There seems to be some confusion about how there are some moons that orbit their planets retrograde. These are moons that are captured objects, objects whichs did not form alongside the planet. These are known as irregular moons, different from the regular moons which formed with the planet and thus orbit along its plane.
@firstnamelastname9918
4 жыл бұрын
And Pluto's very different orbit (likely due to similar gravitational interactions with Saturn or Jupiter) was very much a part of why it was "voted off of Planet Island". EDIT: snate56 has corrected me, that it was voted off for it's size. So... I guess size does matter... EDIT #2: and Emilia Little has informed me that it simply hasn't cleared it's orbit. Let's see if IAU changes it's mind again in the next 10 after debating the value of using a word adopted from astrology: "planet."
@nettyz833
4 жыл бұрын
Yep.. like Neptunes moon Triton, is that right?
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
@@nettyz833 yes exactly!
@ZangariRC
4 жыл бұрын
PRIMER FIELDS shape all galaxies.
@robertperry4439
4 жыл бұрын
All the 'planets' and 'moon' and all other luminous objects in the 'universe' rotate the same direction because they are floating in the liquid hydrogen layer approximately 120 miles above 'Earth'. These luminous objects are rotating around the 'North Pole'; 'Earth is in the center of the 'universe'. The 'stars' are simply crystalline minerals similar to diamonds that emit light when are electromagnetically charged. The 'planets' are artificial satellites as is the 'moon', all of which resist the flow of the liquid hydrogen. Sunlight is the effect caused by the interaction between the electromagnetic force field located about 250 miles above 'Earth'; there is an artificial satellite composed of superconducting material that creates a plasma field when interacting with the electromagnetic force field, which encloses 'earth'. 'Earth' ('existence' / 'reality') is created from electromagnetic energy and consciousness; each 'atom' that composes 'matter' is simply a force field; objects appear solid because one force field resists another. Bonus answer: the sky is blue because it is composed of liquid helium that is a fluorescent gas, as is argon, neon and xenon that each emit colors that create the sunrise and sunset. Our 'World' is simply an artificially created bio-habitat for biologically engineered organisms; we are in a 'zoo'.
@MsLaBajo
3 жыл бұрын
I love learning astrophysics at 4am, when I can’t sleep. Thank you!
@apollonius7227
3 жыл бұрын
Me rn, at 4am, unable to sleep, watching Astrum, 2 weeks later. 🥺
@TheLuke712
3 жыл бұрын
@@apollonius7227 Me, at 3am, unable to sleep, watching Astrum, 2 days later :/
@jaac7027
3 жыл бұрын
The places our minds choose to go when we can't sleep. Instead night was the Sumerians
@jeromepowell8026
3 жыл бұрын
It's 4:35 for me 🥲
@warshrike666
3 жыл бұрын
Then dont watch this, its make believe lol.
@CitizenAyellowblue
4 жыл бұрын
If the universe is self-organising, I guess that means I can sleep in.
@Cat_in_Spacetime
4 жыл бұрын
Yes only for healthy amounts of time
@michaellidster1389
4 жыл бұрын
It'll self organise you out of bed
@deliriousmysterium8137
4 жыл бұрын
Life.. finds a way.. Lead them to liberty or death. R u buddha or hitler hahahahaha
@cdamauser1963
4 жыл бұрын
Yes take a load off, I am! Then, coffee 😋
@aviralgupta393
4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha like you were planning on organising the universe
@NicholasMonks
4 жыл бұрын
"As a matter of fact I DO know." (5 minutes later) "Oh, that I did NOT know."
@lastbornrelic3430
3 жыл бұрын
Happens with everything I look at love theres always something to learn
@CeesaX
3 жыл бұрын
I've always loved the simplicity of the demo with the lycra and marbles. Thanks for including it!
@CaesiusX
4 жыл бұрын
This very question long bounced about in the back of my mind quite often. But usually at times when researching was not convenient. And then it would slip away. Thanks for this. 🌠The more you know…
@metalwellington
4 жыл бұрын
is that the best fictional backstory you can come up with. Jesus Christ what else Haas long bounced around up there. researching is not convenient. lol. is that cos someone in the family using the laptop again. guess we'll have to wait till a more convenient time.
