Soviet ships are not that big but highly packed with complex weapon systems
@gagi1165
3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@gagi1165
3 жыл бұрын
Bat petar Veliki and admiral Nahimov are bigest ship's in the world today
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
3 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 with modern systems and energy hungry sensors and requirement for long deployments we may see a return of CGNs in the USN It was the USN that built the first CGNs in the world
@CR1T1KaL714
3 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 false
@X.Y.Z.07
3 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 to be specific.. Largest surface combat non-carrier ship... Its not the largest ship in the world, as many Cargo ships can easily be bigger than even an Aircraft Carrier..
@jackwhitetron
2 жыл бұрын
I used to be VERY impressed with Russian military hardware but after their performance in Ukraine it is obvious that their capabilities were greatly exaggerated.
@lexburen5932
Жыл бұрын
or the mainstream media is very exaggerated
@locoman888
Жыл бұрын
Or what or where you getting your information is propagandized.
@nabobcisav9187
24 күн бұрын
True
@davidbridge5652
3 жыл бұрын
The Russians do seem to be able to pack on alot of weaponry
@cesaravegah3787
3 жыл бұрын
Yup, how reliable are such ships remains kind of dubious however.
@waterboi8197
3 жыл бұрын
Russian ships may be more armed than other ships of other country’s but that comes at a cost of dry dock repairs and rearm and refit time as it’ll take longer to get add on to the ship due to the tightly packed weapons and sensors.
@ruslankazimov622
2 жыл бұрын
Because Russian ships lose edge on numbers, the quality of materials, high tech electronic and also also shipbuilding skills are lagging behind of those on western world. So they can't compete using same So they have to focus on slightly different doctrine, where they can use more ground/aviation tools like big auto-cannons, missiles (which Russia is good at and has capability to produce in sheer numbers). It's also about US and UK having a strong naval tradition that have passed from generations to generations. Russian sailors never really proved themselves in battles and never made name for themselves. The only CV Russia have is literally stuck in never ending loop of fires + dock collapsing and etc. Lot's guns means lot's of ammo and electric wiring spread all over ship and which is not really very safe. Also in cases if ship takes battle damage ... like a rocket lands on deck... there is high chance that guns packed tightly and not protected with thick armor will suffer damage as well. Not to mention that many guns also requires more crew, which increases other problems like not "enough man to fight fires" or help with repairs. If Russia reduces the number of guns... Then they won't be able to engage that many allied ships.
@sushilover1356
2 жыл бұрын
A lot of weapons are also hidden dangers, one malfunction may kill everyone and sunk these ship or 1 hit to one of these weapon may cause total destruction to the ship.
@wengelder9256
2 жыл бұрын
@@cesaravegah3787 since last week we know , albeit it was a different type of warship , that Russia s navy is not that impressive . Sunk by missiles or on board explosion …. Not much difference
@bigbob1699
3 жыл бұрын
With so many weapon systems jammed all over the ship , I would hate to see a fire or battle damage get out of control .
@Krypton1996
3 жыл бұрын
It's still the beast for Russian Navy.
@drawingdead9025
2 жыл бұрын
25Km SAM, that's a big issue.
@joem80003
3 жыл бұрын
When I was in the Navy Soviets packed a lot of weapons on their ship in the 1980's the disadvantage is the maintenance salt water and apathy can be unknown variables.
@T02myRu
2 жыл бұрын
Did not know that Ireland was part of USSR.
@The_last_prime
2 жыл бұрын
@@T02myRu 🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣
@augustofernandez1999
3 жыл бұрын
i like it, i would got rid off the back cannons, make it space, and modernize it with vls för Kalibr. still is a fucking monster.
@georgeantabi6025
2 жыл бұрын
What an idea, this would definitely prolong the life of these legends, but the problem is that the shipyards are too busy modernizing other ships.
