *Yahweh (also pronounced as: Jehovah)* -the God of the Bible, the God and Father of Abraham, Moses & Jesus.
@toreschanke4086
3 жыл бұрын
What do you think of Rupert Sheldrake's, "Morfic Resonace", or the idea that the universe and matter/energy, is not only physical. Maybe it is so that consciousness is a primary thing. We are self conscious, and all we're experiencing is our own consciousness. Maybe all sensing beings, are a way that consciousness can observe itself.. I don't think we can make a sort of hard solution to the problem of how life and conscious experience, started. I think the universe has no point of starting and ending. The laws of thermodynamics, are just applicable to a closed system, that's close to equilibrium. At least, what I had of thermodynamics, in relation to chemistry, was mostly about what way a reaction had to go, to reach equilibrium. Those thing we call "life" seems to reach t. d. equilibrium, when they are no longer 'living'. Like I read, someone said, "A forest at equilibrium, is a bog." I think it's not a big chance of escaping some sort of animism! All I've read of epistemology, seems to say, that pure science, without any basic dogmatic idea, is not possible! Positivism, always run into self-contradiction, somewhere along the line! Gödels Theorem of Incompleteness, comes to mind.. I love the scientific approach to things. But, I don't think a pure materialism is tenable.
@MrMemejojo
3 жыл бұрын
You can add to that the source of information can only be one God not two or three Gods as they can cotradict and then we can see many disorders in physics laws and so on..
@food4lifecycle4life
3 жыл бұрын
You are on the right track mr Meyer . Your explanation is very close yet not as eloborate and detailed as the Vedic version of creation / mantainence and desolution of the universes and all the living sentient beings from predetermined time to time . All done by the dint desire and a thought process of God who is trance dental as well as a person .
@iangray5407
3 жыл бұрын
My understanding of the multiverse argument against the Anthropic principle is that there are an infinite number of universes with different cosmological parameters, and in almost all of these universes life, and in particular intelligent life, won't exist. The argument goes that it is only in a universe with the right values for the parameters would intelligent life arise that would raise the issue of fine tuning in the first place and naturally this issue could not be raised in any of the universes with different parameters. If this was true than arguments from probability about the likelihood of life don't hold water because in the infinite subset of universes which have the right cosmic parameters, it would be mathematically certain that life would arise in one of them (at least) by pure chance. Now this argument assumes that the multiverse contains an infinite number of universes which have come into being over an infinite amount of time. So while it is superficially plausible, the onus is on the person arguing against fine-tuning to provide evidence of an infinite number of universes, when we only have evidence of a single universe and by the very nature of the multiverse, we would never be likely to be able to establish the existence of even a second universe, let along an infinite number of universes. So they would prefer to believe in a theory that can never be proven than even concede the possibility of an intelligent designer. And that is what is wrong with materialist science. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent annually on the search for extraterrestrial life, even though there is not a shred of evidence that such life exists. If science were to concede the validity of an intelligent designer as a working hypothesis, it makes you wonder how much more evidence we would find if such funding was spent on the search for the intelligent designer or at least evidence of the existence of such a being. ( While it is tempting to equate the intelligent designer with God, there is nothing in the evidence to suggest only a single intelligent designer of that the same designer was responsible for both fine tuning and for the widely varying types of living things on earth. There could conceivably be multiple designers, although the simplest hypothesis would be of a single designer.)
@TheologyUnleashed
3 жыл бұрын
The sounds not great. Need a better mic.
@yanbu000
3 жыл бұрын
I am the son of a nuclear physicist. I grew up in a household that 100% believed in Darwinism and
@georgesmyrnis1742
3 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain where the choice of the terms “Deistic” and “Theistic” has come from? Linguistically they mean the same thing, one is Latin (Deus) the other Greek (Theos). Is that choice purely historical in nature?
@anshsharma163
3 жыл бұрын
Sir in Bhagwad Geeta Lord KRISHNA states that "atha vā bahunaitena kiṁ jñātena tavārjuna viṣhṭabhyāham idaṁ kṛitsnam ekānśhena sthito jagat'' BG 10.42: What need is there for all this detailed knowledge, O Arjun? Simply know that by one fraction of my being, I pervade and support this entire creation.
