0:14 “a…………………………………………………...squared plus b squared equals c squared”
@adenwong716
8 ай бұрын
I don't believe in god but this video is not making any solid argument against god
@masoncraftmine1996
7 ай бұрын
I was going to like this comment but I had decided not to for obvious reasons
@DeltaInternetFaaaan
8 ай бұрын
"There's no possible way for c² equal anything other than a² + b²" Another types af geometry like hyperbolic and spherical: Ok
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
you're missing the point, but it doesnt matter tbh, the target audience of this video are not minds that will decompose.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
Imagine missing the point this much 23 likes because HP debunkers at this point don't care anymore about actually debunking HP* *pretty hyperbolic statement but it does have some truth to it. Also technically I'm an HP debunker too.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
8 likes for an equally bad reply (no offense to you btw). Nice. >">someone debunks your hypothesis with equal evidence" Missing the point spectacularly is suddenly "debunking a hypothesis" with "equal evidence" kek. many keks.
@kappasphere
8 ай бұрын
I think this hits close to the "God can't create a rock that is big enough that he can't lift it" argument, in the sense that the laws of logic are still fundamental to even any God that may exist, and therefore, such a being neither created nor can contradict said laws, making it not all powerful or the origin of everything.
@eingyi2500
8 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_Greeceby missing the point do you mean "disagrees with the video"? 😂 clown world
@gomdgomd2268
8 ай бұрын
I lost my remaining two brain cells from this
@alekhinesgun9997
8 ай бұрын
one of the few people that can unite the theists and atheists... to point and laugh at this nonsense, well done!👏
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
said the same thing to Galileo and Darwin.
@jnitz1
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective comparing yourself to Galileo and Darwin is embarrassing
@alekhinesgun9997
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective I'm sorry to be the one to give you the cold shower but I can promise you you're not no Galileo or Darwnin. The fact you think that is worrying not gonna to lie.
@eingyi2500
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective wow. You are a CLOWN
@rimbusjift7575
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective Out of curiosity... Quick IQ test: Solve: 4, 5, 14, 185, ...
@saadhorsepower8908
8 ай бұрын
Nope. The Pythagorean theorem wouldn't work in a non-Euclidean reality. Plus the Pythagorean theorem only works assuming space exists. God created space itself and the way space works. God is beyond the concept of space and time, since he is the one who had created them.
@Avokadik13
8 ай бұрын
Pythagorean theorem is a property of our system of axioms. This system was chosen, but it’s not easy to notice that
@Ornamentmountain
8 ай бұрын
It’s just the result of a universe with dimensions. It’s probably one of the silliest arguments I’ve ever heard.
@Turvold
8 ай бұрын
Bro has no source to prove why Pythagorean theorm has to be a multiversal concept.
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
in what universe does c² not equal a² + b²?
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
The source is literally common sense...
@waydeclark
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective Why can't other universes have different laws of logic and geometry?
@saadhorsepower8908
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective in a non-Euclidean one
@neoncat6820
8 ай бұрын
I do, I was in another universe before. In that universe, E was equal to mc cubed, but c squared was still a squared plus b squared
@doraemon402
8 ай бұрын
Actually, you could have a triangle that doesn't follow the Pythagorean theorem just like you can have a triangle that has angles that add up to more than 180º. Read Euclid's elements before posting about the fundamentals of geometry.
@quadrewplex6782
8 ай бұрын
yeah, I google searched non-euclidean geometry in 5 seconds and remembered that in a spherical coordinate system, a triangle with 3 right angles is possible. This guy's clueless.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
>"you could have a triangle that doesn't follow the Pythagorean theorem" This isn't an own; everyone knows that, even HP does. The Pythagorean theorem always, ALWAYS, applies to Pythagorean triangles.
