Bro can you help me in understanding philosphy and below questions i am beginner and someone say start reading hegel first but i know from one of chomsky interview he dissmiss hegel as nonsense can any one tell me chomsky is right or wrong? Can hegel philosphy of embracing contridictions rather than overcoming is correct or wrong? Also is hegel correct in dissmissing kant noumenal realm is knowable as contridicitions rather than some unkowable substance as describe by kant ? Please answer if you have answers i will happy me it will help me my understanding
@disciplinetalk7251
21 күн бұрын
Hegel, is known for his dense, complex, and abstract style of writing, as well as his dialectical method, which can be difficult to penetrate. Chomsky, being a linguist and cognitive scientist, values empirical rigor and clear argumentation, and he often critiques philosophical systems that he perceives as lacking in these qualities. In short, Chomsky’s dismissal of Hegel as "nonsense" reflects his preference for empirical clarity over what he sees as the speculative and obscure nature of Hegel’s thought. Yes, Hegel's philosophy is known for embracing contradictions, particularly through his concept of dialectics, where the development of ideas and reality occurs through the resolution of contradictions. However, Hegel does not simply embrace contradictions for their own sake; rather, he sees contradictions as the driving force of development, progress, and the unfolding of truth. In terms of right and wrong, Hegel's view is that reality, knowledge, and even ethical principles develop through a dialectical process. What may seem contradictory or oppositional at one stage of development might be harmonized or transformed in a higher stage. This doesn't mean Hegel rejects the concepts of right and wrong outright, but he sees them as evolving through a dialectical process. Hegel, rejects Kant's sharp distinction between the phenomenal and noumenal realms. He argues that Kant's idea of the noumenal realm as something fundamentally unknowable creates an unnecessary dualism between appearance and reality. For Hegel, this division leads to an incomplete and unsatisfying view of knowledge, because it implies that there is an aspect of reality that is forever beyond human comprehension. Hegel believes that reality is knowable in its entirety, but only through a dialectical process that resolves contradictions. In Hegel's view, what Kant describes as the "noumenal" can be understood through the development of thought, which moves from incomplete or limited forms of understanding to more comprehensive and self-conscious ones. For Hegel, contradictions are not evidence of unknowable realities but are essential moments in the process of coming to know the truth. By working through these contradictions, human thought progresses toward a more complete understanding of reality, including what Kant would call the noumenal realm. Hegel rejects Kant's idea that the noumenal realm is fundamentally unknowable and argues that reality, including what Kant calls the noumenal, can be comprehended through the dialectical resolution of contradictions. For Hegel, contradictions are not a sign of unknowable substances but are central to how we come to know reality in its totality. Whether Hegel is "correct" depends on one's perspective. Those who favor a more holistic and developmental view of knowledge might agree with Hegel, while those who emphasize the limits of human cognition might side with Kant.
@akbar-nr4kc
21 күн бұрын
Hi bro i want to ask question did there is any relation between hegelain philosphy of embrace of contridictions and colin mcginn philosphy of new mysterianism which say some questions like conciousness and as chomsky desrcibe matter is also mysterious we no conception of matter etc is not in our grasp and we can never understand it.from your view in today modern world which is correct if they have no relations.? My other question is embrace of contridictions and logic arguments which is more mentally demanding?please answer thank you
Пікірлер: 3