@vikingsmb
Жыл бұрын
the guns are good for use as shore bombardment
@lingth
2 жыл бұрын
Russian vehicles tend to favor more firepower than their NATO counterparts . same for armed Helicopters like Mi-24 Hind, or Kirov cruisers or battle cruisers
@austria5892
2 жыл бұрын
its an all purpose warship capable of maybe simultanously engage multiple types of threats in a single sortie or engage next target once the preceding target have been dealt of without using another dedicated warship to the job
@S.Hunter279
2 жыл бұрын
A model of ship design excellence, which modern Russia has not been able to properly replace. As of 2022, only 2 Sovremennyys remain in service, out of a total of 21. Russia has, of course, the powerful Kirov-class cruisers (1 in service), the 3 Slava-class cruisers and the 8 Udaloy-class destroyers, but they pale in comparison to the US Navy's surface fleet, comprised of 22 Ticonderoga-class cruisers and 70 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Even if we forget about aircraft carriers, this means that Russia is not ready to fight the Americans in a surface action. What made these Soviet designs so excellent, in my opinion, is that they were defensive weapons, conceived to counteract the strengths of the American fleet. But the new frigates and corvettes, besides being too small, are essentially offensive weapons, optimized for launching Kalibr missiles, although they can be equipped with Oniks and Zircons.
@johnknapp952
3 жыл бұрын
We spent 3 weeks trailing the Minsk and her two escorts, a Sovremenny and Udaloy class ships in the western Pacific in '85. It seems like half the time the Minsk and Sovremenny ships were dead in the water with black smoke spewing from their stacks. The ages of these three ships combined was less than that of our Know class FF and they seemed to be in terrible shape.
@shoubhikvarman3228
3 жыл бұрын
Well sir in the 80's & 90's their economy was in a terrible condition so the concept of servicing was thrown to the wind due to which the Soviets & later Russian Navy had many issues and accidents think you know that
@johnknapp952
3 жыл бұрын
@@shoubhikvarman3228 Makes you wonder about the state of the weapons systems also. Also with all those weapons and the men required to maintain and operate them, that doesn't leave much room for the crew. Then again, crew comfort was always low priority for the Soviet/Russian military.
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
3 жыл бұрын
@@johnknapp952 I was an Oliver Hazard Perry sailor and I can tell you surprisingly the soviet ships were actually better and more comfortable for the crew , none of this 64 guys sharing 3 toilets and 2 doorless showers like the frigates I served on
@johnknapp952
3 жыл бұрын
@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520 So how many Russian ships have you been aboard? I've served aboard my share of ships (with LAMPS Detachments) and know the good and bad of them. But the Soviet military has never been know for crew comfort. Just ask any tankman or infantry that had to squeeze into a BMP. And with all the weapons that they throw onto their ships doesn't leave a lot of room for the crew. Also Russian sailor says "You had showers!!" 😂
@iumbo1234
3 жыл бұрын
@@johnknapp952 Don't forget that the Typhoon submarines have a sauna and even a fucking swimming pool inside.
@orphidian11
3 жыл бұрын
3:14 turret was pointing to the mast
@audiquattros-rf1of
2 жыл бұрын
Yea.... so strong that it got promoted to a submarine.... lol
@valamaas
3 жыл бұрын
You need to make the video longer (or footer screen) because KZitem overlays suggested videos while you are still presenting. ⭐⭐⭐
@Jhay_07
3 жыл бұрын
I used this ship in cold waters 2 I liked it.
@SauceMaster2157
2 жыл бұрын
Maintenance is probably a nightmare
@richessery8475
2 жыл бұрын
Looks good but that is about it. Russian ships suffer from poor build quality, unreliable power plants, leaking hulls and most of all malfunctioning weapons. Add in a mainly conscript crew and you have inefficiency all round.
@barracuda7018
2 жыл бұрын
Russian weapons in general are hugely overrated propaganda assets.
@hoangcanhthanh1757
2 жыл бұрын
If u r playing morden warship, U will know that this ship is quite good
@emielemiel2633
Жыл бұрын
Nice yacht for Fred Flinstone
@NSomchai
2 жыл бұрын
What are they afraid? The floating steel?