@juanpgomez1299
8 ай бұрын
My man just got a degree in yappology
@mrmcface713
8 ай бұрын
a²+b²=c² is a universal rule in OUR reality within all contexts, however that does NOT mean that it couldn't be created. If we're pressuposing that an Omniscient Omnipotent God created reality, then, by definition He could have created reality in an infinite number of ways, physical, metaphysical, finite, infinite, euclidean, non euclidean etc. Therefore following that reasoning. God could of made a²+b²=anything He wants. Infact, if another reality did exist then it would be foolish to assert that it would follow the universal rules found in our universe.
@StefanDruga16
8 ай бұрын
How do you know the Pythagorean theorem holds for all possible realities? Do you have access to them?
@ethiopicmiaphysite5527
7 ай бұрын
What a terrible argument… if it's unconceivable then it is impossible, concieve a world were the pythagorean theorem is false?
@AlchemistOfNirnroot
8 ай бұрын
Multiple realities is a massive assumption... God is by definition supernatural. There is no ontological argument for God but you cannot use reason to disprove God either. That's what it meant by saying that God is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. It goes both ways in other words. The only position you can truly be gnostic in is agnosticism - which isn't an impressive quality.
@marionjuettges6122
8 ай бұрын
Maths confirms God. - Every living being can be calculated. Without maths, we would not exist. Yet, the figures do not build an inch by themselves, unless the level of oversight unites them and declares or finds the rules. E.g. the law of life. the natural basic law. the laws of equations, etc. ....
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
Did God choose for 2 + 2 to equal 4? Or does 2 + 2 just equal 4?
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
Did God choose for 2 + 2 to equal 4? Or does 2 + 2 just equal 4?
@shirkam3657
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective2 + 2 equals 4 because God designed the universe so it has sense under the laws He made. Basically 2 + 2 equals 4 because God created a perfect universe
@MGJ182
8 ай бұрын
a² + b² = c² is a theorem built upon a set of axioms, which aren't being considered in the argument. What evidence is there that axioms cannot be changed in a different universe by the intention of God? Furthermore, as others have noted, non-Euclidean surfaces themselves disprove of the video. What guarantee have we that there are or aren't universes with strictly non-Euclidean surfaces?
@jacquespotgieter7005
8 ай бұрын
God is not bound by the time space continuum. Got any other human musings on trigonometry?
@laurawalker3403
8 ай бұрын
It works both ways, c^2= a^2 + b^2, meaning, the geometry you see throughout the world, joints together to make new, whilst the world disconnect the geometry in the world, to make new. Meaning, the world and the perception(=geometry) of the world work together as one. Meaning, it’s the exact opposite, it proves God.
@masoncraftmine1996
7 ай бұрын
If something is discovered than it had to be created
@naturalLog26
8 ай бұрын
Just like a²+b²=c² is true in every universe, the same logic could apply to the laws of physics. As far as we know, they could be the same in every universe just like mathematical concepts, which could make general relativity no different than the pythagorean theorem (which by the way was NOT discovered by Pythagoras. Also we now know he probably wasn't even a real historical figure, go look it up). We could use any group of axioms, yet the reason we chose the one we currently use is because we most likely derived it ages ago from empirical evidence since it was the more intuitive one (we could've still used other ones, as mathmatics still remain perfectly consistent inside different axiomatic systems). Physics is also derived from empirical evidence, which could imply that the laws of physics are inherently related to mathematics, therefore would not be able to be separated from them, and that's also why E=mc² would be correct everywhere just like a²+b²=c². Because they would share the same roots. And no I'm not a religious believer
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
the point is that one could make the argument for physics being 'intelligently designed' as it is possible for physics to be different in any reality (look at the physics in video games for example) however in every reality, c² = a² + b²
@mrmcface713
8 ай бұрын
@historicalperspective But religious texts such as Genesis are claiming that God created reality, meaning that even if c²=a²+b² was universal it would be due to God creating it that way, which would mean that the Pythagorean theorem doesn't point towards or against the existence of God.
@lancelot5286
8 ай бұрын
this is the dumbest thing ever lol
@gru2671
6 ай бұрын
There is literally no way this man is this underdeveloped. The reason why the Pythagorean theorem exists is because of God. If he wanted it could be a/b=c but it isn't.
