Ben桑說得很棒。 除了有提到的和來不及提到的規劃部分,還有台灣人已被養出不走路的習慣了,再好的大眾運輸,也無法和 door to door 隨地免費停的機車相比,因此台灣人出門普遍是連五分鐘的路也不走,只有大都市搭車人較多才比較多人願意走路。 一甲子前多數人自家車是腳踏車,隨便停,政府不管,慢慢富裕了改買機車,繼續隨便停繼續沒人管,現在已變成無法減少的自用車數字,而且政府也沒想減少,連全新的重劃區也是遍地長時間的停滿車。這也連動了另一個片裡帶到的主題:違停。當路邊滿是商店,臨停需求極高時,卻幾乎毫無合法臨停空間,併排或紅線等違停自然就無法避免了,這問題明顯難以靠執法手段解決(因為暫停一下被罰的機會必然很低),也不應該只靠執法來解決,該趕走的是長期免費或廉價佔用路邊的那些汽機車。 大眾運輸也一直在台灣交通建設裡不被重視,不但沒長期前贍規劃,連已經塞車嚴重的地方,新開了路也不是給公車鐵路先走,而是給一般車輛,然後就是繼續養出更多的車,又塞滿新建不久的路。 再過六十年台灣交通也不會趕上現在日本的模樣。
I like your analysis which is easy to understand and very convincing. I agree with the fact that Taiwan's traffic design has a great room to improve, it is to me behind by decades when compared to other countries. It is also dangerous as too many motorcyclists always in a rush. It appears to me that some thinks it's a Taiwan culture but I think not, it's a negative impression in which I hope the Taiwan government can think forward and give it a serious change to improve.
Пікірлер: 1,6 М.