TRUTH - the only thing we contribute to our salvation is our sin. Thank you Pastor Jonathan for another informative and encouraging video. I want to start a poll of my fellow subscribers on the shave or no shave look. Blessings Pastor!
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
How did the KJV translators learn correct doctrine before they finished their translation work? Or did they learn correct doctrine after they finished their work?
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Excellent question!
@4jgarner
2 ай бұрын
Christianity didn't *really* start until 1611.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@4jgarner That sounds like such a Jehovah's Witness thing to say..... Sometimes I get these vibes when I'm talking to certain KJV only individuals that reminds me of my talks with the people from the hall.....
@4jgarner
2 ай бұрын
@@hayfieldhermit9657 well it makes sense when you remember they believe pretty much the exact same things about the nwt that KJVO people believe about the KJV. Honestly so sad. Especially since the KJV is actually a good translation. But they make it something to divide over.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@4jgarner Exactly! JW's say the parts of the NWT that have ZERO manuscript support were "restored" by God's organization. Much like some KJV only people will say the KJV is the "reinspired" word of God. I have heard KJV only individuals reference how much hate there is toward the KJV. I actually don't think there is much hate toward the KJV. I think there's a lot of frustration with KJV only people, who constantly tell everyone else that the Bible they read is the devils Bible, and they are inferior Christians and or dumb for reading it. There are tons of NON KJV only people who read the KJV all the time. Tons of people use it. They don't hate it.
@mikael9196
2 ай бұрын
One day, we're all going to give an account for our idle words, how much more our intentional words, and how we treated God's words throughout our lives. Are you ashamed of God's words? How do you know that you're not ashamed of His words? Luke 9:26 For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels.
@toddstevens9667
2 ай бұрын
What a wacko this guy is. A friend suggested I read Ruckman’s commentary on Revelation. I picked one up. I made it 15 pages before I threw it away. These Ruckmanites are crazy. And the hatred and vitriol they inherited from Ruckman just make me sick. Great video, as usual.
@Sgomes-is4or
2 ай бұрын
Great video. Ive always believed there is one gospel through the ages. Grace alone!
@oldschoolbiblebaptist
2 ай бұрын
All publicity is good publicity! Thanks Ya'll! Praying you believe and learn the Bible one day!
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
Why do you believe if somebody that reads another translation other than the King James isn't a Bible believer and doesn't know the Bible
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
@oldschoolbiblebaptist, did you watch the video? Send me an email. I would love to have a gentlemanly conversation with you.
@dalewhite64
2 ай бұрын
KJV Onlyism is a idolatrous heresy. You are worshiping the book, not the author. I pray you will someday repent of this sin.
@oldschoolbiblebaptist
2 ай бұрын
@@dalewhite64 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@oldschoolbiblebaptist
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris That would be a waste of both our time. I know and believe the Book. You don't. See you at the J.S.O.C... I have no fear of God saying "Shame on you for believing every single word of that Book" On the other hand....I wouldn't want to be you on that day!!!
@sillyrabbi64
2 ай бұрын
These videos are helpful in one sense: They put a lot of useful clips in a central place where they are easy to find. Other than that, Pastor, take care of your soul. Watching too much of this stuff can't be healthy. (But your work is appreciated! It means I don't have to watch this stuff.)
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Oh it is absolutely mind numbing and painful to sit through. I had said I wouldn’t respond to him anymore, but I was asked by a couple friends and I relented.
@alcox6377
Ай бұрын
It's people like Roy that I turned away from kjv onlyism and it's cult and use more now the NLT and ESV. I, As a pentecostal roy bell is seriously messed up
@gsw313
13 күн бұрын
I have recently found your channel and i am glad i found it. I am not familiar with roy bell but i can say when i was a much younger man i had the displeasure of being present in my one and only ruckman experience. He was the most rude pastor i have ever came across. The way he would insult people call them stupid or make jokes about their weight. I came to the conclusion that he thought he was above everyone else and his way was the only way much like a certain barbarian. Everyone needs to come to THE LORD JESUS but crack pots like that can and do great harm.
@KevinHale-vq2xr
2 ай бұрын
Ignorance is dangerous.
@TheFightingSheep
2 ай бұрын
That's why Jesus chose ignorant men to be his apostles, he wanted them to be dangerous.
@CC-iu7sq
2 ай бұрын
@@TheFightingSheepFalse.
@TheFightingSheep
2 ай бұрын
@@CC-iu7sq Acts 4:13 (KJV) "Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marveled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus." You're false, like your father.
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
@@TheFightingSheepfalse
@TheCastleKeeper
2 ай бұрын
It's sad that CMA (Christian Motorcyclists Association) hasn't said anything to him with their logo on his jacket prominate in his videos. CMA is not KJV only. They use the NKJV in all of their materials, including the Bibles they give away as they have a deal with Nelson to use it in their ministries.
@oldschoolbiblebaptist
2 ай бұрын
@@TheCastleKeeper I made a video disclaimer about CMA. I was in it way back when they stood for something. Colors still mine, unless you want to come try to take them?🤣😂🤣😂
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
@@oldschoolbiblebaptistdon't lie they probably kicked you out for bearing false witness slandering your fellow brothers and being a hateful extremist dividing the body of Christ
@netdude21
2 ай бұрын
Roy (I refuse to call him brother) is confused about the word "Study" in 2 Timothy 2:15. According to Mark Ward, "Study" is a false friend, which according to the New Oxford American Dictionary, "the devotion of time and attention to acquiring knowledge on an academic subject, especially by means of books." Roy is taking the modern definition of Study and applying it to the word which during the 17th century meant, Be diligent, Work hard or Do your best. Which is why you see either one of those three meanings in the modern versions. So, those of us that use modern versions are taking Paul's words to Timothy to heart by "doing our best", "working hard", and "Being diligent" As for his subscribers, they need to leave his channel in droves and block his channel. Everything he teaches has been refuted many times over the years. He thinks that when someone doesn't adhere to the words of the King James Version, excuse me, in his mind, the King James Bible. His false teachings and divisiveness are really bad. I think it would do him and the other KJV Onlyists well, if they would just keep their mouths shut. He reads the King James, I'm fine with that but don't teach Ruckmanism and let people use the modern versions. Anyway, I've rambled on long enough, check out Mark Ward's video titled "10 Ways To Avoid Ruckmanism" It would have done Ole Roy some good. Before I forget, CONTEXT IS KEY! I wish the IFB and UPCI Pentecostals would STOP taking Scripture verses OUT OF CONTEXT to try and prove a point.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
Ай бұрын
Stop doing that, study means study.
