finally the answers ive been looking for! thank you so much
@deanthoniwilkins1529
2 жыл бұрын
This video is incredible! Thank you so much!
@hollywarner3048
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooo much for this explanation! The light bulb finally went on...:D
@MS-eg2we
4 жыл бұрын
Studying for step 2 rn, and this is gold!! Thanks doc!
@cs1983
4 жыл бұрын
At 1:59 you say that with the 95% CI "... we are 95% sure that the *real value* is between 5 and 44". If you want to be really precise, this is not correct. The correct interpretation would be: If you (or someone else) did this experiment 100 times, you would expect the observed point estimate to be in the interval (5, 44) 95 times. That's all the CI can tell you. The CI can't tell you about the *real value* .
@Matt_Kumar
Жыл бұрын
Gets it
@moncef2466
7 жыл бұрын
can you do a video on "P-hacking" or data dredging in the literature and how to detect it? thank you
@Bill.R.124
2 жыл бұрын
Wow. Finished a prestigious PhD program and never fully "got" the thing about the odds ratio and 1. This all makes more sense!
@marcellberto2538
Жыл бұрын
Clearly explained-well done!!
@wuxiaaddict
8 жыл бұрын
OMG!! Thank you! I finally understand CI!
@BazzTriton
7 жыл бұрын
So you did not really know anything. This guy did not add anything, just repeating the basic books ..
@asifaltaf13
2 жыл бұрын
exactly the video i needed
@wish1me1luck
5 жыл бұрын
this was really good thanks alot fo the effort ! solved the problem i was having with understanding this problem!
@luisluiscunha
5 жыл бұрын
Very good: thank you for the elegant explanation
@ruochengeng9981
2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you. But just confused about one point you mentioned, what principle or methodology do you use to tell if this value is clinical significantly like you did for "blood pressure increased by 5 is not clinically significant"?
@ismidina
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Sir...
@suepreme1876
2 жыл бұрын
how about if the parameter was negative, and the CI was negative?
@thecarpentercprteam8815
9 жыл бұрын
Thanks- as always!
@joansterify
7 жыл бұрын
Hi Rahul, really helpful videos. I was wondering if you could further demonstrate the concept of confidence intervals for non-inferiority trials. Just a thought!
@claylayne9497
3 жыл бұрын
I know Im randomly asking but does anybody know a method to log back into an instagram account..? I was stupid forgot my login password. I appreciate any tricks you can give me!
@mathiaszayd9623
3 жыл бұрын
@Clay Layne Instablaster =)
@claylayne9497
3 жыл бұрын
@Mathias Zayd thanks for your reply. I found the site through google and I'm in the hacking process now. I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@claylayne9497
3 жыл бұрын
@Mathias Zayd it worked and I now got access to my account again. I am so happy:D Thanks so much, you really help me out :D
@mathiaszayd9623
3 жыл бұрын
@Clay Layne you are welcome xD
@wknajafi
5 жыл бұрын
great video. but would you get the same results using p-value with an increased level of significance to 99%
@codiforney9523
8 жыл бұрын
are confidence intervals only giving clinical significance or statistical significance as well?
@oldblueday
8 жыл бұрын
+Codi Forney Only statistical significance and NOT clinical significance.
@djongzayzay800
6 жыл бұрын
But you do say and write that in the video..?? One of the important points that you made in the video was that confidence interval is more usefull because it also gives you information about the clinical significance and precision. And P-value only shows if the study is significant or not.
@ezzyt
9 жыл бұрын
thanks Rahul Can you record something on hazard ratios please. Cheers
@med-steve2089
6 жыл бұрын
just great :)
@BazzTriton
7 жыл бұрын
You're saying six is the same as half a dozen. The title of your post is misleading.
Пікірлер: 31