We made these videos a while ago but never got around to making an all-in-one video like we usually do. I imagine lots of new subscribers haven't seen this, so enjoy... We'll be back Wednesday on the regular posting schedule. Thank you for watching!
@lianawei8711
2 жыл бұрын
God. I want to keep repeating the 11:52 part. I think there's a lot of musicians who produce the dynamic style and being thankful about life but all I know are Japanese artist: Wanima-Tomoni and Super breaver-Utsukushihi . But I don't really know if this was his but I interpreted it to be like these songs. What do you guys think? I want song recommendations similar to these..
@willb295
2 жыл бұрын
Hello, I’m a 18 year old and I’m really trying to get into philosophy and literature (I’m a science guy). In addition to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, do you think you can cover other existentialists: Kierkegaard, Camu, Sartre,Dostoyevsky, etc? Or maybe some other philosophers? I ask because your channel is one of the few that covers philosophers in depth in a visually pleasing way. Most other channels only talk about philosophy in the context of “self-help” rather than for educational purposes. You teach philosophy for philosophy’s sake, so it’s a great learning resource.
@aluami7712
2 жыл бұрын
There are a lot of channels that cover philosophy that aren't "self-help" like Plastic Pills, CCK Philosophy, Theory & Philosophy, Epoch Philosophy, Carefree Wandering. Then there are lectures that you can watch on youtube like Rick Roderick, Raymond Geuss, Michael Sugrue, Gregory Sadler, etc. Then there are podcasts you watch too like Pill Pod Philosophy. Other channels exist.
@gustavswasser7073
2 жыл бұрын
I’m the same as you 18 and science guy but some of the best philosophy videos are found here or on the channel called Eternalised. He talks about the existentialists like kirkegaard or Dostoevsky (some of my favorites) in depth and provides a visually pleasing easy to understand take on them. Also reading their books for yourself is a life changing experience if enough attention is given to their ideas.
@yogi2436
2 жыл бұрын
ha ha , one day you will realize that philosophy is not for philosophy's sake, good luck in your quest.
@DonnaSnyder
2 жыл бұрын
How about Diotima, Hypatia, Murdoch, Wollstonecraft, de Beauvoir?
@WeltgeistYT
2 жыл бұрын
They’re in the cards yes
@TurtlePower718
2 жыл бұрын
We'd love to see a Nietzsche contra Wagner video! Great work!
@giftenjoyer3664
2 жыл бұрын
Didn't Nietzsche say something to the effect of "Without music, life is a mistake."? Yet he can't find a musician to endorse. Do you think he would have liked Jazz?
@garrycraigpowell
2 жыл бұрын
Surely, he would - especially the early New Orleans jazz of Armstrong.
@bilkishchowdhury8318
2 жыл бұрын
Neitzche composed some music, too! His complete piano works are available in youtube.
@theobiggs6611
2 жыл бұрын
@@garrycraigpowell he would've had adornos view of it I believe : "elevator music"
@701delbronx8
2 жыл бұрын
He would not have liked Jazz
@bobnewton1064
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/p4943YKZjZeKaoI here’s some of his works
@Ann_A_Lien
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, interested in Nietzsche vs. Wagner.
@VoidOctopus
2 жыл бұрын
"music has not yet such a project" Alexa play Kanye West - my beautiful dark twisted fantasy
@ben_alfred
2 жыл бұрын
This has easily become one of my favourite channels to tune in to. Love you guys, keep up the good work :)
@godsdominatrix439
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent analysis of Nietzsche's views on music. Himself a musician, Wagner once brutally laughed at Nietzsche's attempts at composition. I appreciate the trajectory from his early work, the Birth of Tragedy out of the Spirit of Music, to The Gay Science, to his final Nachlass writings. The only thing I really don't understand is why -- after you display the sentence that shows that after all Nietzsche didn't think music had reached the level of the noblest Dionyisonism -- that you then provide as soundtrack Pachelbel's dreaded canon. You might as well have played Britney Spears' "Oops, I did it again." There is nothing noble or Dionysian in the repetitive groundbass of one of the most droll pieces conceivable. Its commodifiability today is a testament to contemporary musical commodifiability in general, from Pachelbel to the Sex Pistols; let alone today's endless sequence of sequels in movies and limited chord progressions in music. Pachelbel -- using your analysis of Nietzsche -- cannot come close to representing the Goethian and Rubinesque sensuality and erotics that animated Nietzsche: rather, Pachelbel's boring canon REpresents the continuous chewing of the cud from herd animality. Theme; variation. Verse; chorus. Pachelbel was worse than a romantic, and in today's parlance he was the worst error of all: an aspiration toward the universal. For a video on Nietzsche's mistake, you could have at least chosen one of Nietzsche's piano works: at least Wagner would have recognized it as an appropriate mistake.
