Il est évident vu l'aspect beaucoup trot neuf des boites de conserves ect que c'est du '' répliqua '' mais assez bien imité
@dave177
8 ай бұрын
You showed us only 1/3 of the iron ration. I hope you didn’t paid to much
@tolik5929
Жыл бұрын
Thats a late war lable . They stopped specifiying what kind of meat was in the can , to save on production costs and for simplicity . It was pretty random for the soldier , it could have been beef , pork , or chicken , because they were all labled the same .
@iac4357
7 ай бұрын
To be more precise, isn't this the Half Iron Ration ?
@Shelby-fq3eh
Жыл бұрын
Hi, is there any evidence of similar ration existing or is it just how probably it could look like?
@roflduck232
Жыл бұрын
This is based on the contents of the Halbeiserne Portion. The quantities (weights) are not correct, but the general contents are given the amount of variation that existed. The packaging of the contents did not seem to be uniform in WW2, however the packaging here is not convincing - The paper is bleached and the tin is not of the type that was used in WW2. I recommend the book 'Rations of the German Wehrmacht in WW2' as a reputable source rather than people's youtube comments like this one.
@Shelby-fq3eh
Жыл бұрын
@@roflduck232 I know this book but man is it expensive! Thanks for the info.
Пікірлер: 13