@netdude21
Ай бұрын
@@GodisGracious1031Ministries that’s the MODERN definition and meaning of the word. I stand by my comment. You really need to understand how language works and what certain words meant to the readers in the 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th centuries. Words had COMPLETELY different meanings and definitions than they do today.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
Ай бұрын
@@netdude21 I am pretty sure I seen people write in that time about studying the scripture in the context we have to day. Yes, I know there are words back then that have changed meaning like alien. I know what they mean, I can define it with the King James Bible. I have no issue with the King James Bible language. Study means study. The Bible is modern English.
@mikehopper1674
2 ай бұрын
I almost sent you a message when I saw his video! He also had a video where he openly stated he is just teaching Dr. Ruckman's teachings to get them out to as many people as possible. At least he admitted he doesn't have an original thought.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
Did Ruckman say, "what do the Bible say?"
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
We must insist on a perfect Bible to call it the word of God. Only the King James Bible qualifies to be called the word of God.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Your insistence doesn’t mean there is one perfect in every word. You are holding to a higher standard than did Jesus and the NT authors.
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris I’m okay with that standard.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
You are okay with a higher standard than even our Lord had of his own word? Good luck with that.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris Paul said people were corrupting the word of God.
@bigtobacco1098
Ай бұрын
The kjv adds words
@KevinHale-vq2xr
2 ай бұрын
No Bell has settled in his own gig. It’s his livelihood now.
@failswithtylerking
2 ай бұрын
King James, Authroized version ❗️Psalms 12:6-7/ The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.❗️ 1.Let me point something out Here, the Lord’s words are Pure words, not just words. 2.Purifed 7 times( this 7 is important), like silver tried in a furnace of earth, PURIFIED 7 times. When you melt silver or any metal down into a furnace and it’s melted down the IMPURITIES are separated to leave a PURE metal. With this being said we have a God in heaven that loves his numbers, especially the #7. The first English Bible that was compiled into English from the pure Masoretic and textus receptus text is 1. 1534: Tyndale Bible Tyndale's biblical text is credited with being the first Anglophone Biblical translation to work directly from Hebrew and Greek texts. Masoretic & T.R 2. 1535:Coverdale Bible 3. 1537: Matthew’s Bible 4. 1539:the Great Bible 5. 1560-99:the Genova Bible 6. 1568:the bishops Bible 7. 1611:Authorized Version(King James version) With the KJV being the 7th transliteration of the original text’s that were purified with each Bible until we have received a perfect and preserved word of God in the most used language in the end time. With that being said there is over approximately 900 English bibles; which do you think makes more sense ? ( these are not salvational hermeneutics but they are important ✝️🩸👑
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
Look do yourself a favor get ahold of an original 1611 authorized King James Bible go to Psalm 12 and go to verse 7 and then look at the marginal Note for.verse 7 and you will see your error
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Yep. There’s a marginal note from the translators smiling at every KJVO.
@4jgarner
2 ай бұрын
@@failswithtylerking to add to what my brothers here are saying, it does not say that God's Word WILL be purified 7 times. It uses the present tense, "are." It also doesn't say even that His Word has been or is purified 7 times but compared it's purity and perfection to that of silver that has been purified 7 times, meaning it has no impurities. Not that it itself has gone through said process but is as pure as metal that has gone through that process. And certainly not that it *will* or needs to go through that process. When those words were originally penned in Hebrew it was already true. It was perfect right then. Not waiting to be purified some 2 to 3k years later.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
Ай бұрын
@@randywheeler3914 in Hebrew, its singular and in English, it must be plura.=l.
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
Roy bell's video is interesting... I wonder if he has ever talked to somebody that has never read the King James yet has the same core beliefs about Christ and God the Virgin birth etcetera as he does, judging by his videos he doesn't talk to anybody unless they read the King James
@marcwhite9234
2 ай бұрын
Possible.
@imustkeepremindingmyselfofthis
2 ай бұрын
When fifteen different denominations with various hermeneutics that lack uniformity all claim to be “rightly dividing”, it seems a little questionable.
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
Roy Bell preaches publicly and witnesses to the lost on a regular basis.
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
@@scooterp7009well that may be true I doubt he engages hardly at all with Christians who read other translations I have tried to have civil conversations with him on his channel but I believed he blocked me which leads me to believe he doesn't want to talk to Christians who do not thank the King James is the only word of God
@marcwhite9234
2 ай бұрын
@@randywheeler3914 I belong to a Baptist church that uses the KJV exclusively. That said, my pastor has been removed from other churches for saying people can be saved from an NIV. He disagreed with another leader at a previous church that said someone not reading the KJV can’t be saved. His point was that God is bigger than that. He believes in the KJV as the exclusive word of God. So there are KJV Only people who believe you can be saved from other translations. I brought Ruckman up once and I was told by an older member of the church that he felt there were better resources out there. Why am I saying all this? Not all churches that believe in the KJV Only for study and worship are cult like. My pastor is does not care if someone uses an NIV in their private study.
@jamesaburks
2 ай бұрын
And we all should be teachable with right attitudes in God's love.
@MattPoole-t9j
2 ай бұрын
well, not sure I can trust this smooth face fella.... what happened to THE JB? lol
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
In all honesty, I was trimming my mustache and messed it up horribly. So I had to start over. 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@r.m.solympic1771
2 ай бұрын
I don't see how a person who believes faith plus works can be viewed as a brother. Galatians says that adding works to the Gospel will cut you off from Christ. The fact that Roy doesn't get the plain sense meaning of only one gospel of grace reveals his falseness and blindness.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
He doesn't believe that.
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
Brother Roy Bell speaks the truth. “The only perfect thing on earth is the King James Bible.” Amen.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
That’s your preference. That is absolutely not a fact. It is demonstrably false. Check out my video on Revelation 1:8. The New KJV is a more accurate translation of the TR. If you want to learn, I will help you.