@darthvodder7426
2 жыл бұрын
The Moskva has reached its final destination! The bottom of the Black Sea!😀
@SKCCP
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe 35-40 years ago, but not now.
@emilcoelho1536
3 жыл бұрын
what happen about my c130 hercules videos?
@kempmt1
3 ай бұрын
Was a VLS made for the SA-N-7 Gadfly?
@user-co4ky8fe4l
2 жыл бұрын
動力に蒸気タービンを採用しているせいで稼働率がウダロイ級よりも低くなってて不憫な艦
@jurgenmuller143
2 жыл бұрын
LOl, outdated ship with a huge radar silhouette, would be spammed with missiles without even knowing from whom.
@adolfshitler
2 жыл бұрын
"feared" as in past tense? Means they no longer fear them!
@nikosifantis9526
2 жыл бұрын
Τελικά ένας πυραυλος χρειάστηκε.. .... Τώρα έγινε υποβρύχιο
@user-dq6yk5fd8c
3 жыл бұрын
【现代级】当年中国也把他当个宝,现在不配给052d洗个澡
@loyalist5736
2 жыл бұрын
How the Hell do they keep up with the maintenance on all these systems ?
@gamm8939
2 жыл бұрын
they don't. They scrap a lot of ships or let systems unused. Packing that many weapons on a ship is awful for reliability, rearmament, and a security hazard, because if a fire happens on one of these ships, its basically a write-off
@belikumari6893
2 жыл бұрын
It's called "Ushakov" in modern warships if y want to fully experienced this ships and it's capabilities then i will recommend y to try 🔥🔥Modern warships 🔥🔥 it's a versatile and dangerous both. But in this vids, where is russian kashtan AA defense sytem 🙏🙏 more capable then AK-130. 🔥🔥. That's for now 👋👋
@curtiscarpenter9881
2 жыл бұрын
Krakatoa a device smaller then a can of cola can sink a ship invented by Sidney Alfred would be the UK's leading line of defence against this showpiece/centrepiece.🎋
@maxt7525
3 жыл бұрын
I believe they are upgrading these ships with vls systems and new anti ship missiles right?
@6dvc
3 жыл бұрын
No, they're updating the Udaloys
@elitedima9672
2 жыл бұрын
Modernized udaloy has total 24x missiles
@BossModeGod
2 жыл бұрын
I’m gonna need one of those ALL NEW 100% WEATHERPROOF BearSkin brand hoodies, to try out & see if I’d like to infact purchase☝️🤤
@khanhonam7196
3 жыл бұрын
the soviet navy loved large ships
@victoreous626
3 жыл бұрын
Then they must really like the 11 American Super Carriers.
@khanhonam7196
3 жыл бұрын
@@victoreous626 russian cruisers food are those 11 Super Carriers. Those cruisers were developed to destroy u.s carriers
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
3 жыл бұрын
Soviet surface fleet was mostly small corvettes, fast attack craft and frigates Norman Polmars books on the soviet navy go into detail , off the top of my head I’m pretty sure Soviets had 2700 ships in the early 80s but side by side comparison with the USN the US had more tonnage
@jerzkos1301
2 жыл бұрын
Ja też się obawiam. Mianowicie tego, że rozpadnie się w pierwszym lepszym sztormie, bo to w końcu stara, by nie powiedzieć, przestarzała konstrukcja....
@ronaldmarcks1842
3 жыл бұрын
One EMP weapon would knock this legacy class out of the park. I respect the Russian military, but it is completely underfunded.
@duurnamets9678
3 жыл бұрын
The problem of NATO & US is always they underestimate the Russian Army.
@riptide9126
2 жыл бұрын
The thing is do you think you can get so close to such a warship for an emp attack? its defenses can spot you hundred of kms away
@riptide9126
2 жыл бұрын
Emp attack is the last thing that a ship has to worry about, AShM launched from other warships, subs an jets are a much bigger threat
@duurnamets9678
2 жыл бұрын
You talk about a country that can destroy the whole world 100 times with his Nukes.