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
Math proves God. Jesus is king, repent and believe in Christ that he died and rose again and you shall be saved.
@historicalperspective
6 ай бұрын
so you believe that a person who claimed to be God.......is God?
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective I believe that a person who performed many miracles, and rose from the dead according to many eyewitness accounts including non Christian’s who proved himself to be God is God.
@historicalperspective
6 ай бұрын
and did you convert to this cult or were you just born into it?@@swanson_8804
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective I converted, I like how the only thing you can do is resort to insulting my faith instead of addressing the facts I gave. The only cult here is the one you serve, Atheism is evil.
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspectiveI converted to the truth. The only thing you can come back with is insults instead of facts cuz you have nun. Even when you’re a fool which you are God still loves you so much he died for you and is still waiting for you to come to him . Whatever hatred you have for him just know he still loves you and wants to save you and has such a good purpose for you and just wants a relationship with you. God bless.
@nikozdev
8 ай бұрын
How can you be sure that pythagorean theorem could exist without our reality? I mean... this theorem, all formulas in our world - they are reflections of our reality. If it was not created - we have nothing to reflect, math would be meaningless without our world. And I don't mean that people created math. I mean that God created math and the entire universe.
@Zibit21
8 ай бұрын
@charlesmrader
8 ай бұрын
What utter nonsense! I spent much of my early life in a city with a rectangular geometry. To go from Second Street to Seventh Avenue to Fourth Street and Eight Avenue I had to walk two street blocks and four avenue blocks. That was what distance meant to me. I never associated the street geometry of the city to God, or decided that He must not exist, or this if he did exist he would not have allowed any paths to exist off of the streets and avenues.
@ammaraliyasir747
8 ай бұрын
Nonsense
@albertomair5686
8 ай бұрын
So dumb
@ravikumarmistry
8 ай бұрын
The sample size of this theoram is 1, the local universe we live in.
@gojira4036
8 ай бұрын
This disproves nothing because God could have decided that C squared had to equal A squared
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
>"could have decided that C squared had to equal A squared" If we're talking about triangles; no, unless you're talking about Minecraft (where if c is the hypotenuse and a>b then a=c a² = c²)
@gojira4036
7 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_Greece a God that created everything created the rules for triangles aswell therefore all of their rules would have been created by that god
@hxrl5838
8 ай бұрын
Google non-euclidean space
@T3nMiDGET5711
6 ай бұрын
If you aren’t willing to speak, we aren’t willing to listen. Get a microphone dude.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
6 ай бұрын
what even is this comment
@T3nMiDGET5711
6 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_Greece His stupid AI voice pisses me off.
@777Slater
8 ай бұрын
In classical theism, universal truths such as mathematical truths and logical truths (Laws of logic etc) are not abstract entities within actuality external to the essence of God, but are rather thought to have its source grounded in the very essence of God. Omnipotence is not defined as being capable of absolutely anything, this would be a pretty weak definition. Instead a more philosophically advanced definition would be that the quality of omnipotence is to be capable of absolutely anything *logical possible* and *not contra to ones own nature* (such as (if God defined as all-loving) doing something hateful against a person without any sufficient reasoning) Then 1) If mathematical truths and logical truths and laws are not created entities by God external to him, but are grounded in God, then it follows that God doing something unbound by those mathematical truths would be against his own nature. Therefore it follows by the definition of omnipotence itself God can’t do something which doesn’t align with mathematical truths, this is not something going AGAINST his omnipotence. 2) The action of doing something that defies a Mathematical truth (that is universally true, in all possible worlds, such as the pythagorean theorem) is not possible, therefore again it follows by the definition of omnipotence that God can’t do this. Also, I highly doubt that the Pythagorean theorem is a universal truth such as 2+2=4, considering that it only applies within euclidean space in which space is flat. You can have non-euclidean geometry (in a possible world), and the pythagorean theorem wouldn’t apply there, hence it isn’t universally true.