@yogi2436
2 жыл бұрын
LOL , thus speaks the young Dionysian :)
@ideologybot4592
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, Canon in D is repetitive, easily commercialized, and basically a sonic meme that every wannabe sophisticate plays at their wedding. Got it. But you know what it's good for? Background music, just like it's used here, something that doesn't require all of the attention and is more of a familiar calming influence as your attention is on something other than the music. You are encouraged to make your own video where you are speaking Nietzschean ideas and showing great works of visual art while simultaneously blasting hyper-dynamic, emotional musical compositions. It could work tremendously if done with extreme emotional sensitivity and skill, or be really unpleasant. I'd kind of like to see it.
@godsdominatrix439
2 жыл бұрын
@@ideologybot4592 "Hyper-dynamic emotion" is precisely the kind of romanticism the video demonstrates that Nietzsche abhorred. Good luck.
@ideologybot4592
2 жыл бұрын
@@godsdominatrix439 never said Nietzsche would like it. I said, if you made a sensory-overload video that included it, I'd like to see if it turned out to be a monstrosity.
@NihilRuina
2 жыл бұрын
"The Dionysian is best expressed in intoxication", for he, Dionysus, is the God of wine, madness, insanity, and ecstasy. Furthermore, "Now all is still! The sea lies there pale and glittering, it cannot speak. The sky plays its everlasting silent evening game... it cannot speak... O sea, O evening! You are evil instructors! You teach man to cease to be man! Shall he surrender to you? Shall he become as you now are, pale, glittering, mute, tremendous, reposing above himself? Exalted above himself?"
@theunclejesusshow8260
2 жыл бұрын
The Philosophers wouldn't know what the hell to do with the world today🤣🧐🤡🧙♂️👺👍
@DavidGoliath1
2 жыл бұрын
They are still philosophers now. In fact it’s an almost meaningless title to anyone interested in the vaste domain of philosophy. I am a philosopher and you are a philosopher. You can only judge the true qualification of that title depending on your own knowledge in that domain. It’s therefore relative. I guess the closest meritorious person to be qualified a Philosopher is someone who actually studied or made a doctorate in Philosophy. Anyway Philosophers never knew what to do with the world. There wouldn’t be any discussions, argumentations, confrontation of ideas and conflicts in the World if a Philosopher of any time resolved them all by his almost divine knowledge and premunition of the steps to take for humanity to find quietude, peace, happiness and the end of all suffering. Do you know what were the steps to take for the Roman Empire to not fracture and collapse ? What was there to do when the Ming dynasty ruled over China ? What was there to do with Victorian era British empire ? You don’t know, like no one know what to do today. Nobody has a omniconscious intellect that can resolve all problems we have in the World, and somebody like Nietzsche, surely wouldn’t either. The Republic of Plato wouldn’t have worked out. The liberalism of Adam Smith wouldn’t have worked out. The communism of Marx wouldn’t have worked out. Christianism hasn’t worked out. Islam either. Nothing will ever cease the troubles that intrinsically arrive with the human existence. So what is there to do ? That is philosophy.
@yogi2436
2 жыл бұрын
6.50 . 7.35,8.40 N had his limitations but also insight; but time has shown he was mistaken about his view of his mistake in new ways.
@mithrandir2006
2 жыл бұрын
How can you produce an art of overflowing vitality alone, in a society that offers no help or community?
@yogi2436
2 жыл бұрын
tough it out
@DavidGoliath1
2 жыл бұрын
@@yogi2436 Actually Nietzsche was very supportive of Artists and their way of not being productive, living in true freedom, doing what they like as their first priority. Artists wouldn’t survive without the shelter of society, that’s why Artists are truly human, utilising their consciousness not for materialistic causes but for noble creativity.