@drzilman4536
4 жыл бұрын
@@metalwellington Jesus christ, this guy. Examples of when researching is not convenient: Driving, stuck in traffic, trying to fall asleep, whilst in work, whilst shopping, whilst changing the babies nappy, whilst cycling, whilst painting or other DIY, whilst gardening, whist waiting in a game lobby, whilst playing said game or waiting for it to load... Etc etc. Edit: yes, and of course, when somebody else is using the laptop or computer.
@shinyoneincarnate5565
4 жыл бұрын
"Out of chaos, comes order." - Swami Shinyone Incarnate
@Mythraen
3 жыл бұрын
"The more you know…" ... the more angry you are at ignorant people?
@petejones8312
3 жыл бұрын
Finish that sentence
@iryhughes
2 жыл бұрын
After re-watching How the Universe Works so many times I began to feel a void for interesting space videos with awesome animation. That void has been filled by your channel. Thank you!
@mrpink878
3 жыл бұрын
Great video but missed a lot of things: Venus actually spins opposite from all other planets in our solar system. Also, vast majority of star systems observed are NOT on a single plane. We still don't know why/how planar orbital systems like ours happen, but we know they are more unique/rare.
@JSSTyger
2 жыл бұрын
I think he was talking about the orbital path, not the spin of the planets.
@mrpink878
2 жыл бұрын
@@JSSTyger yes Venus spins on the opposite orbital direction
@JSSTyger
2 жыл бұрын
@@mrpink878 Rotation about its own axis is not the same as the orbital path around the Sun. All of the planets go the same direction around the Sun.
@mrpink878
2 жыл бұрын
@@JSSTyger you right, still though, our solar system is unique in how our planets are on one single plane
@noeldenever
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Alex. This update brightened up my day. In this bleak time, it's nice to be reminded that order could emerge from chaos. Long after we're gone, the cloud and dust from the remnants of solar system might be recycled in this way to form a new generation of stars. Our existence, including our crisis, is nothing but a petty blip in the vastness of the universe. Yes the knowledge gives me existensial crisis, but it's also awe inspiring. I hope you and your little family is well and healthy. Take care.
@JanjayTrollface
4 жыл бұрын
While I didn't expect to learn too much from this video, I gotta say a couple of the visualisations were quite impressive. They will definitely make an explanation easier next time I'm asked a similar question, TYVM!
@RcsN505
3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact. In contemporary functional linguistics theories, human languages are also seen as emerging complex systems, with frequency of use playing a role analogous to that of gravity (frequent patterns attract more members, as in wept > weeped) up to a threshold. It is a highly quantitative, probabilistic view of language, and has great explanatory power =)
@JCT75
4 жыл бұрын
And that demonstration was so wonderful. Thanks to the prof who did that.
@sivakumarmethrran7072
3 жыл бұрын
mhm
@STARKILLER15100
4 жыл бұрын
Gives the phrase circle of life a whole new meaning
@marieelisa1
4 жыл бұрын
Everything is a circle (✿☉。☉)
@metalwellington
4 жыл бұрын
so weak
@thegreathadoken6808
4 жыл бұрын
Elipse of life, surely.
@yoooyoyooo
4 жыл бұрын
Except the cube.
@drzilman4536
4 жыл бұрын
@@yoooyoyooo yeah but you can walk a circle round a cube.
@caspervankerschaver9974
4 жыл бұрын
Me at 4am: I should get some sleep. KZitem: hey, why are all planets on the same orbital plane? Me: I don't need sleep, I need answers
@eddiebrock7024
3 жыл бұрын
LMAO dammit, every night! 😆😆😆
@mhoover
3 жыл бұрын
It's probably more accurate to say colliding objects average rather than cancel their momentum.
@sivakumarmethrran7072
3 жыл бұрын
well but still
@Jeremy.Bearemy
3 жыл бұрын
Average actually is more misleading. The total momentum of the "system" (rings, moons or orbiting planets) is the SUM of the momentum of each individual sattellite. Average would imply that after summing the momentum of the parts, you would divide by the total number of objects to get total momentum which is not correct. " Cancelation" implies that objects with negative momentum (orbiting the opposite direction) will simply be subtracted from the total momentum of the system, canceling out some momentum of other particles moving on the positive direction. An average would be the correct way to estimate the "total" velocity of the system, not momentum.