@TheKingofBunga2912
8 ай бұрын
bruh we can use science and math to prove god lol. Pretty much, you'd technically proved God using an theoritcal math solution if you'd want. Even the Mandelbrot diagram proves God.
@seanmcdonald5365
8 ай бұрын
I see where you were aiming at, finding something that cannot not be what it is, to imply that it likely couldnt be created and would be true in any universe. I agree, in any universe where there is space similar to ours, a^2 + b^2 = c^2 in right angled triangles, but simply because it is a relationship that comes about by nature of space and the polygon. If he created space and the polygon, he technically created it.
@Rachjumper
8 ай бұрын
Alternate title: Pythagorean Theorem could prove the existence of God
@noThankyou-g5c
8 ай бұрын
oh no babe! ai is trying to disprove the existence of god with logic ! The singularity is turning into a Reddit Atheist! Humanity is doomed
@reid3031
6 ай бұрын
>thinks he is disproving God >reveals he lacks the imagination to imagine a non-Euclidean universe Math is observation of the laws that exist. It's not hard to imagine an alternative universe where different physical laws exist (although it IS hard to process any specifics), this can easily be a universe where God said "This system of dimensions will do fine".
@historicalperspective
6 ай бұрын
bro pls leave my channel. you're not open minded.
@reid3031
6 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective aight
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
Jesus loves y’all repent and give your life to him, hell is real and he doesn’t want you going there. For God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
@radhakrishna1845
8 ай бұрын
What does this Pythagorean argument Says...? God is not a mathematician.. Much Less a.. Euclidean geometrician.. Cartesian geometrician..? Nature is a mystery.. So is our lives.. Nothing deterministic.. Physical reality cannot be defined with mathematical exactitude..
@boiboi2505
8 ай бұрын
"God doesn't exist because 1+1 = 2" this is essentially what you are saying. Because one of anything plus one of the exact same thing will always equal two of that thing. I don't see how this disproves anything other than 1+1= anything other than 2. Also how do you know if this God of our reality isn't the God of every reality. How do we know that other realities exist? You jumped through many hoops without explaining yourself in order to make this ad hoc fallacy
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
the point of the argument is that there exist things which cannot be created. and therefore the ultimate God cannot exist by definition
@naturalLog26
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective what you're basically saying is that God as an infinite and omnipotent being can't exist as it can't create something outside of basic logic (for example he can't create a universe where 1+1=3). A simple counterargument would be that it wouldn't threaten god's omnipotence at all. Not being able to create 1+1=3 doesn't limit his power, as the reason he can't create it isn't because he can't, rather because the request itself is illogical. It would be like asking him to create a person who is both alive and dead at the same time, or to make a square with 3 sides. God could still exist in a universe with prefixed logic
@SpikeSpiegel-hk7tr
8 ай бұрын
How did you somehow make a video giving more proof *towards* god rather than against 💀
@Djentisnotagenre371
8 ай бұрын
waisted 2 minutes on this AI voice chat gpt bullshit
@Toon444
8 ай бұрын
What kind of dumb AI video is this bruh
@smileyboi2667
8 ай бұрын
God didn’t create math, humans created math to explain the world around them. That world was created by God.
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
but when God was creating the world, did he have to follow certain already existing laws and rules? That's like kind of the whole point of this argument against God's existence.
@JadeNichols5270
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspectiveare you familiar with hyperbolic geometry? In that universe, which we can’t say is impossible, then a^2+b^2≠c^2, thus there is control in whether that statement holds true. Just because you can’t perceive a different universe doesn’t mean it’s impossible. I am an atheist, and honestly arguments like these make us look bad, you can do better than this.
@shirkam3657
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspectiveGod created these rules so He could create the universe as He wanted it to be. There weren't any "already existing" laws, because God is eternal and existed before anything material or spiritual, because these were created by Him.
