Calvinism and Molinism are two very different ways of understanding God's sovereignty. But which one best addresses the problem of evil?
James White argues that Calvinism - God foreordaining all human behaviour both good and evil - is the more Biblical and coherent view. William (Bill) Lane Craig argues that Molinism - a view which reconciles human freedom and divine sovereignty - is Biblically consistent without making God the author of evil.
For James White: www.aomin.org
For Bill Craig: www.reasonablefaith.org
For the 2013 Bill Craig & Paul Helm dialogue on Calvinism & Molinism: bit.ly/3o550G0
• Register for Premier Unbelievable? Live: www.unbelievable.live
• Get our 'Confident Christianity' course: www.premier.org.uk/course
• Support us in the USA: www.premierinsight.org/unbelie...
• Rest of the world: resources.premier.org.uk/supp...
• Newsletter: www.premier.org.uk/Unbelievab...
• Blog: www.premierinsight.org/unbeli...
• For the podcast: www.premierchristianradio.com/...
• Facebook / premierunbelievable
• Twitter / unbelievablejb
• Insta / justin.brierley
Негізгі бет William Lane Craig vs James White - Calvinism vs Molinism: which best addresses the Problem of Evil?
Пікірлер: 9 М.