आजादी के बाद पहली बार अंतर्राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर देश की इतनी भद्द पिटी है। जय हो लौह पुरुष की विदेश नीति।
@sushilmanrai3000
Сағат бұрын
यह भारत की कमजोर कूटनीति का परिणाम है।
@fudwadia21
Сағат бұрын
After this government has come power in 2014 our country has lost everything including good image and it has gained 1 ram mandir no nothing more
@GurjantSingh-o7i5d
Сағат бұрын
यह तो देश छोड़कर भाग जाएंगे हम कहां जाएंगे
@YasminChotaliya
Сағат бұрын
4th pass PM se kya ummid karoge ?
@amjadhussain7309
Сағат бұрын
Baba siddiqui ke hatya ke piche bhi inhi logo ka haath hai bishnoi to sirf ek mohra hai asal mastermind to yahi log hai
@sanjivk496
56 минут бұрын
अमेरिकी जासूसी एजेंसी के पास डेढ़ शाने के काले चिट्ठे के अनेक पन्ने हैं , चुनावी धांधली से लेकर देश Bechkar Jholanautha Bhaagjane के षड़यंत्र तक। पर डेढ़ अरब जनता को इन सबसे क्या ?
@nb9116
2 сағат бұрын
सबको पता है इस के पीछे कौन है लेकिन कोई भी बोलने से बचते हैं लेकिन कभी न कभी तो दुनिया के सामने जरूर आयेगा अमरीका का डबल स्टैंडर्ड है❓😢😢😢😢😢😢
@markvelber8664
Сағат бұрын
Do You mean that the USA has attacked on its own civilians???? 😂😂😂
@smshafique9873
56 минут бұрын
@@markvelber8664: Andhbhakt👽😎🥸 think so
@robinchowdhury5999
Сағат бұрын
Azad fear his pension will stop if he speaks the truth . People are not fools 😂
@SanjayKumar-by5fp
42 минут бұрын
आजाद साहेब की साफगोई ने देश का माथा ऊंचा कर दीया
@ndliar
Сағат бұрын
Lawrence Bishnoi gang of criminals if used by our govt then it is v bad and wht abt pro Hindu Rashtra promoters, they r too separatists if Sikhs r separatists,we. r secular so we object Hindu rashtra promoters also
@dipu255
57 минут бұрын
केनेडा में जो भारतीय है वो भारत की शान के लिए जान दे देंगे। 😃🙏
@KashmirSingh-x4d
Сағат бұрын
In india since 1947 sikh are sufferer. Many have settled themselves abroad on political asylum. Canada, america, australia, england, france, german etc. should give list of sikh on political asylum. This is ample proof of sikh asking separate state, apart from other suffering. Now international human organisation need to interfere in the interest of peace. 😮
@SatpalVerma000
43 минут бұрын
All Indians are same regardless of their political orientation. Don't classify them and support any people or parties that are anti modi. They are all united against us
@SatpalVerma000
43 минут бұрын
Why Should India be Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
@GolmaalReturns-x6y
Сағат бұрын
Excellent news
@akhlaqahmad1481
53 минут бұрын
Salute sir
@vinodchadha3253
Сағат бұрын
Ab koun sach bol raha hai ,ye sochna chhod kar bas news sunte rahen !
@mahenderkumar5250
48 минут бұрын
Great Ashu ji❤❤
@RanjitSingh-xo8jf
Сағат бұрын
Wonder why cooperation of Canadian govt was not sought if action was warranted and taken by india
@MohdnasirNasir-dn5ks
Сағат бұрын
Thanks
@VijayChawla18
46 минут бұрын
यशोवर्धन साहब पश्चिमी देशों के high moral ground पर तंज करते हुए इस्राइल की पर बमबारी पर इन देशों की चुप्पी का उदाहरण देते हैं। अगर मोदी सरकार की बात करें, तो इसने जिस तरह से लोकतंत्र को क्षीण किया और कई शांतिपूर्ण लोकतान्त्रिक आंदोलनों का हिंसक दमन किया, तो high moral ground तो मोदी सरकार के पास भी नहीं है।
@straighttalk2022
Сағат бұрын
Retd Ips has skirted around the issue. Investigating is different from having a hand in killing. He didn't analysecthat
@MohdMasood-fw2np
Сағат бұрын
Good
@AkashDeep-ie8dn
Сағат бұрын
Bhai Asutosh today I release why you have very less followers. Because he is telling truth but you made your program limited time. You not feel comfortable with this program.
@RahulIndian-j7r
Сағат бұрын
Accha hota Agar India Canada Government ko Confidence me le kar ye Karyewahi Karta...