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
Brandon Peterson has presented irrefutable evidence over and over again that the King James Bible is supernaturally perfect. If you are too stubborn or prideful to examine it objectively, then you may have to answer to God for being willfully ignorant. And misleading multitudes of people. I fear for you brother.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
I’ve already done multiple videos on his antics. Here’s a good one that demonstrates his confirmation bias - and yours: Horrible Hermeneutics - Numerology, King James Onlyism, and the Most Misused Bible Software Ever kzitem.info/news/bejne/2Jd50q2lfIOdppg
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris I believe Brandon uses the Cambridge 1769 edition for his searches. You may want to do a review of this huge revelation: kzitem.info/news/bejne/uXiAs2ypjIKFf4osi=ayzTwtrGxzU3Nv2e
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
I watched your linked video review. I believe that Brandon uses the Cambridge 1769 edition of the KJB. Also, if you are familiar with his discoveries, he sometimes uses case-sensitive searches, and sometimes not. The volume of patterns do not all show up in one or the other, but the large majority only work with the KJB. Perhaps you could do a review of his recent reveal of the amazing Elton anomaly?
@jamesaburks
2 ай бұрын
Oh boy! He have a long way to learn. He need to dig more.
@marcwhite9234
2 ай бұрын
To this day Ruckman gave one of the best salvation messages I have come across, and yet some of his doctrines are just crazy.
@CC-iu7sq
2 ай бұрын
While I enjoy your KJVO content, I cannot fathom your reasoning on dispensationalism. Can you link me to a video as to why Leviticus 5 is not telling Israel that that in order to receive forgiveness of sins, sacrifices were required? If we interpret literally, I don’t understand how you get around the book of Leviticus.
@GodCenteredTheology
2 ай бұрын
Excellent video. One of the things that got me to leave that way of thinking behind was Scripture combined with a rational mind to think about how it created seperate ways of salvation. I remember having 2 Timothy 2:15 drilled in our heads. This is an example of why translations need to be updated because "dividing" doesn't mean what the original is conveying which is to accurately handle.
@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever
2 ай бұрын
I can tell you’ve read a whole lot of Dr. Ruckman as I have, you have the quotes of his behind the screen and read from them to represent Ruckman accurately, and you succeed greatly! By the way, Dr. Ruckman’s ideas undoubtedly was a form of Mid-Acts Dispensationalism but to distance himself from a few men who weren’t AV-only he has indoctrinated all his students that he’s not a Mid-Acts dispensationalist. Their teaching IS abundantly clear Mid-Acts Dispensationalism and they just parrot Dr. Ruckman’s falsehood that they’re different: they are “Bible-believing dispensationalists” incredible!
@jonpope4965
2 ай бұрын
With all due respect, if he preaches a false gospel as you say at the beginning of the video (“faith plus works”), he should not be considered a brother but apostate. Paul clearly taught in Galatians 1:8 that anyone who preaches a false gospel is accursed. I believe you should treat this man as a danger to gospel faithfulness and false teacher, not a brother in good fellowship.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
It’s hard to argue with your statement. Biblically, you are spot on.
@r.m.solympic1771
2 ай бұрын
I agree with you.
@frankmckinley1254
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for another great video. 👍😁
@SEL65545
2 ай бұрын
If you don't believe exactly like Brother Roy does, "you just might be in a cult." I've lost count of how many times I fell into his cult criteria. Oh, the irony!
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
Yikes! Sounds like you most definitely might be in a cult!
@r.m.solympic1771
2 ай бұрын
I don't know how anyone could stand to listen to Roy Bell. He is not focused on the Gospel which saves, but on idolatry involving a certain translation. He is totally lacking in understanding. Why would you consider him a brother? Even though he says he believes in Jesus for salvation, I don't believe it is a true belief, based on his other idolatrous statements. Remember, Jesus warned us that some will have a superficial belief, but will fall away. Jesus also says He will turn away many "believers" away. Matthew 7 21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. 22 Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many [s]miracles?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’
@r.m.solympic1771
Ай бұрын
@Packhorse-bh8qn Au contraire mon frere, we can tell people that if they continue in certain activities and/or they preaching a different gospel, and/or adding works to the gospel they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven. Jesus tells us in John 7 to judge righteously. The apostles certainly did, and the guidelines are written in the Bible. Jesus spoke of superficial belief and told many He would tell them to depart from Him. These are professing believers mind you. I said I personally don't believe he has genuine faith, for the simple reason that he is trusting in a temporary gospel, while the Bible proclaims an eternal or everlasting Gospel. If a Mormon claims to believe in Jesus, we can say he is not saved, because that Mormon is trusting in a different Jesus than the Jesus revealed in scripture. In the same way, Roy Bell is trusting in a different gospel. That is my opinion, based on his fruit of dividing the body of Christ and saying God's written word is of Satan, and of trusting in a mere, temporary gospel. He also leads future people astray by saying the gospel preached in Revelation will be one of works. I don't believe a person can have the Spirit guiding them and continue in such blatant heresy. Maybe he will repent. All I am saying is I have strong doubts he is a true believer based on what I read in my Bible. Galatians 1:9 9 As we have said before, even now I say again: if anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed! Revelation 14:6 And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,
@docbrown7513
2 ай бұрын
I don't know if he is saved. I don't think he would accept us as brothers in Christ....
@jamation9X
2 ай бұрын
I'd be curious to see what your opinion is of Bryan C. Ross. He is a King James Onlyist on KZitem as well, and a dispensationalist, albeit not as crazy as other KJVOs Good video by the way
@frankmckinley1254
2 ай бұрын
I take it then Bell also believes that the gospel preached by Jesus is different than that of Paul and today we only follow Paul. Is this assessment correct?
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
This is exactly what he believes.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
Peter warned us that people twist what Paul said, to their own destruction.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
I can't imagine believing that Paul was preaching a different salvation than Jesus was.
@longstreet2740
2 ай бұрын
?? Then WHY did GOD set Paul apart to Gentiles . Didn't Paul claim his gospel was "not after man." Gal 1:11, but given by direct revelation of JESUS CHRIST after his conversion in 3 years in Arabia ( probably the real Mt Siani in Saudi Arabia ) "Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus." Gal 1:17 ?Did Peter and Paul preach a different soteriology ?? They seem to at least not burden the Gentiles with Jewish customs which many of the 12 continued out tradition, NOT Salvation. Even Peter, near the end of his live pondered over the wisdom and Revelations given through Paul I do not hold to Hyper Acts 15 Dispensationalism, though Ruckman, and ***Roy Bell have refuted this teaching 15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. 2 Peter 3:15-16 FYI Paul’s Gospel by William R. Newell (1868-1956) Moody Bible Chicago IL www.middletownbiblechurch.org/dispen/newell.htm
@longstreet2740
2 ай бұрын
PAUL-ONLYISM...Divisive Heresy! by Roy Bell kzitem.info/news/bejne/qphsu5aMk6mUnH4
@randykeener2047
2 ай бұрын
You should debate him.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
If he would do it, I would cover all the costs.
