ok ok gyz.Thanks for 100k views.I know some of like some others don't like because if I chose the winner as bismark.Ok but they both are good but I think there were no any winner if they battle.I m a srilankan that why I not uploading vida now.Our country is not in a good situation, also our social. I cant explain everything. But thanks all to watch this not sub's the views that's I want❤️❤️❤️
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@Soviet-Union9
11 ай бұрын
Team IJN yamato 👇
@Atomic_Bomber-man
10 ай бұрын
Maybe, but i am main of Littorio and Iowa class battleship.
@brextonaverymargison1828
7 ай бұрын
Yamato
@EmperorNapoleonI704
5 ай бұрын
Yamato can have a chance but that requires them to get a lucky shot as size weighs the ship down and the main guns would have a hard time locking onto a accurate shot on Bismarck since Bismarck was much more fast and tirpitz would certainly kick yamatos ass hard since it is much faster and has torpedo launchers
@scarletking115
5 ай бұрын
Why did the Bismarck get the attack potency and not the Yamato
@ImperialJapaneseNavy
3 ай бұрын
@@EmperorNapoleonI704 nah not thinking about the armor or tragic shells Yamato can penetrate over 600+mm armor in short or long range or even a Iowa class battleships they gonna eat them by Yamato
@satoimo4453
Жыл бұрын
bismarck Broadside: 320mm Deck armor 110mm Main gun mantlet 360mm Main gun side 220mm Main gun rear 320mm Main gun top plate 130mm Main gun barbet 340mm Control Tower 350mm yamato Broadside 410mm+15mm (inclination 20 degrees) Deck armor 250mm Main gun mantlet 660mm Main gun side 250mm Main gun rear 190mm Main gun top plate 270mm Main gun barbet 560mm Control Tower 500mm The Bismarck had only 145mm on the upper part of the broadside. Yamato is overwhelmingly superior, not a difference that can be filled by the quality of armor
@satoimo4453
Жыл бұрын
Outdated and poor Bismarck is no match for Yamato Bismarck is weaker than Richelieu
@user-vq5gj9bt8p
Жыл бұрын
@@satoimo4453 Too many people ignore armor thickness and talk only about quality
@pepesigma-qy8le
8 ай бұрын
Bismarck was just a prototype. Its main agenda was to hit and escape in small seas while yamato was armed to fight in open areas. The competition of yamato was with H class(if completed). Bismarck was to withstand heavy firepower(2000+ fired 800 hit 3 actually Penetrated damaged).it is still intact in sea and can be rebuilt Unlike yamato
@LuciHernandes-lz9ub
6 ай бұрын
Team ijn Yamato
@dann9777
Жыл бұрын
It also depend on the wether and bismark have fast reload speed if u know how iron work When ton of shell hit on one point it will brake and the bismark wont stand in one place to let yamato pratice shooting.
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
Yah how can explain it to other yo??
@dann9777
Жыл бұрын
Wdym i still dont understand
@su-57stealthfighter73
Жыл бұрын
Yes ,Bismarck have advantage in terms of rate of fire ,and she have a radar but the problem is, every time Bismarck fired a salvo ( all 8 guns or just the 2 forward guns ) it knocks out her own radar so in a battle she's also blind like Yamato , both of them only used their Optical Range Finder .. another thing is Bismarck can do over 30 knots but prohibited to go on full speed because of structural weakness on it's center line screw ,she can do about 27-28 knots only , which is the max speed of Yamato ..
@mightysigarilyo5113
Жыл бұрын
um yamato had more armor and bigger and more stronger what do you meaaan yamato is the real winneeeeeerrrrr not bismark yamato is the gooooaaaaat aaaaaaa🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
@hninthuta-vy9le
8 ай бұрын
Yamato is better than Bismarck
@ghost_z17_08
Жыл бұрын
Tbh. Idfc which ship was better, they’re both legendary either way 😂
@alexsingh7254
Жыл бұрын
Yes
@I_am_sped
Жыл бұрын
An opinion I can get behind.
@-renji
Жыл бұрын
Best and most underrated comment i have seen in this commenct section
@General_MacArthur
Жыл бұрын
True 🤝
@KLT2627
Жыл бұрын
W comment
@cool_guy_from_Poland
Жыл бұрын
Yamato vs Bismarck: Power: Yamato Shell: Yamato Speed: Bismarck Planes: Yamato Bigger: Yamato Guns: Yamato Firepower: Yamato Guns to destroy plane: Bismarck Japenese: Yamato German: Bismarck Endurance: Bismarck Reflex: Bismarck Secondary guns: Yamato Towers: Bismarck Gun reload: Bismarck Yamato 8/8 Bismarck Winner: Drew. Edit: Pls Can anyone like my comment? Thanks for 4 likes🎉
@danteproductions2075
11 ай бұрын
Tbh, the yamatos only defense are only AA defenses on the middle of the ship, if your talking about the early type where they ar actually applied.