@Bejman13
4 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the main key point- conservation of angular momentum.
@benlaurent3102
4 жыл бұрын
Exactly. That’s literally the whole answer I was like when is he going to say it
@yookalaylee2289
3 жыл бұрын
Yah I was waiting for this as well.
@kari7403
4 жыл бұрын
So the sayings, "go along to get along." And, "If you can't beat em, join em." Has a much larger meaning, and applicable to much more than our social lives? 😁👍 Nice. The logic of those 2 sayings is pretty heavy, now.
@jaegercrown964
4 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad that this came in my recommendation, I've always have so much liking in planetary science and computer science.
@hanamaloku4699
4 жыл бұрын
melodysheep, also one of the best!
@humanfromconception1195
3 жыл бұрын
You have made orbital patterns & solar spin comprehensible, thank you. Very cool
@mishkataapon
4 жыл бұрын
Ah Astrum 💓 Thanks for this when I had nothing to watch
@madduck692002
4 жыл бұрын
Awesome Alex, enjoy these immensely!
@EnhancedPsyche
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Astrum! I have always wondered about this. And always, I’ve never gotten around to researching it. Thank you for explaining with visual aids, as well. You’re awesome!
@thaedleinad
4 жыл бұрын
I ended up asking myself if one day the universe will even itself entirely. No stars, only black holes. No asteroids, comets or dust, only planets and moons.
@FakingANerve
4 жыл бұрын
That's not far from the truth in the looooooong run when the universe dies in its heat death.
@hubbletrubble7875
4 жыл бұрын
Even black holes will die because of hawking radiation
@allyshivers3082
3 жыл бұрын
Wow very interesting point of veiw
@hyri3188
4 жыл бұрын
"Its almost beautiful how in nature, you can have something so chaotic that will eventually form something rather calm and orderly" Litterally my class from 5th Grade to 9th Grade
@myrusEW
4 жыл бұрын
What..?
@briancooley8777
4 жыл бұрын
That’s how you know something is wrong with their little story... (and that they are lying)
@briancooley8777
4 жыл бұрын
God does exist. His evidence is everywhere in everything...
@michaelfarrell4824
4 жыл бұрын
Just look at the game of life, order from chaos
@tommylandmark5779
4 жыл бұрын
Brian Cooley what’s your proof of his existence, millions of hours of research have gone into these hypotheses and they’re still not confident they are the truth. Why is one book which is thousands of years old definite proof of gods existence if this isn’t proof of science-based creation.
@AboveBeyondVapor
4 жыл бұрын
There are some Kuiper Belt objects orbiting perpendicular to the major planet's plane. Planet Nine, if it exists, orbits in a different plane too. I think there is still some mystery about why most planets orbit most stars in a common plane. There may be A LOT of planets in the universe that orbit stars in many different planets. We just aren't looking for them yet because of lack of technological tools. There are valid simulations of star formations that create many different planes of orbits around stars.
@tonywooten596
4 жыл бұрын
pluto isn't on the plane
@karthikeyank2207
3 жыл бұрын
As a thumb rule, objects with lower mass always rotates around objects with heavier mass, like moons rotate around planets, planets rotates around star, stars rotate around black hole at the center of galaxy. When something rotates "time" is created. Just an idea.
@TheDarktsun
3 жыл бұрын
This question has been bothering me for years and no one I asked has been able to answer it. Thank you so much for posting it, makes so much intuitive sense. Liked the part about self-organizing emergent-systems as well.
@LabyrinthMike
4 жыл бұрын
I must admit, I really thought that the Coriolis force would have a bigger effect. After all, the gas cloud would be in orbit around the center of the galaxy and, as it began to collapse, the outer parts, which would be moving faster, would "miss" then center and head to the leading part of the cloud in the galactic orbit. The inner part, moving slower, would head to the trailing part of the cloud. Much like what happens to a cyclone.
@buildingsheriff
4 жыл бұрын
I thought Venus and Uranus had retrograde orbits?