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburrisI would donate to help cover the costs
@4jgarner
2 ай бұрын
@@randywheeler3914 well sadly, in another thread on this same video he outright refused a cordial conversation with Pastor Burris. Not even a debate. Just a conversation. and mocked him while doing so. sad and shows no love as John said would be the mark of a Christian.
@RobertJones-v8h
2 ай бұрын
Well said Brother …. Now I don’t feel guilty for studying my nkjv and American standard
@TheCastleKeeper
2 ай бұрын
Yeah, us modern dispensationalists believe in only one way to salvation; by Grace through Faith alone through all time post-fall. NT looks back to Jesus, OT looked forward (even without clarity) to Jesus. The OT points to Jesus, even though most of OT is not about Jesus.
@josephkearns3999
2 ай бұрын
It is sort of ironic that he is saying that we can only get Bible doctrine from a KJB, yet he's a Ruckmanite...........lol.
@jamest4659
2 ай бұрын
I thank you for this teaching and I enjoyed the video. I thank the Lord you have a pastorate. I wonder, is Spencer Smith a Ruckmanite?
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Spencer Smith is not a Ruckmanite. He is a KJV Only guy. But not a Ruckmanite.
@annakimborahpa
2 ай бұрын
Does Brother Roy Bell also add to his list the number of times the word 'doctrine' appears in the Apocrypha that was part of the original 1611 Authorized Version of the King James Bible? 1. Ecclesiasticus 16:25 “I will shew forth doctrine in weight, and declare his knowledge exactly.” 2. Ecclesiasticus 24:33 “I will yet pour out doctrine as prophecy, and leave it to all ages for ever.” 3. Ecclesiasticus 21:19 “Doctrine unto fools is as fetters on the feet, and like manacles on the right hand.” 4. Ecclesiasticus 24:32 “I will yet make doctrine to shine as the morning, and will send forth her light afar off.” 5. Ecclesiasticus 24:27 “He maketh the doctrine of knowledge appear as the light, and as Geon in the time of vintage.” 6. 1 Esdras 5:40 “For unto them said Nehemias and Atharias, that they should not be partakers of the holy things, till there arose up an high priest clothed with doctrine and truth.” 7. Ecclesiasticus 19:19 “The knowledge of the commandments of the Lord is the doctrine of life: and they that do things that please him shall receive the fruit of the tree of immortality.” [King James Bible Online Org /search.php?q=doctrine&bsec=A&s=order=0] And if the original 1611 King James Bible containing the Apocrypha is good enough for Brother Roy Bell, then that's good enough for me.
@thepreacher7828
2 ай бұрын
The English speaking people really lacked before 1611 according to the title premise I like your videos, stay hopeful I pray you get a pastorate soon
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your encouragement. I accepted a senior pastor role back in March. Our Lord opened the door to a very sweet and loving body of believers.
@bruce-g7s
2 ай бұрын
do non-english speaking people know any doctrine? asking for a friend
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
People like Sam Gipp simply say that they need to learn English if they really want to know God’s word.
@notsatch
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris It's beyond belief that there are people who would question or deny the faith and salvation of 16 centuries worth of believers because they didn't speak a language and read a Bible that didn't exist in their time.
@4jgarner
2 ай бұрын
Nope. Unfortunately not. Only English speaking/reading people are physically capable of salvation. And that only after 1611.
@bruce-g7s
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris i heard him say that on the KJV debate on john ankerberg show
@scooterp7009
2 ай бұрын
God brought it all together and perfected his word in 1611.
@igregmart
2 ай бұрын
The King James version is THE HOLY BIBLE for all English speaking people.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Nah, there’s several great ones.
@igregmart
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris Seriously? You referring to all the fake English Bibles that are tainted by the corrupted Critical Text, which are based on relatively recent identified texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus? Those corrupt texts were championed by heretics Westcott and Hort. The KJV is based on the textual tradition available since the beginning of Christianity resulting in the Textus Receptus for the New Testament and the Masoretic Text for the Old Testament. My KJV is the perfect word of God in English. Will you dare to say any of your fake English Bibles are perfect? On a side note, who do I place more trust in, the dozens of translators of the KJV or the current academy full of agnostics, atheists, and heretics? The KJV translators.
@randywheeler3914
2 ай бұрын
@@igregmartinteresting you should say that you put your trust in the translators of the KJV especially since their view was that the KJV wasn't perfect and had errors but they still considered it the word of God
@Bigmac_attack
2 ай бұрын
Salvation has not always been through grace alone faith alone. You're shot.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
That is absolutely incorrect. Paul even states it himself in Romans 3, Romans 4, Ephesians 2, Galatians, and many other places. Repent. You are holding an unbiblical position. From the time Adam fell in the Garden, there has been a “Dispensation of Grace”. Adam was saved by grace and everyone after him who has ever been saved has been by grace alone through faith alone. Deal with it. Accept it. Love it.
@KevinHale-vq2xr
2 ай бұрын
What does the Bible mean is the truth.
@tanner7779
2 ай бұрын
20 minute "rebuttal" , but not one specific Bible verse given nor one example of how New Versions are doctrinally accurate. All youve given is general chapters and YOUR interpretation thereof. Is Luke 2:33 doctrinally accurate? Or how about John 1:18? How about addressing the specific arguments that KJVOists have given instead of attacking straw man arguments and personalities.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
I attacked no straw man. None at all. I addressed the heart of Ruckmanism’s multiple gospels with scripture. It seems you missed it. And I do not need to use a particular chapter and verse to refute KJV onlyism because it isn’t a biblical argument. It is illogical and irrational. But, since you brought it up, I would encourage you to check out the MANY videos on my KJV only playlist on KZitem and see my videos where I have demonstrated omissions, additions, and errors in the KJV. And yes, Luke 2:33 is accurate in modern translations and supports Luke 2:41 in the KJV. This is called confirmation bias. John 1:18 is also correct in modern versions. If you had any understanding of textual criticism or the Greek manuscript history, you would know this. Perhaps if the KJV didn’t omit God from Revelation 1:8 and also add words to Titus 2:13 to confuse the teaching that Jesus is God and savior, you may be more inclined to accept what is an acceptable and accurate rendering of John 1:18. Again, I have an entire playlist on my channel going through painstaking details in order to deal with the stuff you don’t want to deal with. You are demonstrating confirmation bias. You are ignoring evidence you don’t like and selecting only evidence that supports your position.