@Physicslover1879
8 ай бұрын
God obviously Exist your Video made 0 sense
@codygillard
8 ай бұрын
Except, things which do not have a beginning, such as the Pythagorian theorem, Pi, really all of mathematics, does not disprove the existence of God. We first must understand that there are contingent, dependant and changeable things, like you me, the laws of physics, birds, and alike. Next we have non-contingent, non-changing, dependant things. This is where we find things such as mathematics, and concepts/abstracta. Now while these things initially sounds threatening to the existence of God, they are not, because all if these things are things which can fail to rxist and ve swallowed by nothingness. They are not things which can exist independently on their own, ad they are things which must have a ontological foundation. Thats leads us to non-contingent, non-changing, independent things. Theres specifically on one entity which can exist or fit in this kind of catergory, which would be what we call God. The foundation ontologically and necessarily of all that which is and could be, as ge is the only thing which can be as he is, he is the stone and foundation on which all the others rest, whether the be contingent and changing, or non-contingent and non-changing. Furthermore it can be argued from the nature of mathematics itself that God does infact exist.
@NotJosh420
5 ай бұрын
I just lost brain cells and I am an atheist
@swanson_8804
6 ай бұрын
You said a whole bunch of nothing.
@briceforeman8920
5 ай бұрын
We got the christians with this one🗣️🔥
@sma7283
8 ай бұрын
If god created the universe in 1 dimension or less, then the pythagorean theorem wouldn't exist.
@gomethins7738
8 ай бұрын
Step by step breakdown of the argument: 1: If God created everything that exists, 2: There exists the Pythagorean theorem which was not created by God because it is simply a pattern that cannot be different over multiple realities 3: God does not exist The issue here is that there is no real reason to believe that premise 2 is true as there very well could be an alternative universe in which non-Euclidean geometry exists outside of theory and drawings Of course there are other issues with the argument, but I’ll leave those for the other comments.
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
the physics in minecraft is different from the physics in skyrim which is also different from the physics in valorant. But in the universes or Minecraft, Skyrim and Valorant, a² + b² = c²
@gomethins7738
8 ай бұрын
All the video games you listed are generated from code in this reality. Of course if you can show me a video game that isn’t in this reality (which is impossible) that still follows the Pythagorean theorem, I will be more than happy to begin to accept that your proof might be a possibility. Also was Minecraft the first thing that popped into your mind when trying to show the Pythagorean theorem existing in multiple realities? I’m not sure how you would even be able to measure diagonals in Minecraft.
@dougwatson5717
8 ай бұрын
The Pythagoras' theorem only shows that not only does not disprove God but that this theorem is part of the nature of God.
@bebopbountyhead
8 ай бұрын
When did you get back from all of the other possible universes?
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
so you're telling me that a² + b² does NOT = c² in certain other universes?
@bebopbountyhead
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective You're the one claiming that other universes couldn't contain non-Euclidean geometries. I'm simply asking: how do you know that, given that you only have access to this universe?
@Goji1954minus
8 ай бұрын
Is there any other mathematical equations that is not created?
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
probably
@Yopmemama
7 ай бұрын
How about you delve into the Mandelbrot set cuz the first video in my recommended is how math proves god
@facelessman9224
8 ай бұрын
He uses the definition of God he randomly pulled from a dictionary, to disprove the existence of God. Ok....
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
so you're telling me that God is not the ultimate being?
@facelessman9224
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective Your ability to derive absurdities out of logic is astounding.
@TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu
8 ай бұрын
Euclid be like: Yeah, right... (that was a lame argumentation, but I gave you a like for trying, lol)
@DagazsYT
8 ай бұрын
The premise of the argument seems to precede to certain... Assumptions, as many as the comment section could (and already) point out. So, perhaps what you're looking for may be the most unshakeable principle and 'multiversal' concept fathomable, in an attempt to 'disprove' your given definition of god, yes? Let us consider, in how many ways could these concepts be mutually exclusive? Beyond the ones you already presented in your video. Just. Why. In good faith: we could still polish this premise, for not all is lost.