@HigherHumansPath
6 ай бұрын
This is rapidly becoming my favorite channel.
@floris812
Жыл бұрын
I wonder what Nietzsche would have thought of Scriabin.
@blackfeatherstill348
2 жыл бұрын
I think the most interesting analysis of Nietzsche's ideas for me so far on this channel, and clarifies his relationship to Schopenhauer and Wagner in my mind. And his approach to art which interests me. Great video.
@PropagandalfderWeiße
6 ай бұрын
Regarding Goethe, has Nietzsche ever written about the "German Illiad", Faust? I have a feeling he wouldn't have liked its "apotheosis" of Gretchen, the embodiment of the ascetic ideal...
@1950sTardigrade
2 жыл бұрын
these are such beautiful videos, and ingenious analysis. Keep up the good work!
@michaelvan-vn9ku
11 ай бұрын
The question, or at least mine, arises..where are now ? Art wise ? If I look around me and see what we are building now, what kind of music we are listening to, the programs we look at on TV, the books we read which seem to have been replaced by social media...it doesn't look particularly good huh...🤔
@Richard-1776
2 жыл бұрын
I see life as a disaster, because it is. I'd love to fall asleep and not wake up. I try to be positive and learn things and develop myself because it's my duty to myself, but I'd rather just quietly fade away in my sleep, or better yet, never have been. Frankly I'm too good, not in the nice sense, for this disaster of a world.
@RocketKirchner
Жыл бұрын
There are three polar opposites in Neech thinking . The third is the Alexandrian man going blind by books .
@ΑναστάσιοςΤαρενίδης
2 жыл бұрын
We want a video Nietsche vs Wagner
@steadyliam
Жыл бұрын
I don’t understand what the difference is between the Dionysian art of the vital among us and the intoxicating art of the languid. After all, Dionysus was heavily associated with intoxication for the purposes of summoning primeval forces within oneself. I also find it curious that Nietzsche associates Homer with the Dionysian given his work is, as Joseph Campbell put it, the epic poetry at the foundation of classical civilisation, yet Spengler, who was heavily influenced by Nietzsche, chose to designate that civilisation as Apollonian, the Nietzschean opposite of Dionysian.
@paulusvonpapahet4155
2 жыл бұрын
Nietzsche loved the south, the idea of the south, its antiquity and vibrant genius. I suspect he would've loved music like that of Boccherini or Padre Soler, the Sarao de la Chacona or even portuguese fados.
@paulusvonpapahet4155
2 жыл бұрын
One little secret : in his last days of sanity he apparently discovered (and loved) a notable spanish zarzuela, La Gran Vía, in particular a segment called Jota de los Ratas (Song of the Rats ), in which three thieves disclose their methods and experience of life in a very funny way.
@WeltgeistYT
2 жыл бұрын
He loved the opera Carmen for its Mediterranean vibes!
@Griegg
2 жыл бұрын
Please do elaborate on the subject of Nietzsche versus Wagner.
@bontasliviu300
2 жыл бұрын
Yes please do a video on nietzche vs wagner!!! Thank for all the effort you put in making this channel.
@satnamo
2 жыл бұрын
Art+music= de Dao to salvation
@MrSolus-ls6us
2 жыл бұрын
Was this meant to be 2 separate videos?
@robertwallach1828
2 жыл бұрын
Would you make a video covering 'On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason'?
@WeltgeistYT
2 жыл бұрын
Someday. I feel like it’s not really important to understand Schopenhauer in WWR (even though he said so himself)
@Williamaster369
5 ай бұрын
I have learnt SO much from this insightful channel! Thanks a lot!
@ezravanessen7288
2 жыл бұрын
I really like this video. In my opinion one of the greatest of the romantics was Novalis and according to Rudiger Safranski he was maybe an even freer spirit than Nietzsche; he was the Mozart under the romantics. Can you do a future video on him?
@challenger1423
2 жыл бұрын
Hey, I really enjoyed your video, is that possible for me to hear you talking about late Nietzsche’s view after reading Schelling in the future?