@tanner7779
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris I can show you there are at least TWO different gospels in the Bible. 1) the gospel of the kingdom 2) the gospel of the grace of God. Just answer this one simple question, if someone came up to you today and asked you "what is the gospel" what would you say?
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
God find my video addressing the Kingdom of Heaven and the Kingdom of God being the same thing. I pray you repent.
@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever
2 ай бұрын
Also Doctrine is another... yes again, false friend in the AV. This time Webster in his 1828 catches it even though the OED marks this sense as dying in 1710 † 1.a. c1384-1710 The action of teaching or instructing; instruction; a piece of instruction, a lesson, precept. Obsolete. Webster 1828: DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] 1. In a general sense, whatever is taught. Hence, a principle or position in any science; whatever is laid down as true by an instructor or master. The doctrines of the gospel are the principles or truths taught by Christ and his apostles. The doctrines of Plato are the principles which he taught. Hence a doctrine may be true or false; it may be a mere tenet or opinion. 2. The act of teaching. He taught them many things by parables, and said to them in his doctrine Mark 4:2. Sense 1 is the sense which all Ruckmanites take doctrine to mean, but sense 2 in Websters 1828 is often found in the AV and modern versions are simply updating it to "teaching". Again Mark Ward is right, they're tripping over a false friend and then blaming the modern versions for exposing their misunderstanding. By the way in the AV's rendering of Isa. 28:9 there is another sense of "doctrine" which is obsolete and therefore is a false friend: c1460-1616 † 4. Learning, erudition, knowledge. Obsolete. Webster also catches this in his 1828: 3. Learning; knowledge. Whom shall he make to understand doctrine? Isaiah 28:9.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
I've been thinking a lot about this lately. KJV onlyism, is a tier 1 doctrine in many KJV only churches. Its as important to them as any other doctrine. And yet, it doesn't exist 300 years ago. So its a modern doctrine. Its not just the doctrine of textual preservation, because people had that before 1611. So its a new doctrine. I think thats the root of why its like trying to pick through a stone wall with a toothpick trying to reason with KJV only people. It's like attacking the deity of Christ, the resurrection, or the virgin birth. It simply means everything to them, and its integral to their faith and salvation. How they made a 1769 revision of their translation, the doctrine of all doctrines is astonishing. And I wish they could see that its a modern doctrine, that millions of Christians never had.
@crossbros30
2 ай бұрын
I am King James only the less only then they English Bibles have covered up. Rome have covered up the Roman Catholic Church and have been just not of God.😮❤❤❤❤
@longstreet2740
2 ай бұрын
Post Reformation doctrines were developed by those who believed the Bible KJV . For example, much of our premill beliefs came from Larkin, Ironside and others in an era before Modern versions took hold on the minds of many believers. I read from NIV and NASB in college days 1980s and found them rather hollow. The omissions Matt 18:11, Acts 8:37 and other with footnotes claim earlier manuscripts missing' troubled my soul. After years of research, I came to conclusion of KJV superiority, but I believe the HOLY SPIRIT led me. I glean from Ruckman but not exclusively. I've listen to many PBI grads who respect Ruckman but differ on an few points. I like Roy Bell, Gene Kim, and Robert Breaker. I also like Les Feldick though many have accused him of being a hyper dispensations. I also glean from Jack Hibbs, Brandon Holthaus, JD Farag..... Just did a word check on 2 Timothy 2:15 on Bible Gateway and there many which say 'study' but the most popular in my generation say NASB Be diligent CSB Be diligent NIV Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved NKJV Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, NLT Work hard so you can present yourself to God RSV Do your best to present yourself to God TLB Living Paraphrase Work hard so God can say to you, “Well done.” GNT Good News Paraphrase Do your best to win full approval in God's sight,
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Have you studied the omissions in the KJV? Have you studied the additions in the KJV? Have you studied the readings in the KJV no Christian had ever seen before the 16th Century? Did any of that trouble you as you were doing your research?
@longstreet2740
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris No, but please show me omissions in KJV
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Revelation 1:8 Destroys KJV Onlyism by omitting God from the text. kzitem.info/news/bejne/z4RsqK6rn2lqhaA I actually have three videos on this one alone. There are others. Please do not simply dismiss it. Make sure you deal with the facts.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris No, it did not. Its differenatily between Father God and Jesus.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
@@longstreet2740 He is probably talking about how the KJB 1611 had missing words which were added back in 1769 and other revisions.
@rossbel5735
2 ай бұрын
The inspired word of God was written in Hebrew and Greek.
@kelseytcoleman
2 ай бұрын
Thank you. Keep up the good work.
@rodneyjackson6181
2 ай бұрын
I have said it before. Roy Bells opening statement you played Bro. Jonathan is "blatantly arrogant and patently ignorant!" Did Roy Bell say how many times the Geneva Bible mentioned the word doctrine? Nope. These people act like there was no English Bible before 1611. The NKJV I know corrects at least 6 errors in the KJV.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@Rodney Jackson, Maybe he meant, the next closest translation that uses that word fewer times. Kind of like "Price is right" where the closest without going over wins. 😁 For the record, the Geneva Bible has "doctrine" in the singular, 54 times in the Old and New Testaments. If more is better..........................
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@Rodney Jackson, it gets worse. The Bishops Bible, the one the KJV translators were revising, had "doctrine" 57 times. What if the Bishops Bible readers, pointed out that the Brand New and Modern KJV had the word "doctrine" fewer times? And then they proceeded to accuse it of "watering down" the emphasis of doctrine?
@rodneyjackson6181
2 ай бұрын
Great points brother!!!👍👍
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@rodneyjackson6181 The Great Bible has "doctrine" 56 times. So, out of the 3 Anglican translations, Great Bible, Bishops Bible, and the KJV, it is the KJV that contains the fewest uses of the word, "doctrine". Are we to assume that means it emphasizes doctrine the least out of the three? Honestly, its getting disturbing how much I'm seeing KJV only people using numerology and math to prove they're right. I think the next step is reading palms, sharing dreams, and staring into crystal balls.