@baschdiro8565
4 жыл бұрын
@@buildingsheriff The orbital motion of Venus and Uranus around the sun is the same as for the other planets. The difference is, that Venus's axial rotation is upside down and Uranus's is turned by 90°
@phyl1283
4 жыл бұрын
the coriolis is an "effect", not a force.
@ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e
4 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered this but never looked it up for some reason. The universe provides anyway.
@k.l.3098
4 жыл бұрын
I've been wondering this, but not sure how to Google it. Thank yoooou!!
@wholeNwon
4 жыл бұрын
Trial and error?
@davidm5707
4 жыл бұрын
A recent video raised this question for me. It turns out you had already answered it. Thank you!
@edwardlee2794
4 жыл бұрын
A question most people have but don't know how to frame it without looking stupid. Thanks for reading great.minds of ours. Keep up with the good work. Stay safe and healthy. From Hker worldwide
@duran9664
4 жыл бұрын
Question: Which direction the sun orbits the center of the galaxy? Does the sun moves equator on or polar on? I mean can the planets be ahead of the sun in its orbits around the galaxy?
@mohamedkaba6934
4 жыл бұрын
The planets orbits around the sun (which in turn, rotates along with our galaxy). I don't think we should look at space structurally. Meaning all things being always in motion, they can't be an "ahead" nor "backward" At least I believe.
@treborria4001
4 жыл бұрын
I've wondered about this forever
@geebee2276
4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation and watched several times to digest. I have been asking this question since the age of 14, decades ago. It’s something that was always astounded me. Science teachers at school, it seemed, couldn’t even grasp the concept. In particular, our solar system was always shown in 2D so when the question arose “what does it look like in 3D?”; there would always be this answer of “well it looks the same” but could never really get an answer of why. Thank you so much for addressing this.
@pramodkrishnamurthy3707
4 жыл бұрын
Fascinating...thank you! How does this square with the second law of thermodynamics that says that entropy of a system always increases? It seems to me that the system is actually getting more orderly, hence lower entropy. Silly question I'm sure, but foxed me.
@BittermanAndy
4 жыл бұрын
The entropy of the system includes EVERYTHING in the system, and the entropy of all that hydrogen randomly moving and colliding in the sun (98% of the mass of the system) is enormous. Local low entropy elsewhere can't compete with that.
@othellosmalley2729
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much for answering a simple long time child hood question, I really enjoyed the simulation, don't mind all the brainiacs in the comments section, social media makes people think they know everything,
@martinaxe6390
4 жыл бұрын
Talking about how a large occupied space area can flatten out, I couldn't help but think of deflating a balloon as an example. Although instead of a central pull like gravity, is an outter compression due to elasticity of the balloon; visually speaking, I think kids would get it in a classroom.
@andyharpist2938
3 жыл бұрын
What fascinating insights I have learnt from this video. I refer to the Comments, of course. I knew I would get a higher class of slanderous academic warfare, and was not let down. Marvellous.
@ethan3056
3 жыл бұрын
Funny how I was just wondering about this exact thing yesterday
@JoshWomble
3 жыл бұрын
I was today and THAT my friend is how strong the youtube algorithm has become
@allyshivers3082
3 жыл бұрын
Thats God letting you know he's there
@jayarm9258
3 жыл бұрын
I was literally just telling the girl I talk to how all the planets and our moon follow the exact same line the sun does in the sky 2 days ago
@mikeclarke952
4 жыл бұрын
At 4:30 I paused: READ this additional info: The law of conservation of angular momentum is the WHOLE story here. All is good in Astrum's explain here, but now the cold dark cloud is collapsing around an AXIS of rotation and all particles with small radius from this axis (the poles N and S as it were) feel very little centrifugal force, so they collapse toward the middle. The particles at large radius experience a large centrifugal force so they tend to stay at their radius and not fall into the star. It's a sine function, so when sin(90) =1, then the centrifugal force is at a maximum, this is 90 degrees to the axis of rotation (the poles). As the cloud of gas falls in its rotational speed goes up, so does the centrifugal force on all particles, but that is a maximum at sin(90), therefore eventually all particles end up in a disc around the central axis of rotation, where the resistance to fall into the star is at a maximum. I will explain "centrifugal" and "centripetal" forces as a matter of reference frame if asked. Cheers.
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
I was already worried my explanation was getting too complicated in the video, but this comment is great for anyone that wants to delve a little deeper. Thanks!