@timothychen754
2 жыл бұрын
When the music started playing I got so confused but I was loving it haha
@Jabranalibabry
2 жыл бұрын
Nietz be like: suffer my bars!
@andreyandreiko8553
2 жыл бұрын
Nice argument Nietzsche but i still going to listen to Wagner
@gregpappas
Жыл бұрын
Please tell us more about Wagner’s influence on this.
@JudyFayLondon
2 жыл бұрын
Always love to know more about Nietzsche.
@denisehall5145
2 жыл бұрын
Wagner, that would be a video I would like to see.
@chrisfarley839
2 жыл бұрын
I am very interested to learn about Nietzsche and Wagner!
@larsharald2431
2 жыл бұрын
I would like to see a video about the case of wagner :)
@ericchristen2623
2 жыл бұрын
The issue that many rationalists misunderstand is the fact that rationality is nothing more than a small department in the great emotional and spiritual self, and that intuition and imagination always dwarfed it.
@Joe-os3vp
2 жыл бұрын
5:50 What painting is this, please? Great video.
@boglot
2 жыл бұрын
The Youth of Bacchus
@Joe-os3vp
2 жыл бұрын
@@boglot Thanks!
@Charismaniac
5 ай бұрын
I thank Nietzsche for all his work and enthusiasm that never died and you, my dear friend, for revealing so much of it for me and inspiring me to study him.
@needtoknowbasis3499
4 ай бұрын
Better to read Nietzsche.
@POSTELVIS
2 жыл бұрын
You could argue that Nietzche's aesthetics are found in atonal works of the 20th century, no longer constrained by conventional tonality, they were free to explore other methods of melody and harmony which often sought beauty in a chaotic mess.
@wordcel
2 жыл бұрын
which atonal works in particular?
@travisheldreth5021
2 жыл бұрын
Yes to Nietzsche and Wagner
@oseascartagena2060
2 жыл бұрын
Please do The Case of Wagner
@yashmishra17
2 жыл бұрын
Wonderfully informative video like always. I am always eager whenever a new video drops from you. regarding the future videos, I would really like to see Nietzsche's full take on Wagner as you mentioned in the video but also a video where you speculate a little about what other artists could fit into the mould of a Nietzschean artist !
@bilkishchowdhury8318
2 жыл бұрын
Neitzche composed some music too.
@anandkapdi4822
2 жыл бұрын
Interested
@benisjamin6583
2 жыл бұрын
Magnificent!
@robtennapel78
2 жыл бұрын
Great stuff!
@megshan09
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. The sacred law under Plato to keep the enigma hidden, the mystery may be found in allegory, never in relative terms. Do the same laws apply to Germania? Where relative positions may only be measured in mysteries. Also, as a philosophy, is it not better to be canceled every single day than not at all?
@garrycraigpowell
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, and thought-provoking, but I'm not sure Nietzsche is right about Wagner. And what about Mozart and Bach? Isn't their music coming from overflowing vitality? To me it sounds as if it is. Of course post-Nietzsche, lots of artists quite consciously attempted to create Dionysian art in the Nietzschean mode, with varying levels of success. D'Annunzio did in Italy, for example, and occasionally succeeded. Herman Hesse with his novels too, perhaps more successfully (though not always: The Glass Bead Game is not remotely Dionysian.) I think he ought to have included Shakespeare too, and Chaucer.
@jan-martinulvag1953
2 жыл бұрын
He did not misunderstand it . He just first thought his life would be great and later realized that it sucked.
@grosbeak6130
2 жыл бұрын
Frederick Nietzsche simply worshiped the force of life, the sex drive in all of its so-called glory. It really is that simple folks. There's nothing more to it, that's why Frederick Nietzsche was ultimately not a philosopher but a poet. That's why he had a love-hate relationship with the stoics such as Marcus Aurelius whom for me blows Nietzsche out of the water. And that's why he also hated Socrates and Gautama Buddha. None of these were poets, none of these succumb to the deliriums and delusions of the sex drive. Frederick Nietzsche ultimately was a propagator and propagandist for a Promethean hubris of indefinite progress. He was a slave to an horizon, and his eternal reoccurrence is nothing more than a asymptotic fantasy.
Пікірлер: 95