@shubhayjain5634
Сағат бұрын
Thik he
@sanjaykinkar9798
42 минут бұрын
😡😡 मेरी विपक्ष से और ख़ास कर राहुल गांधी से विनम्र अभिवादन है के ऐसे बुद्धिहीन और मुर्खतापूर्ण लोगों को निकाल बाहर किया जाये। नहीं तों विपक्ष आने वाले सौ साल तक आप सत्ता में नहीं आ सकते है। ट्रुडो के बप भी कौनडा का अध्यक्ष था और एअर इंडिया का विमान हाईजैक किया था। ट्रेडों के बाप ने उन हैजाकर को कौनडा में छिपाया था तों कौन्ग्रेस के सरकार ने ट्रेडों के बाप को भी घुटनों पे लाया था अब मोदी सरकार ने टू्डों कों घुटने पर लाया हैं। ट्रूडों तों कौमेडियन है और भारत में भी एक कौमेडियन है उसें भी कौनडा भेज दो। 😡😡
@sahafideccan6582
47 минут бұрын
There is always big difference between Police mentality and Diplomatic approach. Ashotosh ji you would agree.
@SatpalVerma000
43 минут бұрын
Why Should India be Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
@sukhdevsohal5172
Сағат бұрын
सभी गोदी धारनावे। समय बरबाद।
@amjadhussain7309
Сағат бұрын
Yashowardhan azad ki himmat hi nahi ki wo sarkar se sawal kar sake Retirement ke baad bhi ye haal hai
@ManishKumar-jr8gj
Сағат бұрын
हां, हाथ है, डंके की चोट पर बोलना चाहिए, देश विरोधी ताकतों का आगे भी यही हश्र होना चाहिए
@aishwarykalosia7129
Сағат бұрын
Hindu desh = Khalsastan 😊
@balwantkumar1125
Сағат бұрын
Pehle apne temper ko sambhalo
@shubhayjain5634
Сағат бұрын
Usa to hamesa Canada ke sath he Or tu kis ke sath ho
@shabbirtamboli3621
44 минут бұрын
Amit Shah ke sath Modi ko bhi bhej do
@gianchamdal537
Сағат бұрын
Punnu Sahib,always instigated whenever some happens against India.He has no right to do so being a citizen of another country.If he wants to favor the movement,He May come to India and fight for His Cause.
@rogerbinny641
Сағат бұрын
Azad sab seem to be speaking More like a modi supporter THAN AN INDIAN
@MonikaSahu-n4p
42 минут бұрын
Modi ka virodh krte krte ...desh ka virodh krne lage...
@amjadhussain7309
Сағат бұрын
Jab kisi gangster ke piche chipkar aisi anaitik karya karoge to duniya sawal to puchegi hi
@shabbirtamboli3621
42 минут бұрын
Modi Sahab voting mein Bhandari karte Hain
@DrTariq-ez1pj
Сағат бұрын
Ashutosh sb andh bhakt nahi sudhrenge .Bahut jald vishguru non biological avatar bhagwan modi ke aur biological avatar bhagwan yogi ki murtiya mandir me rakh kar unki pooja karnge 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@ashoksoni1372
Сағат бұрын
Apko or koi panalist nhi mila kya
@nirmalhazarika
42 минут бұрын
Kidka Danka baj raha hai ?😂
@rajindersinghbhatia736
49 минут бұрын
Ashutosh g aap Nijjar ko terrorist keh rahe h Canada 🇨🇦 apna Citizen ???
@ManishKumar-jr8gj
Сағат бұрын
इस मामले को जितना ज्यादा तूल देगा कनाडा, भाजपा सरकार और मोदी की उतनी ज्यादा दुनिया में धाक जमेगी
@user-yh8dg3wq6i
Сағат бұрын
Dunia mei thoo-thoo ho rahi hai. Andhbhakon ka zaroor tushtikaran hoga. Sarkar ko sarkar ki tarah kaam karna chahiye, girohbaaz ki tarah nahi.
@savitriramola4671
Сағат бұрын
Kaise ????????
@amjadhussain7309
58 минут бұрын
Andhbhakt ho kya
@PardeepKumarKumar-wl3sv
43 минут бұрын
Jai chand channel
@TheAnkitahlawat1
49 минут бұрын
Trump k permotio hora ye to
@खरेकीखरीखरी
Сағат бұрын
तुम बहुत बकवास करने का प्रयास करते हुए पत्रकारिता करते हो
@SanjayKumar-by5fp
Сағат бұрын
सरकार ने जो किया सही किया
@masroorahmad1858
Сағат бұрын
Har bar kisi sachhai ko bebuniyad kahta hai
@SanjayKumar-by5fp
Сағат бұрын
कुछ भी नही तुमको तो बदनाम करने के लिए मुद्दा चाहिए
@adminteampune1877
Сағат бұрын
Azad saheb thnx for defending india.. ashutosh laga raha apni bakwas karne me
@salmanhussain3672
Сағат бұрын
DO HE SHOULD ALSO DEBATE ON PM MODI DEFENDING ISRAEL'S GENOCIDES AGAINST INNOCENT PALESTINE CIVILIAN .
@SajidKhan-gn7gj
41 минут бұрын
Yadav ko qirftar kia gaya
@adminteampune1877
Сағат бұрын
I really salute today azad saheb
@VinodKumar-o6n3k
58 минут бұрын
EEE azad barka chadi sangi hai....was in system 😂...tere se zyada tez hai Americans
Пікірлер: 100