@omaracosta2706
8 ай бұрын
guys its a meme, its a meme
@masonm2140
8 ай бұрын
Its not this guy legit bullies people who are christian
@edwardtbabinski
8 ай бұрын
Can God make 1 not equal 1? Can God make A not equal A? If God can’t alter such things, then is it necessary to invoke God to explain either math or logic? Even Christian apologist William Lane Craig has admitted that one of his biggest worries (was) "Is math or perhaps some other immaterial objects more fundamental or basic than God?"
@noThankyou-g5c
8 ай бұрын
as many people have pointed out. You can imagine a reality where the pythagorean theorem doesn’t work. It’s just as easy as it is to imagine where E=mc^2 doesn’t work. Good luck on your future endeavors proving the non-existence of God with facts and logic. I’m sure everybody before you that’s attempted this was just really dumb but you’re clearly very smart and very special so I know you’ll do it 🙂👍
@MBZ_64
8 ай бұрын
whose to believe that mathematical concepts are universal though? just because you cant understand a world where a^2+b^2=c^2 or 1+1=2 doesn't exist, doesn't mean it cannot exist.
@doc0core
8 ай бұрын
For the majority of the world cultures that are polytheist, this kind of internal argument about monotheism v atheism is just silly.
@MinstrelEmpire
8 ай бұрын
ngl this proves that there is an ultimate God, thx for boosting my faith
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
Did God choose for 2+2 to equal 4? Or did 2+2 already equal 4?
@MinstrelEmpire
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective God chose that because he created the laws of the universe and logic, can God make 2+2=5? No because that would be God going against the logic and reality he has created
@laurawalker3403
8 ай бұрын
It works both ways, c^2= a^2 + b^2, and a^2 + b^2 = c^2. And you can see this throughout all logistical and geometrical aspects and characteristics throughout the world. Meaning, the geometry you see throughout the world, joints together to make new, whilst the world disconnect the geometry in the world, to make new. Meaning, the world and the perception (=geometry) of the world work together as one. Meaning, the logic we see today, was created by a divine spiritual system of energy pathways and perceptional connections between organisms (c^2=a^2 + b^2) creating productive and progressive processes throughout the world [(a^2+b^2) which can be created] in the beginning, the today, and the end. (c^2=c^2) Meaning, it's the exact opposite, it proves God. Therefore, = = [(+)(-)(/)(x)] = God. So, this “historical perspective”, may be flawed, considering the amount of logical fallacies I’ve been seeing….Hence, it’s more likely it’s a future parallel projection, and not, a historical perspective. 📝 = = C^2 = a^2 + b^2 🎤 ⬇️ 😎 #Monotheism = (or 🟰) #️⃣✝️☪️✡️ = was created, and that’s in your equation, isn’t it? And a^2 + b^2 = c^2 can’t exist without the equation = = which created itself and created all other forms and functions, which means, the Pythagorean Theorem proves God exists! Now, about Jesus, my equation proves the links a local God and Ultimate God can have, and I believe, in my faith, that Jesus was the “broadcast” of the Ultimate God in human form, based off the links and equations I’ve given above this final statement.
@MinstrelEmpire
8 ай бұрын
@@laurawalker3403 no disrespect but I just got home from school and I'm too deranged to read all that, appreciate the explanation though
@flerovium_red97
8 ай бұрын
If God never created anything made out of matter then pythagorean theorem wouldn't exist
@achyuthcn2555
8 ай бұрын
The pythogorean theorem only proves that Mental concepts cannot be created and hence are eternal therby meaning consciousness is eternal.