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@rodneyjackson6181 The scoreboard has the KJV in 4th place at the moment for uses of "doctrine". It is behind the Bishops Bible, the Great Bible, and the Geneva Bible. Actually, it sounds like they had more doctrine before the KJV......and which Bible was it that started the downward trend????..... Hmm....by date, it goes 56, 54, 57, 51.......4th place. 4th place is where the downward trend starts. Got to be careful with those slippery slopes. You never know where it will end.
@gene4231
2 ай бұрын
I've got a buddy like that. KJV only. Although, Jesus and his disciples read from the Greek Septuagint. The OT quotes referenced in the NT are more than likely from the Septuagint and the dead sea scrolls also add clarity, but that clarity is not found in the KJV. Here's what the bible says and here's what it means. The,here's what it means is doctrine.
@igregmart
2 ай бұрын
It has not been proven to me that Jesus read from the alleged Greek Septuagint.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
False.
@padraicbrown6718
2 ай бұрын
It saddened me to watch that. I don't think he really understands what the Bible is (especially the New Testament), how its parts fit together or even how the Bible works. The problem with merely picking up a Bible, reading it and wholly into it, is quite simply that, like the Ethiopian eunuch, you NEED a teacher! He is like the man who wished to live in France, so he bought a French copy of Les Miserables and when he got to Paris, he discovered that he couldn't comprehend anything anyone was saying and that no one was able to communicate with him. This brings us to root of the problem. Not merely KJVOnlyism, but sola scriptura in general. The simple fact is that the Bible is very much like a physics text book. No matter how intelligent you are, no matter how faithful you are, no matter how earnest you are in striving for theosis, without a teacher and without a sound basis for that teaching, you're just going to be lost. In physics, you go to school and take a class. It could be in high school, it could be in college, it could be in Oklahoma, or it could be in California. All the teachers are going to teach the same universal laws. The reason we can walk into a physics class anywhere in the world and learn the same physics is simple: all physics teachers are accredited and they all learned from accredited physics professors of the previous generation. All the way back through the centuries that physics has been understood as a science. Kind of ironic, is it not, that no matter what university we attend, they all teach the same physics! How is it that if we go to this pastor or that pastor, or attend this denomination or that denomination, or follow this doctrine or that doctrine, we discover only chaos, discord, disagreement! How is it that a Baptist, a Pentecostal, an Evangelical and a Lutheran can all rightly divide the natural revelation of the Creator of the Universe, yet when it comes to the incarnate revelation of that same Creator, so many of their words are incoherent and their arguments circular or else without logical basis. Thankfully, our Lord didn't actually give us a Bible! Nor did he command that his disciples write anything down! Let alone a King James 1611! Nope. Our Lord gave us a teaching Church! Roy may not even realise this, but what he actually read demonstrates the teaching Church in action! Jesus gave this Church the authority to rightly divide and the mandate to teach and make disciples of all nations. He sent the Holy Spirit to guide this Church and he promised that all the powers of Satan shall never prevail against this Church. And thank God this Church continues to be upheld by his promises! Something to think about: rather than striking out into the darkness, Bible in hand, pridefully assuming it will reveal its secrets once we open it up, maybe Christians should be more like physics students and seek that Church whose teachers learned from teachers going back in unbroken lines for twenty centuries all the way to the Apostles who handed on the faith they learned from Jesus!
@ScottRock-mr6qk
2 ай бұрын
I have a King James, a New King James, a Gideon, an ESV, and an NWT, and I've read a little bit in a friend of mine's NLT as well. I wasn't too impressed with the NLT, though. It was too confusing for the reader. For instance one verse said "This one was the chosen one of God and then a few verses later it said he was God. So which is he? The chosen one of God or God himself?? Yeah he's the chosen one of God and that's why I said it was too confusing to the reader.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
Do know about the old ESV and Gideon's one.
@notsatch
2 ай бұрын
Eureka! You're not getting through to these people, pastor, because you lack dramatic hand gestures! Side note: the KJV translators would cringe at Roy's grammar...
@jesussaves8542
2 ай бұрын
Youve falsly accused roy bell as a hyper
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Nope. Asked and answered. Just because it is what you believe and are familiar with, it doesn’t make it nominal.
@TheFightingSheep
2 ай бұрын
Let's not forget that not only KJVO is a heresy, but it grows out of the mother of heresies - the "sola scriptura", or "scriptures only" heresy. Jesus said "I AM", not "the scriptures are" the way the truth and the life! The only way to learn any truth is from the Spirit of Truth.
@CC-iu7sq
2 ай бұрын
You’re misinterpreting Sola Scriptura. It’s not talking about salvation, but our only sole authority. You find the authority of Jesus in the scripture, nowhere else. If you disregard Sola Scriptura, you disregard the Protestant Reformation. Once you do that, we have some problems.
@padraicbrown6718
2 ай бұрын
@@CC-iu7sq -- And yet, Jesus never gave us a Bible for our sole authority. He instituted the Church, making it a teaching Church, giving the Church his authority to teach. We must disregard sola scriptura, for the Protestants can not find this doctrine in the Bible, and they can not even define what the Bible is from the Bible itself. Ultimately, this Protestant doctrinal position is incorrect. It is, however, ironic in that it rests upon the teaching authority of the very Church they protest against. Once we disregard the Protestant Revolution and the chaos it spawned, we find that there are no longer any problems!
@CC-iu7sq
2 ай бұрын
@@padraicbrown6718 There’s not a single verse in your bible that presents a case for church authority over the believer.
@padraicbrown6718
2 ай бұрын
@@CC-iu7sq -- Correct. There are many instances where the authority of the Church is revealed.
@benzach2
Ай бұрын
Since when is stating there’s only one, true, inspired translation divisive???? It’s anything but! You sir, are deceived! There’s nothing, and I mean NOTHING wrong with the King James, PERIOD! Who’s the author of confusion?!?!
@pastorburris
Ай бұрын
First, there is no inspired translation. Secondly, Roy’s claims sow division and doubt I causing people to doubt that they have the word of God. It is absolutely divisive when you draw denominational lines over a particular translation. KJV Onlyists cause people to doubt God’s words in the same way the serpent did in the Garden.
