In this video author Adam Wood and Richard Jones discuss whether modern policing methods have led to the apprehension of Jack the Ripper.
We look at the crime scenes where the murders occurred and ponder what evidence that might prove useful to a Crime Scene Investigation today would have been present at the scenes of the murders in 1888.
Beginning with a look at what trace evidence would have been present on the bodies or in the immediate vicinity, we then explore whether or not CCTV footage might have proved useful in the hunt for the perpetrator of the Whitechapel murders.
We then explore the idea that fingerprints taken at the scenes of the atrocities might have led the police to the murderer. Having pondered how much the detectives involved in the investigation would have known about and understood the value of fingerprints, we then take a look at where at the crime scenes impressions of the killer's fingerprints might have been found.
Having discussed the possibility that DNA evidence might have proved useful in solving the mystery of whether the portion kidney sent to Mr George Lusk in October 1888 was, as the author claimed in the accompanying letter, part of the kidney that had been removed from Jack the Ripper victim Catherine Eddowes, we end by exploring the impact that the newly emerging detective fiction, such as the Sherlock Holmes stories, had on the police investigation into the crimes.
Негізгі бет Would Modern Detection Methods Have Caught Jack The Ripper?
Пікірлер: 316