@ImperialJapaneseNavy
3 ай бұрын
Nah Yamato would be in AA biplanes are easily to shot but in new planes are more velocity and faster than biplanes Yamato also had multiple AA guns but she could shot a new planes and Yamato has no targeting radar system Japanese using sticks to concentrate to their enemy planes Japanese AA are sucks and US more better AA because they using radar system to locate the enemy planes easily
@hauptmannZ
11 ай бұрын
In fact, To Sink a Bismarck-class battleship you need eight battleships and battlecruisers, two aircraft carriers, fourteen cruisers, and twenty seven torpedo boat destroyers or atleast 3 direct hit by Earthquake Bombs which weighs 12,000 lbs each.
@DestroyahTheBanned
7 ай бұрын
Bro, a single 12000 pound bomb easily recks a bismark, an Iowa could beat it easily.
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@Rosco-jf1wo
5 күн бұрын
He meant the Tirpetz the sister ship of the bismarck
@pranavpranav4744
Жыл бұрын
Both ships have potential to destroy each other .... but they need a good captain and crew for that .
Şanslı olanın kazanacağı bir savaş. Temel özellikler yakın gibi olsa da her ikisi de birbirini tek top mermisi ile batırabilir. Kullanılan top mermileri karaya bile çarptığında krater açıyor...
Bismarck was a pos. Inferior to most treaty battleships and completely outclassed by Yamato
@dutchthespitfire3204
Жыл бұрын
@@scatterlite2266 my guy really said Biscuit was in inferior to treaty ships😂😂 Bismarck was superior to the Richelieu class, the KGV class and at the same level as the NC class And Yamato's guns were super inaccurate, the AA guns didnt even work because they werent even AA guns to begin with
@scatterlite2266
Жыл бұрын
@@dutchthespitfire3204 based on what? Bismarck had less capability at almost 10K more displacement. NCs manage to have 9 16" guns against Bismarcks 8 15". How do you manage to get less firepower on a much bigger hull😂
@hawkerhellfire9152
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck is the King of Overhyped.
@bullreeves1109
Жыл бұрын
I swear it seems like most of the people in these comments get their information from WoWs. In a proper Battleship VS Battleship fight Yamato wins 9/10 times, with the 10th being a lucky hit. There is only a 2 knot difference in speed. Yamato has significantly better armor, and shells, and the accuracy is quite similar. Side note I really don’t get where all these BS claims of Yamato being inaccurate are from. She hit multiple ships at Lyte including a Escort carrier at 29,000 yards. (Compared to Bismarcks hit on hood at ~9,000 to 12,000 yards.) Yamato doesn’t have a “weak citadel” she had the thickest armor ever placed on a warship. Further more all Battleships have important components above the water line, the designers of Bismarck were simply foolish enough to leave them above the armored deck, leaving them vulnerable. Bismarck had on average 4inch thinner armor than Yamato, while having 15”(380mm) shells that weighed ~50% less than Yamato’s shells. Bismarck was armored against her owen 15” guns, maybe 16” guns. No one even knew Yamato had 18.1” guns until post war. Bismarck, and every other WW2 battleship’s armor wasn’t ever intended to stop shells with the size&weight of Yamato’s. Yamato conversely had armor thick enough to make her immune to Bismarck’s shells from 15-42KM. Both Yamato and Bismarck were accurate, but Yamato’s accuracy was more sustainable. Reason: Yamato had the best optical range finders ever mounted to a battleship, with borderline Radar level precision in normal weather. Meanwhile Bismarck used an early war version of radar fire control, which while in theory was more accurate, in practice was far less reliable. (Breaking when the ship fired her guns) forcing Bismarck to fall back onto her (less effective) optical range finders, Just like Yamato. The truth of the matter is Yamato is the best conventional Battleship ever built, with the best optical Range finders ever mounted to a Battleship. People talk about Yamato/Musashi never fighting another battleship like it’s the ships fault. It isn’t. If Bismarck was in the Pacific she would be just as helpless as Yamato. Likewise, if Yamato was in the Atlantic, things would have gone VERY differently for her.