@mikeclarke952
4 жыл бұрын
@@astrumspace Thank you, I love your channel, you do great work here. Stay safe friend.
@santyclause8034
4 жыл бұрын
I've been toying with the notion that spin exerts an outward force against the body attraction of a contiguous mass which nevertheless must spin to ignite stellar fusion. Why spin? Glad you asked, its because the nett balance of forces are summed in the same direction - one is an outward planar gradient of distributed force that generates a voltage drop relative to the inbound force of gravity (according to my line of thinking which was hazy from the beginning). The outward force is still attractive electronically toward the stellar core in sum vector directions of mass and charge and stuff. There's more going on in the mathematical sum of momenta than some stuff rushing together and crushing itself into stellar fusion.
@OssxJah
2 жыл бұрын
The way stars are born and planets are born. It's amazing how it just happen to happen by itself. Like something is programming it and just let time and gravity do all the work.
@danguee1
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Astrum: 1) when there's only one, it's called 'a phenomenon', not 'a phenomena' (which is plural) 2) when a noun is a plural, use 'fewer' but when it is a substance, use 'less' (eg 'fewer planets' and 'less mass'). Do the above and you'll be slightly more articulate.
@DustyCowdog
4 жыл бұрын
That actually made a fair amount of sense in my little mind. Cheers!
@garydunken7934
4 жыл бұрын
My school failed to explain what this video did in 8mins. Thanks Alex.
@OhnoCurls
3 жыл бұрын
True, but school did teach you how to write that comment. I have a feeling I know which skill is more important 😂
@eugenedingleberryy
3 жыл бұрын
@@OhnoCurls I have a feeling too. It's obviously that he knows why planets are on the same orbital plate.
@Quickened1
4 жыл бұрын
As with everything, I guarantee that there are exceptions to this phenomena... Similar to Uranus's unique orbital axis... We may not have found an example, but it is very likely, even probable, that there are planets that orbit in the opposite direction, or even perpendicular to the orbital planes, of the other planets, within distant solar systems...
@santyclause8034
4 жыл бұрын
We have extra solar asteroids that do that now.
@Quickened1
4 жыл бұрын
@@santyclause8034 ..a great example that supports my theory that planets deviate as well...
@santyclause8034
4 жыл бұрын
@@Quickened1 I'm a keep my eye on Mercury, that little guy is suss as hell.
@Cailus3542
4 жыл бұрын
Pp Ss It’s a statistical certainty. Extrasolar planetary captures can certainly have irregular orbits, while the orbital mechanics of binary and trinary star systems can create all sorts of funky scenarios. I’ve no idea if we’ve identified any such examples, given the nature of extrasolar planetary observation, but it certainly occurs. This has been common knowledge for decades.
@werr3222werrr
4 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know if it was for sure if it was that way but now I know and that is amazing
@unknowndeoxys00
4 жыл бұрын
That lycra demo was pretty awesome
@abhishekdeshpande2259
4 жыл бұрын
I always wanted to ask, why would anyone dislike such videos? It's been 44 mins the video is uploaded and already people dislike it. Is it autonomous or are these the anti intellectuals that people talk about?
@Particulator
4 жыл бұрын
Creationism, that's your answer.
@marieelisa1
4 жыл бұрын
Not for me, nothing wrong with understanding God's creation, is beautiful and wonderful how complex it is. I love science 💖📡🛰️
@Wayne--O
4 жыл бұрын
cool. now I can continue to not wonder about this while looking for lycra chairs for living room.
@anonkiddo
4 жыл бұрын
Emergent structures through self organistation - basically sums up all of the universe and whatever has happened in it and whatever will happen in it.
@zerg9523
4 жыл бұрын
Just found this channel now after searching the question itself... subbed, lets see where this goes.
@sicknado
4 жыл бұрын
I know this is way off subject.. but why do ads work? I almost never ever look at them until I can click the skip button and on top of that is irritating
@antoniomaglione4101
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great video. One aspect to analyse further, is why the orbital plane of our Solar System is inclined 60 degrees with respect of the orbital plane of the Milky Way? I doubt we may find the correct answer, but a discussion of the various circumstances that gave raise to this vast difference, would be certainly very interesting. Regards,
@mallanfreefall
4 жыл бұрын
Milky Way gets its shape because of this ?