@thstroyur
3 жыл бұрын
TBF, deism can be considered a form of theism, and a deistic deity can be such that all the objections to a 'one-and-done' God become void
@user-vf5mx8fh8j
3 жыл бұрын
As he said himself in a previous work: "Evolution may explain the survival of the fittest, but not the arrival of the fittest".
@benediktk.8228
3 жыл бұрын
Yes it does. Variation within a population builds the fundament for natural and sexual selection to act upon and is created by mutation and recombination.
@onethdasanayake3689
3 жыл бұрын
Where's obnoxious Bill Nye? Call him here to listen to real science
@missk1697
3 жыл бұрын
Just because we dont know where did X came from, doesnt mean any god created it, we simply may not have knowledge about that kind of stuff, and possibly never will. And it CERTAINLY doesnt prove any particular religion (dumb religion of materialism included).
@jsharp9735
3 жыл бұрын
What he is saying is that you can't create X from X so the materialist argument doesn't even hold up to their own argument. I think cosmology has lost the plot with the hypothetical abstract math.
@khufu8699
3 жыл бұрын
God created spirits/consciousness. We/spirits created the 3d world. Makes sense that we have a part in our own "game".
@Mockturtlesoup1
3 жыл бұрын
So who/what "intelligently designed" the "intelligent designer"?
@godexists2177
3 жыл бұрын
We can all see the world heading towards doom. It's amazing to see anyone still hanging unto the lies of Darwin
@mohamedali2858
3 жыл бұрын
21 O mankind, worship your Lord Who created you and those before you, that you may become mindful (of Him):22 the One Who has made the land a habitat for you and the sky a structure, and has sent water down from the sky and has brought out products thereby as provision for you. So do not assign rivals to Allah while you know.23 And if youpl are in doubt about what We have bestowed upon Our servant from on high, then bring a single surah of its like, and call your witnesses apart from Allah if you are truthful. 24 But if you do not-and you will not-then be mindful of the Fire whose fuel is people and stones; it has been prepared for the deniers.[ Surah : Al-Baqarah ]
@abashedsanctimony154
3 жыл бұрын
I agree, Fine tuning means adjustable sequence within a hierarchy of law-driven informatics in the invisible. (I mean to say, what exactly is being fine tuned, or what I mean where is it being fine tuned at specifically and who is doing it. Molecules aren't intelligent to Crete their environment.. only to adapt and mutate within their existence.) Again.. evolution proven inconsistent and must await an actual answer from them. The invisible informatic laws are based upon design laws which vary almost not at all unless per that design systemology. Who can claim where and when adjustments occur? Not ona microscopic level. Even the smallest of intelligent designed organisms did not perform their own creation. When fine-tuned materials can change to admit only that singular fine-tuned universe - that usually infers intelligent functionality based on observation. I do believe this is where the "universal entity" or hivemind religion is coming out of. Which is clearly a Higher intelligence but obviously atheists so not claim God. It becomes confusing the obvious shifting sand their arguments follow. which is not entirely different from something engineered by a higher power, to say no intelligent life evolved into intelligent life. The idea is they prey circumlocution upon the masses through education system resources. But they still deny God while coming to a basic similar idea. Meaning they believe matter and elemental materials cocreate their existence and that is the mainstream narrative as it stands. It could be based in Hinduism and pagan eastern mysticism in such belief format. but atheist scientism leads many to believe that everything is material based in origin. It isn't. It's semantic drivel. The foundations of Creation laws, (even if one claims Existence without a Creator, the fabric of time (cosmological argument) is proven that laws, such as gravity, are based not on matter, but matter reacting to each other within a given spatial compartment based on invisible laws. Invisible laws such as space and the like. Electromagnetivity cannot exist by interaction with materials alone. Two materia objects interacting doesn't explain what is causing the to interact. And the original big bang explosion no longer contain the energy to fulfill the lack of objective evidence for that conclusion. Though I believe Dr Meyer has mentioned that before the energy has been long consumed before now in their model. They rely of theoretical imagery to push the expanding universe, the inflation and the mixture of all sorts of nonsensical inner collapse and rapid expanse machinations. Something exists within the spatial construct of their materialism which allow action of the dynamic atmosphere as a multifaceted enigma in which matter and thus invisible construct of existence operate. Long statements such as these can be clarified in that. Humans cannot understand that