@banger2998
Жыл бұрын
The problem for Yamato is that it was never made to face other battleships Japans naval doctrine was completely different from Germanys approach. The Yamato only ever undertook support missions. While Germany made raider battleships that operated alone or in groups. The Yamato must be one of the biggest waste of recourses in military history Japan could have build so many carriers for her cost.
@bullreeves1109
Жыл бұрын
@@banger2998 “The problem for Yamato is that it was never made to face other battleships” Did you even read my comment? When Japan designed both the Yamato class they took the “quality of quantity” approach. Because they realized they would never be able to outbuild the USN or RN. The Yamato class wasn’t just designed to fight another battleship. They were designed to fight enemy battleships even when outnumbered 3-1. (3 USN/RN Battleships for every 1 Yamato.) And while yes, *In hindsight* Yamato, like every other battleship in WW2, were obsolete. But that was in hindsight, not foresight. Even in the late 1930s carriers still weren’t anything but a scouting force. (Case in point, the Americans, British, Italians, French and Germans were all also building battleships.) 1930s Japan expected a war with the US, UK, or both. And they needed something to match their capital ships, so they built what was already by 1941 the largest carrier fleet in the world. And built 2 out of the 4 Yamatos to lead the fleet in a “Decisive battle” that Japan was expecting. And lets not even get into how many cruisers/destroyers and tanks Germany could’ve built with the amount of steel they put into Bismarck and Tirpitz. Where one (Bismarck) was sunk within a year of commission by the two British battleships Nelson and KGV. (2 ships Yamato was designed to handle btw) and where the latter (Tirpitz) did even less than Yamato and Musashi before being sunk by bombers in 1944.
@mirum8726
10 ай бұрын
This might be one of the few comments I agree with
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Baby yamato have so many weeknes.If you think the size is the matter don't think about that,Also think one destroyer one torpedo can destroy they both
@bluberry8107
Жыл бұрын
And they both make great reefs
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
Ok
@ImperialJapaneseNavy
3 ай бұрын
No reefs in 2000+ feets in bottom of ocean
@adrianlouis2108
4 ай бұрын
The Reason why Bisnark lost its orginal battle was.. The anti aircraft guns produced so much smoke that crew coupdnt see.. So busmark was fighting but was blind..
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@nitishadarshchand9929
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck is the reason y many countries began to built ships with big guns ,Japanese navy only taught others how to built super battleships and winner for the became Iowa classes so chill out everyone
@cold_raptor
4 ай бұрын
The reason why other countries build Ships with big guns? You mean literally any warship ever?
@murshedpaak8355
Жыл бұрын
Music 🎶 name is fxbii-crazy phonx -remix
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
Yah thank for add this comment! ❤️
@crackin90s
Жыл бұрын
Pin this NOW
@DEBUND
Жыл бұрын
y'all crying in the comments saying yamato can defeat Bismarck forget about it tactics matter 💀
@I_am_sped
Жыл бұрын
finally someone with a brain
@reouanyang5978
Жыл бұрын
They forgot who sank the hood for just 3min
@zornxottx
Жыл бұрын
@@reouanyang5978 Yeah and Bismarck just runs like a coward after sinking Hood
@bahamascountryball7582
Жыл бұрын
@@zornxottx Bruh it's because THEY GOT DAMAGE AFTER FIGHTING HOOD AND PRINCE OF WALES (sorry big caps)
@reouanyang5978
Жыл бұрын
@@zornxottx you're crying aren't you? Lol like Bismarck wasn't damaged by prince of Wales literally a kid crying for Yamato lol
@its_mikuz
8 ай бұрын
Yamato : hey man you're lucky, no ships are approaching me, but there are 400 mosquitoes carrying bombs and torpedoes circling me, and I'm sure you won't be able to survive as long as me Bismark : 🥲
@juancristobalsanchezlopez9008
Жыл бұрын
Sin duda,por poder y calibre el Yamato junto a su gemelo el Musashi fueron los acorazados más poderosos jamás construidos,pero sin duda para mí mi acorazado favorito y poderoso y más hermoso jamás construidos fueron el Bismarck,por su historia,corta y violenta,y su gemelo el Tirpitz
@angelogiovannichumpitazmon1404
Жыл бұрын
X2
@dibujosymonitos4639
Жыл бұрын
Exacto, mi favorito Bismarck
@SargHWP
10 ай бұрын
Long live the fatherland ❤🇩🇪
@villanedits5617
9 ай бұрын
Forever
@villanedits5617
9 ай бұрын
🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
@DestroyahTheBanned
7 ай бұрын
is this guy a nazi
@Turkoatmapping
Жыл бұрын
I dont really care who is the better ship, yamato will still be the best in my mind (bismarck is legendary to)
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
Yah 🙂
@NZGG25
3 ай бұрын
Big Mack's cannon is quite easily damaged because the cannon's armor is not as sturdy as the Yamato's😂😂
@Triplane1234
Жыл бұрын
Didnt bismarck have more guns?