@duurnamets9678
2 жыл бұрын
You totally wrong Russia has one of best radars. If it comes to a war between Nato&US then is over for mankind. They will destroy eachother. So many Nukes and a Chain Reaction of wars world wide.
@user-xj3ve7wt8k
2 жыл бұрын
And now... he is under the sea :)
@mohammedines6182
2 жыл бұрын
Je peu vous aidez à le perfectionner et le moderniser pour qu'il soit un destroyer porte hélicoptères d'attaques et de soutiens opérationnel efficace .
@josedurin1125
2 жыл бұрын
My god, it's so much heavy armament, 😐🐻🐻🚀🚁
@williamhutchinson7
2 жыл бұрын
In reality it not much different from others, just looks crammed with evrything on
@TriXelOne
2 жыл бұрын
three em eighty 3M80 is the designation, not Em three eighty M380
@mydearcod9639
2 жыл бұрын
Old school shit.
@Grogag684
2 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣no need nato warship to turn it to submarine.......remake of this video is require after 9 months...
@dataman6744
2 жыл бұрын
It's a beast
@MrCetirizina
2 жыл бұрын
with "buksir" escorting this miracle
@Trojan0304
2 жыл бұрын
Why can’t the aircraft carrier go to sea, just saying.
@MrCetirizina
2 жыл бұрын
even the RF submarines are escortoded by "bucsires" ))
@danigreatprogresslana570
3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@gergelylovaszi9453
2 жыл бұрын
zumwalt class ?
@ahmadmersarani3767
2 жыл бұрын
Russian developed most advanced electronic weapons inspire slow electronic production of Russia.
@saworieza
3 жыл бұрын
The AK630 suspiciously looks like Daleks ... well .. sort of
@stormtrooperanimations3241
2 жыл бұрын
1:52 tanjung perak :)
@tasarasgoku
3 жыл бұрын
Armed to the teeth!
@000pete9
2 жыл бұрын
Top sea dog? really?.you are the expert.
@fredsaga3708
2 жыл бұрын
And Sovremenny is the most outdated warship in today's Chinese navy. (4 active in China, 2 active in Russia)
@winbear7423
2 жыл бұрын
In fact, the Chinese navy has upgraded the Sovremenny destroyers it has by installing the YJ-12 with a 250km range instead of the 120km Moskit like the original Russian.
@marklinsdell7527
2 жыл бұрын
Why don't we build them then
@user-xb2eq1cg6l
2 жыл бұрын
Aren't you afraid the Chinese 052D will think it's made of paper?
@winbear7423
2 жыл бұрын
What do you mean?
@ayane7283
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm
@quymaitv7755
2 жыл бұрын
Tầu nè của Nga có nhiều hỏa pháo và tên lửa mạnh nó bắn vỡ đầu thì Nát to sơ chứ sao
@lustrousmetal3677
2 жыл бұрын
Dang!
@user-xx6hg1eo8m
2 жыл бұрын
اي نوع من العلف تأكله انت؟،العلف الروسي ،او العلف الفرنسي.
@4rct1c9Ic3m4n
3 жыл бұрын
1:21 Smoke belcher
@Falko-Nanda
2 жыл бұрын
Deutscher Untertitel-englische gesprochen?!
@drawingdead9025
2 жыл бұрын
Very short range SAM system.
@rael5469
3 жыл бұрын
With so many different weapon systems they must not have much ammo for any each of them. I would think that their ...how would you say it?....battle duration wouldn't be that long. I would think that they would run out of ammo faster than a US ship. No?
@adrianotaylor7230
3 жыл бұрын
i think they would be in a fleet with replenisment ships with food and extra munitions also the russian navy is to protect the shores not to really go out far in the ocean
@Nothing_._Here
2 жыл бұрын
Each AK 630 has 2000 rounds. with 8 belts of 2000 rounds stored internally in the ship for reloading the turrets. Each AK 130 has 340 rounds Each RBU-1000 has 24 rockets. It's more than enough.