DNA from an organism would "randomly generate" an organism from the combinations and reactions to each other toward anything resembling life unless they could first prove that massive amounts of non refined and chaotic matter functioned first to create the existence of laws from nothing. They are narrow-minded on the focus of what happened rather than how it happened. (Even if evolution even resembled something true, A space dot of the center of the big bang means that outside of said "dot" , the explosion and expansion of a universe requires that it exists - In a contained or infinite region of nothingness. The region of nothingness still exists. Even now. Because by default they believe in infinity. Which is nothing ore than a mathematics symbol. Again.. scientism or I should call it a-scientism. The space the dot existed in, still remains outside of expanding existence. Explain that. I can explain it. It is the habitation of God. But if we must keep it logical in a confined scientific method argument, they haven't explained anything yet. But we can thank then for allowing Christians to prove them wrong. That is what is garnered from listening to experts in scientific fields dealing with abiogenesis. Where did the fabric of existence originate? What is any "physical law" created upon in a nonspatial or non-time based dimension that has no parameters or matter to build upon. Where did it come from, and where did basic intelligence escape to that leads people to believe in evolution? Where does their infinitely exponential dot of something and the obverse nothingness create all that we have now. After watching any atheist channel for any period of time. They have concrete belief they have won the debate about that topic, when they cannot explain what a time space continuum consists of. It doesn't exist of Time and space, because that would mean the reverse is true. It first existed without space and time outside of there 5 dollar theory board of imagination. They are not explainable unless the law of time and space can be explained as they are. Because they are not based upon matter. And it cannot be explained when given proper definitions before they give their answer. To give a box on a screen with a graph and claim they are evolutionists and scientists is almost laughable. Maybe just perhaps, their university failed them when seeking the material universe but not intelligent design universe. The brain doesn't create information unless the information already exists. Intelligence cannot be created nor destroyed. In case any have forgotten the laws of thermodynamics . Information isn't information unless is can relate to something observable. John Lennox and others state. Mathematics and information are based upon the same idea, but naturally a law that describes them, not what they actually are. What does mathematics relate to except observed and processed Explainable phenomena. Giving an explanation doesn't prove where it originated from nor the creation of the explained thing. Where did the ability for any phenomena begin, a big bang doesn't prove how or from what the phenomena occurred.. Those scientists are not clued in enough to be able to give that , they struggle with conflicting problems daily. And then conclude life created itself, amusing. And it also inquires that a language exists to communicate such phenomenal observations. If almost all matter is created, information created it by use of a language. Where did that language spontaneously derive from. "The five levels of information. To fully characterise the concept of information, five aspects must be considered-statistics, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and apobetics. Information is represented (that is, formulated, transmitted, stored) as a language." Even experts have to acknowledge in their definition that language is expressed. Where did the laws for expression of information originate? Where did language come from. Where did the ability to process and create language to communicate the information used for your experienced information come from? Evolution cannot prove any of this. Except to give definitions and more theories. They have a circular religion of beliefs in their own information repertoire. Atheism + scientism :: Evolutionism
@comaxvii
3 жыл бұрын
Call it Swiss cheese it has so many holes in it. 😂
@izziebon
3 жыл бұрын
This view is similar to Antony Flew, the prolificly published atheist who later became a theist and titled his last book “There Is No(crossed out) A God”… what convinced him was the creation of ‘mind’… its not material, so what could invent it into existence? (Read his last chapter).
@ApplesSF
3 жыл бұрын
I would say that a deitistic God could still explain intelligent design because theoretically intelligent design could be programmed from the beginning when fine tuning was created. Although I prefer the idea of a theistic God. I suppose it depends where one draws the line between what is involvement and passiveness. Free will is still a form of involvement because a theistic God allows us to have free will.