@gator7082
19 күн бұрын
People who have lead an extreme life, tend to go to the opposite extremes when making a directional change.
@michaelroots6931
2 ай бұрын
Is the law of repetition another made up Law, like the law of first mention. Is there a definitive list of them.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Yep. It’s made up. I won’t say there is a definitive list, but there is a pretty concrete list that is taught at IFB Bible colleges. Principles of Biblical Hermeneutics by J. Edwin Hartill seems to be a pretty consistent standard at them. It is utter trash.
@XerosigmaZ
16 күн бұрын
Question, do you believe we will be going through the “time of Jacob’s trouble”? If so, then it would make sense why you’re not a dispensationalist. We dispensationalists, believe we won’t be going through that time thanks to the finished work of God on the cross. We believe that you need faith in God throughout the 7 thousand years of history of course. But before the finished work of God, you had to work or obey what God wanted you to do. Not for forgiveness of sins, but for the appeasing of His wrath. There are a few exceptions like Abraham and David as it states in the book of Hebrews (I’m NOT a hyper dispensationalist!). Hence the OLD testament is faith + works. Now we still need to have faith in God (age of grace) but we just put our faith in His finished work on the cross (gospel) and spread it across the world until the day of redemption. The point of the “time of Jacob’s trouble” is for the unrepentant Jews who disobey the gospel by treading it underfoot and are still “stuck” in the Old Testament. Hence them wanting to rebuild the third temple and do the ritual (reason for the current war going on as we speak in Israel). Although honorable towards God, that’s NOT what God wants. They’re disobeying and will “get in trouble”. Not us Christian’s though because Paul clearly states we’re not appointed to wrath. So then, what happens to the people that stay behind when we get raptured since we’re not appointed to wrath? Would the same gospel work? Yes and no. Yes, you have to come to the realization that Jesus is God. Yes, you have to realize that what He did on the cross was going to save you. No, it’s not enough anymore since you’re late. He redeemed His possession. But, not all hope is lost. You have to realize all of that, and endure to the end and die for Him. Those Jews and gentiles that become Christian’s during the tribulation will have to go back to works (not taking the mark of the beast) and die. It’s a different gospel to the one we have now which is basically an addition to our current gospel.
@pastorburris
16 күн бұрын
One can be a dispensationalist without believing in multiple gospels. Your heresy is not your eschatology. It is in your final sentence. The current gospel is the only gospel. No one has ever been saved by grace+works. No one. No Jew. No Gentiles. Not before the cross. Not during the Tribulation. Lay the eschatology aside. Read Paul’s own writings. He refutes your abuse of text and blasphemy.
@XerosigmaZ
16 күн бұрын
@@pastorburris thank you for replying pastor. Just want you to know I’m just respectfully probing to get your point of view on the matter. It will not change the fact that we’re both saved and won’t see each other in heaven. My question to you will be then, if by your logic, why did Jesus have to go through such a terrible death? What would have happened if He didn’t go through with it? What would have happened if the Jews would have never sacrificed a single animal? Couldn’t they just have said “oh well our faith is in the God you claim Moses, we’ll just try to live as good as possible”. Couldn’t God just have said during that time “don’t worry about anything! Just know that I am God!” And not have to die on the cross? What would’ve happened if Noah didn’t build the ark and just said “oh God talked to me!! He is real!!” And gone with just that faith that He is real? I’m actually serious about these questions when people say that works never played a part before Jesus died on the cross. I will await your answer with patience. Again, thank you for your time sir. Like I said, I’m not a hyper dispensationalist. But to say that works never played a part before Jesus’s death on the cross is questionable.
@KennethBridges-j3w
2 ай бұрын
The original version of the KJV, published in 1611, included the apocrypha but was removed by the Arch Bishop of Canterbury on 1885. In Acts 12:4 the word pascha (Strong G3957) is mistranslated ‘Easter’. In all other 28 occurrences pascha is correctly translated ‘Passover’. But the most inexplicable example of mistranslation is Romans 1:1 1 “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” KJV Romans 8:1 1Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. NAS Romans 8:1 1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. ESV Romans 8:1 1 Therefore, no condemnation now exists for those in Christ Jesus, HCSB Romans 8:1 1 THERE is now therefore no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus, who walk not according to the flesh. DRB But the error in the Romans 8:1 does not end there. It continues in verses 2-8. None of the other translations repeat this KJV error. You have to lay them out one by one next to the KJV to get the full picture. Perhaps the KJV translators did not have access to older original Greek manuscripts scripts. I have not yet read someone offering an acceptable explanation for the KJV translators interpolating these passages. I am not threatened by these errors. My salvation is intact. JESUS did not say ‘Its good that I go away, because I will send you the New Testament and it will lead you into all truth and remind you of what I have said.’ JESUS says, “John 16:7 7 “But I tell you the truth, it is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I go, I will send Him to you. NAS John 16:13-15 “ 13 “But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. 14 “He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you. 15 “All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you.” NAS
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
No, Easter is right. Acryophal is not inspired, its not mixed in as the Catholic Bibles and the translators did not believe it was inspired. It was there for historical purpouses, even the Geneva had it.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
Ай бұрын
There is no error.
@ShooterReview
2 ай бұрын
🤦♂️ the KJV onlyiest are part of the strong delusion placed upon those who have not received the love for truth.
@kjvitor
2 ай бұрын
Sure, doctrine means teaching, however it carries a more heavy importance of that teaching on its meaning than just a teaching. That's the problem about modern versions, they use lighter words. What makes fewer people taking the Bible seriously.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
That’s a hasty generalization fallacy. Could the Catholics not have said the same thing about English Bibles like the KJV when the standard across Europe was the Latin Vulgate? Your statement is purely subjective and unquantifiable. Therefore, it is hearsay.