@rael5469
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nothing_._Here Totally fascinating N.H. Thanks.
@dureteheiral1793
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nothing_._Here i wish that NATO warship capable of hunting submarine also equipped with similar ASW mortar as good as RBU-6000, but apparently most NATO ASW ships relies mostly to ASROC..
@Onesweettone
Жыл бұрын
We all know today they are not dangerous at all.. and easly sinks
@henryvacal7402
2 жыл бұрын
It's still a beast.
@gamm8939
2 жыл бұрын
that goes down if its hit by basically anything and has an incredible chance of failure. One little fire and you can scrap the ship
@ENGBriseB
2 жыл бұрын
40 years old.
@moffgideon2213
3 жыл бұрын
Lots of mistakes
@danialshazly7547
2 жыл бұрын
so why nato feared this ship? nothing said about that
@gweltuz3445
3 жыл бұрын
The best ship of wargame red dragon
@marcwitt8507
2 жыл бұрын
All top heavy …
@halgaci
3 жыл бұрын
The anti aircraft missile's maximum range is just 25km. Can it survive the antiship missiles equipped by western navies?
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
3 жыл бұрын
That’s the surface variant the naval variant is just over 30km ( still piss poor ) This destroyer isn’t an AA ship its design was more so an ASUW ship with a strong NGS capability for amphibious operations , their Self defence systems are really good but they’re definitely not an air warfare platform , I hope this helps with your question
@pikapikacool
3 жыл бұрын
There are also 4 ciws system..
@gamm8939
2 жыл бұрын
@@pikapikacool which are old and unreliable, and their ability to shoot down modern missiles is doubted a lot. Gun based CIWS is far worse than things like Rim-116
@pikapikacool
2 жыл бұрын
@@gamm8939 still better than nothing.. and how gun based ciws works, they don't need good accuracy, they just need to create screen of bullets to protect the ship..
@gamm8939
2 жыл бұрын
@@pikapikacool which is a highly debated tactic. what do they do if they fly in low? It doesn't seem like they can shoot that low. If you come from the front or the back it's literally impossible for them to shoot down the missile. A RIM-116 and Seas Sparrows in VLS are far more capable, and the west is far closer on laser CIWS than Russia. Also, you guys are missing my point. My point is that packing that many different systems on a ship like in a sandbox game makes the ship unreliable, hard to work on and dangerous
@miodragvesovic2391
2 жыл бұрын
Rusija je zakon.
@jbhk7977
3 жыл бұрын
Look outside, look at the world . . . maybe the army should start concerning about the const*tut*on and the people instead of showing off what the tax payer payed for.
@user-qo8jn9re7o
2 жыл бұрын
لا الاه الا الله محمد رسول الله
@MrShrog
3 жыл бұрын
Hello there
@xdboiii4833
3 жыл бұрын
General Kenobi
@robertosovietunion7567
3 жыл бұрын
Now Sovermeny have been refurbished by the CHINA PLA NAVY
@paulsteaven
3 жыл бұрын
PLA-Navy has better destroyers now compared to this Soviet relic.
@johnekk1560
2 жыл бұрын
จรวดร่อนไม่เคยกลัวเรือ.
@MrCetirizina
2 жыл бұрын
that
@worldoftancraft
3 жыл бұрын
Learn to use transcriptions, and look to the stressings, because right now you sound as a typical English speaker - not a narrator/speaker.
@Military-TV
3 жыл бұрын
Well get to work making your own video and talk about it all you want.... It takes a special kinda whineyass person to complain about a completely free video that you watched on a completely free app... 😭
@victoreous626
3 жыл бұрын
@@Military-TV Better to ignore criticism if you can't receive it graciously. You see, I took his critique as being constructive, albeit crude in delivery. PEACE
@dkhang7274
3 жыл бұрын
Great video. But now I gotta convert kilometers and kilograms into pounds and feet so I can have better context to the many sizes and weights I love learning new things. Thanks for the vid.