@hdmaragh
8 ай бұрын
This is definitely on the same level as christian apologetics . . . utter nonsense. I'm an athiest but I can't just jump on anything that confirms my current thoughts
@picoroja
8 ай бұрын
Man i really don't know what to even say
@Arrowgu4
8 ай бұрын
is this ur voice
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
yea i finally started using my own voice
@Arrowgu4
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspectiveoh cool
@codygillard
8 ай бұрын
No, it's a robot
@Your_Local_Nerd
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective❌❌🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🙅♂️🙅♂️🧢🧢🙅♂️🙅♂️🧢🙅♂️🧢🙅♂️🙅♂️❌🙅♂️🙅♂️🙅♂️❌🧢🧢❌❌❌ but if this is actually your voice then why did you talk like a robot
@laffy7204
8 ай бұрын
This sounds like christian if they were trying to prove god doesn't exist, or an Atheist pretending to use the same arguments as Christians to mock their arguments proving god exist
@gomdgomd2268
8 ай бұрын
Sadly this isn’t the case. If you look at his community posts you will see some of the wildest takes in which he believes is objectively true.
@DoloresLehmann
8 ай бұрын
OK, first, I'm a little confused why you chose the Pythagorean Theorem instead of, say, 1+1=2, which would have accomplished just the same. Then, I really don't get why people keep confusing "the Christian God" or even "Jesus" with "God", as if there were no other divine concepts in the world. And third, I don't know where you get that "generally accepted definition of God" from. I would say it isn't generally accepted at all, especially the "deliberately and intentionally created" part.
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
because religious people ignorantly reply to it by asking "what is 0 times 0" or "what is 0 times 10" every theist in the world as of 2024 is a genetic theist. They did not come to theism on their own devices but instead were born to a theistic culture.
@historicalperspective
8 ай бұрын
1. when I say 'theistic culture' I am referring to Christianity/Islam/Etc. which is passed down from parents to children, NOT through conversions. 2. Where is slavery condemned in the Bible?@markstein2845
@gomdgomd2268
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspectiveWho cares if it’s genetic in some cases? In my case it isn’t genetic but why would it even matter?
@shirkam3657
8 ай бұрын
@@historicalperspective1. The whole damn point of Christianity is EXPANDING the Gospel, i know a lot of people who lived on a non-Christian family but converted to it, or lived on a Christian family but moved to another Christian denomination, like, it's so common, but i guess you don't live on a place where that occurs frequently. 2. Buddy, the whole book of Exodus is centred on God freeing the Jews from slavery. Ugh, you really like to disprove stuff you don't actually know about, don't you?
@imperialofficer6185
8 ай бұрын
Wait, this isn't satire?
@masonm2140
8 ай бұрын
Look at his polls
@Keepyourselfsafe-c4b
4 ай бұрын
You are not him.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
Ain't no way people start severely ripping onto HP whenever he actually does have a point 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭
@ideah4773
8 ай бұрын
Ah another terrible video by "Historical" Pinhead
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
Imagine calling one of the few HP W's a "terrible video"
@thecoolgamingshow7349
8 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_GreeceAlt account
@neoncat6820
8 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_Greecehow is it a W there's literally no evidence. There is no proof God did not create the Pythagorean theorum. Sure, humans discovered it, but it could have been created by God. The argument only seems to make sense because as far as we can comprehend, there is no way the Pythagorean theorum could be false. But since God created reality, he also defined all the rules of the reality. Without our universe's very specific set of rules, no formulas as we know them would make any sense.
@PhadexLXIV_Greece
8 ай бұрын
@@neoncat6820 >"There is no proof God did not create the Pythagorean theorum" >"but it could have been created by God" 🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂This is why we laugh at you guys. Assuming God didn't exist the Pythagorean theorem would STILL hold up. Why is it so hard for y'all to understand that a² + b² = c² everywhere, EVERYWHERE; In the Sun, on Jupiter, on Venus, the Pythagorean theorem holds up everywhere Even in another universe a² + b² = c² would still hold true, YOU. CAN'T. CHANGE. THAT.
@neoncat6820
8 ай бұрын
@@PhadexLXIV_Greece pretty sure the sun, Jupiter, and Venus are in our universe. The same god could have made and controls all of those planets.
Пікірлер: 163