@carlitonoid1117
3 жыл бұрын
mostly
@davidc5027
3 жыл бұрын
So, if we lived in the "Southern" part of the Universe would all the planets orbit in the opposite direction??? Inquiring minds want to know! :)
@Tanookicatoon
2 жыл бұрын
I mean, obviously if something spins, stuff has a habit of following the direction of the spin. You could attach beads on string and spin yourself around and the same thing would happen. The answer is literally "it's spinning"
@spamuel98
3 жыл бұрын
It's not that hard to figure out... gravity pulls stuff together, and the dominant velocity wins in the ensuing series of collisions. More stuff gets pulled together, increasing the gravitational pull of the objects, so even if something revolves around the sun in another direction, the gravity of everything in the area tries to tug them as close together as possible, and the path of least resistance in the balance between gravity and velocity is a parallel orbit. The sort of thing that's a lot easier to illustrate than describe verbally.
@Nikioko
3 жыл бұрын
Answer: Because the all arose from the same protoplanetary disc.
@nickyvella1
3 жыл бұрын
No it's what op said
@thelastpigeon8098
3 жыл бұрын
@Bill Dan Yeah sure, god did everything
@orlandovazquez9662
3 жыл бұрын
Astrum: after awhile asteroids stop colliding Oort cloud and Kuiper belt: are we a joke to you?
@Débribu
3 жыл бұрын
Orlando Vazquez: here is a boring joke Me: …
@Martipee
4 жыл бұрын
Gotta love certain areas of the scientific world. The ability to specifically define every minute aspect of a situation - place, time, mass, speed etc - until something 'suddenly' happens. Then any explanation goes out the window with barely a comment (besides mentioning it), and then onto the result of that 'suddenly'. Lots of speculation on what might have happened, but expected to be accepted as what did happen. Probably why "hollywood-syfy" is so popular.
@sachetbhat8353
3 жыл бұрын
so nice channel i really really love this channel it gave me so much knowledge
@СамуилМичуев
3 жыл бұрын
0:27 Venus goes counter-clockwise though
@thundaga4005
3 жыл бұрын
That's Venus's rotation, not its orbit.
@jan2oo
3 жыл бұрын
@@thundaga4005 Also, it is not impossible for orbits to be going in different directions, its just that over time it becomes less and less probable
@antred11
3 жыл бұрын
@@jan2oo That usually happens if a system captured a rogue planet that wasn't originally formed in-system.
@LuckyLucyHi
3 жыл бұрын
Or a moon, like Neptune's Triton.
@mmoarchives2542
3 жыл бұрын
it's because stars and blackholes has electromagnetic poles, so gravitational pulls doesn't occur at it's pull, but at it's equlitium
@oldtimefarmboy617
4 жыл бұрын
One problem with the explanation. If it requires a pressure wave from something like a nova to start a gas cloud's hydrogen clumping together, what caused the pressure wave that started the first star that went nova and created the pressure wave for the other stars. After the big bang created inertia imparted to the hydrogen and helium that was blasted into the empty vacuum of space (second law of thermodynamics) there would have been no outside force to cause the hydrogen to start clumping.
@victorsegoviapalacios4710
3 жыл бұрын
This phenomenon can be explained more easily with conservation of Angular Momentum, a given Gas Cloud has a intrinsic angular momentum, around a rotation axis in 3D space. This angular momentum can be very small; considering the overall size of the Gas cloud, there exist some differential linear movement around different parts of the cloud (not everything travels at the same speed and direction in space), and as gravity begins collapsing the cloud, the angular momentum just gets conserved; overall size reduces (reducing the overall "mass moment of inertia"), so "angular velocity" increases. The disk itself is created due friction and tidal forces...
@OmarHernandez-nq2jo
4 жыл бұрын
The pattern would follow the same gravitational pull ala magnetic wave with the same repetitive motion in only one infinite direction that would follow the same harmony in a circular, cyclical and cynical fibonacci order and manner for eternity or towards the end and reciprocal will restart and repeat.
