Not sure making an argument for using something that people need to buy where you get a cut, plays well as an unbiased opinion. My thoughts are that if you had just made your case and left it at that, it would be reassuring to your viewers ( especially ones that have bought from your recommendation ) that the plug-in is still viable. But adding that bit at the end where you tell them where to buy etc. comes off at the moment a little disingenuous.
@MehmetKozal
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. How to tell the plugin which workspace it should work in? If we can't, is it accurate before 709 conversion or after?
@franzmathauser
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Theo, thanks for sharing. Does the plug-in still work with davincis colormanagement wide gamut? I am having a hard time to expose with the plug-in, because the IRE values differ from the waveform scope values taken by the focus qualifier. Have you had seen any issues with that too?
@keithdennis5085
3 жыл бұрын
I'm grateful that you introduced me to Time in Pixels about a year and a half ago. I've been using this False Color plug-in ever since. Moreover, since I plan to wait on Resolve 17 until it comes out of Beta testing before I upgrade, I still have this valuable tool going forward.
@christianhotter
3 жыл бұрын
I learned how to use false colors with the Pocket 4K. The built in false colors in Resolve uses the same scale, so it’s what I’m used to.
@michaellanghausen4365
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, these are reasons I'll be sticking with the Time In Pixels False Color Plug-in
@thatcherfreeman
3 жыл бұрын
Didn't know the plugin had that feature. Cool stuff!
Пікірлер: 8