@mirum8726
10 ай бұрын
If you talk about main gun then no Bismark 2 x 4 = 8 main gun in total Yamato 3 x 3 = 9 main gun in total
@villanedits5617
9 ай бұрын
Secondary battery
@arifnurbain7722
2 ай бұрын
The yamato 18:prowler theme
@NoDad.Notthebelt.
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck could not be sunk by guns. Another battleship had to torpedo it. The rudder was damaged, so the maneuverability was absolutely Screwed yet the Bismarck held off against a British navy and fell only to bad luck and sheer numbers from the enemy
@reouanyang5978
Жыл бұрын
YES A BRAIN they don't know that Bismarck taken 2000! And more shells!!! But it didn't sank Dorsetshire had to sink it with torpedoes and they have to put 4 ships on him to sink imagine of it's 1 by 1 Bismarck may have gotten to Brest if it was 1 by 1 wars Yamato got any of bismarks armour that many torpedo attacks didn't even made a dent on it but Yamato just few torpedo it was having such big holes on him
@hawk2222
Жыл бұрын
Even 460mm? I dont think so. It could be sink by guns
@NoDad.Notthebelt.
Жыл бұрын
The British sure tried that
@hawk2222
Жыл бұрын
@@NoDad.Notthebelt. I'm taking about yamato (vid is Bismarck vs yamato) but Brits couldnt sink without torpedoes
@su-57stealthfighter73
Жыл бұрын
@@reouanyang5978 British navy fired about 2,800 shells on Bismarck but only about 400 land directly/hit Bismarck so don't make fake assumption .
@jellyisfunny.1252
Жыл бұрын
What type of battle ship can withstand FUCKING 400 PLANES AND 1K POUNDS BOMBS. 12 bombs and 7 torpedos is what sunked lyn yamato Lyn musashi took 19 torpedos 17 bombs bismark took 3 torpedos.
@norulhazlinmatnor
Жыл бұрын
The answer is THEY BOTH ARE BEAST 💀
@Ayushkumar-zs3xb
9 ай бұрын
Team Bismarck 👇
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@DevLastLine
Жыл бұрын
The ship that struggle to takedown a god damn torpedo bomber biplane... Yamato could hold an entire air raid even tho he was heavily damaged
@dutchthespitfire3204
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck didnt sink after being shelled for hours by 2 battleships
@basedmax9029
Жыл бұрын
@@dutchthespitfire3204 hours? It was a whole fucking day before the bismark sank. And the first ship to come within range of the bismarks guns got sank in ONE SHOT. talk about precision
@su-57stealthfighter73
Жыл бұрын
@@basedmax9029 it's not 1 shot .. Bismark fired 5 salvos (8x5=40)of 15"inch gun probably the same with her 5.9 secondary ,so it's not she( Bismarck) one shotted the Hood ..
@basedmax9029
Жыл бұрын
@@su-57stealthfighter73 send me a link to that source I actually didn't know that thanks
@su-57stealthfighter73
Жыл бұрын
@@basedmax9029 just watch the original footage of Bismarck vs Hood you can clearly see that Bismarck fired multiple salvos on hood ..
@소비에트군
10 ай бұрын
YAMATO IS THE BEST WARSHIP
@Hotsauce1999
11 ай бұрын
bismarck shows alot of potential on its days while yamato not since it only show herself 2x so its hard to tell how efficient the yamato is
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@BOEING--mh6xm
Жыл бұрын
Both battleships are amazing in my opinion
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. Bro, you don't understand anything about battleships. Torpedo defense is of little use in a basic battleship to battleship firefight. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea
@omererdemoglu738
Жыл бұрын
Yamato has bigger advantage over long range(eg plunging fire throughout bismarck's deck armor can cause severe damage in vital compartments. Yamato has better active armor over long ranges. Basically *invulnerable* between 20-40 km.). But in close quarters bismarck has a *solid chance* to win(bismarck's turtleback armor scheme can endure against yamato's 18.1 inch guns in close quarters). But in both scenarios i would pick bismarck. Yamato has thicker armor but very vulnerable vital compartment protection like armor scheme on 1st and 3rd main battery magazines(even when angled, it is *possible* to penetrate bow of yamato, leading to penetration of main battery magazine #1 athwardship armor. That can cause very severe damage to ship). Also yamato's vital compartments *extend over the waterline* so you wouldn't want to be in close quarters with that weakness(bismarck's vital compartments are under waterline, in close combat bismarck is quite *invulnerable* unless you get a very lucky shot on weakspot between athwardship and turtleback triangle under 1st main battery magazine). You can get penetrated by magazines in close combat with yamato, which could lead to a *detonation* . In long range engagement i can say chances between yamato/bismarck are 60%/40%. In short range, 30%/70%. It's not the thing you can say "yamato wins %100" easily, *that doesn't cut it all* . There are so many variables and parameters to calculate. So, in naval warfare; "penetrate or get penetrated" situation applies. First to penetrate opponent's vital parts, basically wins. But as i mentioned above there are so many variables to calculate in that situation. I can see people arguing each other with little to no knowledge about ww2 naval ships. So just don't. Do your own research. For further questions, i would be happy to answer within the best of my knowledge.