@HighStakesDanny
4 жыл бұрын
That we figured this out within 500 years or so makes me wonder what we will learn in the next. I think humans will probably take themselves out by then, it will cool if we didn't and learned how to time travel.
@pauleckersley6132
3 жыл бұрын
I always thought it was because of magnetic fields of north n south atractions. Anything underneath or over the top of a celestial body would be sucked in or repelled. Were as equatorial atraction has a ballance between north n south atractions, were atractions are not to strongly pulling or repelling.
@pauleckersley6132
3 жыл бұрын
@chi sam why it doesnt seem to have helped the people Ive just instructed.
@pauleckersley6132
3 жыл бұрын
@chi sam few people are interested at this time as an audience. I know the obvious is usually to simple for the big heads to see.
@charlesvanderhoog7056
3 жыл бұрын
The explanation is very thin and only occurs around 4:25 with one line. As it is the subject of the video, it behooves more than just a statement and a ten second thing. I found this video wanting at the very core of what it had set out to explain. This meant you get 8 minutes of stories and ten seconds of actual explanation. Perhaps 'Astrum' finds it 'obvious' and so leaves out a bundle of insights. On a two dimensional plane, it is fine, but in a 3D space? That is not clear.
@OldmanNix
4 жыл бұрын
What? I thought it was because of the schoolbooks it was printed in were 2d. The more you know
@TimeTheory2099
4 жыл бұрын
It's the same reason our Galaxy's stars are on the same galactic plain. Edit: Oops, i made this comment before watching.
@PRIMEVAL543
3 жыл бұрын
4:00 „Just a 2D representation for a 3D model in a 4D universe“ Time axis on the „2D“ model: :c
@hoppeltrottel7484
3 жыл бұрын
Love your work. Merry Christmas!
@Cubuntu
2 жыл бұрын
isn't it sort of strange how the principle still applies in space too? you ever notice... it takes a mess to clean a building? what I mean by this... just like it takes money to make money, it litteraly requires a huge mess to be made before a building can be fully cleaned properly... same with space if you have to clear that dust first all that chaos must take place to clear the dust, tons of astroids hitting planets as dust builds up from gravity and so on. sort of the same thing I guess.
@Historyfreak-f7o
4 жыл бұрын
These videos are amazing! Keep up the good work!
@andrekopu
Жыл бұрын
I'm glad this has finally been answered.
@sarojandongol1482
3 жыл бұрын
this is this one of those weird things for me something that you questioned about as a kid and got the answers to back then. but then years later, you forget you ever had that question - you have the answer yourself but forget that you already know it
@Cubuntu
2 жыл бұрын
so kind of like how if you take a large body of water turn it into a spinning funnel into a drain and introduce any and all new water to it, all water will eventually convert to this same motion into the funnel over the course of time just like the balls in this demonstration.
@milodemoray
Жыл бұрын
Good day Alex, could you do a video on how the solar system actually moves through space in relation to the solar systems aspect in the galactic arm where we find ourselves. This question was inspired by someone alleging that Voyager 1 did not find the so called 'bow shock' along the ecliptic. And the the solar system is in fact moving "up" or "north." I guess what this individual meant was if we take the ecliptic from left to right then we'd be looking at "east and "west". I think that this would be a perfect "Astrum Answers".
@doghousejim
3 жыл бұрын
The slow steady beauty of gravity emanating from a sphere.
@elena6516
3 жыл бұрын
such a beautiful creation
@kencur9690
3 жыл бұрын
This one’s easy. Party started at the same time for everyone, so they got high together, which means that they will all be on the same orbital plane.
@PyroXVuurwerk
4 жыл бұрын
So the concluding answer (as I didn’t really hear one) is that in a chaotic space of orbits, the anti-clockwise movement will eventually be universally “preferred”.
@davidusa47
4 жыл бұрын
I did not realize the planets orbited on the same plane until I was an adult. I always assumed it was random and they depicted like that for simplicity’s sake.
@richardcarlin1332
3 жыл бұрын
I call this the centrifuge affect and why I think there are other, but rare, solar systems similar to ours. Also why I think there is life, also rare, on other solar systems. Similar to a software bug that is hard to isolate. If it happens once, it can happen again.
@HandyDan
3 жыл бұрын
Did you ever stop to think that the entire universe all the way down to an atom are identical. Central proton, sun, orbiting electrons, planets.