@tomgoffnett5624
3 жыл бұрын
I have no idea how one can believe in Creation and also believe the earth is billions of years old. Why hasn't anyone called out the old earth pseudoscience? Where is the challenge? Why is everyone so afraid of saying WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW OLD THE EARTH IS! Why go along with the lies? There isn't one iota of evidence of a billion year old earth.
@philipfong8079
3 жыл бұрын
I don't have a religion but I am not stupid to dismiss the creator when science has not found the ultimate answer, But I am beginning to feel disgust with scientist who claimed no creator needed.
@tamimsaykat
3 жыл бұрын
I believe one God💚 God give our life.
@MrMemejojo
3 жыл бұрын
In Islam, there is only one God "Allah" and Allah is Creator, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise and Everlasting..
@kostasz7z
3 жыл бұрын
Allah is 100% just and will find you guilty for your sins because all humans ever born are sinful. Allah cannot save you.
@Dr_Diaz
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your hard work. What if diestic and theistic are both in one? After all, we know that god is omnipresent.
@candeffect
3 жыл бұрын
Both deism and atheism define God down to justify anti-God lifestyles.
@Arminius420
3 жыл бұрын
We build in straight lines with symmetry and we at least try and correct our errors and improve our technology for our pleasure or for our benefit. Nature doesn't correct herself or care about the well being of anything. Biology just does what it does and believing in a creator or not doesn't change anything in reality. Its just a placebo for people who are scared of what they don't know. I have absolutely no use for a belief in a god or goddess or anything it does nothing for me.
@igneous9092
3 жыл бұрын
Do you delete objective comments?? Its a bit strange that I never find any here
@rhondawilson7370
3 жыл бұрын
The comments quoting the Quran are here.
@refuse2bdcvd324
7 ай бұрын
Deductive reasoning leads us to the logical conclusion that the God of the Bible is the perfect candidate.
@abdulrzak1040
3 жыл бұрын
(35) Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]? The Qur’an fully supports your research
@Myma1
3 жыл бұрын
Ok ok ok - how this will help us to solve global warming, Covid, hunger…etc
@D800Lover
3 жыл бұрын
Occum's Razor tells us what? Why are we afraid of "intelligent design" as an explanation when materialism has come of with much weirder explanations? Something else is happening here and it goes way beyond whether there is a God. It has to do with WHO the right ruler of this world is!
@nsptech9773
3 жыл бұрын
Who is Nature's designer? Ans : He is the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, the one in whom we all live and move and have our being :)
@syedhasan6321
3 жыл бұрын
Qur'an surah Al-An'am (6):29-30 (29) And they(disbelievers) say, "There is none but our worldly life, and we will not be resurrected." (30) If you could but see when they will be made to stand before their Lord. He will say, "Is this not the truth?" They will say, "Yes, by our Lord." He will [then] say, "So taste the punishment for what you used to deny."
@charleswoods2996
3 жыл бұрын
Why does God always have to regarded as a separate, dominating being? God is within all of us, and every-/thing/ that is, and being INFINITE, maybe the Universe is every cycling thus no beginning or end to ever concern or worry ourselves about.
@catpapa3615
3 жыл бұрын
If one is going to subscribe to pure materialism why would such ones even bother to weigh in on matters of justice, injustice or any other social matter... after all there's no real rhyme or reason to that model of the universe witch would make it only just one mans view against another. Who really believes that anyone has the right or the wisdom to rule over another?
@randomness3235
3 жыл бұрын
Science: Give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest.
@Jugivadi
2 жыл бұрын
I didn't believe in God because of the absurdity of the ancient texts from which God was defined. I started meditating about 6 years ago and as I became still and let my mind explore the meaning of my existence the Creator became obvious to me. You don't find creator in a book or a tribe, or a church because it's a spiritual awareness that we can all find without books or preachers. Religion is a load of talking, but to find the Creator you have to listen. Close your Bible, close your mouth, and open your mind.
@hassanmirza2392
3 жыл бұрын
Atheists are afraid of two arguments: 1- Fine Tuning Argument 2- Kalam Cosmological Argument.
Пікірлер: 185