@hawk2222
Жыл бұрын
1. Also crew matters a lot 2. Where can I find so many informations bout ww2 ships and naval tactics?
@HanzoGreen-jn3qn
11 ай бұрын
Remember Bismark saw more action then yamato
@peterpeter1263
Жыл бұрын
The Yamato have a lot of armor and fire power but thee reload is slow but it's a good ship to have
@Vladimir_Lenin990
Жыл бұрын
I love Yamato 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰😍😍😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰🥰😘😘😘🥳🥳😎
@HKapp
3 ай бұрын
BISMARCK 🗿 YAMATO🗿
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
The man I see .Tru sigams
@pakinpakinn8819
Жыл бұрын
ยอดเยี่ยมครับสวยงามมากๆครับ 🌏🚢🛳🛩🚁🚀🚲🏍🚛🚘🚔🇯🇵🇯🇵🇩🇪🇩🇪
@kurtkuczynski
Жыл бұрын
False. Let's put it this way. Bismarck would have to get extremely close to penetrate Yamato's belt. By doing so, Bismarck would easily be penetrated by the 18.1" shells from Yamato. Bismarck could her Yamato, but the likelihood of Bismarck coming out on top is slim.
@log1260
Жыл бұрын
At maximum output, the Yamato can achieve 29 kts. On the other hand, Bismarck's engine malfunctions when it outputs more than 30 kts. To begin with, the 46cm gunship and the 38cm gunship are too different in scale.
@MrRammy-bd1gk
Жыл бұрын
In long range Yamato wins and in close range Bismarck wins, but in mid range 50 /50 chances for each of them!
@sesimono555
Жыл бұрын
Yamato wins both mid and close range
@okuuthenovel
Жыл бұрын
@@sesimono555 yamato armor was cheap
@otimponametarou
Жыл бұрын
@@okuuthenovel Bismarck's main guns can't deal an effective hit against Yamato, but Yamato's main guns can easily destroy Bismarck
@okuuthenovel
Жыл бұрын
@@otimponametarou the yamatos cheap armor would have caused spall damaging the ship even when a shell didnt go through and although yamato had longer range because of bigger cannons it couldnt land a hit at that range
@warlock-jr-2545
Жыл бұрын
@@sesimono555 Yamatos guns were inaccurate af
@kaitenk11-34
Жыл бұрын
No fighting Bismarck is the King Of The 7 Sea And Yamato is the Queen Of The 7 Sea. Both ships heroically sunk doing battle . and left.. As a legend..
Das deutsche Schlachtschiff Bismarck ist das mächtigste Schlachtschiff der Welt und Bismarck ist der König der Ozeane
@americanidiot_𝑨𝑰924
Жыл бұрын
so what
@jasiahthebest3402
5 ай бұрын
Even though I like the Bismarck more than the Yamato, the Bismarck will get f*** up 💀 And the only reason why the British navy fear the Bismarck so much because that one of its shells hit Britain, strongest battleship, causing it to explode into 2 the Bismarck was not stronger than the HMS hood and even if the shell never hit the spot which caused the HMS to explode into 2 it could’ve been a lot different but that is the reason why the Bismarck was feared so much, and why was looked at such a strong battleship but it wasn’t really
@noshinritu5664
3 ай бұрын
supra was chilling 😂😂😂😂
@aleczanderestrella0922
9 ай бұрын
Range: Yamato Armor: Yamato Durability: Yamato Accuracy: Bismarck Speed: Bismarck Crew Experience: Bismarck Firepower: Yamato(triple 18 inch guns biggest battleship gun caliber) If bismarck gets closer it will be the end for yamato as it's turrets turns and reloads a lot slower than of the bismarck.