@samburnes9389
3 жыл бұрын
Except electrons don’t really orbit the nucleus, they exist as probabilistic distributions in various shapes around the nucleus at certain discrete energy levels.
@robertwaichunas
3 жыл бұрын
Why is it that gravity is expressed as a planet (sphere) on top of " " space time where other objects come in from the planets plane. Wouldn't space time be equally surrounding the planet ? There by objects that might encounter the planets plane actually have an equal chance of being sent rotating in any orbit, NE/SW or N/S instead of just E/W direction? Just a thought.
@OshineTheOranguTANK
3 жыл бұрын
what a great question, and a even greater answer. Love your channel
@T-Slider
3 жыл бұрын
Loved the video! Please use fewer, not less, and larger number of collisions, not large amounts.
@chanpol321
3 жыл бұрын
"According to the nebular theory, stars form in massive and dense clouds of molecular hydrogen-giant molecular clouds (GMC). These clouds are gravitationally unstable, and matter coalesces within them to smaller denser clumps, which then rotate, collapse, and form stars. Star formation is a complex process, which always produces a gaseous protoplanetary disk (proplyd) around the young star. This may give birth to planets in certain circumstances, which are not well known. Thus the formation of planetary systems is thought to be a natural result of star formation. A Sun-like star usually takes approximately 1 million years to form, with the protoplanetary disk evolving into a planetary system over the next 10-100 million years. "Wikipedia
@Ro8st3r
9 ай бұрын
One question though: the test in the school on space time by Dan; this is still the case when done on the other side of the equator? Given that water spins the other way around, you might expect that too. And if not, what creates the difference?
@jamesgoldring1052
3 жыл бұрын
This was great i like never even thought about it radical my dude.
@williamhensley8322
3 жыл бұрын
So as it turns out planets don't have the same orbital plane. It's only an approximation to say that they are. It seems like the closer the planets are to the sun, the more similar the orbit plane is but pluto for instance is like 17 degrees off the orbital plane or something similar to that, I can't remember the exact number. Also just look at the milky way galaxy from a side view. There's definitely variation here. The moon's orbital plane makes a 5.14-degree angle with the earth's orbital plane.
@clintonjones955
3 жыл бұрын
Good Job, ASTRUM I began pondering the Universe at the age of 7 I assumed the 'Plane' and direction of 'spin' via the same Gas/Matter accumulation and why the proclivity of 'counter-clockwise alignment ...BUT, why? ...as a kid, I related the 'co-efficiency (I was seven) to the 'nano-world of the Human Body ...the same proclivity to 'counter-clockwise' spin and orbit direction TO DATE, I have yet to see any scientist make the same connection of uniformity in the entire Universe PLUS, the 'Dream World' (perception) and interesting research (allegorical) (anecdotal) relativity ...it would seem that scientists have reduced 'Imagination' and 'zero-mass (calculations) to 'Non-Science' and Dream World empirical research to religion and the theater for understanding (a shame of incompetence in the academic world ...hypocrisy ...so, what is the 'scientific method' (incomplete) (incompetent) (inconclusive)
@blackbirdpie217
2 жыл бұрын
I still wonder what event might have produced a shockwave triggering the first "clumping" of atoms or other particles anywhere in the universe. Without a supernova or any other explosion possible, being the start of all clumped masses.
@lemoncrinckles
3 жыл бұрын
Huh...you'd almost think Someone did it all by design. "Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could. So, somewhere in my youth, or childhood, I must have done something good..." "Something Good", by Richard Rodgers, "The Sound of Music", circa 1965. (:
@dougpetty2128
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@MaxB6851
4 жыл бұрын
The Sun's magnetic field has the effect of aligning the dust that surrounded into an equatorial plane. Once the planets are formed they generally maintain that plane. Many planetary systems have two or more Suns, scientists think we also have two but one a red dwarf which is not visible. Sometimes one of its planets crosses the path of out planetary system vertical to our planets plane and that can disturb their orbits.
@timneish936
3 жыл бұрын
Also, there's no centrifugal force in the poles of an object. With this concept of imbalanced force's, if the system tends towards stability and a disk is formed.
Пікірлер: 2,8 М.