@kjvitor
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburris Why you always come up with the Latin Vulgate argument. The answer is yes, they could, but who are the catholics to say anything about Bible Versions or define the standard for Bible? Those clowns were pagan, statue false queen of heaven worshippers, persecutors of real Christians. As you know from history very few people could understand Latin Vulgate. Those who did, didn't have access to the Bible in Latin as well. People were iliterate and weren't allowed to read the Bible themselves. The Dark ages were dark even in Bible literacy. No wonder their views about God and church were easily manipulated by priests, Bishops and the Pope. The KJV was and still is the Bible for the common man to read, in a language he can understand and know every sound Bible doctrine. each word carrying its weight in meaning and purpose to be there. Since people can read from the KJV Bible. Modern Bible publishers, secular Bible scholars, slick pulpit salesmen and their seminaries with all their "you should go back to the greek" "there is no perfect translation" "only the lost originals are scripture" came up with every persuasion technique known to make people buy on their hoax. "Here's a new, fresh and warm (actually luckwarm) version of the Bible easier to understand, who sounds good that is almost but not quite the words of God". From: Trust me, I know Greek, and have seminary degrees. Funny right!
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Surely you jest. You said, “who are the catholics to say anything about Bible Versions or define the standard for Bible? Those clowns were pagan, statue worshippers, persecutors of real Christians.” Do you not know that the TR was given by Erasmus, a Roman Catholic priest? Do you not know that the manuscripts he used were created by Roman Catholics? Why do you make a distinction against Roman Catholics when you the KJV to Roman Catholics. I am no Roman Catholic, but face it, God used them to give us the KJV. You cannot pick and choose here. Erasmus wrote defending the Eucharist and the Roman Catholic view of free will against Martin Luther. You should know this before you make contradictory and self-refuting arguments. My friend, I bring up the Vulgate because you are making the exact same argument today as Catholics did then. They questioned the credentials of the KJV translators and others before them like Tyndale. This is the same as what you are doing today. My dear Sir, you are guilty of doing the exact very thing that the people you now criticize did. That is inconsistent. Be consistent.
@kjvitor
2 ай бұрын
@@pastorburrisIt's not the same thing, because I'm not going out burning or persecuting those who use those new perversions. You can easily expose modern versions by comparing them to the KJV text seeing some changes are way off leading to confusion. Catholics burned and persecuted those who acquired Tyndale Bible for example. They almost exploded the parliament with King James in the gun powder plot. And you are comparing me to the Catholics for being against this new versions of the Bible?
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@kjvitor A lot of KJV only people mention Catholics regarding modern Bible translations and a couple famous Greek manuscripts. But most devout Catholics do not endorse using these protestant, modern Bibles. And Erasmus, the Catholic, who dedicated his Greek/Latin New Testament to the pope, is the one who did begin what is now referred to as the "Textus receptus". The KJV follows that stream of manuscripts that flowed from Catholic hands. Add on top of this, that the Church of England and their jailing and persecution of Christians, led the Pilgrims to flee England, while King James was King, and a KJV Bible translator was the Arch bishop of Canterbury, and the Anglicans giving us the KJV doesn't actually sound much better. My point is, if anyone is going to be KJV only, they probably shouldn't make any Catholic accusations against other translations, because of the "don't throw stones in a glass house" rule.
@jesussaves8542
2 ай бұрын
How can roy block you when hes the one who shared this video on his facebook? Lol
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
I have two accounts 😉 And I didn’t share his video. I pulled clips and put them into my own under fair use.
@ScottRock-mr6qk
2 ай бұрын
No, you can not. I have 5 Bible's and use all 5 to understand the scriptures. If I strictly used the KJB then I'd believe Jesus was God Almighty but he's not. Although the King James Bible does tell you who God Almighty is at Exodus 6:3 and Psalms 83:18. The mistakes that are made in the King James Bible can lead you to believe differently.
@oldschoolbiblebaptist
2 ай бұрын
@@ScottRock-mr6qk 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 And there is your fruit Burris!
@RedBeardOne
2 ай бұрын
@@ScottRock-mr6qk I don’t think this is the flex you think it is.
@ScottRock-mr6qk
2 ай бұрын
@@RedBeardOne It'll work. Just fine
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@ScottRock, Can you share with us which 5 you use?
@hayfieldhermit9657
2 ай бұрын
@@ScottRock-mr6qk The NKJV isn't going to treat the deity of Jesus any different than the KJV. The ESV is based on a different Greek NT edition, so it has some different readings, but its strong on the deity of Jesus. And I don't know which Gideon Bible you have, but they only produce 3. It's either a KJV, a NKJV, or its a Gideons ESV. So it's either redundant, and you are only using 4 translations, or you have a Gideons ESV, which may have more references to the deity of Jesus than the KJV or the ESV....... So its all about your NWT. Your Jehovah's witness Bible with hundreds of readings supported by ZERO Greek New Testament Manuscripts is what you hang your hat on. Wow.
@benzach2
Ай бұрын
“Faithful” is NOT inspired!
@pastorburris
Ай бұрын
Translations are not inspired.
@imustkeepremindingmyselfofthis
2 ай бұрын
Former Christian, here. I appreciate you opposing Ruckmanism and the conservative fears that developed from Burgon. Ruckmanism makes Christianity look almost as bad as it’s bloody, Catholic phase.
@Kartoom
2 ай бұрын
Hmmm when was the last time that you had an animal slain to cover, not atone, your sins?
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Did you watch the video? I addressed this in the video. Abraham and David were both saved by grace alone through faith alone. Paul quoted Genesis and Psalms and Isaiah and more over and over again in his epistles. Seriously, just watch the video again. It’s in there. If you still need help afterwards, I will be glad to help you. I pray you abandon this false doctrine of multiple ways of salvation.
@MrCode09cody
2 ай бұрын
You need to google or look up the beliefs of hyperdispensationalism.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
There are so many forms of hyper-dispensationalism and no one makes the rules. It is sheer chaos within dispensationalism. Every “dispensationalist”, hyper or not, believes his views are nominal. Compare your beliefs and other Ruckmanites with Darby. Bullinger, Larkin, Scofield, and Ruckman are hyper-dispensationalists. Details matter. Sometimes you have to dig deeper than the first result Google gives you.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
2 ай бұрын
The King James Bible is the perfect word of God.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
As long as you mean perfect in its teaching, I agree, and so are other faithful translations.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries
Ай бұрын
@@pastorburris No, they have contradictions. I believe its perfect in the words too. No, they are not faithful.
@1daycloser2home93
2 ай бұрын
Most dont realize the price that many paid so that you & i could read The-Truth 4ourselves. AV-KJV Was The-Sword The~Most High used2 free His children.
@pastorburris
2 ай бұрын
Yes, a great price was paid. Too high a price for us to disregard faithful translations before and after the KJV.
Пікірлер: 305