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
No firepower bismark.Not the size think about it
@alexdrahomaretskyi2792
10 ай бұрын
Yamato had thicker armor, bigger guns and more of them. But Bismarck had a better crew and better technology and overall build quality loke damage control etc. I think Bismarck would win.
@volpepavoletti6353
Жыл бұрын
Bismark é elegante
@ghostkov279
9 ай бұрын
Responding to all comments, he who doesn't sink first wins
@Mate-My-Day
9 ай бұрын
Yamato was a pussy-cat ship
@mosesliem7465
6 ай бұрын
For me yamato like mike Tyson and Bismarck is Muhammad ali, like Muhammad ali said if mike tyson Punch me, im going to ko but remember ali said if you can catch me 🗿 Both of them is the legend🫡 G.O.A.T🔥🔥🫡
@eggabacon
6 ай бұрын
One thing I want to mention since I don't know a lot about battleships but a know a good bit about this specific thing: The Yamato didn't have very good AA guns. I believe they were called Type 96 guns, and the ones on the Yamato mostly had 3 barrels. However, they only had 15 round magazines per gun that emptied quickly, so they had to reload often, and it also wasn't easy to aim well
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Mmm ok
@ghostkov279
9 ай бұрын
Have there ever been any real battles between these two, just in doubt? Wanted to know
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Mmm actually there were no winner,the firepower of the bismark can penetrate the yamato amour ezy.But also yamato have big guns .if they battle.They both will be destroy
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
No yamato is a japanese battle ship during the ww2.bismark is a nazi germany battle ship .It was the mightest ship ever made
@user-dd1tb9bd4m
Ай бұрын
Yamato win but where is yamato success?😂😂😂😂
@augustinexavier8818
Жыл бұрын
Yamato get modernized to fix the errors The Entire Pacific=Aw Hell No Now I'm A Grave For The US Navy
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
More views and comments there sorry!!🤐🤐 I cant reply all!
@crackin90s
Жыл бұрын
what song is this
@RubixTheGod
Жыл бұрын
Tactic matters not the size
@reinamarreyes-jk9bb
4 ай бұрын
Pls do IJN Yamto vs IJN Musashi😅
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
If I can
@cold_raptor
5 ай бұрын
Stop making such ridiculous comparisons. The best bet for the Bismarck would be to get the fuck out of the yamatos range using its Speed, which is one of the very few Advantages the Bismarck even has. A more fair comparison would be Bismarck vs KGV/ south dakota/ north carolina/ Rodney/Richelieu... most of which she could only beat in the atlantic and with a lot of luck.
@letrungnhantran1091
4 ай бұрын
Yamato was a big waist because that it had more turrets than regular battleships which made it slow and it had thin armor which suck and it can’t really defend itself against enemy Air Force
@paulsteaven
Жыл бұрын
TF is this? The only advantage Bismarck has over Yamato is the latter's range, radar, (Yamato has no radar in 1941), and speed. Although Bismarck is faster, Yamato is more manoeuvrable. Just look up how tight Yamato's turning circle is. And why Bismarck's 15 inch shells and guns became better than Yamato's 46cms when Bismarck is just reusing WWI artillery technology.
@timmayr649
Жыл бұрын
Thats so a stupid Video
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
First lear the ship
@miguelvanynigoyanga8720
Жыл бұрын
Please learn Bismarck took like 4000 shells before sinking
@paulsteaven
Жыл бұрын
@@miguelvanynigoyanga8720 4000 shells? Where's your source for that? And don't forget that the Yamato class took tremendous amount of ordnances (torpedoes and bombs) before sinking which is more noteworthy than Bismarck's or Tirpitz's.
@mololomuanlallian
Жыл бұрын
@@paulsteaven exactly!!
@Anti_communist_republic
9 ай бұрын
Both wont fight not because both are allied But because both sank💀
@Kundan-pr7jm
9 ай бұрын
Form wich app you eadit
@AndalosRahma-iw4mp
2 ай бұрын
Nonono yamoto win .❤❤❤❤❤
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Ok
@Eimran1109
7 ай бұрын
I like yamato
@Th3Ka1TEp
17 күн бұрын
Ok,the best battleships of our time.
@dibujosymonitos4639
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@Bismarck_963
3 ай бұрын
Jeaaaaahhhh. Bismarck 😎😈🫡🤩
@user-ly5px6jh2q
7 ай бұрын
Obviously, I think our USS Alabama could eat Bismarck’s lunch. I’m sorry.