@worldoftancraft
3 жыл бұрын
@@victoreous626 The problem is that 3 replies of greatly explained and elaborated criticism... they did disappear.
@victoreous626
3 жыл бұрын
@@worldoftancraft But of course. Welcome to 2021 censored communications. Perhaps I should have kept out of the comms here.
@isakhanofbengal5936
3 жыл бұрын
Only 4 Anti-Ship missile?!??!?
@enhancedutility266
3 жыл бұрын
8 total
@isakhanofbengal5936
3 жыл бұрын
@@enhancedutility266 no air defence system?
@enhancedutility266
3 жыл бұрын
@@isakhanofbengal5936 it does the SA-8 gadfly
@isakhanofbengal5936
3 жыл бұрын
@@enhancedutility266 range?
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
3 жыл бұрын
8 x AShMs ( normal for a destroyer ) 2 x GMLS with a magazine total of 48 SAM missiles 2 x 130mm dual main guns 4 x CIWs ( most destroyers of 80s only had 1 CIWs ) It’s a heavily armed ship for that size
@rahmatsyahnusfi6946
2 жыл бұрын
As Yg TAKUT dgn RUSSIA, sehingga As Seret ANGGOTA NATO UTUK SERANG RUSSIA
Believe it or not but Nato has reason to fear every Russian ship if they have hypersonic missiles.
@chutichaipormlat54
2 жыл бұрын
กูว่า..สหรัฐ เขาก็ไม่ได้กลัวรัสเชียหรอก
@gregophilip6858
2 жыл бұрын
just take the ship out with planes
@olihsv4047
2 жыл бұрын
Scared? This is a old battel ship
@robertoaseremo4163
2 жыл бұрын
Number of these Russian Navy Soviet era Soveremeny Class Destroyer have been Refurbished by the Chinese PLA Navy just like Liaoning Class Aircraft Carrier Chinese PLA Navy first Aircraft Carrier that they have refurbished from the Russian Navy
@pocholokhan7718
2 жыл бұрын
Russia created Titanium Submarine
@aseptzy3242
2 жыл бұрын
Sulit Dimengerti
@mariuszm8065
2 жыл бұрын
czemu tylko tytuł jest po polsku ktoś tu w ch..a leci
@frankwong7391
2 жыл бұрын
Just fly a drone and sink it
@kevinsyahbana7534
2 жыл бұрын
I want to see Russia war vs NATO & America at European Land, i hope America give permission for F22 join that war, so we can see SU-57 vs F22 & F35 Submarine Fighter Jet
@elitedima9672
2 жыл бұрын
Why would NATO fear it? It has only 8 anti ship missiles. Modern anti-air defense system can engage incoming missiles. 8 is not enough.
@user-xn2zd7bl1u
2 жыл бұрын
Moskit anti-ship missiles are extremely difficult to intercept. Not only they are very low-altitude, but also have more than double speed of sound (that's why they are so big and heavy). They entered service in 1978, but only in 2006 american SM-6 air-defense missile demonstrated the ability to shoot down Moskit. SM-6 entered service in 2013, but it still a big question if it can defend a ship if multiple Moskits will attack simultaneously.
@elitedima9672
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-xn2zd7bl1u How effective are modern russian missiles such as KH-35 and Kalibr?
@user-xn2zd7bl1u
2 жыл бұрын
@@elitedima9672 Kh-35 has even lower altitude: 3-4 meters above the sea on the terminal part of the distance (Moskit has 7 meters), but unlike Moskit, the Kh-35 is subsonic. So I don't think it will be more effective in terms of avoiding anti-missile defense of the enemy ship. It's main advantage over Moskit is smaller size and weight - 600 kg instead of 4 tons, so it can be carried in large numbers by small ships and air crafts. As for Kalibr, it is really better: it has 5 meters altitude, Mach 2.8 speed and 500 km range. So it is even more effective than Moskit and has 4 times longer range. Or it can travel 2600 km on subsonic speed, against the targets that don't have anti-missile defense. Also it weights less than Moskit (technology improved since 1970s).
Пікірлер: 236