@VegitoKingVtuber0301
9 ай бұрын
What’s the name of this song? I know it’s slowed and reverb, I can hear it
@USA_OFFICIAL451
Жыл бұрын
Bismark
@nunopereira265
Жыл бұрын
Just be realistic its more probable that the Bismarck would lose
@002_ariel
Жыл бұрын
Lo dudo, El Yamato Tenía artillería de 460 cm en cambio el Bismarck era de 385 cm, aguanto los 380 del Prince Of Wales, pero dudo que aguante los del Yamato...
@Themenace.
5 ай бұрын
The only 2 things the bismarck was Better at is anti aircraft and speed if it was a 1 on 1 it’s not even a question Yamato would win
@arandomsnkrhead
7 ай бұрын
Idk but i love yamato and my brother says bismarck is leyend but yamato sunk by americans torpedos and bombs using planes
@user-oe9xn7xv7c
8 ай бұрын
Team IJN YAMATO Battleship
@Justfor1.
7 ай бұрын
Bismarck wins it has more durability and fire power
@crackin90s
Жыл бұрын
What is the song name bruh
@capt.Daniel1
10 ай бұрын
❤
@peteseskenchad7055
Жыл бұрын
Bro gave armor to bismark 😭😭😭😭
@Atomic_Bomber-man
10 ай бұрын
Her torpedo protection
@DestroyahTheBanned
7 ай бұрын
@@Atomic_Bomber-man Both had pretty despicable torp protection
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Yes amour was bismark
@mr.puffin7232
Жыл бұрын
Quality > Quantity (size)
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
Hah
@jeswillsonkassper
Жыл бұрын
5 ship sink Bismarck Yamato sunk by plane
@Atomic_Bomber-man
10 ай бұрын
1. Prince of Wales 2. Repulse 3. Arizona 4. Roma 5. Scharnhorst 6. Tirpitz 7. Pensylvania 8. Bismarck 9. Musashi 10. Yamato
@benstar5628
11 ай бұрын
Bro realy called the bismark Yamato and called the Yamato bismark
@aldi4871
Жыл бұрын
100% bismarck win? bruh, are u kidding the king monster of battleship? 💀💀
@villanedits5617
Жыл бұрын
No mmm yamato
@Atomic_Bomber-man
10 ай бұрын
German had more technological type engine for these of machines.
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@manharkhatri3921
Жыл бұрын
'The iron chancellor's iron fortress' A nickname for bismarck
@user-yk2oe6qc7s
6 ай бұрын
El bismarck lo tenía todo y aceros Krupp lo sabe
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@godzillaking_of_the_monste4953
Жыл бұрын
Bro Yamato could clap Bismarck if you think Bismarck could take on Yamato, then you must have to brain
@dutchthespitfire3204
Жыл бұрын
People who think Yamato was actually good need a brain Just bcus she was big and had high calibre guns doesnt make her amazing
@godzillaking_of_the_monste4953
Жыл бұрын
@@dutchthespitfire3204 Yeah she sunk to planes 😂
@okuuthenovel
Жыл бұрын
@@godzillaking_of_the_monste4953 ik
@reouanyang5978
Жыл бұрын
@@godzillaking_of_the_monste4953 ikr like it was on its side just a few torpedo hits while Bismarck took 2,800 shells
@godzillaking_of_the_monste4953
Жыл бұрын
Ok, I'm more educated. 1. The reason why she sunk was due to out dated AA armament. 2. She was torpedoed and bombed, name 1 ship that survived being torpedoed. Guess what, Bismarck sunk to torpedoes too. 3. Yamato sunk more ships. She sunk 2 battleships and a converted aircraft carrier. Bismarck sunk two ships. 4. Y'all are dumb.
@rjm2750
4 ай бұрын
Two battleships Bismarck and Tirpitz
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Uh
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
Musashi ☠️
@ImperialJapaneseNavy
7 ай бұрын
Yamato sunk with torpedo's and bombs Bismarck sunk with shells and torpedo's No one win And how Bismarck sunk Yamato using shells Yamato can only penetrate with torpedo's, and Yamato has special ammo, beehive ammo, underwater penetrating ammo and more long range and powerfull guns and tick armor so don't say Yamato are useless if he survived in that operation the 4th Yamato class are rebuild and japan doesn't surender to US
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
That why we love germans
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Yes no one win tru❤
@ImperialJapaneseNavy
2 ай бұрын
@@villanedits5617 yeah no one win if allies fight each other
@hihowareyu
11 ай бұрын
Keep in mind bismark fought british ships who out ranged her main canons and still won
@mightysigarilyo5113
Жыл бұрын
guns:yamato combat:yamato armor:yamato bigger:yamato stronger:yamato older:yamato winner:yamato....what is wrong with you 😡😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 yamato is the strongest dummy
@Bismark21UA
Жыл бұрын
the Bismarck has little chance of winning in real battles, the Yamato has thicker armor, a stronger caliber, the Bismarck has a firing range of 35 km, and the Yamato it seems to be 45 km, but in a naval battle, one successful landing plays a role
@warlock-jr-2545
Жыл бұрын
Bismarck is accurate Yamato not.. Yamato has very good hull protection but Very weak citadel and Bismarck has a decent overall armor..
@su-57stealthfighter73
Жыл бұрын
@@warlock-jr-2545 Bismarck guns is accurate ?? I don't think so Bismarck fired around 4-5 salvos of 15" inch guns( 8x4=32/ 8x5=40 ) at Hood and probably the same with her 5.9"inch secondary but only 3 hits on Hood which is almost the same size as Bismarck at 18,200 yards (18.2 km) while Yamato manage to hit USS Johnston ( Destroyer)with AP shells at the same range while sailing at Flank speed (Johnston sailing around 40 knots while laying smoke screen protection)and only fired 2-3 salvo( 6x3=18)with her forward guns ..Yamato also sink USS Gambier Bay and manage to knock out the USS White Plains both escort carrier , now tell me if Bismarck is accurate ...
@user-tu1hh5jj1u
2 ай бұрын
They seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Bismarck is equal to the Yamato because it was lucky enough to have a good record against poorly equipped opponents. Bismarck has the same specifications (except for accuracy of fire and speed) as other Japanese battleships except Yamato, but it is overestimated. To begin with, the Yamato was designed for battles against the massive U.S. Navy in the vast Pacific Ocean, and has super heavy armor and one of the world's largest guns, and the Bismarck's guns cannot penetrate the Yamato's armor even at close range. Incidentally, Yamato's armor can withstand even Yamato's own shells. However, Yamato can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor and deliver a fatal blow to Bismarck. Normally speaking, Bismarck cannot win against Yamato. Those who think that Bismarck is of the same rank as Yamato are children without knowledge and people who overestimate it just because it is a German weapon. There are those who claim that the Yamato was easily sunk, but the crew of the Yamato at that time were new recruits with no real combat experience at all, so their damage control and anti-aircraft combat skills were overwhelmingly lacking. On top of that, it took two hours to sink after losing its combat capability due to being bombarded with machine gunfire, torpedoes, and bombs from 300 American planes forever. Essentially, it is battleships such as the Iowa that should be compared to the Yamato. Yamato and Bismarck are both great battleships, but the difference in performance is too drastic to compare them. + Bismarck, after the first hit, most of the systems broke down, as well as the Admiral Hipper class cruisers, it was full of extremely sensitive equipment that failed during each trip to sea,
@tendo_pain473
7 ай бұрын
The yamato crew was new with no experince and the shipp has many Problems with the guns The Bismarck goz a crew with 2 legendary captains and a high skilled crew yeah yamato has bigger huns and more armour but Bismarck is faster and has better and newer Systems as Yamato Bismarck wins
@user-ig5pn8oc9p
9 ай бұрын
ピタットハウスに手付金を横領されました。
@hayapusa
8 ай бұрын
Yamato will always win
@Indoball178
Жыл бұрын
Hms wood: oh shit
@screammer7031
Жыл бұрын
Hood*
@doLPhann
Жыл бұрын
@@screammer7031 wood
@reouanyang5978
Жыл бұрын
Iam sorry what's wood?
@villanedits5617
2 ай бұрын
Ojh
@quantumsniper9433
10 ай бұрын
Both were kinda ass Yamato had VERY lacking AA protection before her refit, and even then it wasnt enough Bismarck's AA might as well not exist. It had about the same AA as a CL or 2 DDs combined. American BBs had about the same AA as 6-8 DDs, or about 2-3 CLs worth Yamato also relied much on visual rangefinding. Bismarck did have a targetting computer....which would be knocked out everytime the guns fired... The bismarck also had a pitiful arnament for its size. It only had 8 15 Inch guns, when many other ships with 8 15 Inch guns were around 10,000 tons less. Comparable ships of her size had 9 16 Inch guns or 10 14 Inch guns The crews on both ships also barely had any combat experience. Yamato spent most of the war in port, Bismarck's crew didnt get a chance to see any real action before getting sunk on her first mission
@carlosdelacruz3598
Жыл бұрын
Sin duda alguna el Bismarck fue el mejor acorazado de la Segunda Guerra Mundial
Пікірлер: 767